iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

SEC Probes Deutsche Bank's 'Crap' Subprime CDOs

Deutsche

Posted: 01/30/2012 6:41 pm

The Securities and Exchange Commission investigates a Wall Street behemoth over claims that it assembled and sold a package of subprime mortgage-backed securities at the behest of hedge fund king John Paulson without telling other investors that Paulson planned to short it.

Sound familiar?

Almost two years ago, Goldman Sachs was in the SEC's cross hairs over such an allegedly fraudulent scenario and ended up settling charges for $550 million, but not without becoming the poster boy for Wall Street shenanigans that helped crash the economy. Now, it's Deutsche Bank that is being probed by the SEC, Der Spiegel reports, for allegedly letting Paulson help pick "junk" mortgage-backed securities that went into a collateralized debt obligation without telling other investors that the hedge funder was shorting the CDO, called START.

Deutsche Bank was the fourth-largest issuer of CDOs in the United States, but it has largely avoided the glare of a federal investigation while its competitors, including Goldman Sachs, Citigroup and JPMorgan, have all been probed by the SEC over how they marketed deals involving subprime mortgage-backed securities. The agency has come under criticism for that lapse, with particular focus on the fact that the SEC's enforcement chief, Robert Khuzami, previously worked as the general counsel at Deutsche Bank when it was packaging such CDOs.

The bank gained a certain infamy for its role in packaging START, as well as other CDOs, during hearings led by Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.) last year. It was revealed then that Deutsche banker Greg Lippman once advised a colleague to buy protection for the bank against START, emailing him: "Start is crap you should short because I bet we'll have to ... buyback cash ones next year."

Another email that came out during the hearing described Paulson's role in structuring the CDOs:

"The $1 billion START 2005-B trade was backed by a static pool of CDS [credit default swaps] on mezzanine RMBS [residential mortgage-backed securities] for Paulson Advisors ($4 bln risk arb hedge fund). Paulson retained the bottom 6% of the trade and we sold the rest of the capital structure. Paulson, who came to us with the strong desire to short the U.S. housing market, wrote CDS on underlying ABS (over 100 names) to DB [Deutsche Bank] and DB intermediated them into the deal."

Germany's biggest bank was also sued over the deal last October by Loreley Financing, which had purchased $440 million worth of CDOs from 2005 to 2007. Loreley claimed that Deutsche defrauded the plaintiffs by issuing CDOs that were "destined -- and indeed, designed -- to fail."

Duncan King, a spokesman for Deutsche Bank, declined to comment on the SEC probe. As to the Loreley lawsuit, King stated in an email:

"Along with other banks and financial institutions, Deutsche Bank is faced with lawsuits brought forward by retail and institutional clients who have lost money in the course of the financial crisis. We look into these claims carefully and, if they prove wrong, defend ourselves vigorously."

SEC spokesmen and Loreley Financing's lawyer declined to comment to The Huffington Post.

The Zombie Insider-Trading Case

In another sign that the SEC is sharpening its claws, the agency isn't letting death get in the way of a case. On Friday, a New York federal judge granted the SEC the right to pursue the estate of Charles Wyly Jr., the Dallas billionaire who was facing insider-trading charges when he died in a car crash in August, Thomson Reuters correspondent Alison Frankel reports. Frankel adds that U.S. District Judge Shira Scheindlin, in her ruling, found "that it doesn't make sense to permit Wyly's estate to hold onto his allegedly ill-gotten gains simply because he's no longer alive."

FDA Monitored Email Of Medical-Device Whistleblowers

The Washington Post revealed Monday morning that the Food and Drug Administration monitored the personal email of its own scientists and doctors "after they warned Congress that the agency was approving medical devices that they believed posed unacceptable risks to patients, government documents show." The staffers have filed suit against the FDA in federal court in Washington, arguing that they were harassed or dismissed based on information uncovered through the snooping.

CFPB Outlines Ambitious Agenda For Next 6 Months

In its first semiannual report to Congress, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau outlined an ambitious agenda, according to American Banker. Over the next six months, the CFPB plans to issue final rules requiring a lender to verify a borrower's ability to repay a mortgage loan; propose a rule streamlining disclosures required by the Truth In Lending Act and the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act; propose rules regarding the mortgage market, including new servicing standards, loan originator compensation rules and restrictions on high-cost loans; and propose initial rules defining the scope of its nonbank program. The bureau has hired more than 750 staffers and spent about $123.3 million in fiscal year 2011, according to its report.

Food Industry To White House: Don't Make Us Pay For Safety

A coalition of food industry groups -- including the National Frozen Pizza Institute, American Frozen Food Institute and American Meat Institute -- wrote a letter to the White House Monday, urging the administration to stop using industry fees to fund food safety initiatives and to use congressional funding instead. "As consumers continue to cope with a period of prolonged economic turbulence and food makers struggle with record high commodity prices, the creation of new food taxes or regulatory fees would mean higher costs for food makers and lead to higher food prices for consumers," says the letter. "As such, we believe imposing new fees on food makers is the wrong option for funding food safety programs." Regulators and food safety advocates tend to prefer fees because they "guarantee a dedicated revenue stream for their activities," rather than depending on the fickle whims of lawmakers, reports The Hill.

Today's Must-Reads

In a giant conflict of interest, taxpayer-owned mortgage giant Freddie Mac has giant investment portfolios that will pay off if "homeowners stay trapped in expensive mortgages with interest rates well above current rates," report ProPublica's Jesse Eisinger and National Public Radio's Chris Arnold.

California health officials are investigating skin-lightening products sold in the Bay Area for possible mercury contamination, says California Watch.

Two Japanese suppliers of automotive electrical components -- Yazaki Corp. and DENSO Corp. -- agreed to plead guilty and to pay a total of $548 million in criminal fines for their involvement in multiple price-fixing and bid-rigging conspiracies in the sale of parts to automobile manufacturers in the United States. It's the second-largest criminal fine ever for an antitrust violation, announces the Justice Department.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS

The Securities and Exchange Commission investigates a Wall Street behemoth over claims that it assembled and sold a package of subprime mortgage-backed securities at the behest of hedge fund king John...
The Securities and Exchange Commission investigates a Wall Street behemoth over claims that it assembled and sold a package of subprime mortgage-backed securities at the behest of hedge fund king John...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 145
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
10:53 AM on 02/07/2012
That's really strange news for a bank which is example for the others.

windshield repair system: http://appliedcolors.com/windshield-repair-kit-for-car-detailers.html
10:05 PM on 01/31/2012
The "SEC's enforcement chief, Robert Khuzami, previously worked as the general counsel at Deutsche Bank when it was packaging such CDOs."

Is there anyone who thinks the Obama Administration is going to charge any of the big banks with FRAUD? When Judge Rakoff refused to approve the SEC/Citigroup settlement, he said that although the allegation­s in the SEC complaint against Citigroup were "tantamoun­t to an allegation of knowing and fraudulent intent, the SEC, for reasons of its own, chose to charge Citigroup only with negligence­". http://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/cases/show.php?db=special&id=138 p. 2-3

"As it has in recent cases involving Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, UBS and others, the agency proposed to settle the case by levying a fine on Citigroup and allowing it to neither admit nor deny the agency’s findings." http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/29/business/judge-rejects-sec-accord-with-citi.html?pagewanted=all

As Judge Rakoff has pointed out, it's the investors (the very people the SEC is supposed to be protecting) who get screwed by the SEC's whitewashes. See p. 10 of the Rakoff opinion: "'neither [an S.E.C.] complaint nor reference to [such] a complaint which results in a consent judgment may properly be cited in the pleadings' in a parallel private action and must instead be stricken."
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
MacTheCat
Those Clouds You See Aren't really clouds at all
11:21 PM on 01/31/2012
And still the faithful believe he is on the side of the 99%.

Incredible.

This has been a bipartisan sell out of the American People. Red And Blue alike. The only color that matters to these bankers is Green!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Blogging Patriot
Facts instead of Faux
07:03 PM on 01/31/2012
In 2002 the Bush released its "Blueprint for the American Dream" to help 40,000 low-income families make downpayments to become homeowners annually through 2010 with loans administered through Fannie and Freddie. While zero-downpayment mortgages have long been considered profoundly unsafe Federal Housing Commissioner John Weicher said "We do not anticipate any costs to taxpayers."

In 2003 after the Responsible Lending Act failed in Congress (the "Loan Shark Protection Act" designed to preempt stronger state laws against anti-predatory lending) the Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee bypassed Congress and by Republican party line vote relaxed the underwriting criteria for mortgages so that income did not have to be verified ("liar loans").

To do this the Office of the Currency Comptroller invoked an 1863 law to give itself the power to override state laws governing mortgage lending. Bush took this argument to the supreme court and lost the case in 2009. But by then the damage had been done.

Finally under a set of rules from the SEC in 2004, called "Alternative Net Capital Requirements for Broker-Dealers," the amount of capital that had to underlie assets was reduced. The act allowed high risk capital instruments, subordinated debt and deferred return of taxes. They even allowed securities "for which there is no ready market" to be counted as capital and broker-dealers to set their own valuations and creditworthiness ratings.

And Conservatives blame Fanny and Freddie, Dodd and Frank. Fanny and Freddie didn't cause the housing collapse.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
MacTheCat
Those Clouds You See Aren't really clouds at all
11:22 PM on 01/31/2012
Truly excellent information and post.
06:01 PM on 01/31/2012
Only three years past due..but I guess better late than never. I still have yet to see one of these crooks go to jail.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
valley boy
02:32 PM on 01/31/2012
With a stable of lawyers, they will go on insisting that they can do business in this manner.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gerald4
licensed mechanical and electrical engineer
05:55 PM on 01/31/2012
The US Government created those laws that made those business actions legal.
02:25 PM on 01/31/2012
Liars, cheaters and thieves and that's the best of Wall Street
photo
JoeHilley
NY Times Bestselling Author
02:23 PM on 01/31/2012
Money for nothing and your checks for free
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
VPerry24
Carpe Diem!
01:28 PM on 01/31/2012
Serves them right doing business with Paulson. Question is why is that guy not in prison.
Meanwhile, the US Securities and Exchange Commission is also investigating Deutsche Bank, SPIEGEL reports. According to financial regulatory sources, the bank launched one CDO transaction called "START" in which it allegedly allowed the hedge fund of US speculator John Paulson to choose junk mortgage securities against which he could speculate -- without the other investors knowing about it.

Goldman Sachs settled a suit with the SEC in a similar case for $550 million, SPIEGEL reported.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:04 PM on 01/31/2012
VPerry24, is the SEC going after Paulson?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
theobserver4
progress is a process not an end result
11:42 AM on 01/31/2012
The stuff Deutsche Bank was doing is stuff that can be cleanly prosecuted. It's fraud and it's illegal....I bet the SEC/DoJ will have an easier time moving cases forward since they're primarily German.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
VPerry24
Carpe Diem!
01:29 PM on 01/31/2012
Let us see how much DB will be fined? Goldman Sachs settled with only 550 million.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
theobserver4
progress is a process not an end result
03:07 PM on 01/31/2012
That was a line item on the cost of doing business when the big short helped save the firm. Hopefully it doesn't turn out that way.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
carolgregor
11:09 AM on 01/31/2012
Deutsche Bank was accused by the Justice Dept for defrauding the American public. No money for stupped homeowners, no jail time, money paid and disappeared, again....SEC has no ability to get these people. Time to bring in the troops, takeover Wall Street and give people their homes free and clear. The country is riddled with fraud and can never overcome all this, bankruptcy was designed for times like this. Let them fail, stop foreclosure and stabilize the country.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
VPerry24
Carpe Diem!
01:31 PM on 01/31/2012
You are correct, all the way down starting with congress and yet they want to build more jails and have tougher sentencing when the big crooks get to walk.
http://www.stansberryresearch.com/pub/reports/201112PSI_issue.html
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:06 PM on 01/31/2012
VPerry, some big people are making money on the privately "owned" prisons. I wonder who is policing these prisons to make sure all is on the up and up.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:02 AM on 01/31/2012
Here is tomorrow's headline:

"The SEC today settled with _name_of_Bank_ for $10 Million dollars. In exchange for this settlement, the Bank admits no wrongdoing and cannot be prosecuted for any crime."

(Insert name_of_bank here.)

Yawn.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
treabeton
Gold dust at my feet, On the sunny side of the str
11:01 AM on 01/31/2012
What does this say about the buyers? Oh, here's some crap I thought you might want to buy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gerald4
licensed mechanical and electrical engineer
11:01 AM on 01/31/2012
It really irritates me when my banker refers to Banking, Stock Trading, Insurance and other financial businesses as "industries", since they do not create anything, except worthless paper (toxic asset) financial "products" with imaginary value.

The Wall Street Stock Exchanges and Banks are essentially corrupt and should be allowed to close in Bankruptcy.

Wall street is too corrupt and inept to be salvaged.

Matbe the stock certificates should be delivered to the registered owners.

The Taxpayer bailouts appear to reward the financial institutions and managers that caused the trouble in the first place. Many of these managers pushed for congressional repeal of The Glass-Steagall Act (GSA) and promotion of other lax regulation policies that allowed this crisis to happen.

The Stock Markets are just gambling Venues for the public to make gambling wagers (investments) in ownership of publicly traded companies, securities, loans, and other investment vehicles. Investors just lost some of value of their investments, and there is nothing wrong with this loss since the value was speculation over and above the Balance sheet value of the companies.

The investors should not have believed anything that their brokers told them about those or any other investments.

If you review almost any of the SEC filings (on the EDGAR database) you will find almost all of the sworn information filed with the SEC is extremely false, most especially when you get away from the "Blue Chip" stocks.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gerald4
licensed mechanical and electrical engineer
10:50 AM on 01/31/2012
I believe that maybe all of the recently created new financial products, and the similar new toxic asset products created by the Wall Street master financial geniuses that created various derivative and other junk bond type freshly printed paper securities out of the thin air should require a separate application and a separate license granted by the SEC for the creation, existence and/or sale of each and/or any new financial product.

Maybe the SEC should require/grant license only to those that have intrinsic collateral value, are easily understood, are transparent, forthright, and are not deceptive in their sworn financial statements filed with the SEC.

Maybe the SEC should also require a study to justify the need and define the value of any new derivative type instrument created, similar to an Environmental Impact Statement.

When the financial risks are several layers or completely removed from the title to the actual asset that has some actual collateral value (like a Mortgage, Bond, Property Title, Stock Share, Promissory note), and this instrument is insured from most of the investment risk, how much due diligence will an investor perform before he will commit to purchase, as compared to the investing into a primary mortgage or similar instrument that is collateralized for the event of failure?

If I were driving a car without insurance, I would probably drive more carefully than if I had insurance since my exposure for loss is lessened with insurance coverage.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gerald4
licensed mechanical and electrical engineer
10:55 AM on 01/31/2012
Maybe the USA would be better off without any of these recently created new financial (Toxic Asset) products that required the US government to guarantee to the foreign parties that bought them, and US taxpayers had to redeem them when they were discovered to be without value.

These freshly printed financial products are similar to a cancerous disease, because once they are created, they infiltrate, contaminate, multiply and destroy the basic economic foundations of the US economy.

Other Wall Street financial geniuses then emulate these successful financial geniuses and then create and sell even more of these new imaginary assets.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
treabeton
Gold dust at my feet, On the sunny side of the str
11:03 AM on 01/31/2012
Yes. And to add insult to injury, even the creators of these financial instruments do not understand them.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:07 AM on 01/31/2012
Of course, there is no such thing as a "Toxic Asset."

It's like saying, "Poisonous but Nutritious Food." (Well, which is it??)

But nevertheless: do not ask the SEC to approve anything, nor to license anything, nor to regulate anything. The SEC has been bought. "The fix is in." And the same is true of every other government regulatory institution. You can have any ruling you want, and we get to name the price. (As Judge R. observed, "and it ain't much.")

Mind you, I do not say these words flippantly, nor happily. But let us face squarely this thing that would destroy us, for "by their fruits shall ye know them." The proof that I offer for my harsh words is simply the proof of repeated and continued evidence. Terrible crimes are being repeatedly committed in the Financial world (as well as in the worlds of Insurance and Banking), and we have Commissions chartered by fearsome Acts of Congress that are specifically intended to address them ... and, instead, these very Commissions are acting to make these crimes possible.

The stench of corruption reeks throughout Washington, DC, and I submit that it's time that we wake up and realize just where and why it's coming from.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gerald4
licensed mechanical and electrical engineer
11:04 AM on 01/31/2012
I believe that all of these various public traded US Corporations should abandon Wall Street, buy and sell their company stocks themselves.

This would then allow new stock brokerage firms to be created and evolve with more ethics, tighter regulation, and more penalties to prevent future Wall Street type criminal atmosphere of entitlement and above the law attitude.

These new trading exchanges should evolve, preferably in cities other than New York City such as Houston, Atlanta, Dallas, Phoenix, Denver (not Chicago), or some other different location that might be a better location for a clean new start with much less of the prevalent Wall Street culture of criminal activity, self worth, and financial entitlement.

These new stock trading exchanges could evolve with new and different rules and regulations that would prohibit the criminal excesses of the Wall Street Master Criminals.

We also need new federal legislation to make one single individual (President, CEO, Chairman, etc.) in each corporation criminally responsible for the accuracy of the financial data that is filed with the SEC, whether the filing is intentional or not intentional, knowingly or unknowingly false, an accident or otherwise incorrect and/or misleading.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
theobserver4
progress is a process not an end result
11:58 AM on 01/31/2012
This would be worthwhile to see.....Decades ago Wall St. still contributed something to our economy even as they gorged on the revenue that passed through their hands. Now that these companies have invented financial products to benefit themselves they provide little to no value for our economy or anyone elses. They can't be trusted and they're already clammoring to roll back Sarbanes-Oxley which has been by and large a good bill to assign corporate responsibility.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blood1
10:36 AM on 01/31/2012
Adding to the angst: FDA halted shipment of OJ from Canada and Brazil due to contamination with fungicides and companies complained. The companies, always putting consumer's first (cough cough) are asking the FDA to raise the allowable limits - and now that we are blessed with a Monsanto Lobbyist at the FDA - who knows.

and speaking of Monsanto: did you miss the video out of Florida - where FOX news reporter's had prepared an Expose on Bovine Hormones found in milk. Just before airing - Monsanto lawyer's went to FOX and in the end - the story was never aired and the reporter's were "let-go". http://axiomatica.org/myvideos/video/130/Monsanto
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
VPerry24
Carpe Diem!
01:34 PM on 01/31/2012
Corruption everywhere I am afraid. FDA has become a joke, so has congress and no new ruling will instill more trust and confidence in them.
03:18 PM on 01/31/2012
Start growing vegetable gardens and keeping egg laying hens. They're gonna try to keep us diseased ridden and obese with the food Monsanto creates. Then you'll have to go to the Pharm Corp and pay hundreds of dollars a month to rid yourself of the disease you got from the food!