iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

School Lunches To Be Healthier: Have More Fruits, Vegetables, Whole Grains

By MARY CLARE JALONICK   01/25/12 06:02 PM ET  AP

ALEXANDRIA, Va. -- The first major nutritional overhaul of school meals in more than 15 years means most offerings – including the always popular pizza – will come with less sodium, more whole grains and a wider selection of fruits and vegetables on the side.

First lady Michelle Obama and Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack announced the new guidelines during a visit Wednesday with elementary students. Mrs. Obama, also joined by celebrity chef Rachael Ray, said youngsters will learn better if they don't have growling stomachs at school.

"As parents, we try to prepare decent meals, limit how much junk food our kids eat, and ensure they have a reasonably balanced diet," Mrs. Obama said. "And when we're putting in all that effort the last thing we want is for our hard work to be undone each day in the school cafeteria."

After the announcement, the three went through the line with students and ate turkey tacos with brown rice, black bean and corn salad and fruit – all Ray's recipes – with the children in the Parklawn Elementary lunchroom.

Under the new rules, pizza won't disappear from lunch lines, but will be made with healthier ingredients. Entire meals will have calorie caps for the first time and most trans fats will be banned. Sodium will gradually decrease over a 10 year period. Milk will have to be low in fat and flavored milks will have to be nonfat.

Despite the improvements, the new rules aren't as aggressive as the Obama administration had hoped. Congress last year blocked the Agriculture Department from making some of the desired changes, including limiting french fries and pizzas.

A bill passed in November would require the department to allow tomato paste on pizzas to be counted as a vegetable, as it is now. The initial draft of the department's guidelines, released a year ago, would have prevented that. Congress also blocked the department from limiting servings of potatoes to two servings a week. The final rules have incorporated those directions from Congress.

Among those who had sought the changes were potato growers and food companies that produce frozen pizzas for schools. Conservatives in Congress called the guidelines an overreach and said the government shouldn't tell children what to eat. School districts also objected to some of the requirements, saying they go too far and would cost too much.

The guidelines apply to lunches subsidized by the federal government. A child nutrition bill signed by President Barack Obama in 2010 will help school districts pay for some of the increased costs. Some of the changes will take place as soon as this September; others will be phased in over time.

While many schools are improving meals already, others still serve children meals high in fat, salt and calories. The guidelines are designed to combat childhood obesity and are based on 2009 recommendations by the Institute of Medicine, the health arm of the National Academy of Sciences.

Vilsack said food companies are reformulating many of the foods they sell to schools in anticipation of the changes.

"The food industry is already responding," he said. "This is a movement that has started, it's gaining momentum."

Diane Pratt-Heavner of the School Nutrition Association, which represents school lunch workers, said that many schools won't count pizza as a vegetable even though they can. Students qualifying for subsidized meals must have a certain number of vegetables and other nutritious foods on their lunch trays.

"Most schools are serving fruit or vegetables next to their pizza and some schools are even allowing unlimited servings of fruit or vegetables," Pratt-Heavner said.

Celebrity chef Ray said she thinks too much has been made of the availability of pizza and French fries. The new rules will make kids' lunch plates much more nutrient dense, she said.

"The overall picture is really good," she said. "This is a big deal."

The subsidized meals that would fall under the guidelines are served as free and low-cost meals to low-income children and long have been subject to government nutrition standards. The 2010 law will extend, for the first time, nutrition standards to other foods sold in schools that aren't subsidized by the federal government. That includes "a la carte" foods on the lunch line and snacks in vending machines.

Those standards, while expected to be similar, will be written separately and have not yet been proposed by the department.

___

Online:

___

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST EDUCATION

Filed by Emmeline Zhao  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 339
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (7 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:01 AM on 01/28/2012
kudos to jamie oliver
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:59 AM on 01/28/2012
after processed food company's lobbyists get finished tinkering with the language of the law....even a twinky will be considered grain (b/c of flower used) and pizza will continue to be considered vegetable (b/c of tomato sauce).

i don't hold out much hope for ameirca.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PollyTics
undefined
05:34 AM on 01/27/2012
I'm glad to see that this food movement is beginning to get noticed despite the many restrictions from our politicians and glad handing lobbyists.

Let's all hope that with some work and joint efforts, we can get our kids healthy food instead of the horrors they are currently being fed.
04:01 PM on 01/26/2012
I would never allow our 2 daughters to eat a school lunch, even with these improvements. They are disgusting! We pack organic salads and homemade soups, fresh fruit, etc. Their friends are so jealous and can't wait to see what our girls pull out of their lunch bags. It's always the topic of lunch conversation, according to them. Some of their friends have never tried most of the fruits and veggies that we eat. Our oldest daughter describes her friends' diets as beige.

They also tell us that most of the food served is thrown away, except for the high sugar items. They use styrofoam plates every day, too. What a waste!
12:50 PM on 01/26/2012
This is excellent. Growing up my mom always sent me to school with healthy meals and I watched the other kids dine off chips and soda for lunch. French fries are not a vegetable! The sooner our children learn how to make good food choices, the better. Our children are not farm animals to be fed the cheapest crap available!
10:48 AM on 01/26/2012
Good luck, LA schools report fewer kids buying school lunches as a result of the new healthy menu's, more food being thrown away and more kids bringing their own foods or just ging hungry. My local school has tried to change to the healthy menu and the results have not been good, abt the same as LA, we even had to ban parents from bringing in the happy meals etc at lunch but now the parents just pick kids up for lunch, so the kids are just sitting in the car eating whatever their parents bring. I pack my grandkids lunches, always have and they eat healthy because its all they have ever known, grapes with my mandrin orange/yogurt dip is a bg hit right now....:-)
06:16 PM on 01/26/2012
Change is never easy. And the goal of school lunch should not be to feed every child, but to feed the children who need to be fed. Everything else is gravy. if parents can afford to drive to McD's and buy their children lunch everyday, so be it. Chances are these kids eat crap at home anyway.

But it should never be used as an excuse to feed crap to those who don't have options.
09:23 AM on 01/26/2012
Eating healthy is expensive! Great effort to all involved.
Please allow the end of your bananas to turn yellow before your eat. It will taste way better- trust me!

https://encrypted-tbn1.google.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcT8_78rkVBgmR8tP4cefdXYKRQa2PVDN5BfcBsa3OtJN2pdaSZ91Q
6 is a good stage to eat, 7 is great (9maximum fructose content) but if its too soft then make a smoothie
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bibe318
Life long Liberal Democrat
08:59 AM on 01/26/2012
Gosh, what would Ronald Reagan think about all this? He said catsup counted as a vegetable in school lunches.
08:28 AM on 01/26/2012
Why on earth do people still think fat-free or low fart milk is good? Don't doctors and nutritionists stay current?

Here's another problem: "Vilsack said food companies are reformulating many of the foods they sell to schools in anticipation of the changes". Food should never have to be "reformulated".

Just serve a wide variety of whole food in it's natural state.
06:17 PM on 01/26/2012
Why? Because even though these food companies live off government money.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:29 AM on 01/26/2012
"Conservatives in Congress called the guidelines an overreach and said the government shouldn't tell children what to eat."

This is such a BS line. The schools already "tell children what to eat." Unless you bring your own lunch to school, you are eating what the school decides, which is based on previous regulation.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mtview
08:49 AM on 01/26/2012
The stances some "conservatives" take are just so ridiculous.
12:54 PM on 01/26/2012
I bet they don't feed their kids that crap! They just don't care because they're stingy. They're probably happy when kids get diabetes. One less person they have to provide medical care for and more money to buy their 8th yacht or 4th mansion with. Makes me sick...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PollyTics
undefined
05:40 AM on 01/27/2012
Come on now, NO ONE is happy when kids get Diabetes, but far too many people take the easy way when it comes to this new and important fight. It's sure as hack not easy, especially when many of the politicians are working against these changes...but if you unite, educate and continue the fight.
03:47 AM on 01/26/2012
When I was in school (lol now I feel old)-
On free lunch mind you. I could get a tray loaded with french fries(nothing else) with about a cup of tartar sauce on the side we didn't have food like that at home so I gorged .. no joke I gained 10 pounds my senior year...when I went to the Dr he told me I had the cholesterol levels of a 60 year old man. @19. that was a wake up call..
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:47 AM on 01/26/2012
One meal a day, especially the limited quantities schools give, is not going to make or break childhood obesity. What would help more is bringing back outdoor recess and letting the kids run around for a good half-hour or so. I know many schools have gotten rid of it, either because of financial problems or because of liability.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:07 PM on 01/26/2012
Since many schools also provide breakfast, it's common for kids get half of their meals at school. Providing healthier foods (I mean, really, a sausage wrapped in pancake batter, fried and served with syrup for breakfast) may not solve the obesity epidemic, but is a step in the right direction.

Completely agree about physical activity. It makes kids happier, healthier and better learners.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PollyTics
undefined
05:42 AM on 01/27/2012
The problem with that is that many schools no longer have gym classes, so the push for physical activity has to come from home.
09:39 PM on 01/25/2012
Our school lunches are already whole grain and have fruits and veggies. Our cafeteria ladies do a wonderful job, the students say that their mac n' cheese is better than their parents. Is it gourmet? No, but when you've got to feed 400+people in the course of an hour...
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
SpencersMom
You may say I'm a dreamer but I'm not the only one
09:10 PM on 01/25/2012
So potato growers and frozen pizza makers spend whatever it takes to hire lobbyists who influence Congress who vote their way even if it flies in the face of our own kids' best interests...

How is this legal?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thinkingwomanmillstone
great, green, globs of greasy grimey GOPerspeak.
09:16 PM on 01/25/2012
ask Newt.
09:00 PM on 01/25/2012
Obesity was such a huge problem 100+ years ago when everyone drank whole milk.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Brianna Cole
Which one wins? The one you feed.
07:05 AM on 01/26/2012
And ate mostly vegetables while toiling in the feilds from early morning to nightfall. Yeah, if we had that level of activity/ calorie burning today we would be fine. We don't however.
08:31 AM on 01/26/2012
True. I am no medical expert, but I believe I have heard that fats are a good source of glucose for our brains. Kids have way active brains that need fuel. Eliminating all fats may not be in their best interest. Sugars and preservatives are a different story. I vote for a good balanced diet of real food.
Luckily our school district is pretty on top of nutrition, like using quinoa pasta and fresh ingredients - much better than I remember back in the day.
08:28 PM on 01/28/2012
If you took away all the calories from soda, chips, fries and candy, a glass or two of whole milk a day rich in brain building fatty acids is not going to make a fat kid. Those natural 'good' fats actually help keep the bad fats in check when you do have a treat. Would we say fish or flaxseeds/nuts are too high in fat for kids to consume every day? No, because we know those fats are good. Well the ones in milk are too, especially milk from organic or free range grass fed cows.