iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Arab League: Syria Observer Mission Halted

Syria Arab League Observer Mission

BASSEM MROUE and AYA BATRAWY   01/28/12 01:29 PM ET  AP

BEIRUT — The Arab League halted its observer mission in Syria on Saturday because of escalating violence that killed nearly 100 people the past three days, as pro-Assad forces battled dissident soldiers in a belt of suburbs on the eastern edge of Damascus in the most intense fighting yet so close to the capital.

The rising bloodshed has added urgency to new attempts by Arab and Western countries to find a resolution to the 10 months of violence that according to the United Nations has killed at least 5,400 people as Assad seeks to crush persistent protests demanding an end to his rule.

The United Nations is holding talks on a new resolution on Syria and next week will discuss an Arab peace plan aimed at ending the crisis. But the initiatives face two major obstacles: Damascus' rejection of an Arab peace plan which it says impinges on its sovereignty, and Russia's willingness to use its U.N. Security Council veto to protect Syria from sanctions.

Syria's Interior Minister Mohammed Shaar vowed the crackdown would go on, telling families of security members killed in the past months that security forces "will continue their struggle to clean Syria's soil of the outlaws."

Government forces launched a heavy assault on a string of suburbs and villages on the eastern outskirts of Damascus, aiming to uproot protesters and dissident soldiers who have joined the opposition, activists said.

Troops in tanks and armored personnel carriers attacked the suburbs of Kfar Batna, Saqba, Jisreen and Arbeen, the closest of which lie only a few miles from downtown Damascus, said the Local Coordination Committees activist network and the British-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights. Dissident troops were fighting back against the attackers, they said.

In a nearby suburb, Douma, gunmen ambushed a bus carrying army officers, the state-run news agency SANA, calling the attackers "terrorists." It said seven officers were killed.

The assault in the suburbs seemed to be a sign of the growing presence of dissident soldiers closer to the capital. Although the tightly controlled Damascus has been relatively quiet since the uprising began, its outskirts have witnessed intense anti-regime protests and army defectors have become more visible and active in the past few months.

"The fighting today is the most intense near the capital since the uprising began," said Rami Abdul-Rahman who heads the Observatory for Human Rights. "The Syrian regime is trying to finish the uprising militarily now that the case is being taken to the United Nations."

In Saqba, electricity and phone lines were cut off and mosque loudspeakers told residents to say in lower floors for fear high buildings might get hit in the fighting, said Omar Hamza, an activist in the district. "Random shelling and sound of explosions terrified the people," he told The Associated Press.

He said army defectors had managed to stop the advancing troops. The regime forces are putting all their force to finish the Free Syrian Army and protesters in the Damascus suburbs," Hamza said.

The Free Syrian Army force of anti-regime military defectors is based in Turkey, and its fighters frequently try to cross into Syria through the mountainous border area in the northwest. SANA reported that Syrian troops prevented gunmen from crossing in from Turkey on Saturday in fighting that it said left many of the infiltrators killed or wounded.

The LCC and the Observatory also reported intense fighting between troops and defectors in the town of Rastan near the restive central city of Homs.

The Observatory said at least 36 people, were killed across the country Saturday, including 17 civilians, three defectors and 16 troops, while the LCC said 20 died, half of them in Homs province, which has been one of the areas hardest hit by government crackdowns. The new deaths come after two days of bloody turmoil killed at least 74 people, including small children.

In the eastern oil-rich province of Deir el-Zour, an oil pipeline took a direct hit and caught fire as government troops shelled a nearby town, the two groups also said, reporting at least one person dead. State media blamed "terrorists" in the attack.

The month-old Arab League observer mission in Syria had come under widespread criticism for failing to bring a halt to the regime's crackdown. Gulf states led by Saudi Arabia pulled out of the mission Tuesday, asking the U.N. Security Council to intervene.

Arab League Secretary-General Nabil Elaraby said in a statement that the organization decided to halt the observers' work immediately because of the increasing violence, until the League's council can meet to decide the mission's fate.

He sharply criticized Damascus for the spike in bloodshed, saying the regime has "resorted to escalating the military option in complete violation of (its) commitments" to end the crackdown, Elaraby said. He said the victims of the violence have been "innocent citizens," in an implicit rejection of Syria's claims that it is fighting "terrorists."

Syria's state-run news agency quoted an unnamed official saying Damascus "regrets and is surprised" by the Arab League decision after Syria agreed to extend the observer's mission for another month. The official said the halt aims "to pressure the talks in order to call for external intervention in Syria's internal affairs," referring to the U.N. talks.

Elaraby's deputy, Ahmed Ben Heli, told reporters that the around 100 observers will remain in Damascus while their mission is "reevaluated." He suggested the observers could resume their work in the future...

Elaraby and the prime minister of Qatar were set to leave for New York on Sunday to seek U.N. support for the latest Arab plan to end Syria's crisis. The plans calls for a two-month transition to a unity government, with Assad giving his vice president full powers to work with the proposed government.

Syria has rejected the proposal, saying it violates its sovereignty. Elaraby had previously been due to travel Saturday, but his trip was pushed back to Sunday with no explanation.

The U.N. Security Council began closed-door negotiations Friday on a new Arab-European draft resolution aimed at resolving the crisis, but Russia's envoy said he could not back the current language as it stands.

Any resolution faces strong opposition from China and Russia, and both nations have veto power. Russia's U.N. Ambassador Vitaly Churkin told reporters that the text introduced by new Arab Security Council member Morocco has "red lines" for Moscow, but he's willing to "engage" with the resolution's sponsors.

Churkin said those lines include any indication of sanctions, including an arms embargo. "We need to concentrate on establishing political dialogue," he said.

____

Batrawy reported from Cairo; Albert Aji in Damascus, Syria, contributed to this report.

___

Bassem Mroue can be reached on twitter at http://twitter.com/bmroue

1  of  8
PLAY
FULLSCREEN
ZOOM
SHARE THIS SLIDE 
Syrian army defectors patrol a street in Homs province, central Syria, on Wednesday Jan. 25, 2012. Government forces clashed with army defectors and stormed rebellious districts in central Syria on Wednesday, firing mortars and deploying snipers in violence that killed at least seven people, including a mother and her 5-year-old child, activists said. (AP)
FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

BEIRUT — The Arab League halted its observer mission in Syria on Saturday because of escalating violence that killed nearly 100 people the past three days, as pro-Assad forces battled dissident ...
BEIRUT — The Arab League halted its observer mission in Syria on Saturday because of escalating violence that killed nearly 100 people the past three days, as pro-Assad forces battled dissident ...
Filed by Eline Gordts  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 378
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (9 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jerry Bourbon
04:36 PM on 01/30/2012
"Reasonable gun control laws" seem to be working as planned in Syria.

For Bashar Assad...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
HextallDrums
Nobody fiddles with ol' Firefly!
07:35 PM on 01/29/2012
It amazes me that we still have to be deadlocked in a debate about what to do while innocents are being slaughtered. Will it take things going to the brink? Another eruption of civil war while the world watches?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jerry Bourbon
04:37 PM on 01/30/2012
You are welcome to enlist in the Army and agitate from within for yet another pointless middle eastern war.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
HextallDrums
Nobody fiddles with ol' Firefly!
12:03 AM on 01/31/2012
Wow guy that makes less than zero sense. Please explain this to me.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Escalonz
07:33 PM on 01/29/2012
Any resolution faces strong opposition from China and Russia
So much for any solution being accomplished there as both countries have other interest with Syria.
Would a naval blockade be of value?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sonoflars
Growing old is mandatory, growing up is optional
11:33 AM on 01/29/2012
Its getting about time to take this guy out. I hope we aren't the ones to do it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kodimirpal
teacher
11:23 AM on 01/29/2012
Disunity among the people of a nation is very dangerous and it may provide a murderous opportunity for the adversaries to add fuel to the fire.

For the sake of saving the millions of innocent people of a nation, at times we have to forgive and forget the shortcomings of our leaders and rulers rather than trying to change the regime, create massive anarchy ( look at Afghanistan) by getting help from insincere and manipulating world powers.
Iraq is right in front of our eyes.

Tens of thousands of People like me hated Saddam Hussein and went to the extent of morally co-operating with his opponents and dissidents in seeking help to punish and execute Saddam and overthrow his administration.

No one 100% blindly supported and loved Saddam Hussein.

But right now the haters of Saddam Hussein feel the foolishness, naivety and immaturity of such political thinking and wish if only Saddam had remained in power and we could have saved the deaths of about 1.2 million Iraqis and avoided about 400,000 people becoming refugees, over 600,000 becoming widows and about 500,000 becoming orphans and the nation going to the dogs. Was not brutal American intervention responsible for this tragedy?

But I do say that Arabs should think outside the box and seriously consider the options.
There are hard lessons for the from the Iraqi, Afghan tragedies. United we stand and divided we fall.
10:46 AM on 01/29/2012
They can't govern themselves and, apparently, can't even "observe" themselves, but the Arab League Observer Mission is, at least, consistant with the overall U.N. "unable to do anything" policy.

Unbeleivable.

Before we go off on the inevitable "human rights" rants, recall what's happening in Iraq and Afgahnistan as we pull out, and where most Arab Spring nations seem headed: not good.

Bad, for 9 years, 5K KIA and nearly $2 trillion: Real BAd.

The region thrives on chaos and conflict.

They keep each other in check, so long as no one upsets the balance.

Whoever does gets the whole load in the face: up front fights, guerilla warriors and covert support for guerillas.

Then, they go back to fighting themselves.

Saddam Hussein was not friendly, but in this fetid system, he was actually the best friend we had. He kept Iran in check. But now, we have to keep Iran in check and maybe with Iraq as an ally.

They've worn out Russia and now they are wearing us out with it.

If you don't understand it, then leave it alone.

We don't understand them, but our multi-culti liberals are rushing where wise men fear to tread.

Pounding away about the "religion of peace" does nothing for my confidence in current European or American leadership.

It's just not simple enough to fit into any liberal one-liners.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Salukeitis
04:38 PM on 01/29/2012
Why are you picking on the Liberals. I don't know of any Lib who wants us to go into Syria.
The Neo-Cons are the war makers. THEY started Iraq. THET want to battle Iran.
06:03 PM on 01/29/2012
I did not intend my entire rant to be against liberals, but I can see how you could take it that way.

Therefore:

Liberals are running things, now. Their blind side is multi-culturalism and some shallow thinking about Islam. To be successful, they are going to have to get over those illusions and deal with the "macht politik" of it.

The Taliban understands power. Negotiation is just a sign of weakness if not capitulation.

Libya and the Arab Spring all happened on Obama's watch and his response reminds me of our take on the Mujihideen when they fought the Soviets: same shallow thinking about "freedom fighters" with a not-so-free agenda.

Just because they are the underdogs fighting tyrants, doesn't mean their agenda is IAW our interests.

Conservatives have their own blind sides, of course, but they are not running things. So, who cares?
However:

Bush and Rumsfeldt used a few special forces and heavy divisions to great affect, but then got lost in Petreous COIN and the insurgency.

That was dumb: it took the British two Afgahn Wars to figure out that quick, punitive expeditions work, but don't hang around.

The worst mistake was to take out Hussein, which I mentioned up front and figured anyone would take as the major Bush blunder of all time.

I don't know what the answer is. But, there is another big war coming if somebody doesn't start playing "real politik".

And that ain't Obama. It ain't Gingrich, either.
10:36 AM on 01/29/2012
It is ok for the US to have vetoed EVERYTHING that affects Israel but not for Russia to support Syria. Neither country is responsable enough to have the veto. Neither is England, China, or any of the other "Superpowers". In my lifetime the worst thing that has affected world peace is the veto in the Security Council. It has been abused over and over. As long as the Security council existed the UN has been worthless. The UN should NOT be in the US. We have abused it over and over and it has hurt the rest of the people on this planet. It should be somewhere else and so far as international relations there should be NO veto.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jerry Bourbon
04:38 PM on 01/30/2012
"The UN should not be in the US." You are quite right. And the US should not be in the UN either.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kodimirpal
teacher
10:31 AM on 01/29/2012
A democratically elected Islamist governments hostile to American hegemonic aspirations in the region… are considered unacceptable in Washington. We saw this in Algeria in 1993 brutally

This is primarily because the democratically elected governments are unlikely to allow the United States (the West) to use Algeria, Egypt, Libya, Tunisia, Bahrain, UAE, Morocco, Jordan and Syria as part of its attempts to consolidate its military-economic hegemony throughout the region.

The West always supports coups in an effort to prevent Islamic fundamentalists ( even if they are as democratic as Italy is for instance)coming to power through the ballot box.

The Arab monarchs and tyrants want to show themselves as defenders of the West against fundamentalism Read democracy) and as acclaimed partners in defending the American, French and Western interests in the region

Accordingly, Western governments including Britain, have been supporting these regimes, along with their repressive polices and the atrocities committed by their security forces, by supplying them with heavy military and if necessary financial aid.


One can understand the West’s tacit support of the undemocratic regimes, given that European access to resources such as oil would have been jeopardised by Islamic governments - simply because genuinely Islamic governments would mobilise domestic resources for the benefit of the population, as opposed to allowing them to be plundered by Western investors.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:18 AM on 01/29/2012
OK then. That obvious lack of back bone kind of explains why the leaders of all peaceful people of the peaceful religion of Islam have had such a difficult time stopping Islamic fundamentalist violence.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
drb107
Remember what Opinions are like
10:11 AM on 01/29/2012
Since Europe uses large amounts of Mid-east oil they should be the ones intervening for their security, but no, they are waiting on the stupid Americans to sacrifice our sons and daughters for them. America needs to stay out of this Arab in-fighting and get out of Afghanistan and Iraq now, over time all these fights would take care of themselves.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kodimirpal
teacher
09:40 AM on 01/29/2012
Should we oppose and condemn foreign intervention in Syria or any Arab land? . Is it necessary to assume that all those calling for it in Syria under the current conditions are part of a Western conspiracy?.


Certainly, some may have had ulterior motives, connections or designs and supported intervention all along. But the majority of those calling for intervention have been brutalised into doing so. They are not thinking in terms of supporting or opposing imperialism at this time.

Let us imagine a wild scenario where the United States is going to intervene to stop the massacres.

This is similar to the problematics of the United States' self-image supporting democracy: if it can engage in promoting democracy, that's all the better.

If not, promoting dictatorship to serve its interests (as is the case in the Arab world) will do just fine.

This is because the objective was never to create democratic regimes, but compliant ones.

In other words, Syria is being used by various powers, including the United States and Saudi Arabia and their chorus, as an occasion to accomplish their own objectives in the region - reactionary ones, to be sure, in terms of the interests of most people in the region as the decades behind us attest,.

That does not mean, that we should withdraw our opposition and halt the struggle against dictatorship in Syria. It only serves to remind us how not to do it.
09:38 AM on 01/29/2012
right never mind that you placed
a former high ranking Sudanese Army
officer in charge of this farce of a fact
finding mission an officer who has been
accused of crimes against humanity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ipolitics123
The Left is not Liberal
09:34 AM on 01/29/2012
So in response to 5,000 dead and the Syrian army moving in with 2,000 troops and 50 tanks:

The Arab League pulled it's observers out.

The UN is going to "hold talks."

The Russians are willing to "engage" with the issue (not to be confused with taking any action.)

No wonder Assad feels like he can do whatever he wants.
09:28 AM on 01/29/2012
The Middle East is simply a mess. The Arab league has no real power and obviously scares no one. Their love of life is simply different than the US which is something Bush never thought about before he put our soldiers in harms way. The only way to fix the problem is to repeat history. All the super powers need to occupate the entire Middle East and each claims a certain region for themselves to rule under their government. That's the only way to stop the uncivilized behavior as far as suicide attacks. It would be nice if Europe and the US could do it alone but they would need Russia and China to buy in on the concept.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
muck-raker
give me liberty or give me death
07:12 AM on 01/29/2012
As the Washington historian William Blum has documented, since 1945, the US has destroyed or subverted more than 50 governments, many of them democracies, and used mass murderers like Suharto, Mobutu and Pinochet to dominate by proxy. In the Middle East, every dictatorship and pseudo-monarchy has been sustained by America. In “Operation Cyclone”, the CIA and MI6 secretly fostered and bank-rolled Islamic extremism. The object was to smash or deter nationalism and democracy. The victims of this western state terrorism have been mostly Muslims. The courageous people gunned down last week in Bahrain and Libya, the latter a “priority UK market”, according to Britain’s official arms “procurers”, join those children blown to bits in Gaza by the latest American F-16 aircraft.

The revolt in the Arab world is not merely against a resident dictator but a worldwide economic tyranny designed by the US Treasury and imposed by the US Agency for International Development, the IMF and World Bank, which have ensured that rich countries like Egypt are reduced to vast sweatshops, with half the population earning less than $2 a day. The people’s triumph in Cairo was the first blow against what Benito Mussolini called corporatism, a word that appears in his definition of fascism
more: http://www.johnpilger.com/articles/behind-the-arab-revolt-is-a-word-we-dare-not-speak
08:09 AM on 01/29/2012
I doubt you have ever visited Egypt (or any of the other countries you list in your diatribe). Egypt is poor because it is overpopulated, suffers from intractable corruption and produces nothing the world wants not even much oil. Its economy depends heavily on tourism and canal tolls. There is no triumph in Cairo because the same corrupt ruling clique is still in power. What you are witnessing is not a revolution but street theater. You seem to imply that Assad is just another Western stooge. Reading up on the history of the Alawites and the Baath party might help you gain at least a modicum understanding of what is going on.
photo
giving
For the right to the pursuit of happiness.
08:17 AM on 01/29/2012
is not the baath party
[Iraq and Syria}
founded on nazi principles?
08:48 AM on 01/29/2012
No
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ipolitics123
The Left is not Liberal
09:35 AM on 01/29/2012
Yes. Paul Berman touches on this in his excellent book "Terror and Liberalism" where he points out that the Baath party is explicitly fascist.