JACKSONVILLE, Fla. -- At a Monday morning rally at the Hyatt Regency Riverfront in Jacksonville, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich sharply condemned the Obama administration's recent decision not to exempt religiously-affiliated groups from a rule requiring employers to offer birth control coverage to the women they employ.
"The Obama administration is engaged in a war against religion," he said.
The rule always exempted employers such as churches and other places of worship whose primary purpose is imparting religious beliefs. But many religious groups argued it was too narrow and should apply to religious-affiliated organizations as well. The Obama administration disagreed, but it gave these employers an extra year to comply with the new law.
"Their decision last week that they would impose on every Catholic institution, every Jewish institution, every Protestant institution, the Obamacare standard of what you have to buy as insurance is a direct violation of freedom and religion -- an example of the increasingly dictatorial attitude of this administration," Gingrich said.
"Cardinal Timothy Dolan has said this is a direct assault of freedom of religion in America and a complete violation of our First Amendment rights," he added, referencing objections of the new rule by the Catholic Church, of which Gingrich is a member. "On the first day that I am president, I will issue an executive order repealing every aspect of infringement upon religious liberties in America at that moment."
Dolan is currently archbishop of New York and president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops. He will soon be elevated to cardinal. In the wake of the Obama administration's decision on the rule, Dolan has said he felt "a sense of personal disappointment."
"I had to share with him that I was terribly let down, disappointed and disturbed, and it seemed the news he had given me was difficult to square with the confidence I had felt in November," Dolan said of a phone conversation he had with the president on the issue.
On issues of women's reproductive rights, Gingrich supports defunding Planned Parenthood and has said he would back a federal personhood amendment defining life at conception.
Take a look at candidates' stances on issues of women's reproductive rights:
Former Gov. Mitt Romney (R-Mass.)
1 of 6
FIRST SLIDE
PREVIOUS SLIDE
NEXT SLIDESHOW
Romney's position on abortion and other women's health issues switched from pro-choice to anti-choice during his term as governor from 2003 to 2007, and his record on choice-related issues is mixed. He vetoed a measure that would have allowed pharmacists to dispense emergency contraception without a prescription to rape victims, but he signed into law a measure to expand family planning services for low-income women and families in Massachusetts.
Romney was also one of the few GOP candidates who refused to sign the Susan B. Anthony List's pro-life pledge, because his camp said it could have some "potentially unforeseen consequences." But he believes abortion should only be legal in cases of rape, incest or to save the life of the mother, and he said if he were president he would support the reversal of Roe v. Wade.
"This is not the time for the Republican Party to put up a candidate who is weak on the pro-life issue or has a history of flip-flopping over it," Bachmann said of Romney at a National Right to Life convention in June.
Romney said as president he would defund Planned Parenthood, and then took it even further saying he'd "get rid of that" altogether.
Romney's position on abortion and other women's health issues switched from pro-choice to anti-choice during his term as governor from 2003 to 2007, and his record on choice-related issues is mixed. He vetoed a measure that would have allowed pharmacists to dispense emergency contraception without a prescription to rape victims, but he signed into law a measure to expand family planning services for low-income women and families in Massachusetts.
Romney was also one of the few GOP candidates who refused to sign the Susan B. Anthony List's pro-life pledge, because his camp said it could have some "potentially unforeseen consequences." But he believes abortion should only be legal in cases of rape, incest or to save the life of the mother, and he said if he were president he would support the reversal of Roe v. Wade.
"This is not the time for the Republican Party to put up a candidate who is weak on the pro-life issue or has a history of flip-flopping over it," Bachmann said of Romney at a National Right to Life convention in June.
Romney said as president he would defund Planned Parenthood, and then took it even further saying he'd "get rid of that" altogether.
Former Gov. Mitt Romney (R-Mass.)
1
/ 6
SHARE THIS SLIDE
Romney's position on abortion and other women's health issues switched from pro-choice to anti-choice during his term as governor from 2003 to 2007, and his record on choice-related issues is mixed. He vetoed a measure that would have allowed pharmacists to dispense emergency contraception without a prescription to rape victims, but he signed into law a measure to expand family planning services for low-income women and families in Massachusetts.
Romney was also one of the few GOP candidates who refused to sign the Susan B. Anthony List's pro-life pledge, because his camp said it could have some "potentially unforeseen consequences." But he believes abortion should only be legal in cases of rape, incest or to save the life of the mother, and he said if he were president he would support the reversal of Roe v. Wade.
"This is not the time for the Republican Party to put up a candidate who is weak on the pro-life issue or has a history of flip-flopping over it," Bachmann said of Romney at a National Right to Life convention in June.
Romney said as president he would defund Planned Parenthood, and then took it even further saying he'd "get rid of that" altogether.
OKLAHOMA CITY — A once-powerful Washington figure himself, Newt Gingrich pledged Tuesday to state lawmakers in Oklahoma that he'd shrink the role of the nation's...
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- The debate over President Barack Obama's new contraception-coverage rule has been largely been considered through the frame of religious liberties, federal authorities...
By David Gibson Religion News Service (RNS) The White House has surprised observers and disappointed some liberal allies by signaling that it is willing to...
Sarah Palin gave her two cents Tuesday regarding a religiously-charged piece of the Affordable Care Act's contraception rule. On Jan. 20, the Obama administration announced...
By Rick Jervis USA Today NEW ORLEANS (RNS) From Maine to Arizona to southern Louisiana, Catholic churches across the country echoed with scorn for a...
WASHINGTON -- The caffeinated, rapid-fire GOP presidential primary is about to ease into a slower pace and a more spread-out map, creating new challenges for...
This week, Rick Perry closed out his presidential run while Newt Gingrich's second ex-wife claimed he'd wanted an open marriage -- and President Obama brought down the house at the Apollo by revealing his heretofore hidden inner-Al Green. Meanwhile, Mitt Romney, unable to counter the hardening narrative that he's a tone deaf, out of touch mega-millionaire, didn't help matters with his response to being asked about his tax returns. When you are being booed for lack of financial transparency by a GOP debate crowd, odds are you've probably royally screwed up. It's never a good idea -- and especially not this year -- to be seen as completely out of touch with the economic concerns of ordinary Americans. Perhaps as he hobbles into Florida, he'll be helped by a shadowy new super PAC, Rich Kids for Romney (see the group's first ad here).
Stop-at-nothing radicalism is dangerous for the GOP because most Americans recoil from it. It's also dangerous for America. We need two political parties solidly grounded in the realities of governing. Our democracy can't work any other way.
Fortuitously, if Newt Gingrich does indeed declare his presidential candidacy, we'll already have a blueprint for his campaign available, which he published last year as a direct challenge to Barack Obama.
I was stunned to read E.J. Dionne's column in the Washington Post today denouncing a decision that should instead be lauded, especially by those of us who care about religious freedom, women's health, and economic fairness.
Although there are differing religious views on the use of contraception, it should be up to women to decide on whether and when to use contraception based on their own beliefs and needs.
Actually Newt, I suspect your multiple infidelities, ethics violations, and greed are a bigger affront to religion than anything Obama's done in the last 4 years.
This bloated and pervy Keebler Elf needs to go back to Fox and an audience that takes him seriously.
solar_diablo: Actually Newt, I suspect your multiple infidelities, ethics violations, and
So does the same rules go for the men that use condoms? This is a form of birth control, are the women the only ones making babies by themselves. It takes two to make this fetus, so why are only men making the decisions for us women. What's good for the goose, is good for the gander... Hello
Toniifit: So does the same rules go for the men that
as usual newt is full of it. when doctors take their oath, it is to the craft of healing and serving people, not god or a church. if a doctor or hospital says no i won't write prescriptions for the pill, what's to keep them from saying no, i won't treat jews, or gays. they took an oath. if they can't abide by that oath, then become something else
Hawklord_Tst: as usual newt is full of it. when doctors take
I agree 100% Muswell. As a Catholic, I wonder if Newt and Calista were married in the Catholic Church and if so, how much did they have to pay off the priest who married them. I checked a conservative Catholic internet site and they too were troubled by Newt's conversion to the Catholic Church and Calista being able to remain Catholic relative to Newt's being divorced twice before. As far as holding the Catholic hospitals to the same standards as any other employer, what is wrong with that? They are not being "attacked" for being a religious entity but rather being treated like any other employer. Surely the opposition doesn't insist on "special rights" for these hospitals do they? Hmmmmm "special rights" where have I heard that before...
Lemon_Stern: I agree 100% Muswell. As a Catholic, I wonder if
What I don't understand is why the Republican party seems to be going out of its way to alienate anyone who doesn't hold extreme conservative views on every possible issue. At what point did driving most of the country's population toward the other party due to lack of options start to seem like a good idea?
Copper236: What I don't understand is why the Republican party seems
The real war against religion in the USA began when the Constitution refused to make any religious thought dominate in the new nation. I am happy to leave it in history where it belongs, so bye, bye force religion on the people supporters like Newt.
Watching_rock_grow: The real war against religion in the USA began when
More Huffington junk journalism and more airheaded responses. The issue is one of Obama fascism compelling religious institutions to finance all forms of birth control including abortion. The airheads who said it’s the insurance companies that pay not the religious bodies clearly learn their economics from Obama and Huffhead “journalists.”
Employers finance insurance in accord with whatever terms both parties agree on. Such terms are none of the business of Obama fascism.
bveritas: More Huffington junk journalism and more airheaded responses. The issue
And the Catholic hospitals have no business refusing paid access to contraceptives to non-Catholic employees. The church's are exempt. The church owned hospitals and other employers are not. If the Catholic women don't want to get contraceptives, they don't have to.
cam1002: And the Catholic hospitals have no business refusing paid access
What do you mean by "paid access?" Nice attempt at bluffing yourself. The terms of private employment are subject to private agreement. Government has no business imposing terms of a private contract.
bveritas: What do you mean by "paid access?" Nice attempt at
WHY is it an assault against freedom of religion?? A woman has the right to NOT ASK for birth cotrol doesn't she?....... No one is trying to force someone to use birth control.... It is up to the individual....
yahooserious: WHY is it an assault against freedom of religion?? A
Absolutely. Religious hospitals also hire women not of their particular religion, so they shouldn't get the birth control paid for by insurance either? It's not the hospital that is providing the birth control. It is the insurance co providing the coverage.
cam1002: Absolutely. Religious hospitals also hire women not of their particular
Ah but you are assuming that the lesser of god creation (aka woman) is capable of making her own decisions...after all she is to submit to male authority...she needs the pope and other members of the clergy to make that decision for her fraile mental self (sarcasm)
JoyC124: Ah but you are assuming that the lesser of god
Is there anything that the conservatives can do without screaming WAR! This made up war on religion is the new buzzword. Just like 'job creators', it will be overused until they move on to something else. They know that they can't win on merit. They have to prey upon the fears and exploit the religious beliefs of their base to get votes. Cowards.
Coffee4Me: Is there anything that the conservatives can do without screaming
This shouldn't effect any religious organization. If their religion forbids birth control then I am sure these religious women won't use the option at all! Doesn't cost a thing if you're not using it!
erinbliss: This shouldn't effect any religious organization. If their religion forbids
Hey, extreme religious right republicans why don't you work on reducing unwanted pregnancies and abortions by making sure women have access to birth control?!
Mytwocentstoo: Hey, extreme religious right republicans why don't you work on
Sandra Day O'Connor quoted "we have a candidate who practices polygamy and isn't even a Mormon."
Gingrich wants to profess Obama waging war against Catholics. Where does this #(%(#*% thrice married adulter turned catholic get off on throwing stones?
Nuf said.
ricnaustin: Sandra Day O'Connor quoted "we have a candidate who practices
Doesn't easier access to birth control lead to fewer unwanted pregnancies which in turn leads to fewer abortions? If you really are pro-life, you should be handing out condoms and b-c pills like they were peppermint candies.
damikli2: Doesn't easier access to birth control lead to fewer unwanted
First Posted: 01/30/2012 11:10 am Updated: 01/30/2012 12:24 pm