Andrew M. Lankler, Attorney For Greg Kelly, Has History Of Avoiding The Spotlight

JENNIFER PELTZ   01/28/12 12:54 PM ET   AP

NEW YORK -- When the police commissioner's TV host son found himself facing a rape allegation, he turned to a lawyer with a reputation for handling high-profile cases with low-key know-how.

Andrew M. Lankler has represented people ranging from Bernard Madoff's auditor to the owner of a construction crane that collapsed and killed two people. But look Lankler up in news archives, and the words that often follow his name are "declined to comment" outside court.

Now Lankler is involved with the investigation that's been the talk of the city this week: a probe into whether Greg Kelly sexually assaulted a woman after they went out for drinks in October. And Lankler is choosing his words carefully, saying in the only statement he or anyone else has made on Kelly's behalf that the "Good Day New York" co-host and son of Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly strenuously denies any wrongdoing and that the investigation will clear him. No arrests have been made. The probe began after the woman went to police this Tuesday.

Lankler brings a straightforward, un-showy savvy to the legal questions and publicity storm surrounding Kelly, colleagues say.

He's a "lawyer with impeccable judgment in a case that calls for good judgment," said Paul Shechtman, who has worked with Lankler on cases including the forthcoming manslaughter trial of the crane owner and his company.

A founder of a firm that specializes in white-collar criminal defense, Lankler is a second-generation presence on the New York legal scene. His now-retired father, Roderick C. Lankler, was a special prosecutor investigating corruption in the city's criminal justice system in the 1970s and later worked under Robert Fiske, the original independent counsel for the Whitewater probe during the Clinton administration.

A graduate of George Washington University and its law school, the younger Lankler spent six years in the 1990s working in the Manhattan district attorney's office, which is conducting the Kelly probe. Police quickly saw a potential conflict in investigating a son of Commissioner Raymond Kelly.

Lankler "has a lot of credibility ... and knows how to make decisions that are in his client's best interest" in dealings with the DA's office, said Isabelle A. Kirshner, a fellow criminal defense lawyer who has worked with him on some cases.

Lankler also served as the inspector general of the Battery Park City Authority, which oversees a swath of lower Manhattan, among other posts before helping launch Lankler Carragher LLP in 2002. He and his wife have two teenage sons.

Lankler has tackled a number of criminal cases arising from the construction industry, including a racketeering case against a powerful carpenters' union leader, who ultimately pleaded guilty, and a nearly three-month-long trial of a concrete testing laboratory and some executives. They were charged with faking results for ground zero's signature skyscraper and other landmarks.

The case required defense lawyers to master extensive records and building-code complexities – and to contend with the balance, in any multi-defendant trial, between working together and advancing individual clients' interests, Shechtman recalled. He represented Testwell Laboratories Inc.'s president while Lankler represented a vice president.

"I knew that I could completely rely on Andy's word, that he was going to represent his client zealously but he wasn't going to do things behind my back," Shechtman said. Both their clients were convicted of racketeering and other charges and have appealed.

Lankler's other clients have included longtime Madoff auditor David Friehling, who made a cooperation deal with prosecutors and pleaded guilty to securities fraud, and former art gallery director Leigh Morse. She was convicted of selling works that belonged to four artists' estates without telling them, but she was acquitted of a more serious grand larceny charge that specifically involved the estate of Robert De Niro Sr., the actor's artist father.

The trial made headlines, especially when the Academy Award winner testified against Morse last March. But Lankler, with cordial no-comments, didn't try to seize the limelight.

"His primary goal is protecting the client, not seeking publicity for himself," says Susan Hoffinger, a defense lawyer who has known Lankler since both were prosecutors.

___

FOLLOW HUFFPOST NEW YORK

NEW YORK -- When the police commissioner's TV host son found himself facing a rape allegation, he turned to a lawyer with a reputation for handling high-profile cases with low-key know-how. Andrew M.
NEW YORK -- When the police commissioner's TV host son found himself facing a rape allegation, he turned to a lawyer with a reputation for handling high-profile cases with low-key know-how. Andrew M.
NEW YORK -- When the police commissioner's TV host son found himself facing a rape allegation, he turned to a lawyer with a reputation for handling high-profile cases with low-key know-how. Andrew M.
NEW YORK -- When the police commissioner's TV host son found himself facing a rape allegation, he turned to a lawyer with a reputation for handling high-profile cases with low-key know-how. Andrew M.
Filed by Christopher Mathias  |  Report Corrections
 
 
  • Comments
  • 19
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
UnknownSolider
10:16 PM on 01/30/2012
This case needs a prosecutor from outside of New York, and any trial needs to be held outside of the New York area.

Its easy to win a case when you have a major local newspaper trashing the victim everyday, and when the owner of the Newspaper is also the defendants boss. Not to mention the defendants dad is the Police Commissioner. 
08:19 AM on 01/31/2012
This woman reports the rape months after the fact. I have a problem with that. I believe this woman is a liar. I hope she is held acountable for her false accusation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
UnknownSolider
09:01 AM on 01/31/2012
(A) How do you know when this woman tried to report this event? Are you sure she didn't go to precinct or attorney's office. Did it ever occur to you that people may be afraid to go after the Police Commissioner's son for fear of retaliation. (B) What evidence do you have that none of the rest of us have that proves this woman is making a false allegation? (C) Do you think it is ethical for the defendants boss to run stories about this victim because he owns a newspaper, with contacts inside the Police Department that provides protection for the owners Head Quarters? What do you know outside of what you have read or heard about reported by the defendant's bosses Newspapers? What are you basing your conclusion on. This case needs to be handled by authorities outside of New York, too many conflicts of interest. All that being said the defendant is INNOCENT until PROVEN guilty.
02:01 PM on 01/30/2012
What some women will do.
â– Young women report rape to cover up truancy, pregnancy, lost money or sexual precocity.
â– Adult women report rape to cover up infidelity, indiscretion, lateness or pregnancy
â– A rape is reported so that the survivor can obtain an abortion or the morning-after pill free of charge.
â– Women report rape to “obtain revenge†and power and controll over a man who has “in her mind done her wrong,†or to make her partner “feel guilty†after a “lover’s quarrel.â€
■Girls lie about rape all the time, for reasons “known only to [themselves]
08:28 AM on 01/30/2012
Empirical evidence does not support the widespread belief that women are extremely unlikely to make false accusations of male sexual misconduct. Rather the research on accusations of rape, sexual harassment, incest, and child sexual abuse indicates that false accusations have become a serious problem. The motivations involved in making a false report are widely varied and include confusion, outside influence from therapists and others, habitual lying, advantages in custody disputes, financial gain, and the political ideology of radical feminism.
08:17 AM on 01/30/2012
Begin with evidence of false accusation of rape, the crime which has become not only the metaphor for all cases of sexual misconduct but for male sexuality itself. Alan Dershowitz (1991), for example, has further harassed his students by telling them that an annual F.B.I. survey of 1600 law enforcement agencies discovered that 8% of rape charges are completely unfounded. That figure, which has held steadily over the past decade, is moreover at least twice as high as for any other felony. Unfounded charges of assault, which like rape is often productive of conflicting testimony, comprise only 1.6% of the total compared to the 8.4% recorded for rape.

Consult also a recent development, DNA testing, which is now becoming routine in rape investigations (Krajik, 1993). Also routine is the discovery that a third of the DNA scans produce non-matches. Consequently, a growing number of men are not only gaining acquittals but are also being released from prison. As with all rape statistics, these figures need careful scrutiny. Police investigators warn, for example, that a mismatch proves innocence only when the DNA could have come from no one but the assailant and its profile or makeup doesn't match the suspect's. Even so, the DNA tests, primarily a prosecutorial weapon, have now been added to the arsenal of defense attorneys, and more evidence of false allegation is appearing.
08:12 AM on 01/30/2012
Believing the self-proclaimed victim of sexual misconduct has thus evolved from ideological conviction to legal doctrine and, in some jurisdictions, into law. California now requires that jurors be explicitly told that a rape conviction can be based on the accuser's testimony alone, without corroboration (Associated Press, 1992; Farrell, 1993). Canada is proposing that a man accused of rape must demonstrate that he received the willing consent of a sexual partner.

These new rules rest on the assumption that women do not lie because they have no motive to lie. Consequently, as Jenkins (1993) states, the question of the "victim's credibility" has now become "crucial."

http://www.ipt-forensics.com/journal/volume6/j6_2_4.htm
06:15 PM on 01/29/2012
This is not about the lawyer, it's about the victim. This article explains why Kelly and his lawyer should be ashamed: http://apleblog.com/2012/01/28/rape-shield-statutes-%e2%80%93-shield-or-sword/
08:02 AM on 01/30/2012
The victim is the man in this case. This woman made a false rape claim. Remember the Duke case.
10:33 AM on 01/30/2012
even remembering the duke case [even a broken clock is right twice a day; not ALL those boys were TOTALLY innocent], but getting back to this: kelly is most likely quite innocent of these charges and it is most unfortunate that his reputation, future career moves, etc. have been so damaged by the media onslaught. however, until we know for sure that this woman has made a false rape claim, maybe cessation of masturbating our brains would help. lots of people have been to college. such long winded, erudite, condescending posts. ESCHEW OBFUSCATION.
12:56 PM on 01/29/2012
I will let you figure out where this is all headed....
02:20 PM on 01/29/2012
So glad you have wrapped up the case without hearing from BOTH sides.

I guess you just saved the taxpayers a bundle. Good for you.

Commence eye rolling...now.
06:29 PM on 01/29/2012
I am glad you have reached your conclusion too.....now go commence yourself in an appropriate manner, pal.
photo
phal4875
The world is run by cats; we just feed them.
04:48 PM on 01/29/2012
Wherever this goes, Greg Kelly's reputation is probably shot.
06:30 PM on 01/29/2012
Reputation?....as a giggling TelePrompTer reader?...