iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Janet Napolitano: Homeland Security, Economic Security Go 'Hand-In-Hand'

Napolitano

Posted: 01/30/2012 4:22 pm

WASHINGTON -- A top administration official on Monday signaled that the focus of homeland security in 2012 would shift in emphasis to business and the economy.

"Simply put, our homeland security and our economic security go hand-in-hand," Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano said in a speech at the National Press Club. "Security measures should, to the greatest extent possible, be designed to facilitate the safe and efficient movement of people and goods while securing our critical infrastructure."

In a wide-ranging "State of America's Homeland Security" address, the nation's third homeland security chief touted her department's achievements on everything from disaster response to a gradual lifting of screening procedures at airports. But with Osama bin Laden out of the picture and a 2012 election that will likely hinge on the economy, Napolitano made clear the administration is looking for ways to better balance security with commerce so that neither are overly compromised.

Since the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, Napolitano said, "we have learned a great deal about how to better secure our country, but we remain aware of how a successful terrorist attack or natural disaster can inflict economic damage beyond its human toll."

The secretary spoke soon after returning from the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. There, before the world's business movers and shakers, she announced the Obama administration's plans to develop a new global strategic plan to guard the international supply chain from terrorist attacks and disruptions.

"No one understands the need for security more than the business community, where one break in the supply chain can put an entire company at risk," said Napolitano, whose department is working to ensure foreign countries and companies adhere to U.S. air cargo security standards. "We will foster an all-of-nation approach to leverage the critical roles played by state, local, tribal and territorial governments, and private sector partners in strengthening supply chains; and we will enhance our coordination with the international community and international stakeholders who also have key supply chain roles and responsibilities."

The evolution in focus for DHS comes as the agency is also fine-tuning how it conducts intelligence. Napolitano's predecessor Michael Chertoff recently told a Capitol Hill committee that it is time for the department to reduce its focus on foreign enemies and find new ways to work with the private sector and local governments so it can protect critical infrastructure from homegrown threats.

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- A top administration official on Monday signaled that the focus of homeland security in 2012 would shift in emphasis to business and the economy. "Simply put, our homeland security an...
WASHINGTON -- A top administration official on Monday signaled that the focus of homeland security in 2012 would shift in emphasis to business and the economy. "Simply put, our homeland security an...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 86
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
dimitrius
Resurrecting Jeffersonian principals in the 21st
01:17 PM on 02/07/2012
Barack Obama 2008: "I wan't a domestic military force that's just as strong, just as powerful, and just as well funded as our military abroad."

Sounds like he wants to re-create 1984.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
dimitrius
Resurrecting Jeffersonian principals in the 21st
01:15 PM on 02/07/2012
Where's this new multi-billion dollar bureaucracy that secures and protects our Bill of Rights and Constitution!?

Oh right....
04:40 PM on 02/01/2012
The job they do, protecting america, isn't that what the military is for?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
yeti7
don't need no stink'n badges
10:16 AM on 02/04/2012
not within its' borders
10:51 AM on 02/04/2012
That's false, they absolutely could, they just can't be housed with citizens. The only reason the military doesn't do it is because then America would look like a Fascist police state, so what do they do? just change the uniforms and give them a less threatening name.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Dosadi
Political agnostic
07:32 PM on 02/07/2012
Uh, we have our military already stationed within our borders. They go to work every day within our borders. Some of the men flying the drones are sitting within our borders while they control them.
04:35 PM on 02/01/2012
Bazillion dollar waste.
My magical shoes keep terrorists away. Don't believe me? do you see any terrorists around? exactly.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheSarge
Armed Crawdad BodyGuard
06:51 PM on 02/01/2012
My shoes quit working when I was in Dubai, make sure you check the batteries.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jill Press
11:28 AM on 01/31/2012
I take this to mean that Janet is tacitly admitting that she was doing a national disservice by going hand in hand with bigots and the anti-immigration mob, while ignoring genuine threats to national security.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mater
mater
06:19 AM on 01/31/2012
Dept of Homeland Security--wasn't Tom Ridge the Head of that per Pres. Bush? And didn't even Mr. Ridge wind up leaving with a shake of the head, roll of the eyes? I understand there are thousand of huge containers which are put on ships, which come over here all the time, which could hold criminals, or potatoes. Instead of groping people before they get on airplanes, perhaps those containers should get a closer search. And maybe, people will start flying less, driving more--gas to drive is still cheaper than plane tickets, just takes longer, but one can put whatever they want into their underwear.
smo1111
President Obama - The greatest One
03:30 AM on 01/31/2012
Oh..........I thought I was going to read that she is proposing dismantling DHS to save taxpayers money and reduce the deficit and debt.
04:37 PM on 02/01/2012
you are speaking logically, and clearly, in manner that is easily understood. The government politely requests that you please stop.
smo1111
President Obama - The greatest One
07:39 PM on 02/01/2012
LOL.........oh........again.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
yeti7
don't need no stink'n badges
08:22 AM on 02/04/2012
They are expanding to the Interstate highway system now, get ready for traffic stops (check points-your papers please)
02:49 AM on 01/31/2012
Sounds like Obama wants to ensure offshoring and free trade with communist China run smoothly. Basically Democrats believe in making sure China is the future. So they will tax you to fund our military to protect the supply chain around the world to factories in communist China.
11:25 PM on 01/30/2012
She has been a disastrous homeland security chief.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
yeti7
don't need no stink'n badges
08:23 AM on 02/04/2012
and a bad hair cut-what's with that?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:03 PM on 01/30/2012
from 2012 to 1984
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
beartrack
Follow the track, find the bear ?
09:49 PM on 01/30/2012
Here's a shift for you. Disban the whole department. The DHS was a knee-jerk reaction to Bush's failings. It has done nothing that actually does anything to protect the homeland. Now they want to get into other things to justify the money they are wasting.
photo
planetjeffy
On the other hand, you have different fingers.
09:48 PM on 01/30/2012
how about getting rid of the orwellian name - homeland security
02:48 AM on 01/31/2012
Just change it to "Defense", and eliminated the Department of War (which has been hiding behind that name for the last 60+ years). You'll wonder where the deficit went...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
yeti7
don't need no stink'n badges
08:24 AM on 02/04/2012
Department of State Security
photo
planetjeffy
On the other hand, you have different fingers.
05:50 PM on 02/04/2012
Department of Love?
photo
Sabrae
Talk to the paws.
09:43 PM on 01/30/2012
"No one understands the need for security more than the business community, where one break in the supply chain can put an entire company at risk," said Napolitano "

So, now our bloated and wasteful defense department is going to use our tax dollars to support corporations?
Why not just hand them the country, and we'll all find somewhere else to live?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
UnknownSolider
09:05 PM on 01/30/2012
Hey GW Bush did really need a whole new wing of the Federal Government to monitor people getting on an airplane........... Couldn't the Dept of Justice handle this. 

It will take an act of congress to get rid of this beauracratic nightmare
08:00 PM on 01/30/2012
At the airport, you have private citizens getting on privately owned (FREE ENTERPRISE) airplanes. It should fall on the airlines to provide security for their airlines, not the government.