Jessica Ahlquist, Atheist, Receives Threats Over Prayer Banner Ruling; School Board May Appeal (VIDEO)

Weeks after a judge ordered the removal of a prayer banner at a Rhode Island school, the atheist teen at the center of the controversy continues to receive threats as the school board decides its next move.

Since 2010, Jessica Ahlquist had been urging school officials to remove the banner from the auditorium at Cranston High School West.

The 8-foot banner features a prayer a student wrote in 1963 -- a prayer some consider part of the school's history.

On Jan. 11, federal judge Ronald R. Lagueux ruled it was unconstitutional for the banner to hang at the public school, The New York Times reports.

But the fight to remove the banner has come with consequences for the teen.

Ahlquist has encountered online threats and bullying and has even taken some time off from school, WPRO News reports.

Nevertheless, the 16-year-old says she plans on graduating from Cranston West next year.

Today, the prayer is covered by a tarp, as residents and school board members aren't ready to take the banner down without a fight.

First, the controversial ruling was a popular topic at a Jan. 25 budget meeting, and police even had to be called suppress the crowd, WPRI reports.

Now, a meeting has been scheduled for Feb. 16 during which school officials will hear public comment on the issue, Providence's NBC 10 reports. The board will then decide whether or not to challenge the judge's decision.

Ahlquist, an atheist who grew up Roman Catholic, was not the first to take issue with the presence of the 49-year-old banner.

A family filed a complaint with the American Civil Liberties Union in 2010, though Ahlquist eventually became the spokesperson for the plea and a plaintiff in the lawsuit, according to The New York Times.

At least one religious leader says Ahlquist should be able to stand up for what she believes.

"...We are proud to stand with others in Cranston who desire that Jessica and every young person be encouraged to learn to talk about their differences in peace," Rev. Leigh McCaffrey told Providence's NBC 10.

When the school committee addressed an initial complaint from the ACLU at meeting in August 2010, two religious leaders, a reverend and a rabbi, agreed the banner should be "altered or removed," according to the court document obtained by the Providence Journal.

In March 2011, the committee met again to hear public comments on the issue. Twenty-six adults spoke at the meeting, 24 of whom were in favor of keeping banner. Even one speaker who described himself as an atheist threatened to "assemble a group of people to surround the school and protect the Mural," if the ACLU took down the banner, the document states.

At the end of the meeting, committee member Michael Traficante announced the decision to keep the banner in its current state. Later that month, the committee decided to place an explanation next to the banner, detailing its decision to keep the prayer without alteration for "historic and cultural reasons."

The ACLU formally filed suit on April 4, 2011.

The prayer reads as follows:

Our Heavenly Father,

Grant us each day the desire to do our best,
To grow mentally and morally as well as physically,
To be kind and helpful to our classmates and teachers,
To be honest with ourselves as well as with others,
Help us to be good sports and smile when we lose as well as when we win,
Teach us the value of true friendship,
Help us always to conduct ourselves so as to bring credit to Cranston High School West.

Amen

What's your take on the issue? Vote in the poll below.

Quick Poll

Do you agree with the judge's decision?

Yes, the presence of the prayer banner is unconstitutional.

The prayer banner should be altered, but not taken down.

No, the banner is a part of the school's history.

Undecided.

VOTE

Share your vote on Facebook so your friends can take this poll

Comments

[Ariana Drobet]

10:56 AM on 10/03/2012

As a non believer in ANY religion which may be atheist, christian, catholic, jew or jahova(whatever) I think Children should be allowed in school to express their believes if it be religiously or not. Your already taking the fine arts now they have to be cautious to what they say? My issue is where does it stop? Unless the school is making them Recite the Prayer and worshiping it before the banner. That banner has no merit to what the school is doing but being a banner a historic one at that. I am sure it has played significant roles to people's lives. I do not understand where her constitution rights are being "hurt" here. For me this is a great publicity stunt for a 16 year old to get in college...and Harvard has caught her fancy. What next we are we BANNING Beethoven because his music inspired Catholic worshipers. So "God" inspired this child. This is a form of Art and should not be dismissed.

[michael3ov]

06:28 AM on 01/29/2013

Yeah atheism is a religion like bald is a hair color. Saying atheism is a religion is remarkably misinformed and ignorant. It is the lack of belief and that is it, nothing more. Atheism has zero aspects that could qualify it as a religion.

[melonpan12]

01:04 AM on 09/03/2012

Ok, so this is illegal? Schools say the Pledge of Allegiance, which has the world "God" in it. Let's stop saying that in school, then. Also, the schools are being funded by money that says "In God We Trust". I feel this is a direct violation to my constitutional rights. XD

[Domino8515]

11:38 PM on 02/27/2013

Actually, the courts have ruled that the words "god" in the pledge and on our money are not religious, but secular ceremonial statements.

[rsiacobelli]

02:22 AM on 06/05/2012

You can always count on the religious right to honorable take on the task of threatening a teenage girl. I guess if I was religious and every study available showed secularism to have a very high connection to nearly every desirable quality, I'd be a little pissed if my God was showing favor too Scandanavia, and japan, while our right turn has set us to an endless miserable decline into absurdity. Time for the great American brain drain, as we saw in Iran. Canada will adapt all our Ivy Leages and Silicon Valley and Wall St with open arms. And the evangelics can throw rocks at each other until say horrible things about little girls for being brave a American who deserves massive applause, they are monsters to challenge, truly wicked people who's time being relevant is long over and they are sad old windbags craping at straws and abandoning every ounce of the Constitution, rather than accept their inescapable, antiquated fate as an embarrassing footnote in the history books .

[RonP58]

09:18 PM on 03/07/2012

WOW...First, I think that Jessica has every right to do what she did. Second, anybody, adults especially, who threaten her for this is repulsive. I find their actions have much more to do with a lack of character rather than their religion. I find it very sad that a compromise was offered and not accepted. I think the "prayer" is a great lesson for all children and after taking out very few words it is no longer a prayer, but a positive affirmation for teenagers. I would hardly say a prayer hanging in the gym is shoving it down your kids throats, that is a little dramatic. I am a Christian, by choice, and will pray wherever the hell I want to and will expect not a single smirk or nasty comment about me being a "follower" of society or stupid for believing in "myths". How is this right? What I find amazing is that all of the posts I see, always involve a non-Christian resulting to name calling or an inability to be tolerant. Yes, there is a Constitution and amendments, but that does not mean you can use and abuse them however you feel. And, all the focus is on Christians when many religions honor a Father. I love my God and Jesus and think it is about time they were the ones to stop being blamed for the choices we make everyday. Let's get back to the basics, creating unity and supporting each other.

[bajesa]

07:20 PM on 03/08/2012

You said: "I am a Christian, by choice, and will pray wherever the hell I want to and will expect not a single smirk or nasty comment ..."

People (usually) deserve respect, but ideas or beliefs do not necessarily deserve respect. While you have a constitutional right to believe what you want, you do not have a constitutional right to not be offended. So, you are welcome to pray when you want to, but you should not expect that others won't smirk at the idea of prayer. Consider political views as an example. You might think Tea Partiers have ridiculous views and you might even mock their ideas. Why do you think religious views are more deserving of protection from criticism than political views?

You said: "...all the focus is on Christians when many religions honor a Father..."

The focus is on Christians for good reasons. As the judge said: "No amount of debate can make the School Prayer anything other than a prayer, and a Christian one at that. Its opening, calling upon the "Heavenly Father," is an exclusively Christian formulation of a monotheistic deity, leaving out, inter alia, Jews, Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists, and atheists alike." (from Ahlquist v City of Cranston, which can be viewed here: http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10811058226814137027&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr ) If you read the case, you'll see that those who fought against Jessica were Christians (usually Catholics).

[RonP58]

09:58 PM on 03/08/2012

I agree that public schools should be governed by our Constitution, so that issue is solved right there. I disagree with the fact that it is a prayer once the words which make it a prayer are taken out. And, there is a difference between Catholics ( a religion) and Christians, which is a deep relationship with Christ. So often they are confused and put together to stereotype anyone who believes that God exists.

I reserve the right as a human being to be offended whenever I want. It is how I express my feelings which makes all the difference. This works both ways: If Jessica is to be able to stand up for what she believes in without backlash, then I deserve the same. I disagree with you that people's values and beliefs do not deserve respect...THAT IS WHAT THIS ENTIRE ISSUE IS ABOUT!!! Does this fifteen year old girl not deserve respect for her beliefs???

[Timothy Woodward]

09:45 AM on 02/25/2012

It's a shame that the reporter (and most of the population of Providence, R.I.) seemed to miss the "real" point. These God fearing simple folk, "claim" the prayer is so much a part of there history and identity missed or forgot the part of the prayer that said:

"Help us to be good sports and smile when we lose as well as when we win."

After the judge made his ruling, it left no doubt at all that the prayer was inappropriate and needed to come down. It should have never been put up in the first place. The "good" and "righteous" congregations need to put down their bibles and pickup an read an elementary text on American civics.

The only one bringing credit to Cranston High School West is a brave young student and atheist named Jessica Ahlquist.

TimW
Faith is not a virtue -- pass it on

[sweetlilthing]

10:14 AM on 02/22/2012

What type of public school is this that doesn't promote the Constitution? Certainly the school knows it won't be backed up in the courts? These cases never win. All the school board is knowingly doing is wasting the taxpayers money while going against the Law. What's the message here? Have the taxpayers approved the use of their taxes on such a wasteful endeavor?

[MikeQ2]

12:30 PM on 02/21/2012

These people need to keep their religious comments to themselves and not assume everyone wants the prayers and Jesus signs all over the place. I am a retired Catholic working to be excommunicated. I am sick of paying into their retirement plan and have nothing to show for it. Praise Allah and I cannot wait for Yom Kippur

[Jeff Clifton]

01:54 PM on 02/21/2012

What 'people' are you talking about? Religious extremist fanatics,...or a teenager who had a message with good intentions?

Please re-post which lines offend you in the prayer....and if 'heavenly father' was replaced with 'Allah', would that be acceptable?

Ever think that may be offensive, or does it even matter whether it says 'heavenly father', or 'Allah'...should it not? Or are you just concerned with yourself?

[artboyzreborn]

03:06 PM on 03/01/2012

It's a prayer and it has to go.

[lifeline paige]

04:19 AM on 02/21/2012

Has anyone actually looked at the content of the prayer. The fact that this is directed towards God shouldn't bother anyone who doesn't believe there is a God. The fact that it brings so much attention confirms that there is a God. What part of the prayer bothers people...be honest or grow mentally? This is no surprise and I hope no one minds me quoting God on this but "But mark this: There will be terrible times in the last days. People will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boastful, proud, abusive, disobedient to their parents, ungrateful, unholy, without love, unforgiving, slanderous, without self-control, brutal, not lovers of the good, treacherous, rash, conceited, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of GOD (2 Tim. 3:4). The good news if we give it a little more time GOD will be happy to more explicitly prove his existence. The bad news is that it will be a little too late to believe that He does exist. For the record...God owns the world and its rather comical to think that He needs permission to govern our country.

[MikeQ2]

12:35 PM on 02/21/2012

Yes, yes I pray every day to wake up the next day. All my life this has worked, what could go wrong? Then again, uncle Feeblefester did the same but he did not wake up last week. Must have missed a prayer.
Or praying is a lazy person way of facing reality.

[Jeff Clifton]

01:59 PM on 02/21/2012

So, if say, uncle Feeblefester didn't praise Allah, would he die as well?

Are you coming with two agendas? One is that it is wrong to force ones religious ideals in the form of a banner, and the second being that Catholicism or Christianity is wrong and Islam is correct?

So, what is your argument? You seem focused on creating conflict here.

[sweetlilthing]

10:24 AM on 02/22/2012

The fact that people want it gone because it's a religious prayer that doesn't belong in public school is proof that God is real? The part that bothers people is that it's against the law and they don't want their children influenced by a prayer that represents a certain type of religion, in this case Christianity. My children are Atheist. I send them to public school to get an education not to read prayers from any religion. I respect your right to believe as you wish but please don't push it down my children's throats and I won't insist on a banner that says there is no God(s) in the cafeteria.

[lifeline paige]

11:32 AM on 02/22/2012

The fact that people want to take down a sign promoting community, respect for one another, and virtues that promote a great school environment was my issue. The idea of proving God's existence comes from the following question: Since you don't believe in God, then why would a sign containing the name of a God who does not exist bother you. If I oppose something that I claim doesn't exist then doesn't my resistance suggest that I must be opposing something that does exist. When someone steals your child's coat at school, you would agree that it is against the law to steal. You resist it by arguing that it is wrong. This awareness of wrong is not just the government's law but it's God's law. If human opinion is the only power behind our laws, then we have a major problem. If we can arbitrarily eliminate God's laws (don't steal, kill, or worship anyone other God), then why should anyone honor human laws. Since human power made the law, then human power can break the law because we are equal in power. You don't have to insist on a banner that says there is no God, just continue to fight against banners that promote God's value...mission accomplished. We're raising our kids to get a Masters in finance, only to commit suicide because life has no value. God is not philosophical argument, but God is good...God is love.

[Koreboomer]

08:26 PM on 02/19/2012

If they got rid of the religious references, it's all good advice.

Problem solved!

[Jeff Clifton]

02:01 PM on 02/21/2012

Which reference? Two words; 'heavenly father'??? Did you read the rest of the 'prayer'???

[bajesa]

04:28 PM on 02/27/2012

The religious references are these:
(1) The banner is titled "School Prayer"
(2) It makes a request to "Our Heavenly Father", an exclusively Christian formulation.
(3) It closes with "Amen", used only the the Abrahamic religions.
(4) It uses language such as "Grant us..." requesting help from a deity.

Although many have remarked that the overall sentiment of the School Prayer is good and valuable, the religious parts make it an unconstitutional endorsement of religion (in this case, specifically Christianity).

The school committee considered the option to remove the religious parts to make the banner comply with the law. They refused, apparently because the religious bits were the important thing to them. The court decision is worth reading:
http://www.rid.uscourts.gov/menu/judges/opinions/recent/01112012_1-11CV0138L_AHLQUIST_V_CRANSTON_P.pdf

[LisaJames]

08:11 PM on 02/16/2012

Tonight's the night. I wonder if Cranston finally will use some common sense. Hope so.

[LisaJames]

07:42 PM on 02/17/2012

And... it is over. 5-2 they voted not to appeal.

[bajesa]

08:42 PM on 02/06/2012

Jessica has inspired at least two others to protest prayer at their schools:
http://cranston.patch.com/articles/ahlquist-inspires-two-others-to-contest-prayers-at-their-schools

[Funkstronaut]

03:35 PM on 02/06/2012

Looking forward to seeing everyone back here next month.
http://www.al.com/living/index.ssf/2012/02/bible_man_okd_by_jackson_count.html
"Board members retired with their attorney into closed executive session to consider the five-page complaint sent last month by the Freedom from Religion Foundation on behalf of the parents. After an hour’s deliberations, board members returned to the room to announce, to applause, that they would not be banning the Bible Man from schools, despite the complaint about his monthly meetings with county elementary children."
Sounds like their attorney was home-schooled in Alabama. There is absolutely no way the school could win if it went (when it goes) to court. The fallout could be much greater than the Ahlquist case.
A storm is brewing.

[rmrgdr]

04:55 PM on 02/06/2012

I think they are, emboldened by the GOP/TP rhetoric floating around.
They WILL lose in court, no about about that.
Ask Judge Moore!

[crowepps]

04:24 AM on 02/07/2012

There's an old man and his wife who moved to our local area in the last couples years who shows up at all the public events handing out cheap mini-Bibles to little kids, but so far they've managed to keep him out of the schools. Frankly, he strikes me as pretty weird.

[eundrh]

12:36 AM on 02/06/2012

Think of the banner as a benign tumor...it doesn't belong there, but the removal causes more harm than its presence, and in time, the school would eventually come down and the banner find its way to some dusty corner of the historical society. Jessica may have been legally in the right, but she ought to have known enough to leave well enough alone. She is certainly not the first non-believer to go there; the others simply knew enough to go along to get along, not blaming the banner for the exclusion they felt as outsiders

[rmrgdr]

10:54 AM on 02/06/2012

Think of your post as ridiculous.
Why should anybody be a second class citizen?

[eundrh]

11:22 AM on 02/06/2012

Because they aren't as popular as the first class citizens but cooler than the third class citizens...high school "red in tooth and claw".

[bajesa]

11:07 AM on 02/06/2012

I must disagree with you. The school committee is entirely responsible. They were supposed to be the grownups in the room. They should have recognized that the prayer banner was illegal and remedied the situation. Instead they caved into the demands of the mob and their own personal religious preferences. They could have used this as an opportunity to teach the kids (and the parents apparently needed to learn too) about the importance of the separation of religion and government. They failed in their duty. Don't blame Jessica for this.

[Mac1967]

12:20 PM on 02/06/2012

The school board, being elected officials, cared more about their reelection than the law. Now they can say that they did everything in their power to prevent this imaginary outrage. They already had been on notice, that they weren't going to prevail, since the 1962 decision when prayers in school were ruled as unconstitutional. Plus, not a single nationwide challenge to the no religion in schools has ever been won. It was all about appearences and posturing by those who should have known better.

[Aardvaark]

02:25 PM on 02/05/2012

It's ironic that this took place in Rhode Island. The colony was founded by a Puritan, Roger Williams, nearly 400 years ago, who did it to separate church and state.

Here's an interesting op-ed piece that appeared in today's L. A. Times by John M. Barry. Barry says that Roger Williams "called such forced exposure to prayer 'spiritual rape.'"

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-barry-religion-20120205,0,3487349.story

[Miles Catlett]

09:04 PM on 02/14/2012

Roger Williams was a Baptist.

[Aardvaark]

10:39 PM on 02/14/2012

Not according to Wikipedia.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roger_Williams_%28theologian%29
Maybe you should send your "correction" to Wikipedia. ;-)

[BurtonDesque]

10:16 AM on 02/05/2012

STILL no arrests of anyone who threatened Ms. Ahlquist? Disgusting.

[Mac1967]

06:30 PM on 02/05/2012

Does anyone really expect anything different from the Cranston police? Politics have always been first.

[eundrh]

01:05 AM on 02/06/2012

They are too busy nailing speeders from our parking lot...likely to raise funds for the appeal.