iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

President Obama's Pro-Choice Birth Control Decision Draws Praise From Religious Leaders


First Posted: 01/30/2012 7:21 pm Updated: 01/30/2012 7:30 pm

ORLANDO, Fla. -- A group of religious organizations Monday thanked President Obama for his administration's recent decision on contraception, hoping to bring attention to religious pro-choice voices and to show that not all people of faith disagree with the new law.

Seven religious leaders from the Jewish, Unitarian, Baptist and other faiths addressed a letter to Obama and Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius. All are members of the Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice, a which includes more than 40 denominations and faith groups to promote education and issues of reproductive choice

"We believe that all women deserve access to affordable birth control, regardless of their employer, and we hope that, in the future, HHS will expand the same preventive coverage to women across the board," they wrote in the letter, obtained by The Huffington Post.

"As clergy, we are committed to upholding the important goals of reproductive justice and health, empowering women and men to make decisions about whether and when to have and bear children within their own moral and religious tradition, and assuring them the means and ability to raise their children in a safe and healthy environment. Access to reproductive health services recognizes a moral value embraced across the religious spectrum. We thank you for your decision supporting the fundamental value of reproductive health to women and families."

The new rule stems from the Affordable Care Act. Most women employed in the U.S. will have the cost of their birth control covered with no co-pay, effective Aug. 1.

The rule exempted employers including churches and other places of worship whose primary purpose is imparting religious beliefs. But many religious groups argued it was too narrow and should apply to religious-affiliated organizations as well. The Obama administration disagreed, but it gave these employers an extra year to comply with the new law.

The Rev. Matthew Westfox, the organization's director of interfaith outreach, said the letter was intended to thank the Obama administration for its decision, and to provide an alternative religious voice, since so much attention had been put on opposition to the rule by some Roman Catholic organizations.

"What a lot of the press has been reporting is that all religious groups are opposed to this -- which is just categorically untrue," Westfox said. "We really wanted to make clear that on behalf of ourselves and thousands of people of faith and clergy and religious organizations across the country, that we stood in support of this decision. We think it's really important to know that many people of faith are supportive of this and have been supportive of access to birth control and individual people being able to access their conscience in support of health care."

Perhaps the loudest voice opposing the Obama administration's decision has been the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops. After Sebelius issued the administration's decision, New York Archbishop Timothy Dolan, president of the U.S. Conference, said he felt "a sense of personal disappointment."

"I had to share with him that I was terribly let down, disappointed and disturbed, and it seemed the news he had given me was difficult to square with the confidence I had felt in November," Dolan said of a phone conversation he had with the president.

Read the letter:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
ORLANDO, Fla. -- A group of religious organizations Monday thanked President Obama for his administration's recent decision on contraception, hoping to bring attention to religious pro-choice voices a...
ORLANDO, Fla. -- A group of religious organizations Monday thanked President Obama for his administration's recent decision on contraception, hoping to bring attention to religious pro-choice voices a...
ORLANDO, Fla. -- A group of religious organizations Monday thanked President Obama for his administration's recent decision on contraception, hoping to bring attention to religious pro-choice voices a...
ORLANDO, Fla. -- A group of religious organizations Monday thanked President Obama for his administration's recent decision on contraception, hoping to bring attention to religious pro-choice voices a...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3,424
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (28 total)
  1 of 2  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
Cacey 02:44 PM on 01/31/2012
Of course the President is correct in this decision. We as citizens have every right to know with absolute assurance that the actions taken by medical professionals are take in the best interest of the patient and what the patient wants and needs. A pharmacist for example has no right to deny methods of contraception to anyone, male or female, who can legally purchase such items. A doctor has not right to  Read More...
08:37 PM on 02/11/2012
Good grief! You mean there are people who call themselves "religious" besides Catholics and Evangelicals?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
OLJW00
right is right
10:32 PM on 02/06/2012
Eastwood WAS right. It is halftime in America... We're just going to change the Quarterback for the second half.
02:40 PM on 02/03/2012
K, i know this has probably been said, but i feel that it bears repeating: religious institutions that primarily employ only their people will be exempt. However, if you are a business only affiliated with a religious organization, you will not be exempt.

Meaning: i am doctor who is employed by St. Francis Hospital. Obviously, it is a religiously affiliated hospital. However, i am not catholic. This means that St. Francis' insurance provider must offer me the option to get contraceptives for no cost to me.

Therefore, MY first amendment rights rightly supercede any religious interference.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
OLJW00
right is right
10:29 PM on 02/06/2012
Using rights to force others into submission...even when it FORCES them to go against the very core of their belief system and PAY for it. Hmmm?

Interesting, wrong, scary, and dangerous...
12:00 PM on 02/07/2012
So you're saying that a church has more rights then an individual? Thats screwed up.
12:01 PM on 02/07/2012
I bet you think corporations are people too.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sammi 56
11:04 AM on 02/08/2012
Absolutely!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tquin
01:59 PM on 02/01/2012
The price of this decision will be told in November. Goodbye Obama.
madame48
NO..it's a gop Cookbook !Tempus edax,homo edacior
03:44 PM on 02/01/2012
misanthrope alert.!!!!!! how dare the president give a damn about the needs of women?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
OLJW00
right is right
10:31 PM on 02/06/2012
Weak....

Forcing others to pay for said coverage does not DENY anyone anything. Women still have access to it - they just have to pay for it. If they don't like it - then DON'T work for a religious organization.

BTW - Tquin is correct. This is the proverbial nail in the coffin.
photo
bpdarling
Party of LOGIC and COMMON SENSE
03:44 PM on 02/01/2012
The program is already paid for...... THANK YOU President Obama.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Larry Motuz
More prayers, fewer preyers.
01:16 PM on 02/01/2012
Civil liberty is based on the idea, first, that people have inherent rights to make responsible decisions for themselves while pursuing their goals through life; and, second, that their freedom to act on these is, in fact, the heart/basis of civil liberty.

Religious liberty is based on he idea that people may practice one's faith and act in accord with their conscience.

Civil liberty enjoins and protects this religious liberty to a limit. That limit is reached when the claim to religious liberty places at risk the abilities of other people to make responsible decisions for themselves in accord with their goals through life.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lady1genius
No se puede tapar el sol con un dedo
01:29 PM on 02/01/2012
Very well put. As I stated in another post, religious liberty is not without limits. A muslim still cannot have more than one wife. A rastafarian cannot smoke cannabis. One cannot do absolutely "anything" and claim it's a practice based on religion and one of those things is discriminate against women.
Nobody's right to practice his religion is being denied here.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Larry Motuz
More prayers, fewer preyers.
01:34 PM on 02/01/2012
Thank you, Lady1genius. Without civil liberty there can be no religious liberty. History has shown that time and again.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wonder Woman2
Whats a micro-bio?
12:04 PM on 02/01/2012
Obama chose right here. He put a womans right to be free of religious principles she does not agree with over an organization. Regardless as to what our Supreme Court said about corporations having the same rights as people, they don't trump the personal right to seek medical care.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Larry Motuz
More prayers, fewer preyers.
11:20 AM on 02/01/2012
"A free people must be able to exercise their inherent rights to make responsible decisions for themselves while pursuing their goals through life.

In a free and democratic society, neither who employs them nor where they are employed can be
permitted to substantially impair those responsibilities and liberties. Insisting that others bear risks they would choose not to bear is both an impairment and a denial of liberty.”

Others have no inherent right to do such things.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rcott1019
09:02 AM on 02/01/2012
The Catholic Church is upset about medical coverage covering contraceptives. First, what makes them think that a large segment of their flock isn't already using them? Second, I doubt that all of the employees of Catholic hospitals are catholics, and they deserve to be allowed to make a choice. Just because the coverage is there doesn't mean they have to use it, but they should be able to choose. While the church says they don't ask patients if they're catholic before they receive care, they want to impose their beliefs on their patients. Rome hasn't figured out that its believers have more sense than their religious leaders when it comes to deciding what is best for their own families.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wonder Woman2
Whats a micro-bio?
12:05 PM on 02/01/2012
90% of Catholic women/couples use contraceptives.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lady1genius
No se puede tapar el sol con un dedo
02:43 PM on 02/01/2012
Of course they do. And it's been that way for as long as I can remember. And I'm not a spring chicken.
09:51 PM on 02/01/2012
Wrong. 98% of Catholic women have used artificial birth control at some time in their lives.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sammi 56
11:12 AM on 02/08/2012
The Catholic doctrine must not be working - a large portion of Catholics use birth control and have been for years and years. Women are not breed cows. I did when I was Catholic and had I not, I would have had 10 kids and probably dead. I quit the catholic church--too big of a price to pay.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nettwench
Dedicated Truther!
08:53 AM on 02/01/2012
This is excellent. However, I have seen almost no coverage of this in the news, and especially not about the base of support from other religious leaders. Doesn't fit into the 10 second soundbite, I guess.
BritishColumbian
American/Canadian liberal
11:36 AM on 02/09/2012
The MSM is too lazy to actually research and do follow up before they spout off and are more interested in enflaming an emotional partisan controversy . They have decided that the President was wrong, that it will cost him in the election and that he will have to backtrack even though none of that is the case.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RS
I think, therefore, I don't listen to Limbaugh
11:41 AM on 02/09/2012
“The MSM is too lazy to actually research and do follow up before they spout off and are more interested in enflaming an emotional partisan controvers­y."

Here's the reason why:

emotional partisan controvers­y = INCREASED RATINGS
INCREASED RATINGS = MORE $$$$ FROM ADVERTISERS
MORE $$$$ FROM ADVERTISERS = SATISFIED PARENT COMPANY SHAREHOLDERS

'Nuff said.
06:24 AM on 02/01/2012
Thanks for the reference to the Gutmacher Institute, shall look at that. May i remind you that language means something in intelligent human conversation. IF a baby is conceived, and intentionally destroyed, that is not birth control, as the phrase is normally used. It is birth PREVENTION before the fact, IF conception occurs it is control of whether the baby is allowed to be born, not quite the same meaning. I follow the global scene. We are well aware that desperation, poverty, fear, threats real or perceived from the baby's father, or Daddy or the Pimp of the, "babies having babies" prostitutes, college kids wanting to stay in school, are quite common. Ridding the world of its "undesirable" ethnic minorities, you know the history of Margaret Sanger and her racism, and of course pushing abortion worldwide which is this half-Kenyan, half Caucasian POTUS and his team, Ms Clinton as Ses. of State are quite obviously aimed at the non-Caucasian populations of Africa, India and elsewhere. SLA VERY was legal in the 1800s but people eventually saw that legal does not equal moral and it ended. Pl. P'' hood makes big US dollars on its abortion services, drying up as people are waking up to that in a down economy..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nettwench
Dedicated Truther!
09:46 AM on 02/01/2012
You have got to be kidding! Hilary Clinton travels the world addressing the needs of women in backwaters like Afghanistan. She wants to better the lives of women all over the world. This nonsense you are spouting is some kind of crackpot conspiracy theory. Saying that planned Parenthood makes money on abortion is ludicrous, although I have seen congressmen lying through their teeth, in congress, that all Planned Parenthood does with 100% of it's funds is provide abortions. It is really sickening to see your own government representatives perpetuating some religious agenda through hyperbole and deliberate misinformation. They don't seem to get it that providing decent health care for women is what's really happening. You have to ask yourself - why do these men deliberately lie about a service that is probably the only access to reproductive health care that many women have? Do they actual care about women's lives and health? No - it's much more important to pander to the religious conservatives who voted for them.
11:28 AM on 02/01/2012
It is so important to walk carefully through a mine-field. I am not living in the USA. I taught the Humanities hence my interest. One can, as Mrs Clinton does, promote women's rights and health BUT spoil that by pushing abortion as a solution to their needs and presuming that there are too many babies. There are too many greedy people, and governments spending money on weapons while their people starve or need schools and hospitals and clean water. Pl P'hood makes money on abortions and that is their money making work, which includes not telling women the truth and fighting every law and suggestion they get told the truth. Do they offer other services , of course but so do not-for-profits who also support, feed and clothe and educate the mothers who are often afraid. The Pl. P'hood "counselors" prey on that, I know because an adopted grand-daughter told me what lies they fed her. and many former abortion centre workers and mothers who regret the destruction of their babies are speaking out worldwide. I have no control over the inner workings of the mind of ;politicians who oppose abortion but I can see the half-truth and outright lies of those who favour abortion. Those who opposed slavery in its day were not exactly the Guests of Honour at the tables of the slave owners and slave boat owners of England and the US at the time. They were right of course. ..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lady1genius
No se puede tapar el sol con un dedo
02:50 PM on 02/01/2012
I'd like YOU to remember that words have meaning. A "conception" does not a pregnancy make, no matter how loudly you scream that it does. The fate of some 70% of zygotes under natural conditions (no hormonal contraception being used) is to be flushed down the toilet with the woman's next menstrual cycle. Therefore a woman isn't pregnant at the moment of conception, and it's more likely than not that she won't be, no matter what.
Pregnancy begins at the time of implantation, and until such time, no "abortion" is possible. So no contraceptive can rightfully be called abortifacient simply because you have chosen to "move the goalposts" in the middle of the game. I believe in contraception. Abortion, not so much, but I can't make that decision for anyone but myself.
08:13 AM on 02/02/2012
Conception is when the M and F elements unite. What happens after that is up to the body and or outside interference. Check the MEDICAL facts please on the types of birth prevention available today. Some are abortifaciens or may be. Check the R U 4 - "morning after". Ms Sibelius recently forbade them over the counter for children under a certain age. That is USA news we get from sites that monitor what is going on worldwide with every moral-political topic that affects humans, and even some for animals that are being illegally abused.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
patrick klocek
... takes more than combat gear to make a man
10:32 PM on 01/31/2012
WOOOOW, Jews and Unitarians supported the measure. Together they represent about 3% of the population. Catholics, on the other hand, represent about 25% and they are spittin' mad. Nice try, Barry!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
reading2009
Down the rabbit hole and through the looking glass
11:41 AM on 02/01/2012
Most American Catholics use contraception. And if you read the article you wouldn't see that ALL Catholics are mad about this. Just the Church....and they do tend to have some messed up policies.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
patrick klocek
... takes more than combat gear to make a man
07:55 PM on 02/01/2012
The Bishops made their statement. Catholics are obliged to at least try to follow the rules. If they don't like the rules they are free to become protestants.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wonder Woman2
Whats a micro-bio?
12:07 PM on 02/01/2012
Sorry but its the bishops who are spewing dissent not the Catholic faithful. And since those bishops don't play the game they shouldn't get to make the rules.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nautilus55
09:34 PM on 01/31/2012
Obama has bit off more than he can chew this time
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lady1genius
No se puede tapar el sol con un dedo
10:02 PM on 01/31/2012
I seriously doubt that. Women use contraception and they vote. Women love this.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nautilus55
10:13 PM on 01/31/2012
Cardinal Mahoney of Los Angeles who is usually supportive of Obama came out against Healthcare rule. He has a lot of clout- dont be so sure that this wont hurt Obama big time
11:15 PM on 01/31/2012
I knew there was a reason I fanned you. ;o)
10:05 PM on 01/31/2012
Oh, how so?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
No1Liberal
09:25 PM on 01/31/2012
While Catholics are against birth control, they seem to be all for child molestation! Just ask the Padres!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lady1genius
No se puede tapar el sol con un dedo
10:33 PM on 01/31/2012
Please don't mistake the Catholic Hierarchy for the Catholic laity. Back in MY day, 30 years ago, married couples were already thumbing their noses at the pope regarding contraception, and likely before that time. Guess what? They aren't going to start listening to him now. We're now a full generation (or more) into routine flouting of Catholic reproductive dogma, and people are leaving the church in droves. The hypocrisy is just wearing thin.
The old saying evolve or face extinction comes to mind. The whole sex abuse scandal isn't helping the church's image too much either.
12:54 AM on 02/01/2012
Lady1genius sorry but as a young Catholic who is loyal to His Church, and just one in a new generation of rising orthodox Catholics, I can tell you we are not going anywhere. If you wish to be unfaithful and heterodox while following the world and it's whims you've made your choice, don't drag the rest of us into the mud. There is much work to be done and if you don't want to be part of it, well Christ said it best "broad is the way that leadeth to destruction, and many there are who go in thereat. "
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sammi 56
11:23 AM on 02/08/2012
Correct.
06:45 AM on 02/01/2012
Sick comment. Why not check your 2000-2011 public schools, not go back fifty years for a small percentage of catholic clerics. Check with your rabbinic groups, protestant clergy and youth directors who of course do not have central stats. as the RCC does and are not the target of the darling soooooooooo balanced media. Yea, "Play dirty for me Misty-" Eyes.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sammi 56
11:24 AM on 02/08/2012
You are rambling--
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
CTtransplant
We don't stop playing because we grow old, we grow
05:21 PM on 01/31/2012
I am so glad we have the separation of Church and State.
04:36 PM on 01/31/2012
Catholicism is one of the more backwards superstitions. Technically the bible offers no guidance on this but if you want more Catholics filling your coffers just add more chapters to the fairy tale and have it come down from the mountain by a tired old man in funny garb to give it legitimacy. As with all of this reproductive stuff if your superstition is against it don't do it but stop trying to make the rest of the world live by your nonsense when your own history leaves you with little credibility on such matters!
05:17 PM on 01/31/2012
Actually we are not. H&HS is dictating for all what is Not Acceptable to some. And you might want to check the factual wording of the first Amendment

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;"

I would say that alone places H&HS at odds with the Constitution.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SirGigglehead
NRA-Nat'l Rimmers Assoc
05:40 PM on 01/31/2012
Where exactly does this decision prevent believers from "exercising" their beliefs? It simply doesn't. The church does not pay taxes because, it is argued, to pay taxes would open the church to the possibility of influence from the state. Fair enough. However, when the church engages in activities which are not inherently religious, in other words, are also done by those with no religious profession or purpose, that puts them in the secular world and the tax-exempt status based on religion no longer applies.
If a person, based on religious belief, wants to forgo any medical treatment or procedure, that is well within their rights, but if a religious person wants to prevent another person, who does not share that same religious belief, from availing themselves of certain medical treatments or procedures, then that becomes an infringement on that other person's rights to freedom of conscience and belief.

No one is dictating anything other than the equality that you say you believe in, but apparently have not accepted.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lady1genius
No se puede tapar el sol con un dedo
07:56 PM on 01/31/2012
It says "congress shall make no law respecting...., or prohibiting the free exercise thereof" Nobody is being prohibited the free exercise of their religion. Unless your religion requires you to visit the burdens of your religion on everyone else. The law doesn't say the church can own unrelated businesses and use the first amendment as a "get out of jail free" card to avoid obeying the laws. This NONSENSE about you not being "forced to financially support what you find immoral" just doesn't apply to everyone else so WHY should it apply to you? I find wars immoral, yet I must financially support them. Where are MY first amendment rights? ENOUGH! Stop whining! Either obey the law or do without health insurance, sell your business, get out of the education and healthcare business if your conscience is so offended. You're going to be working somewhere, and wherever it is, you'll be helping to pay for contraception with your insurance premiums. GET OVER IT.
photo
marrmae1
Obama... Bringing Shame to America Every Day
11:03 PM on 01/31/2012
Believe it or not, God still loves you.
madame48
NO..it's a gop Cookbook !Tempus edax,homo edacior
04:32 PM on 02/01/2012
then how come when as a little girl, I prayed god to stop my alchoholic father drinking...leaving me to suffer? either there is only a hateful god or there isn't one