iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

American Public School Teacher Tenure Rights Weakening As States Seek To Fire Underperforming Educators

Tom Luna

KIMBERLY HEFLING   01/25/12 04:56 AM ET  AP

WASHINGTON — America's public school teachers are seeing their generations-old tenure protections weakened as states seek flexibility to fire teachers who aren't performing. A few states have essentially nullified tenure protections altogether, according to an analysis being released Wednesday by the National Council on Teacher Quality.

The changes are occurring as states replace virtually automatic "satisfactory" teacher evaluations with those linked to teacher performance and base teacher layoffs on performance instead of seniority. Politically powerful teachers' unions are fighting back, arguing the changes lower morale, deny teachers due process, and unfairly target older teachers.

The debate is so intense that in Idaho, for example, state superintendent Tom Luna's truck was spray painted and its tires slashed. An opponent appeared at his mother's house and he was interrupted during a live TV interview by an agitated man. Why? The Idaho legislature last year ended "continuing contracts" – essentially equivalent to tenure – for new teachers and said performance, not seniority, would determine layoffs. Other changes include up to $8,000 in annual bonuses given to teachers for good performance, and parent input on evaluations. Opponents gathered enough signatures to put a referendum that would overturn the changes on the November ballot.

Luna says good teachers shouldn't be worried.

"We had a system where it was almost impossible to financially reward great teachers and very difficult to deal with ineffective teachers. If you want an education system that truly puts students first, you have to have both," Luna said.

On Tuesday night, President Barack Obama weighed in on the issue during his State of the Union address. He said schools should be given the resources to keep and reward good teachers along with the flexibility to teach with creativity and to "replace teachers who just aren't helping kids learn."

Tenure protections were created in the early 20th century to protect teachers from arbitrary or discriminatory firings based on factors such as gender, nationality or political beliefs by spelling out rules under which they could be dismissed after a probationary period.

Critics say teachers too often get tenure by just showing up for work – typically for three years, but sometimes less, and that once they earned it, bad teachers are almost impossible or too expensive to fire. The latest statistics from the National Center for Education Statistics, dating to the 2007-2008 school year, show about 2 percent of teachers dismissed for poor performance, although the numbers vary widely by school district.

The analysis by the National Council on Teacher Quality, a research and policy group that seeks to improve the quality of teaching, documents the shift in laws. In 2009, no state required student performance to be central to whether a teacher is awarded tenure; today, eight states do. The analysis also says four states now want evidence that students are learning before awarding tenure.

Other changes:

_ In Florida, tenure protections were essentially made null and void with policy changes such as eliminating tenure-like benefits altogether for new teachers, but also spelling out requirements under which all teachers with multiple poor evaluations face dismissal.

_ Rhode Island policies say teachers with two years of ineffective evaluations will be dismissed.

_ Colorado and Nevada passed laws saying tenure can be taken away after multiple "ineffective" ratings.

_ Eleven states now require districts to consider teacher performance when deciding who to let go.

_ About half of all states have policies that require classroom effectiveness be considered in teacher evaluations.

_ Florida, Indiana and Michigan adopted policies that require performance to be factored in teacher salaries.

A growing body of research demonstrates the dramatic difference effective teachers can play in student lives, from reducing teenage pregnancies to increasing a student's lifetime earnings. Meanwhile, while controversial, teacher evaluations have evolved in a way that proponents say allows better accounting of students' growth and of factors out of a teacher's control, like attendance.

The Obama administration has helped nudge the changes with its Race to the Top competition, which allowed states to compete for billions of education dollars, and offering states waivers around unpopular proficiency requirements in the No Child Left Behind education law. To participate in either, states have to promise changes such as tying teacher evaluations to performance.

"There's a real shift to saying all kids, especially our most disadvantaged kids, have access to really high quality and effective teachers. And, that's it's not OK for kids to have ... an ineffective teacher year after year," said Sandi Jacobs, vice president of the National Council on Teacher Quality.

Jacobs said tenure should be meaningful, but that in 39 states it's automatic.

"That's the problem with tenure, everybody gets it," she said. "If you're held to a high bar where you've really demonstrated that you are effective in the classroom, then there's nothing wrong with that as long as the due process rights that you do get are reasonable."

But many teachers feel under siege. They argue the evaluation systems are too dependent on standardized tests. While teachers' unions have gotten more on board with strengthening teacher evaluations, they often question the systems' fairness and want them designed with local teachers' input.

Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation of Teachers, said unions understand the tenure process needs change, but that too often, school administrators have used it as an excuse to mismanage. "They want teachers to basically do exactly what they say, give them no resources and then blame them if they don't in a time of tremendous fiscal instability and fiscal pressures," Weingarten said.

In Boise, Idaho, Lane Brown, 56, a biology and horticulture teacher who moved from a private school a few years ago to a public alternative high school to seek new challenges after three decades of teaching, said her school's climate has dramatically changed.

"There's nobody in this building that doesn't understand it could be one of us, not just the newest teacher or the teacher with the fewest number of students. It could be anybody, ... which is scary. Every teacher here is saying, `I don't know if I'm going to have a job next year,'" Brown said.

In Florida, teachers fear expressing what they feel is best for students, said Andy Ford, president of the Florida Education Association.

"Teachers see positions not being filled, class sizes increasing, more demands, more testing, and you add all that together with their economic uncertainty about continued employment and it certainly doesn't allow you to go out and plan for long term investments like a home," Ford said.

Kathy Hebda, the deputy chancellor for education quality in Florida, said the contract-related changes were not done in "isolation," but as part of broader changes that improve accountability and provide teachers feedback.

Michelle Rhee, the former schools chancellor in Washington, D.C., acknowledged widespread mistrust among teachers about evaluations, but she said once teachers are brought into discussions, many are won over.

"If we know who the effective teachers are, if we know what kind of an impact effective teachers can have on individual kids and on our society overall, then why wouldn't we take the obvious step of utilizing the information on who are the most effective teachers to make our staffing decisions?" said Rhee, whose education advocacy group StudentsFirst is pushing for changes to layoff policies based on seniority.

Coming up, Missouri legislators appear poised to take up the contentious topic of teacher tenure. In Connecticut, the Connecticut Education Association launched a TV advertising campaign after Democratic Gov. Dannel P. Malloy and legislative leaders said education reform – and possibly tenure – will be the major focus of this legislative session. Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal and New Jersey, Gov. Chris Christie, both Republicans, are eyeing tenure law changes.

"Tenure laws will be under assault for many years to come," said Marjorie Murphy, a professor of history at Swarthmore College who wrote a book about the teacher labor movement. Murphy said ending tenure protections will "take over any sense of fair play between employer and employee. All of that will be gone."

_____

National Council on Teacher Quality: http://www.nctq.org/

____

Chris Blank in Jefferson City, Mo., and Jessie Bonner in Boise, Idaho, contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST EDUCATION

WASHINGTON — America's public school teachers are seeing their generations-old tenure protections weakened as states seek flexibility to fire teachers who aren't performing. A few states have es...
WASHINGTON — America's public school teachers are seeing their generations-old tenure protections weakened as states seek flexibility to fire teachers who aren't performing. A few states have es...
Filed by Emmeline Zhao  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 782
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (13 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ariel Bonzai
Naked is the best disguise.
08:57 AM on 02/24/2012
This is not about tenure being challenged. I get that and agree teachers should be terminated when they are not effective, pose a threat or are otherwise detrimental to the mission of education. Unfortunately, what we see is a free for all that has presently has LA teachers sent to rubber rooms for reporting noncompliance, administrators so out of control they are allowed to get away with harassment, abuses of power, and cheating on tests to assure funding they'll squander. We see cronies rewarded for insulating corrupt administrators while good teachers are written up every day to facillitate thier dismissal.
There is no union to protect us. Just dues and betrayal. Our pay is decreasing as our workload increases. We have no incentives , no resources and even our lessons are tainted by the pall of the one size fits all rhetoric of Rhee, a liar and a cheat who is ambitious not inspired . I knows exactlly what to do to with education. We can save billions, engage students, provide meaningful evaluation for all, make all of it efficient and cutting edge. It's so obvious. I can lay it out in a few paragraphs. But why should I? I am collateral damage. But I got news for the philanthropists. You got more than you bargained for and without teachers your karma is sealed.
04:03 PM on 02/22/2012
Tenure does not mean a teacher cannot be fired. It means that a process must be followed before the teacher can be let go. Quite often lazy administrators are the reason poor teachers are not fired. The administrator has to document, over time, the teacher's poor performance, following the guidelines of that particular school district.

That being said, I agree that there needs to be a quicker way to get rid of poor teachers. However, basing the majority of the teacher's evaluation on 1 standardized tests is not the way to do it.
photo
JusdaTruth
a proud child of the 60's
06:41 AM on 02/17/2012
The federal government's current educational policies , along with the power of the Plutocrats, Corporate Greed , Gates Foundation, Republicrats, and the rest of the Union Busters, not mentioned in this sentence; are moving along with their plans for privatization of American Public Schools. Plain and Simple. Watch the exodus of teachers in masse and how online education and and rooms with 100's of students will watch big screen TV and Computer Software that will replace teachers. Ooops .... I correct myself this will be primarily for the poor. The rich and the political class will be able to afford a live teacher and small class size at the private schools. I should have voted for Clinton. Ooops my mistake again.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ariel Bonzai
Naked is the best disguise.
10:58 PM on 01/29/2012
If we have fair evaluations facillitated fairly by objective individuals with clear guidelines on what we are judged on, then teachers will not min being observed or evaluated. Unfortunately, oursdministrators are oftentimes failed teachers, or not teachers at all. Indeed there seems to bra pool of sociopaths in line for THEIR TENURED POSITIONS. Incompetent teacher's are not an option. We cannot risk young people's future on slackers just sliding by. But we also have to be aware of the motives these measures are really sporting labor costs are far more compelling than pedagogy.
01:24 AM on 01/29/2012
education is changing....the influence of the tea party

I do congratulate the tea party for being a very dominant force in the united states...but you might
say they may not get elected or are polling less..yes,but people are taking their views and
incorporating their ideas,what was once thought looney is now thought practical and relevant.
Another point to be made is that these are ideas that people have no problem with. Teaching
is important and the president and the states,and several large corporate leaders,presidential
candidates,just an overwhelming swarm of critics saying something new needed to be tried and
it certainly will reinvigorate learning. So as a movement the success is always guaged at not
how you are able to gain power,but how readily your ideas are accept and implemented across
the nation. So the tea party is successful as even the president must acknowledge as a
consensus view. A negative part of this change is the unwillingness of some to accept it,the
largely negative press the tea party is getting in the press,and personal situations which are
regrettable,but this just tells me some people dont like and will resist these changes,but these
are being implemented by elected state and federal officials,if you disagree the ballot box is
your best alternative,not some unfortunate media and personal attacks. I will note i received
an email of changes in massachussetss in education policy,these new ideas seem to be gain
wide acceptance.The republicans should debate education,its that important.
JenAshley
Cool Kids Don't Dance
08:05 AM on 01/28/2012
I am so tired of everyone blaming all educational failures on "teachers who are under performing." I teach for Baltimore City PS (MD) and I have seen more students who REFUSE to perform than under performing teachers. Most teachers are performing the best they can given the students they havento work with. I teach 7th & 8th graders and most of my kids lack basic grade-level skills, have little motivation/drive, insufficeint parental involement and, most importantly, they lack self discipline and respect.

Many kids are underperforming because they choose to, not becuase the teacher is not doing his or her job.
08:35 AM on 02/22/2012
I get the majority of students who are not book smart. I was in a meeting with a woman who teachers 'only honors' students. She was bragging on her 'smart students' doing so well under a program the school administrators want us to use. I made the comment, "I don't have any smart students like you do." She ran to the administration and repeated what I said, taking it completely out of context. She has said she will not teach students like I have because she is 'gifted certified' and wants only gifted students.
I am one of the teachers whose head may be on the block because my students are at least two grades below on reading level and would rather be working on their trucks or deer hunting. Their parents are not involved in school and forget calling home -- most of their parents don't have a working phone.
As JenAshley said, many are underperforming because they choose to. No teacher can fix apathy.
10:40 AM on 01/27/2012
Tenure should not protect teachers who do not perform. Yes, there are some schools where it is really difficult to actually teach the students anything. But, if you couple that with teachers who aren't even trying, then you'll end up with students who learn nothing at all. However, if a teacher in one of those schools is trying their hardest, they will be able to teach the students something. It's also pretty obvious when a teacher is still putting forth effort. Tenure should be there to protect a teacher who is being fired because the new principal doesn't like him or because somebody's daughter needs a job. Nobody, in any field, should have their job protected when they're not doing their job.
06:16 AM on 01/27/2012
What we really need to do is get back to the way schools were run when I was a kid, and they ran pretty well.

Back then, the teachers had tenure.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
francisco cortes
08:30 PM on 01/26/2012
I have a few questions i hope someone could answer them:
1) Equity Project charter schools pay their teachers 125,000 dollars per year and they can be fired any time but only 31% of the students at this school pass the new york standardiz­­­­­­­­­­­­­­e­d tests, why if this school is supposed to get the best teachers money can buy?
Link: http://pro­­­­­­­­­je­c­t­s­.­n­­y­­t­­i­­m­e­s­.­c­o­­m­/­­n­e­­­w­-y­­o­rk­­­-­sc­­­h­­oo­­­l­s-­t­­­e­st­-­­­­s­co­r­­­e­s­/c­o­­­­u­n­ti­e­­­­­s/n­ew­­-­­­­­yor­­k/­­d­­­­­istr­­ic­­­t­­­­­s/ne­­w-y­­­o­­­­­­rk-c­­i­ty­-­d­­­­­­­istr­­i­­ct­-­6­/­­­­­­scho­­o­­­ls­/­t­h­­­­­e­-equ­­­i­­­ty­-­­p­r­­o­­j­­ect-­­­c­­­­ha­r­­te­r­­-­­s­­c­hoo­­­l
2) Why KIPP and SUCCESS charter schools suspend almost half it's students?, if they hire the good teachers and fire the bad ones suspension­­­­­­­­­­­­­­s are not supposed to happen in charter schools, period!
Link: http://www­­­­­­­­­­­­­­.­e­x­a­­m­­i­­n­­e­­­r­­­.­­­­c­o­­m­/­­­c­h­­­a­r­­­­t­e­­­­r­­-s­­­c­­h­o­­­o­­l­s­­­­-­­i­n­­­­­-­wa­s­­­­­­h­in­g­­­­­­­t­on­­-­­­­­d­c­­/k­­i­­­­­­p­p­­-a­­­d­­­­­­mit­­­s-­­­t­­­­­­­o-h­­­­ig­­­h­­­­­­­-stu­­­­­de­­­n­­­­­­­­t-at­­t­­­ri­­­t­­­­­­­­­ion-­­­r­­­at­e­­s
http://art­­­­­­­­­­­­­­i­c­l­e­­s­­.­­b­­a­­­l­­­t­­­­i­m­­o­r­­­e­s­­­u­n­­­­.­c­­­­o­­m/­­­2­­0­1­­­1­­-­0­­­­3­­-­3­­­­­1­/n­e­­­­­­w­s/­b­­­­­­­s­-m­­d­­­­­-­k­­ip­­p­­­­­­-­s­­tu­­­d­­­­­­y-2­­­01­­­1­­­­­­­033­­­­1_­­­1­­­­­­­_kip­­­­­p-­­­s­­­­­­­­choo­­l­­­s-­­­k­­­­­­­­­ipp-­­­u­­­ji­m­­a­­­­­­­­­­-vil­­­l­­­­ag­e­­-­­a­­­­­­­­c­ade­­­m­­­­­y-­w­­e­­­s­­­­­t­­e­­rn-­­­m­­­­­­ic­h­­i­­­­g­­a­­n­­­-­­rep­­­­o­­­­­­rt
3) If good teachers are supposed to being capable of teaching any kind of students and charters schools are center of educationa­­­­­­­­­­­­­­l innovation , why they reject special education students?
Link http://www­­­­­­­­­­­­­­.­n­y­t­­i­­m­­e­­s­­­.­­­c­­­­o­m­­/­2­­­0­1­­­1­/­­­­0­7­­­­/­­11­­­/­­n­y­­­r­­e­g­­­­i­­o­n­­­­­/­ch­a­­­­­­r­te­r­­­­­­­-­sc­­h­­­­­o­o­­l-­­s­­­­­­e­n­­ds­­­-­­­­­­mes­­­sa­­­g­­­­­­­e-t­­­­hr­­­i­­­­­­­ve-o­­­­­r-­­­t­­­­­­­­rans­­f­­­er­­­.­­­­­­­­­html­­­?­­­pa­g­­e­­­­­­­­­­want­­­e­­­­d=­a­­l­­l
4) If politician­­­­­­­­­­­­­­s complain that bad teachers hurt students, why they do not complain when special education students are rejected by charter schools?
Link: http://www­­­­­­­­­­­­­­.­s­p­l­­c­­e­­n­­t­­­e­­­r­­­­.­o­­r­g­­­/­g­­­e­t­­­­-­i­­­­n­­fo­­­r­­m­e­­­d­­/­n­­­­e­­w­s­­­­­/­sp­l­­­­­­c­-c­o­­­­­­­m­pl­­a­­­­­i­n­­t-­­c­­­­­­h­i­­ld­­­r­­­­­­en-­­­wi­­­t­­­­­­­h-d­­­­is­­­a­­­­­­­bili­­­­­ti­­­e­­­­­­­­s-fa­­c­­­e-­­­d­­­­­­­­­iscr­­­i­­­mi­n­­a­­­­­­­­­­tion­­­-­­­­in­-­­n­­e­­­­­­­­w­-or­­­l­­­­­ea­n­­s­­­-­­­­­s­­c­­hoo­­­l
04:17 PM on 01/26/2012
hmmm so if a teacher gets a class full of rejects, that teacher probably will get fired.
sadly public schooling is propaganda, honestly they box thought, take for example the book Animal Farm by George Orwell. You can ask any kid in NYS that read this book what they learned from it. Communism is bad, Goddamm it leaves everybody blind sided to the fact that the book is actually more based on the ideas of democracy and capitalism. if you ever have read the book you know that the animals made commandments to live by, like a constitution, and that the pigs ended up breaking them in power and instated the fear of the humans coming back to make it fine. hmm sound like 9/11 ohh ya i've tried making my classmates open their minds to understand this and weeks, months later i had people coming to me and telling me that they made the connection. its interesting how the government can dangle something in front of us and we dont even notice. its their way of blocking thought and well it works, dig people dig not everything the government does is bad but they are getting away with the bad and we as Americans are utterly blind
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
El Chingaso
Fighting for mental superiority...
04:00 PM on 01/26/2012
Teachers are getting hung out to dry on this deal, regardless of the innumerable incompetent instructors on public payrolls. America’s local school systems – in the aggregate sense (per the Department of Education’s recent statistics) -- and the constituents they serve are awash in dysfunctional/dishonest organizational structures, ineffective & archaic curricula, over-funding of electronic gadgetry such as IPads, poor parenting skills, disruptive/unmotivated students, ad nauseum. In reality, resolving such widespread morass is akin to reversing earth’s planetary orbit...at will.

Just cut loose the bad apples and quit harassing good (or even average) instructors; it's so simple and it won’t require the enormous time & expense of conducting overly-complex (and, perhaps, useless) written assessments and follow-ups. Taxpayers – like teachers – are exhausted by all of this public school silliness -- not to mention the glaringly apparent sense of hopelessness.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
GlennWatson
Two million fans
10:04 AM on 01/26/2012
Something tells me they will take away tenure but we won't get anymore money.
photo
JusdaTruth
a proud child of the 60's
06:43 AM on 02/17/2012
Something tells me we will loose benefits too. Stop the republicrats.
11:37 PM on 01/25/2012
Part 2 of 2: "I know it when I see it."

Principals are charged with making sure that their teachers are competent in the education of their students, however, what if the principal is lacking in the skills necessary to objectively evaluate a teacher? I’ve been witness to teachers that have voiced very different and justifiable philosophical differences about the presentation to and evaluation of students based on a given curriculum. This difference of opinion usually has two outcomes; the principle feels undermined and sets forth on a vendetta to remove the teacher or the principal weighs the input from that teacher and is flexible in reaction. The seasoned principal will utilize good listening skills and follow up with positive feedback to this competent teacher that wants to present lessons that best meet the needs of a given class. An immature principal will go to the mattresses to have that same teacher punished for voicing a different opinion. In the end we have to trust that teachers are evaluated honestly and fairly. And we must all agree that we will all observe each other from different perspectives. Perhaps I was wrong…perhaps, ”I don’t know a good or bad teacher when I see one.”
11:34 PM on 01/25/2012
Part 1 of 2: "I know it when I see it."

Yet again, the topic of “bad” teachers versus “good” teachers begs the question; what is the definition of a “bad” or “good” teacher? After many years in education I’ve come to the conclusion that, as former United States Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart stated when describing pornography, “I know it when I see it.” However my perception of what is a bad or good teacher is often different than that of another observer. I conceder myself a competent teacher, sometimes good or even great and at other times left wanting in the presentation of a lesson. I am not perfect. I’ve been called great by some parents and bad by others. Sadly the evaluation of a teacher depends on ones perspective. This perspective is sometimes driven by one parent meeting with a principal and I have yet to hear of a parent meeting with a principal to discuss the outstanding performance of a teacher.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
emmeaki
09:56 PM on 01/26/2012
An example of a bad teacher is giving a worksheet to students for a two period biology lab and hanging out in the back room chatting with another teacher. This is what I experienced in 9th grade. Oftentimes there wasn't even a worksheet and we just chatted or read magazines for two periods. They should ask the students how the teacher is performing.
10:39 PM on 01/26/2012
Did you say anything to the principal? Did you talk to your family about the problem? Was this a one time event or daily? Was the teacher qualified to teach the class or was it a teacher with a degree in physical education filling an opening? (This used to happen all the time). Did the teacher teach the same class the following year? At what grade level should we ask students about teacher performance? (I really don't want to be evaluated by the 1st grader that kicked me in the privates last week...True story) What you experienced in 9th grade, if even for one day was wrong and I'm sorry you had that experience. However, only a few years ago it was common practice for schools to place teachers not qualified in the subject matter in front of students. This is now illegal in California. Sometimes our perspective is just that, a view from one point in space/time. My suggestion for the future would be to find out why a teacher is not meeting your educational needs and then work to correct the problem.
10:59 PM on 01/25/2012
It is incredible, beyond words, that we should even be having this discussion. The very idea that there should be tenure at all, let alone for poor performers, sounds crazy to anyone but a public sector worker brought up in their sheltered environment.. Finally, finally, we are seeing some movement to meaningfully evaluate teachers and get rid of ones that shouldn't be in any classroom. Kudos to Obama and Duncan for doing what's right, in spite of alienating a constituency.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:03 PM on 01/26/2012
Yes, a big public high school is ever so sheltered...it's all unicorns and cotton candy.
There are already ways to evaluate and dismiss teachers who do not perform...they are just rarely used...what makes you think this will be any different?