More

Mass Transit's State Of The Union: Room For Improvement

Mass Transit

First Posted: 01/24/2012 4:17 pm Updated: 01/24/2012 5:16 pm

The last couple of years have been pretty stormy for public transportation agencies: Amid deteriorating state and local budgets, some 80 percent of them were forced to cut service or raise fares.

New York's Metropolitan Transportation Authority, which raised the price of monthly subway MetroCards from $89 to $104 at the end of 2010, announced a plan last summer for 7.5 percent hikes by 2015. In Boston, a ride on the subway could soon go up from $1.70 to $2.40.

The inevitable stories about steamed commuters and outraged politicians followed, but the cuts and cost increases also masked something intriguing. Even in the midst of budget headwinds, public transit as a whole managed to increase ridership some 2 percent over the previous year in the third quarter of 2011, according to the American Public Transportation Association.

How that happened, and what it means for transit in 2012 and beyond as Congress takes up a new surface transportation bill, are questions HuffPost put to the president of the American Public Transportation Association, Michael P. Melaniphy, whose term began in November. He paints a surprisingly optimistic picture for the future, as long as the federal government does its part.

"When you take into account the fact that the majority of our member agencies raised fares and cut services, it sends a really good message," he said of the ridership gains.

In April and May 2011, gas prices shot up to a U.S. average of $3.96 a gallon. As the year wore on, they gradually receded -- but people kept taking the train or the bus.

"When gas prices really spiked, there was certainly a flight to transit, which would not be unexpected, but as gas prices retreated a little bit, many agencies were able to retain those gains," Melaniphy said.

The transit honcho said flashier designs and better branding, like on Washington, D.C.'s Circulator bus, have played their part in convincing more people that it's okay to take the bus. And, he added, "the other factor that's played a real role here is transit-oriented development along fixed guideways."

Translation: More and more towns in some surprising places are throwing up light rail lines, and more people are living along them. Phoenix, Dallas and Norfolk, Va., do not fit the traditional stereotypes of the kind of American cities that really care about public transportation, but they all expanded light rail at a furious pace over the last couple of years, and they did it by asking people to tax themselves.

In the third quarter of 2011, light rail ridership was up 5.8 percent over the same quarter the previous year.

"The communities have embraced them overwhelmingly," Melaniphy said. "In Dallas we have the largest light rail system in the country, and it continues to grow."

Yes, that Dallas: the metro region now has 72 miles of rail, 55 stations, and an average of about 60,000 riders per weekday. An impressive 36.4 percent more people rode Dallas Area Rapid Transit's light rail in the third quarter of 2011 over the year before.

To continue transit's success, Melaniphy would like to see more money from Congress in the surface transportation bill; he would also like it to cover many years so transit agencies can plan ahead.The current bill is set to expire on March 31, and the House and Senate are fine-tuning their versions of a replacement. Unless either version comes up with more money, mass transit would face further cuts under an extension.

Melaniphy said he believes that transit has proved it deserves more. As cuts continue, he said "those are American jobs that we're losing right now. And I think the big thing to get across is that transit is not only the jobs we create, both in the private and public sector, but also the access to jobs."

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
The last couple of years have been pretty stormy for public transportation agencies: Amid deteriorating state and local budgets, some 80 percent of them were forced to cut service or raise fares. N...
The last couple of years have been pretty stormy for public transportation agencies: Amid deteriorating state and local budgets, some 80 percent of them were forced to cut service or raise fares. N...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 12
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
06:01 PM on 01/25/2012
In considering the state of mass transit, one has to consider the state of the nation's bus systems, not only its rail lines, since cumulatively there are far more bus passengers.
01:01 AM on 01/26/2012
Well said.

There are no bus/rail riders.

Unfortunately, rail riders tend to be car drivers. They take trains if train reach riders' destination. If trains don't, rail riders drive.
Bus riders, on the other hands, use whatever mean, to get to destination, bus, rail, 2 legs, or whatever.
Unfortunately, many politicians only want to please rail riders (actually car drivers). That is simple, bus rider are too busy to transfer buses that they don't have time to revolt
photo
MSROADKILL612
am not convinced geothermal energy is above ground
04:04 PM on 01/25/2012
subsidised transport

now there is a loaded term

trying to be objective here

lets cover the gamut

the swinging dicks (corporate limo & jet) get their main wheels tax free

joe schmo cant deduct his bus fare in oz anyway

a trillion for defence from some imaginary bogey is fine, 20 billion for urban transport is a commy plot
photo
MSROADKILL612
am not convinced geothermal energy is above ground
03:51 PM on 01/25/2012
dont mean to be rude, but yanks are famous for not wanting to step out of their comfort zone - am sure the more travelled ones who have seen how well e.g. london, works pretty much w/o cars relatively, would consider this issue a no brainer

face it dudes - this whole; freeways, burbs, huge commutes, scary petrol prices & frequently v dopey vehicles gas consumption wise = just not viable when u job can be offshored/mechanised/automated at the drop of a hat

its either as above, or work from home - which is not a bad option for usa - it has the smarts & the infrastructure
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ringo3khan
01:03 PM on 01/25/2012
Raise taxes on workers to pay for transit systems they can't use. What a crock.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gottlieb
hated by left since 1973 and right since 1982
08:59 AM on 01/25/2012
Transit use increased 25% from 1995 to 2005. We still need almost $200 billion over the next five years for transit. Transit adds to a regions economic vitality. More local jobs will be created.

http://www.infrastructurereportcard.org/fact-sheet/transit
photo
MSROADKILL612
am not convinced geothermal energy is above ground
05:28 AM on 01/25/2012
Has been a lotta token talk of hsr & catching up w/ china etc - but hsr works best when its city w/ metro to city w/ metro.

US has to walk b4 it can run. methinks only 11 us cities have them, & i suspect many are token efforts

surely any city over 2m deserves a metro - & i suspect us has way more than 11

consider

over head wires are a pain

tunnells have become much cheaper

no wires - smaller tunnels & fewer maintenance closures

cng should be ok in well ventilated stations - maybe a hybrid arrangement to keep air cleaner when standing

2000+ is doable on one train - mostly seated

the station becomes the focus of the community - not some stupid mall

property rights are a biggy in the US - same in bangkok - they just built a "sky rail" - rail on stilts 3 floors above the median strip of existing main roads - sadly, too dear for the poor - but am sure it took a lot of heat off the gridlock for affordable buses
photo
MSROADKILL612
am not convinced geothermal energy is above ground
05:01 AM on 01/25/2012
an anomaly, certainly here in oz, is it costs so much in fixed on road cost p.a, that it distorts car usage - may as well use the bloody thing if am up for $1k pa min.

it also negates the benefits of having 2 cars - a frugal one and a tank that does it all.

further, folks are bad at accounting - the more miles u do - the more repair bills - but they seem to forget that - the cost of a car is mileage/cost of gas - gotcha.

folks grumble about train fares etc. - but they are a huge bargain if u r lucky enough to avail yourself of them time efficiently

try it - u may find it far from being an inconvenience - u can watch a movie, read a book - its actually liberating & way cheaper & less stress - maybe u meet ms/mr right?

do u homework & allow extra time initially

the perfect arrangement is if family collect u from the station

me - i think they should be free - they are only horizontal elavators - fares are way too complicated to bother policing over nickles & dimes
10:15 PM on 01/24/2012
The best solution to infrastructure is privatization!
photo
MSROADKILL612
am not convinced geothermal energy is above ground
04:40 AM on 01/25/2012
BS
10:33 PM on 01/25/2012
Meaning you cannot refute it. Your surrender is accepted.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bret Alan Cebulla
Aime-Toi
06:55 PM on 01/24/2012
Subsidized transportation might solve the drunk driving problem, but that would mean rich folks would have to shell out a bit more coin, so forget I brought it up.