iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Mitt Romney Says His Tax Rate Is Higher Than 15 Percent

First Posted: 01/26/2012 4:49 pm Updated: 03/27/2012 5:12 am

WASHINGTON -- Mitt Romney has begun to make the case that he pays more than 15 percent in taxes.

"The tax rate is really closer to 45 or 50 percent," Romney said Wednesday in an interview with Univision's Jorge Ramos.

That may come as a surprise to those who heard Romney, the Republican presidential candidate and former Massachusetts governor, say last week that his tax rate is "probably closer to the 15 percent rate than anything."

That comment on Jan. 17 put pressure on Romney to release his tax returns, which he did this week. And much was made of the fact that Romney paid only 13.9 percent of his income to the government in 2010.

But Romney argued twice Wednesday that although his investment dividends -- the source of most of his annual income -- may be taxed at roughly the 15 percent capital gains rate, the 35 percent tax on corporate income actually means the federal government gets more than 15 percent from him.

"What capital gains tax breaks have done over time is recognize there are two levels of taxation in capital gains. One at the corporate level, which is a 35 percent rate, and then another at the individual level, which has been 15 percent. So combined, it's about a 50 percent tax," Romney said in a separate interview with CNBC's Larry Kudlow Wednesday.

That Romney is trying to undermine the 15 percent number is no small matter. His tax returns and the rate at which he is taxed have become a focal part of the 2012 presidential race. Romney's Republican rival former House Speaker Newt Gingrich has poked at Romney, using it to his political advantage. And President Obama is seeking to leverage the focus on Romney's tax rate to pass the Buffet Rule, a law that would increase taxes on any millionaires paying less than 30 percent of their income to the federal government.

"Right now, because of loopholes and shelters in the tax code, a quarter of all millionaires pay lower tax rates than millions of middle-class households. Right now, Warren Buffett pays a lower tax rate than his secretary," Obama said in his State of the Union Address on Tuesday night. "Tax reform should follow the Buffett Rule. If you make more than $1 million a year, you should not pay less than 30 percent in taxes."

Romney's comments on Wednesday were a sign that he is apparently listening to calls from some on the right to fight back and make the case that the corporate tax rate should be part of the discussion about what investors of all incomes make.

The Wall Street Journal editorial board, writing Monday about the taxation of corporate profits and how that impacts the incomes of investors, wrote, "We're not sure if facts will matter in this cacophony, but someone should at least try to introduce a little reality into the debate, especially since Mr. Romney seems so unprepared to make the case."

"One certainty is that if he stays on his current path of playing defense, Mr. Romney won't deserve to be the GOP nominee because he's likely to lose the fall election," the paper said.

The Journal went to bat on the issue again on Thursday, penning an editorial titled "The Buffett Ruse," which pegged the "highest marginal tax rate" -- paid by filers such as Romney -- at 44.75 percent.

When asked whether Romney was saying in his Wednesday interview that he pays a rate of 50 percent, a Romney adviser told The Huffington Post that he was not.

"He's simply explaining the concept of double taxation as it relates to corporate profits," the Romney campaign official said.

But Romney's response to Ramos, in particular, was directly in the context of how much he paid in taxes.

"In 2010 you only paid 13 percent of taxes, while most Americans paid much more than that. Is that fair?," Ramos asked Romney.

"Well, actually, I released two years of taxes and I think the average is almost 15 percent, and then also, on top of that, I gave another more than 15 percent to charity. When you add it together, all the taxes and the charity, particularly in the last year, I think it reaches almost 40 percent that I gave back to the community," Romney said.

He continued: "One of the reasons why we have a lower tax rate on capital gains is because capital gains are also being taxed at the corporate level. So as businesses earn profits, that's taxed at 35 percent. Then as they distribute those profits in dividends, that's taxed at 15 percent more. So all total, the tax rate is really closer to 45 or 50 percent."

Regardless, what will likely matter to most voters, if Romney continues to make this argument, is the pure number. Romney has signaled that he is not going to let the 15 percent number go uncontested in the debate over what he pays to the government.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
 
 
  • Comments
  • 360
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
05:19 PM on 01/31/2012
Romney is hoping that it will not occur to those who work for a living that the company they work for is paying taxes on earnings before paying them.

Romney is making the old double taxation argument, and forgetting that most corporations do not pay that much.

And the stuff he has in the Caymens pays nothing till he gets it.
08:25 AM on 01/30/2012
He pays 50% tax . . . because he's doubletaxed when he conveniently forgets to count corporations as separate people than himself.

But he doesn't want corporations to be counted as the same as himself the owner, when it comes to taking responsibility for the actions of the corporation, for liability purposes, et al.

If he want's to avoid being considered separately from his business, there are a number of legal entities that allow him personal accountability and personal benefits from doing so - he can avail himself of any of those, and has chosen not to.

This double taxation argument is about wanting to have it both ways - to recognize corporate personhood as nothing but a polite legal fiction when it becomes financially inconvenient, and an unassailable protection from personal responsibility and liability when those become inconvenient.

I think not - please publicly call he and his brethren out on this.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Saijanai
Micro bio? We don't need no stinkin' micro bio...
03:34 PM on 01/28/2012
Here's an interesting bit of arithmetic. At one point, the ultra-wealthy paid 90% income tax rates. By his method, they could have been paying 125% of their income in taxes and therefore should have been recipients of food stamps because they had no income...
photo
sdterp
Queer, Vegetarian Atheist -- Livin' Large
12:07 PM on 01/28/2012
He is full of it. The same dollar is taxed nearly every time it changes hands. The money I earn is taxed when I earn it and was taxed when the people/company/agency before me got it. It's taxed when I spend it, taxed when others receive it and I give to charitable organizations too, yet I can't claim all of these transactions as my contribution to the govt. This ploy of Romney's is pitiful at best.
09:50 PM on 01/27/2012
Yeah and I pay sales tax, and property taxes, and I get passed on the taxes that corporations I subsidize with my consumer practices and therefore taxed on that, plus pay the base tax rate of about 25%, so my rate now is like 72%.

Come on team Romney is this really the sort of logic you want to go down?
06:03 PM on 01/27/2012
I like Canada's Model...but it could be tweaked to be 75% of capital gains are taxed, but this way it doesnt harm middle income investors by having one standard Capital Gains rate....

CANADA:
50% of your Capital Gain x Your Marginal Tax Rate= Capital Gains Tax

= $100(capital gain) x 50% x 35%marginal rate
= $50 x 35%
= $17.50 Capital gains tax (17.5%)
In this example your capital gains tax on $100 is $17.50, leaving you with $82.50

Tweaked to 75% for USA with highest marginal rate:
= $100(capital gain) x 75% x 35% marginal rate
= $75 x 35%
= $26.25 Capital gains tax (26.25% for top marginal rate)

for reference a 15% marginal rate would pay 11.25% capital gains rate...so it mirrors the progressive income tax brackets
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
l78lancer
Wisdom is the principal thing
03:49 PM on 01/27/2012
It would be interesting to find out if Romney's money is being held in a blind trust by holding company and if, in fact, that holding company is solely his corporation. Or is it in a holding company established and run by Bain.

If he says he pays 35%, he needs to justify that statement by showing those returns.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
l78lancer
Wisdom is the principal thing
03:43 PM on 01/27/2012
Unless Romney owns the company 100% as a sole proprietor, it is completely bogus for him to want anyone to believe that he pays 35% corporate taxes in addition to 15% capital gains. And I am disappointed, but not surprised, that the WSJ would try to justify that fraud. I own stock. The company pays taxes on the stock. At no point can I reasonably say that I paid 35% because my company paid 35%. And at a minimum that 35% would have to be divided amongst the thousands if not millions of shareholders for that company. Consequently even it it was the case additional corporate taxes that I could rightly claim woum be suh a small fraction it would be insignificant compared to the 15% in capital gain it would be meaningless.

If on the other hand, Romney really was responsible for paying 35%, he shoud produce his returns that actually indicate as much. Otherwise he simply told another lie and his stock just went down even further (no pun intended).

One of the reasons that corporations are formed is to protect and insulate personal asstes from liabilities associated with the business. But just like the liabilities are disassociated, so are the revenues and profits. So no, he did NOT pay 35%

This is really another way that Romney is trying to back into the "corporations are people, too" argument and justification by alluding to he IS the company. To that I have just one word:

FAIL.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
carljr
07:35 AM on 01/27/2012
Bain paid taxes, Romney paid taxes. Romney can't claim that Bain's taxes are in fact his taxes too. He sounds a waiter who's pissed off that he has tip the kitchen, bar, and busboy. To say that 'his tax rate' is 50% is what someone who just hates taxes would say.

But I'm sure some right wing clown that I work with will be telling me that Romney actually pays a 5o% tax rate before the end of the day.

ROMNEY 2012
KILLING THE TRUTH ONE LIE AT A TIME
10:29 PM on 01/26/2012
Since some people can't grasp the concept, here we go
Say a corporation makes 10 million/yr. The profit, after expenses (not taxes) is 5 Million. That is then taxed (if a company was actually honest enough to do so) at 35%. That leaves a total of 3.25 Million. This is then payed out to shareholders. The shareholders will then pay 15% on THEIR SHARE. It's not a double tax. It's a 15% tax on the INDIVIDUAL. They get a share of the NET of the company, and that net is AFTER TAX. Reagan really helped his puppeteers with this concept. It's BS that is used to fool people time and time again.
10:36 PM on 01/26/2012
And People like MITT, hold A LOT of shares in a lot of companies. So if they make 100Million off of all their shares, that gets taxed at 15%. Again, the companies in which they have invested pay A COMPANY tax, the investors then pay the minuscule 15% on their personal returns. This idea of double tax is hokum.
11:25 PM on 01/26/2012
The part that you are leaving out is that in order to become a partial owner of a company, it requires either a lot of initial time or resources. The initial money raised by Romney to buy Baine Capital had already been taxed when it was made. So when he invested this money, he risked what he had made in order to make more. The risk was taxed. What happened to the American Dream? I want to be as rich if not richer than Romney some day, but people apparently think that isn't fair if I make that money by becoming a partner at a company? This country seems slightly askew.
09:56 PM on 01/27/2012
I don't think your going to be as rich as Mitt Romney if your are going to use that logic. Romney main resource is his family, he then went on to help create a successful company.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Saijanai
Micro bio? We don't need no stinkin' micro bio...
12:51 AM on 01/28/2012
YEah, let's go back to the good ole days when companies paid no taxes whatsoever... I mean, that is what made this country great, right?
09:42 PM on 01/26/2012
My salary should then be taxed at a lower rate since my employer pays taxes on the corporation's profits. Why should they be taxed on profits and expenses?
11:59 PM on 01/26/2012
You are an expense. What they pay you is deducted from their income and therefore IS NOT TAXED. So many of you on here say this invalid and misinformed argument but it only shows what little understanding you have.
09:24 AM on 01/30/2012
Almost like the corporation were a separate entity from the stockholders who own it - who was it that said "Corporations are people my friend!" - Mitt something?
gibraltar
Put in D to go forward to go backwards put it in R
09:29 PM on 01/26/2012
Whats good for Mittco is good for the USA.
Javalation
Laughing in a Daydream
09:15 PM on 01/26/2012
If corporation are people too then why does the Mitt think he can claim that other person's taxes as his own. Besides, did that corporate person take a deduction for the money paid to Rmoney. Sounds like another misrepresentation to me.
09:02 PM on 01/26/2012
The comments here show that a lot of people do not understand finance, the economy or business.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DavidEvan
voted for the party of yes
08:55 PM on 01/26/2012
Romney pays the highest percentage in lip service