iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Twitter To Censor Tweets In Some Countries

The Huffington Post   First Posted: 01/26/2012 6:01 pm Updated: 01/27/2012 11:15 pm

Twitter, according to its official description, promises to offer up the "latest information about what you find interesting."

There's now a caveat to that, however: The social media service will offer up the latest information about what you find interesting -- and what your government deems acceptable.

Twitter announced Thursday that the company now has the ability to censor tweets on a country-by-country basis, allowing the popular microblogging site to comply with local governments' request to remove or block certain content.

"Until now, the only way we could take account of those countries' limits was to remove content globally. Starting today, we give ourselves the ability to reactively withhold content from users in a specific country -- while keeping it available in the rest of the world," Twitter wrote in a blog post. "We have also built in a way to communicate transparently to users when content is withheld, and why."

The company noted that it has not yet exercised the option to withhold content from users in specific countries.

Once it does, it will alert its users to censored tweets by replacing the text of the post with a grayed-out tweet that reads, "This Tweet from @username has been withheld in: Country. Learn more." (See screenshot below.)

In its blog post announcing the changes, Twitter focused on its new ability to remove some tweets. Yet a Twitter Help Center post expanding on this tool noted that the site could also block access to entire accounts. "[I]f you see a grayed-out user in your timeline [...] or elsewhere on Twitter [...] access to that particular account has been withheld in your country," Twitter wrote. (See below.)

We've reached out to Twitter to clarify whether the company previously had the ability to block individual accounts in specific countries.

Twitter maintained that "one of our core values as a company is to defend and respect each user's voice," and the company noted that it has partnered with Chilling Effects, a non-profit focused on issues of free speech online, to create a site, http://chillingeffects.org/twitter, where it will alert its community when tweets have been blocked.

The company also said it will "attempt to notify" users whose content countries have requested withheld.

Alternately, users could just bypass the restrictions altogether: The Next Web has posted instructions for how to subvert the censorship.

Twitter users have been up in arms about the change, which many see as incompatible with Twitter's professed commitment to openness and a policy that has the potential to undermine Twitter's role in political movements, such as the pro-democracy protests that rocked Egypt last year.

"It's an affront on a free society & could be a PR disaster for Twitter after it's [sic] much praised role in the #Arabspring," tweeted @globalvybe.

Some users are attempting to organize a "#TwitterBlackout" on January 28 and intend to boycott Twitter in protest of the changes.

Others, most notably the director of international freedom of expression at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, have come to Twitter's defense.

"Let's be clear: This is censorship. There's no way around that. But alas, Twitter is not above the law," wrote the EFF's Jillian York. "I understand why people are angry, but this does not, in my view, represent a sea change in Twitter's policies. Twitter has previously taken down content-for DMCA requests, at least-and will no doubt continue to face requests in the future. I believe that the company is doing its best in a tough situation...and I'll be the first to raise hell if they screw up."

LOOK: How censored tweets and accounts will appear to users:

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

Twitter, according to its official description, promises to offer up the "latest information about what you find interesting." There's now a caveat to that, however: The social media service will o...
Twitter, according to its official description, promises to offer up the "latest information about what you find interesting." There's now a caveat to that, however: The social media service will o...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,104
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (42 total)
11:32 AM on 01/30/2012
I'm challenging myself to see this as an almost heroic act on Twitter's part, that they'll actually be making people in censored countries realize just how censored they are and thus incite them.

It's quite a challenge though, and quite a stretch. In the meantime I'm making sure every person I follow reads this article.
08:18 PM on 01/29/2012
Bye twitter nice knowing you.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DonCosenza
06:19 PM on 01/28/2012
I'm certainly uncomfortable with this... but thought experiment for fellow readers: Let's say that we're able to reinstate limits on corporate political participation (constitutional amendment, whatever). Now, let's say a company like Twitter, or Google, or a more traditional media company like TV/Radio/Newspaper/etc. decides they're going to a corporation's political ads in violation of such a law. Would you be supportive of the media firm or outraged by their refusal to obey the law?
05:43 PM on 01/28/2012
It's amazing that a site that has no qualms in allowing it's users to wallow in the most sexist, racist and ableist comments through the so called "trending topics", suddenly feels as if it should restrict our freedom of speech according to what a third parte suscripts. This is the end of twitter, indeed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lonnie DeVorak
04:22 PM on 01/28/2012
SOPA may be gone by name, but is this the after effects when all is said and done? They bound and determined to take every internet right away from us. Just now instead of being out in the open, it will get done on the sly.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joe Bowers
10:58 PM on 01/27/2012
How could they possibly think this is a good idea?
photo
Prometeo
Proud Puerto Rican. Blogger ang blog visitor. Like
09:49 PM on 01/27/2012
This will mark the beginning of the end of the Twitter. Some new service will come that will allow users to send micro messages without censoring.
08:22 PM on 01/27/2012
God I hope Anonymous steps in to fix this. If not, rest in peace to the Internet.
11:23 PM on 01/27/2012
Anonymous is not anyones personal army. They say this for a reason. Though perhaps they would like to be... there is just to many of "THEM" for each of "US" to fight against. They try to fight for the freedom of speech and information. So the message can get out. Yet the real fight... is up to all of us. We the people (Anonymous people or not) are the ones that can change the government, but only together.

Real change happens only when people are willing to fight for what they believe in. Yet when you mean to fight... there is the possibility for winning... and losing. To many people are afraid of losing, but we are slowly getting backed against the wall.

Perhaps when we have nothing left to lose... we will fight. Yet will it be to late to make the change then? I do not know...
07:53 PM on 01/27/2012
A humongous mistake. Censorship isn't good for anybody or any country. Twitter seems to have chosen revenue potential over free speech.
07:47 PM on 01/27/2012
yahoo does it all the time on the news blogs
07:08 PM on 01/27/2012
RIP Freedom of Speech!

On that note, I am sure Anonymous will have some fun! :-D
05:45 PM on 01/27/2012
And there goes good old Twitter, bowing and scraping and kissing...feet!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OleProfessor
"Ours is not a system based upon trust"
05:32 PM on 01/27/2012
There seems to be an International crackdown on individual freedom, information and expression..
01:22 AM on 01/29/2012
It's a triangle: the public, the govts, the corps. The last triangle I remember was patients, doctors, and insurance. How did that work out for the patients (assuming you're American, you should've felt it by now)? It's sad the masses have the numbers yet they don't have concentrated focus. The govts are hungry for control, the corps are hungry for money (and control) so they steely-willed proceed forward, with plans that seem concocted at least a decade ago. One thing they lack? Any kind of flex, moisture, the ability to quickly adjust to sudden bolts of energy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OleProfessor
"Ours is not a system based upon trust"
09:00 PM on 01/29/2012
Good stuff Cat..
04:39 PM on 01/27/2012
Although we will never know all of the details, it sounds as if Twitter was forced into a decision: Either curb access in some countries, or have the site blocked altogether in those countries. Of course, it's a business decision. However, we should consider the possibility that the company chose the lesser of two evils where freedom of expression is concerned.
photo
MiraMcB
Stop whining! You lost!
06:04 PM on 01/27/2012
Twitter should grow a pair and tell those countries to take a flying leap. Freedom of speech! Think where the revolutions in North Africa would have been w/out being able to get the word out via the internet and social media? THAT is exactly what those other complaining governments are worried about. I bet we can name off the govs that want this - every repressive regime east of Europe and west of Japan. Tossers.
01:30 AM on 01/29/2012
And why don't they just name the countries?

It's probably the United States. Y'know .. we're supposed to be happy and grateful to have the adjective of "free". Reality can be whatever .. since we're so used to straddling the amazing gulf between words and reality / actions, it's expected now.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
arizonabay
Why don't cartoon characters have pants?
04:35 PM on 01/27/2012
This makes sense after the comment Twitter's CEO made about Wikipedia and it's SOPA protest.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2012/jan/16/wikipedia-sopa-blackout-slammed-twitter