iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Senate Democrats To Push 'Buffett Rule' Bill This Week

Buffett Rule Millionaires Tax

First Posted: 01/30/2012 6:55 pm Updated: 03/02/2012 11:29 am

WASHINGTON -- Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) announced Monday that he will unveil "Buffett Rule" legislation this week. President Barack Obama highlighted the need for such a measure at the State of the Union this month and will likely continue to call for it throughout his presidential re-election campaign.

Whitehouse is expected to introduce the Paying a Fair Share Act on Wednesday. His proposal would codify the "Buffett Rule," named after billionaire Warren Buffett: It would require people who make more than $1 million to pay a 30 percent effective tax rate. Tax loopholes now allow some of the wealthiest Americans to pay lower tax rates than people in the middle class.

"Our tax system is long-overdue for reform," materials from Whitehouse's office stated. "In his State of the Union address, President Obama proposed adding to the tax code a 'Buffett Rule,' which would ensure that millionaires and billionaires pay at least the tax rate paid by middle-class families. Senator Whitehouse's Paying a Fair Share Act would codify that proposal, bulwarking the system against gimmickry and abuse."

The reality is that Whitehouse's bill stands next to no chance of becoming law. Republicans overwhelmingly oppose it and Senate Democratic aides said privately they don't expect GOP support for it. Democrats could try to roll it into a larger package to pick up some Republican support but that still doesn't guarantee passage. Republicans have instead put forward a proposal that would allow wealthy people to voluntarily donate more in taxes to help pay down the national debt.

Having the Whitehouse bill out there does serve a singular purpose, however: It gives Democrats another tool for selling their election-year message that they are fighting for the middle class as Republicans side with the wealthy.

Between now and November, Obama will be traveling the country pitching the "Buffett Rule" and generally a message of economic fairness. His State of the Union address stressed this theme, which has also run through all his recent presidential and campaign speeches. Buffett's secretary Debbie Bosanek was even a guest of the First Lady at the State of the Union.

Buffett has made the case that people as rich as he is should pay higher taxes and pointed out that Bosanek pays a higher effective tax rate than he does. He even called out Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) for proposing that rich people only voluntarily pay more in taxes, saying that was "a tax policy only a Republican could come up with."

Related on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) announced Monday that he will unveil "Buffett Rule" legislation this week. President Barack Obama highlighted the need for such a measure at the State o...
WASHINGTON -- Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) announced Monday that he will unveil "Buffett Rule" legislation this week. President Barack Obama highlighted the need for such a measure at the State o...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,197
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (15 total)
06:56 PM on 04/16/2012
I am discusted with the democracts who voted against the Buffet Rule. I am doublely discusted with the republicans who did also. This is the will of the American citizens again being ignored. On their opinions for justice of taxing those that put us in the debt middleclass citizens are paying for.
photo
Diskatopia
Zarathustra Sings the Blues
05:43 PM on 03/29/2012
Correcting post below, hit return to fast...
"2) The top 10% includes upper middleclass people, not just wealthy (includes incomes of about $80,000)... and the buffett rule only applies on income above $1million (a fraction of the top 1%ers)"
photo
Diskatopia
Zarathustra Sings the Blues
05:40 PM on 03/29/2012
Average Joey,
1) "percentages of all income taxes" paid is a meaingless stat. Of course people who make all the money pay more of the total tax revenues.
2) The top 10% is upper middleclass people, not wealthy
The stat that matters is effective tax rate. The effective tax rate (percentage of their income they pay in federal taxes) of the Forbes Top 400 (avg. income $350million or so) is 17%.

17%, which is a much lower effective rate than even the lower wealthy (those making say $150,000 to $400,000 a year) and even upper middleclasses pay.
09:20 AM on 02/08/2012
Let us do away with the hyperbole and speculation. Disclose the facts:
1. Top 1% of taxpayers pay 37% of all income taxes
2. Top 10% of taxpayers pay 67% of all income taxes
3. Bottom 50% of taxpayers pay less than 2% of all income taxes
4. Top Income tax rate is 35%. Already promoting inaccurate information & math
5. Fairness is the Top Half of taxpayers paying +98% of the taxes while the other half pays less than 2%? So, the Top half should pay more?
6. Mr. Buffet’s company owes +$1 billion in back taxes (less than 1% of the market cap of the firm) but refuses to pay the IRS since 2002
7. Check out Mr. Buffet’s hypocrisy. He wants other to pay more taxes while he dodges billions. Why did he not lead by example and donate his money to the Treasury and/or pay his “fair share”?
http://www.forbes.com/sites/greatspeculations/2011/08/17/how-buffett-saves-billions-on-his-tax-return/
8. Mr. Buffet & his secretary propose a nation-wide tax policy based upon
their tax returns but refuse to disclose the same returns to the public for confirmation? Mr. Buffet is all about financial disclosure and objectivity in his business but not for a nation-wide tax changes?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kevamy
08:30 PM on 02/01/2012
The fact that this should even be an issue is absolutely absurd. It is immoral for these "christians" to do everything to keep from paying their fair share and while they love to tell us how horrible this country is doing they won't pay more to help this country.
07:06 PM on 02/01/2012
Jennifer: Since when is telling the truth being abusive? The House is made up of people who
are against everything! The President has tried to pass bills that would help all of us !
So what is abusive about truth? Lady DJ
06:50 PM on 02/01/2012
I am totally for the Buffett Rule legislation. The president has presented an idea that is long
overdue. I truly hope it passes both the House and the Sente. Of course the House will be the
"stick in the mud" crowd because they want to be. So everybody let's pounce on our congressional
and senatorial members and let them know what we want!!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
drhooper
Hurting people...hurt others
06:48 PM on 02/01/2012
I was just watching Rev Al....If you want to sign the petition for the Buffet Rule, go to www.buffettrulebill.com which will take you to a petition on the White House webpage.

http://www.whitehouseforsenate.com/act/advocate-for-our-issues/buffett-rule
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
mrJJ
如果你不投票,你不能抱怨
06:22 PM on 02/01/2012
Make the Buffett Rule a Reality

http://www.whitehouseforsenate.com/act/advocate-for-our-issues/buffett-rule
05:30 PM on 02/01/2012
I wonder why this "Buffet Rule" sounds so absurd to some of us? Could it be because Warren Buffet refuses to pay millions $$$ he owes in taxes in spite of the fact that his tax rate is only 15%? I would not be surprised if there is a 'special provision' in the 'Buffet Rule' which would specifically exempt Buffet from paying a single cent in taxes! There is nothing stoping either Buffet or anyone else from paying as much as they wish in taxes, but a good starting point it to PAY WHAT YOU OWE FIRST BE =FORE YOU GO AROUND CLAIMING YOU WANT TO PAY MORE! Obama, start by making Buffet, Gaithner, Pelosi, and all Democrat millionaires and billionaire tax cheats pay what they owe!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kevamy
08:33 PM on 02/01/2012
Why don't you tell your boy Romney to pay more. He can definitely afford it. If he wants to be President of this country he needs to get his money out of overseas banks and put it in this country and pay his fair share in taxes. If not then we DON'T WANT HIM AS PRESIDENT OF THIS COUNTRY.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mudshark12
Now who are you jiving with that cosmik debris?
11:36 PM on 01/31/2012
If you like the Buffett Rule and wish to petition your Senator to sign it then click on the link below:

http://leftaction.com/action/tell-congress-vote-buffett-rule
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ennis438
07:08 PM on 01/31/2012
The anti-American Republicant junta again raises its ugly head by denying fat cats to pay their fair share and instead , make the middle class pay for their useless wars and welfare for the Koch Brothers. The stink in this junta grows more intense every day.
05:37 PM on 02/01/2012
Your anger is ignorantly misdirected. How about asking Obama to make Buffet pay the millions he owes in taxes, which he has been refusing to do and is still fighting? Or how about asking Obama to make sure that all Democrat tax cheats like Tim Gaithner pay back what they refused to pay? Or how about asking Democrats to remove the many exemptions they have written for themselves in every tax increase, such as Nancy Pelosi specifically exempting her husband's businesses?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ennis438
10:10 AM on 02/02/2012
Having Buffett pay and not the Koch's? Just have Dem tax cheats pay and not Republicrooks? Eliminate Dems exemptions and not Republicrooks exemptions? Guess you are fine with this Republicant destruction of the American way. Maybe you should join them at the 51st state. THE MOON!!!!!!!
01:32 PM on 01/31/2012
Is there a place where I can see Warren Buffets tax information? Would like to know how much advantage he gets from the turbines and wind mills that his company has investment in.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
cjus2473
Few men have virtue to resist the highest bidder
01:52 PM on 01/31/2012
he has made his taxes available...he pays just what the other folks pay - he is an advocate for changing the system and making him pay more...he is not going to send a check in to appease those on the right who think he should donate money to pay down the debt and allow their friends to skate this issue...
02:05 PM on 01/31/2012
All I have seen are the end results, not the actual forms of how the results were formulated. Could you please let me know where the actual tax information is found? And by the way, I wish he would pay more in taxes to show others how to follow his lead.
09:19 PM on 01/31/2012
TO:
there are 10 senators in congress-a­ll of whom are paid by the taxpayers.­..why don't you start with them first - most are dems - like me

But they have already shown their returns (as they are forced to do) the top two Republicans and the next 7 Democrats all had to show their returns. Buffet willingly inserted himself into this issue so why not show the whole form. Truly, his involvement in the Solar and Wind Energy arenas are of interest. It would be interesting to see if any personal deductions were involved from his companies involvement. Also, it would be interesting to see if there was a personal involvement in GE after his company's investments in turbines and his promotion of GE in the Media. Since he has drawn attention to the issue and is a Public Figure, it would be interesting to see his personal involvement in the issues and politics of his empire on a personal level.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cruisedoc
Physician, centrist, independent (x-dem)
04:28 PM on 01/31/2012
What's funny is people have now asked to see his secretary's returns. Turns out she is no ordinary secretary and makes about $350k. You'd think the WH would vet this 1st - they obviously didn't. She's a 1%er, and they parade her as the avg. working Joe ....or Jane.

What's even funnier is with that income I'm sure she has investments, on which SHE pays 15% cap gains.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dawn2dusk
REALLY!?!
06:22 PM on 02/01/2012
didn't mean to fav this comment.

Sorry to inform you...$350k a year is NOWHERE near being in the 1%. As you just demonstrated, most people can't even comprehend how much the 1% rake in.

She is more like a 10%er
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dawn2dusk
REALLY!?!
06:24 PM on 02/01/2012
You can open a Charles Schwab online investment account with as little as $50.00 and begin investing immediately.

let's stay focused
01:14 PM on 01/31/2012
you on the right wonder why the rest of us feel we are bearing the brunt of the taxes the rich escape from then think about this. Ruper Murdoch, mister fox network and many other news medias payed an accumulative 6% taxes for 4 years of returns. And hears another one for you I just saw.http://www.social-europe.eu/2011/07/how-murdochs-news-corp-pays-no-taxes-and-gets-money-from-the-us-government/
You Republicans don't stand a chance in the election
photo
Hanover Fiste
guilty as a cat in a goldfish bowl
01:00 PM on 01/31/2012
In order for this double tax argument to work it has to be assumed corporations are people and once the corporate tax is paid anything left is essentially tax free money to be distributed. If a corporation is a separate entity and it sure is for all purposes of LIABILITY then the company pays it's taxes and individuals who make profit pay theirs, even if it came from the taxed corporate coffers. Also since dividends are optional. Somehow I find it difficult to listen to the investor class argument ( those who have seen the most gain in income) of how unfair the tax code is. Considering the top 40 companies in America pay zero taxes and rake in billions the argument the money was even taxed once is in question.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cruisedoc
Physician, centrist, independent (x-dem)
01:13 PM on 01/31/2012
Bogus argument. May I suggest econ 101 - available at a college near you. The corp is owned by the stockholders. They collectively pay corp taxes, then are taxed again as indiv at cap gains rates.

This will never pass, even with dems. I absolutely promise you if it did, we would get less revenue. Already it is NOT advantageous to invest in America - this would make it rediculous to even consider it. You DON'T promote econ growth and investment by doubling taxes on investments.

Besides, run the numbers - it won't even dent our deficit. It may make a few libs feel good, but investment will FLY overseas - absolutely no doubt.

In fact, you can tax the rich at 100% and it won't cover our deficit for 1 year.
photo
Hanover Fiste
guilty as a cat in a goldfish bowl
01:18 PM on 01/31/2012
Oh course it is a bad argument for you. I'll tell you what since corporations are people the next time one gets in trouble I want all the investor to also declare bankruptcy and have their homes and assets seized and auctioned off. Corporations are people you know and vendors deserve to be paid.
photo
Hanover Fiste
guilty as a cat in a goldfish bowl
01:26 PM on 01/31/2012
One last thing.."investments will fly overseas"... tell me when to stop laughing.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jesvey
01:22 PM on 01/31/2012
And then of course when all investment takes place overseas you will be complaining, "why aren't people investing in America anymore", "why are jobs going overseas", why this, why that.
photo
Hanover Fiste
guilty as a cat in a goldfish bowl
01:28 PM on 01/31/2012
"Investments going overseas".... like I wrote for Cruzeguy..tell me when to stop laughing.
photo
Hanover Fiste
guilty as a cat in a goldfish bowl
03:16 PM on 01/31/2012
The guy who founded Papaya Restaurants in NYC had an interesting statement on his wall. It reads something like this. " There will always be those who will find a way to do things cheaper". Since I don't care to live in a hut you do the math.