iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Union Membership Sees Slight Boost In 2011 After Years Of Decline

Union Membership 2011

By SAM HANANEL   01/27/12 04:35 PM ET  AP

WASHINGTON -- Union membership grew slightly last year, giving labor leaders hope that a period of steep declines has finally bottomed out.

The number of unionized workers increased by about 50,000 to nearly 14.8 million members in 2011, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported Friday. The increase comes after unions lost nearly 1.4 million members over the previous two years.

Still, unions' share of the overall workforce fell, from 11.9 percent to 11.8 percent, as state and local governments trimmed thousands of jobs to address budget shortfalls. That's the lowest percentage of union workers since the Great Depression in the 1930s.

Unions saw losses of about 61,000 workers in government employment. But they grew by 110,000 workers in the private sector, mainly in construction and health care. Despite that growth, unions still represent just 6.9 percent of all workers at private companies, unchanged from 2010.

"The devastating losses from 2009 and 2010 have stopped and that's got to be good news for the labor movement," said John Schmitt, a senior economist with the Center for Economic and Policy Research in Washington.

Schmitt said another positive for unions is that private sector membership grew at about the same rate as overall job growth.

Union membership has declined steadily from its peak of about a third of all workers in the 1950s, and about 20 percent in 1983. The losses have been especially steep in private industry with the loss of manufacturing jobs that traditionally are heavily unionized.

"It is telling that as our country begins to recover the jobs lost during the Great Recession, good union jobs are beginning to come back," said AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka.

As private sector union membership eroded, labor leaders turned increasingly toward workers in state and local governments, where there was often less resistance to organizing. About 7.6 million employees in the public sector belonged to a union last year, compared with 7.2 million union workers in the private sector. And public-sector workers had a union membership rate of 37 percent, more than five times that of private-sector workers.

But future public sector growth in union membership is in doubt.

States and municipalities laid off tens of thousands of workers to balance their budgets after tax revenues plummeted because of the recession. Public sector unions also have faced growing hostility from GOP legislatures in Wisconsin, Ohio and other states that have tried to curb collective bargaining rights.

Florida saw the largest increase in union members last year, up 68,000, followed by Michigan, a 44,000 increase as auto industry employment surged. Union membership fell most sharply in New York, down 53,000.

New York remains the most heavily unionized state at 24 percent, while North Carolina has the lowest union rate at 2.9 percent.

Among full-time wage and salary workers, the median weekly earnings of union members was $938, compared to $729 for nonunion workers.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Union membership grew slightly last year, giving labor leaders hope that a period of steep declines has finally bottomed out. The number of unionized workers increased by about 50,000 t...
WASHINGTON -- Union membership grew slightly last year, giving labor leaders hope that a period of steep declines has finally bottomed out. The number of unionized workers increased by about 50,000 t...
Filed by Jillian Berman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 191
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
11:21 AM on 01/30/2012
How is the UAW helping auto workers? New workers that used to make $25/hour are now making $15/hour. Yet, the $15/hour person still pays union fees. Is it really worth it. Before unions, Henry Ford used to pay his workers top dollar.
photo
webwzrd
Reality is liberal indoctrination
02:24 AM on 01/30/2012
I hope this is the start of the comeback for American labor and the middle class. Thank you Republicans for the Pearl Harbor on hard working Americans that woke the sleeping giant, and by that I mean US.
09:44 PM on 01/29/2012
You have a choice - collective bargaining or individual begging. We need strong unions as a counter weight to corporate greed.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
HST
Conservatism = selfishness
07:46 PM on 01/29/2012
In 1935 the Fair Labor Standards Act enacted by Franklin Delano Roosevelt, a man reviled by the right, established a 40 hour week, an 8 hour day, overtime pay, the minimum wage and the eliminatio¬n of child labor. Also in 1935 “Old Age, Survivors and Disability Insurance” was enacted but the title was changed to Social Security when unemployment insurance was added.

In 1945, the Veterans Administration bill provided college tuition aid, low cost home loans and medical care to WWII vets, who then created the baby boom, a major demographic and population increase, whose population we are now confronted with.

During the 40’s, 50’s, 60’s and 70’s, when the boomers were entering adulthood, we had a fairly stable economy driven by the consumption of cars, appliances and homes by the vets and then the boomers. The economy was stable but boring.

In the 50’s, Eisenhower began a large stimulus and deficit spending program that gave us jobs and the Interstate Highway system.

During that time our work clothes changed from dungarees, to blue collars, to pink collars to white collars. Manufacturing jobs were plentiful, wages were high due to unions, society was stable, it seems life was comfortable.

Then Reagan entered the scene and those that were against Social Security and the Fair Labor Standards Law in 1935, who reviled FDR, began their attacks that continue today.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
billw8017
History looks like this
12:48 AM on 01/30/2012
Republicans have long opposed labor unions. The Taft Hartley Act of 1947 amended the 1935 labor law to undermine the closed shop. Together with the rise of consultant companies, it marks the beginning of the decline of the American labor movement. Oddly enough, Sear -- now in the news -- was a major factor in popularizing such consultancies, giving out some of their first contracts and recommending them to suppliers.

The virtual abolition of the NRLB in the Bush II administration did pretty well finish the New Deal labor programs. The Labor Dept actually distributed directions to evade wage and hour laws which only now are required to be posted in work places again.
01:24 PM on 01/29/2012
"Florida saw the largest increase in union members last year, up 68,000..."

That is good for President Obama. He will have more foot soldiers to help him win Florida in 2012.
12:09 PM on 01/29/2012
The US really needs some countervailing power to balance the hijacking of government by corporate interests.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RCnDC
If U Dont Live Ur Life Being Born, U Live It Dying
11:50 AM on 01/29/2012
CEO's and other executives are protected, despite being in their favored right to work states, by employment agreements that guarantee them millions upon millions, free health, car service, relocation and outright house purchases, laundry, assistants, meals, profit sharing, lifetime pensions over what social security will pay them also... the list is endless...

What are union members "promised?" and what is their real company foot print over that of the CEO's and executives who are running these companies in to the ground? What's the difference? Please......
photo
WhoIsNoOne
What I need is a Micro-Brew-o
11:43 AM on 01/29/2012
Perhaps people are realizing that, for a healthy economy,
there needs to be a balance between labor and capital.
the only way to balance out corporate power is for the
labor to band together.
When the balance swings (in either direction) the economy will
suffer.
11:10 AM on 01/29/2012
As an employer, the simple idea that a workforce would show up one day and tell me they are going to unionize, in this economy, would be laughable. I am not forcing you to work here. I am not breaking any laws. I am not putting you in any danger. I am paying you a market wage for your services, which you have agreed to and can cease at any time. Your response is to attempt to for a collective (read: gang) to threaten me and my business at, effective economic gunpoint.

My response, if you want to organize, you better be perfect, otherwise you will be terminated. If you actually succeed in organization, I will simply close shop, reform the business, and open up in another geographic location.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RCnDC
If U Dont Live Ur Life Being Born, U Live It Dying
11:43 AM on 01/29/2012
Okay, now to reality..

I wonder if this report includes CEO's and other enormously compensated executives who are also unionized in the form of, despite being in right to work states, an employment contract where they still get paid millions, 10s and 100s of millions even when they don't reach their benchmarks and who get paid millions upon millions more when they are "forced" to separate from their companies? I wonder how much these white collar unions cost a company over costs of a blue collar union member? I suppose you think that right to work laws should only apply to the "little" people and not the ones who are actually driving these businesses out of business because of their poor performance..
07:07 PM on 01/29/2012
There is a huge difference between individuals negotiating for themselves and when a union uses thug tactics to shut down a business when they don't get their way.
12:13 PM on 01/29/2012
You couldn't have formulated better why some countervailing power is direly required.
08:55 AM on 01/29/2012
My father was a coal miner, who worked his way up to Superintendent with one company. He saw
both sides of the Union issue and said it would always be a "Pendulum Effect". As unions began to decline and management took over, the workers begin to suffer. When the workers take back their power, unions will become stronger. I believe we are at that point now.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cerdayes
GOP demography-pale,stale&male
10:09 AM on 01/29/2012
the same thing can be said about capitalism and socialism, you need a balance of the two, yin yang.
12:18 PM on 01/29/2012
Socialism doesn't work, but I guess you mean social policies which is something quite different though the GOP intentionally confuses these terms. The current imbalance results in extreme concentrations of wealth and income on one side and for a so called developed country also obscene levels of poverty. Some 50 million people have to rely on food stamps. You can hear the fabric of society tearing apart.
10:59 AM on 01/29/2012
Maybe in a closed loop, but those times are passed. In the past you had to hire americans because of foreign trade, now, the company can just find a foreign labor source just as easily.

As for the public sector, no way. The taxpayer is broke, states are broke, taxes are too highly already, public employees better buckle up, going to be a rough ride for them.

Should be interesting when Illinois pension fund runs out of cash in 2014.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Elyriaohio
Stop the Monarchy
08:23 AM on 01/29/2012
Compassionate conservatism has crushed the American dream. As a result, Unions will get more members.
photo
intolleft
ObamaTAX...getting you shovel ready
09:12 AM on 01/30/2012
Compassionate conservatism is progressive.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
justanothergrandma
finding my way
04:11 AM on 01/29/2012
I grew up with a dad who was management, so you can imagine how 'we' felt about unions. But before he died (1990) dad said to me "you used to get a job and grow old working there, but companies don't care anymore. If you want a raise you have to find another job at higher pay because you're not gonna get it staying where you are." So, I think he might have changed his mind eventually.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cerdayes
GOP demography-pale,stale&male
10:15 AM on 01/29/2012
my father as union all his life, my father in law was not. their retirements are total opposites, my union father is financially stable, my non-union father in law struggles. Same pay same, years of service same just about everything, i attribute the diffence to the union benefits.
10:59 AM on 01/29/2012
Until the union collapses along with the pension fund.
04:04 AM on 01/29/2012
So how many Americans believe, or still believe, that NAFTA was a good thing for America?
How many union members think contributing union dues to the campaign funds to politicians all these years was a good idea?
How many union members think union dues should be used for recruiting new members and educating their own members and the public about the good the unions have been to Americans?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Angie Daniels
Nerd, Democrat, PFLAG, taxpayer, animal lover.
03:13 AM on 01/29/2012
this is because the only arena to get decent health care is through unions.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
aacme
My micro-bio is on a strict need-to-know basis.
07:36 AM on 01/29/2012
That says a lot, doesn't it?
12:22 PM on 01/29/2012
Collective bargaining power required.

Though not closed shops.
photo
SteveDenver
Progressive and liberal, just like Jesus Christ.
11:37 PM on 01/28/2012
Scott Walker: Union Organizer of the Decade!
11:32 AM on 01/29/2012
LOL Already a fan.
12:27 PM on 01/29/2012
Agree, Walkers extreme antics have actually mobilized a true counter movement. Clearly Koch brothers lacked the historical perspective and by aiming to extend the kind of power they enjoy within their conglomerate to within society they overplayed their hand most spectacularly. The backlash is promising to be spectacular too though its long overdue.