iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Mitt Romney Florida Primary Comeback Fueled By Deep Pockets, Big Advertising Spending

First Posted: 01/28/2012 11:58 am Updated: 01/30/2012 8:52 am

WASHINGTON -- Fresh off a triumphant victory in the South Carolina primary, former Speaker Newt Gingrich came to Florida with the wind at his back. What he may not have known was that he would be riding those winds into a wall of money. A newly feisty Mitt Romney, fighting for his political life, and his loyal super PAC unloaded on Gingrich in the Sunshine State with a massive spending binge that included wall-to-wall attack ads in a repeat of the assault that knocked Gingrich from the top of the polls in the run-up to the Iowa caucus.

The biggest spender in Florida -- the most expensive state in the Republican primary to date -- has been the pro-Romney super PAC Restore Our Future. Run by a trio of former Romney advisers, the group has spent $10.7 million in the state. The vast majority of that -- $9.9 million -- has gone into a barrage of ads, on television and radio, and direct mail attacking Gingrich. That's more than double what pro-Gingrich super PAC Winning Our Future is spending in Florida.

This is the opposite of what happened in South Carolina, where Winning Our Future was able to match the spending of Restore Our Future and provide Gingrich with room to win.

In total, according to a report from ABC News, the Romney campaign and his super PAC are outspending Gingrich and his allies by a margin of 4 to 1 on television. NBC's First Read reported that the total advertising spending between the two campaigns and their respective super PACs is above $22 million.

To put that in perspective, the 2008 Republican primary election saw only $10.64 million spent on broadcast television ads, according to the Campaign Media Analysis Group (CMAG). That spending was done by only three campaigns -- Rudy Giuliani, John McCain, and Romney -- and no outside groups.

The negativity of the ads has ramped up as well. Pushing this trend is the Romney campaign, which has abandoned its positive, American optimism campaign for a sharper contrast with Gingrich. The move to a contrast campaign has found Florida television viewers subjected to a variety of attacks on the former speaker.

Gingrich "cashed in" with Freddie Mac, the pro-Romney ads say, while "Florida families lost everything in the housing crisis." Despite mentioning conservative demigod Ronald Reagan more than fifty times in the debates, one Restore Our Future ad notes that Reagan only mentioned Gingrich once in his diaries. A Spanish language radio ad notes that Gingrich once called Spanish the language of the ghetto.

All of these ads have played into the lines of attack used by Romney in recent televised debates in Florida. Perhaps to deflect attention away from the debate over his tax returns, Romney made hay out of Gingrich's work as a consultant for the failed mortgage lender Freddie Mac by calling the speaker an "influence peddler." The ad mentioning Reagan came after Romney teased Gingrich in a debate in Charleston, S.C., by informing him that Reagan had only mentioned him once in his diary.

The result, along with two lackluster debate performances by Gingrich, has been a roller coaster ride in the polls. Gingrich shot up in the Florida polls as he was winning South Carolina's primary, but rapidly sunk after the Romney's campaign and super PAC blanketed in the state with ads, while Romney came to life as a candidate in the debates by attacking Gingrich.

The Gingrich campaign and super PAC, meanwhile, spent much of the past week misfiring their attempted attacks on Romney. Their efforts to tie Republican-turned-Independent former Gov. Charlie Crist to Romney fell flat. So did an attack on Romney as anti-immigrant after Sen. Marco Rubio, who is neutral in the primary race, stated, "This kind of language is more than just unfortunate. It’s inaccurate, inflammatory, and doesn’t belong in this campaign."

Another Gingrich ad, released on Friday, used a clip of former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee (R) saying, "If a man's dishonest to get a job, he'll be dishonest on the job," before launching into a brutal attack on Romney as a "liar." Huckabee cut the ad off at the knees by issuing a statement saying, "Any use of an out-of-context quote from the Republican presidential primary four years ago in a political ad to advocate for the election or defeat of another candidate is not authorized, approved, or known in advance by me."

The Gingrich super PAC's spending has also failed to reach levels reported in the press. They have only reported spending $3.9 million to the FEC, despite numerous press reports stating an intention to spend over $6 million. That spending could still materialize and the Friday evening release of a new documentary savaging Mitt Romney for allegedly profiting from a company that was engaged in a massive scheme to defraud Medicare could presage a new push to even the fight for the air waves.

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
 
 
  • Comments
  • 5,417
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (107 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PeacefulRevolution
VOTE PEOPLE!
11:21 PM on 01/30/2012
I'm not mad at government.

I'm mad at corporations!

They are trying to steal our freedom. Not the government!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PeacefulRevolution
VOTE PEOPLE!
11:18 PM on 01/30/2012
Treating people like chattel has never worked.

Corporations, are you listening?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PeacefulRevolution
VOTE PEOPLE!
11:17 PM on 01/30/2012
People made these corporations.

$$ will not save their lives. We can. But will we?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PeacefulRevolution
VOTE PEOPLE!
11:17 PM on 01/30/2012
Not this time. Rs.

The people are awake.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PeacefulRevolution
VOTE PEOPLE!
11:15 PM on 01/30/2012
Note to the R party.

You better take the people of every country seriously.

You need us more than we need you.
photo
Wall Str33t
Science is not a liberal conspiracy.
11:42 AM on 01/30/2012
Nice pic.

I like how Republicans always put their hands over their wallets when hearing prayers.
11:37 AM on 01/30/2012
It would be interesting to know the tally of BIG money that is pouring into these campaigns and then we should all ask ourselves why we seem to have an issue with taxing the rich and big business!! We probably could have put a big dent in our deficit after all is said and done!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ronp121
11:00 AM on 01/30/2012
All the money spent by the secretive super pac is astronomical just to take control of the primary and put the right politician in the winning position. Then comes the Presidency and the money will flow big time then. We all know who really is going to pay for all this and that is the tax payer. The end game will be bail us out for the great campaign we ran for our fellow republicans. Guess they will just have to take a little more from us to pay for these idiots. Remember the rich didn't get rich by paying their own way. They have us for that.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dclintn648
Conservatism is dread
09:03 AM on 01/30/2012
These Republican candidates are so despicable, I truly believe that President Obama could beat them with one dollar!
photo
hiredshoe
Why did the least qualified get elected
09:25 AM on 01/30/2012
He seems to think it'll take a billion of them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dclintn648
Conservatism is dread
09:01 AM on 01/30/2012
Why do the media NEVER ask these Republican candidates why it is that they can't just promote their own positive message, instead of attacking the other guy. They have NOTHING to offer America if you're not white, rich and well-connected. So their ONLY HOPE is to make people mistrust the other guy.

Good luck with that in the general election, guys! You might find people who don't like President Obama's policies, but there is NOTHING negative that they can say about his character!
photo
hiredshoe
Why did the least qualified get elected
09:35 AM on 01/30/2012
The media believes it's their job to get Barry reelected,witness Wolf's performance the other night!
07:44 AM on 01/30/2012
Pray, let us hope this unbridled vomiting of money shall be Ill spent &
indeed FAIL in it's intended purpose
07:41 AM on 01/30/2012
Never has so much been spent on one with so little to offer.....
09:02 AM on 01/30/2012
You must be talking about the Obama administration. You are so right. The spending and borrowing has produced nothing. One would think that if you spend to invest, that would at least have started a wave of growth. It didn't, and yes, we all must pray.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gaspar Ramsey
Licensed Curmudgeon, Hammer of Reason
01:05 PM on 01/30/2012
Go pray for enlightenment. You are in dire need of it.
photo
MarcDel
What a child should never see
07:40 AM on 01/30/2012
Nineteen debates, millions of dollars spent on bombing the opponent and I've never heard any plan to improve the economy. Both say they created jobs, one in the private sector, the other by legislation.
That's all we hear. No positive image of the future........just so negative. Maybe they both have stock in Prozac
photo
hiredshoe
Why did the least qualified get elected
10:00 AM on 01/30/2012
Four years,trillions of dollarsof debt added,over two million jobs lost ineptitude,and arrogance,abound,we've seen his plan,or lack thereof,and now has the insolence to believe,he should be reelected.It's going to be Obama's fault for the next three generations!
photo
MarcDel
What a child should never see
01:33 PM on 01/30/2012
Yeah let's go back to Bush economics which seems to be Romney's plan. Reduce high income taxes. Balance the budget on the middle and lower classes. Deregulate everything so we can have another "bubble" and maybe an oil spill. Sounds like Bush economics on steroids
07:33 AM on 01/30/2012
Myself I wouldn't even consider voting Mitt, but wonder when he does lose because conservative voters like me stay home, is he gonna try and run agian... If his money couldn't get him to the top last time he must know it's not meant to be.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WestSeattle8
O futuro é agora.
07:14 AM on 01/30/2012
If you watch the movie on Mitt, it is pretty powerful. My guess (and the best possibility for Romney) is that Romney, in managing the company was only concerned about making money that he wasn't aware of the fraud going on. When he did discover it, instead of reporting it or doing anything about it, he sold the company for a profit and let someone else take the fall. This being the best possible explanation for Romney doesn't say much for his ethics, or do much to change the narrative that he doesn't care about people but only money. The alternative to this line of thinking is that he was well aware of the fraud and didn't care because he only cared about money. Either way, good luck with this one Mittens.