iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Federal Budget Deficit Falls To $1.1 Trillion: CBO Report

Budget Deficit Cbo

ANDREW TAYLOR   01/31/12 04:20 PM ET  AP

WASHINGTON — The government will run a $1.1 trillion deficit in the fiscal year that ends in September, a slight dip from last year but still very high by any measure, according to a budget report released Tuesday.

The Congressional Budget Office report also says that annual deficits will remain in the $1 trillion range for the next several years if Bush-era tax cuts slated to expire in December are extended, as commonly assumed – and if Congress is unable to live within the tight "caps" the lawmakers themselves placed on agency budgets last year.

The report is yet another reminder of the perilous fiscal situation the government is in, but it's commonly assumed that President Barack Obama and lawmakers in Congress will be able to accomplish little on the deficit issue during an election year. The report was slightly more pessimistic than CBO's most recent projections last summer and would mean the fourth straight year of trillion-dollar-plus deficits.

The recent wave of shocking, trillion-dollar-plus deficits has been largely a product of the recent deep recession and the slower-than-hoped recovery. The jolt to the economy has made a permanent dent in revenue estimates but the budget crunch will get even worse with the retirement of the Baby Boom generation and the resulting strain of Social Security and Medicare.

The report prompted a familiar wave of statements from lawmakers casting blame on the other for the fiscal mess.

"Four straight years of trillion-dollar deficits, no credible plan to lift the crushing burden of debt," said House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan, R-Wis., "The president and his party's leaders have fallen short in their duty to tackle our generation's most pressing fiscal and economic challenges."

"We will not solve this problem unless both sides, Democrats and Republicans, are willing to move off their fixed positions and find common ground," said Senate Budget Committee Chairman Kent Conrad, D-N.D. "Republicans must be willing to put revenue on the table."

Republicans acknowledge that Obama inherited a budget mess and an economy in recession, but they say he's done little to try to keep his 2009 promise to cut the deficit in half by the end of his first term.

"We know that President Obama's policies have failed to produce the economic growth needed to pay down these massive deficits that are creating uncertainty, preventing economic recovery, and harming job creation," said House Majority Leader Eric Cantor. "When something doesn't work, you change it. Let's try something new."

The CBO study also predicts modest economic growth of 2 percent this year and forecasts that the unemployment rate will be 8.9 percent on Election Day. That is based on an assumption that President Barack Obama will fail to win renewal of payroll tax cuts and jobless benefits through the end of the year.

That jobless rate is higher than the rates that contributed to losses by Presidents Jimmy Carter (7.5 percent) and George H.W. Bush (7.4 percent). The agency also predicts that unemployment will average 9.1 percent in 2013 and remain at 7 percent or above through 2015.

CBO Director Douglas Elmendorf, however, told reporters that extending the two percentage point cut in Social Security payroll taxes would only lift the economy by perhaps one-fourth of a percentage point this year and would likely yield only a 0.1 to 0.2 percentage point drop in the jobless rate.

The agency's budget projections are worse than those issued last summer, in large part because its views on the economy are more pessimistic now. Last August, CBO predicted a $953 billion deficit for 2012 fiscal year. Corporate tax receipts are sharply lower than anticipated last year.

On the economy as a whole, CBO now predicts 2 percent growth from the fourth quarter of 2011 to the fourth quarter of this year, a 0.7 percentage point drop from its August numbers. Its predictions of the jobless rate are 0.4 percent higher.

"We have not had a period of such persistently high unemployment since the Depression," Elmendorf said.

The new figures also show that last summer's budget and debt pact has barely made a dent in the government's fiscal woes.

The pact imposed $2.1 trillion in spending cuts over 10 years, but lawmakers are already talking about easing across-the-board spending cuts required under the agreement. The modified estimates predict $11 trillion in accumulated deficits over the 2013-2022 if the Bush-era cuts in taxes on income, investments, large estates and on families with children are renewed. Obama has proposed largely extending them, but allowing them to expire for upper-income taxpayers.

Extending the full range of the Bush tax cuts costs $5.4 trillion over the coming decade, CBO says. Elmendorf said allowing tax rates to increase for families making more than $250,000 a year as Obama has proposed would shave more than $1 trillion from the 10-year costs of extending the tax cuts.

Last year, Obama and House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, tried but failed to reach a "grand bargain" on the deficit, an effort that got hung up over taxes and cuts to major benefit programs like Medicare. A subsequent attempt by a congressional "supercommittee" to find smaller saving sputtered over the same issues.

What's left is a heap of unfinished business that comes to a head at the end of the year: expiring tax cuts and painful across-the-board cuts to the Pentagon and many domestic programs. To top it off, another politically toxic increase in the debt limit will have to be passed by Congress at some point early next year.

The deficit would require the government to borrow 30 cents of every dollar it spends. Put another way, the deficit will reach 7 percent of the size of the economy, a slight dip from last year's 8.7 percent of gross domestic product.

The CBO report shows that the deficit dilemma would largely be solved if the tax cuts enacted in 2001 and 2003 – and renewed in 2010 through the end of this year – were allowed to lapse. Under that scenario, the deficit would drop to $585 billion in 2013 and to $220 billion in 2017.

But expiration of those tax cuts would slam the economy, CBO said, bringing growth down to a paltry 1.1 percent next year. However, the economy would quickly rebound in 2014 and beyond.

Obama is scheduled to release his 2013 budget on Feb. 13.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — The government will run a $1.1 trillion deficit in the fiscal year that ends in September, a slight dip from last year but still very high by any measure, according to a budget repo...
WASHINGTON — The government will run a $1.1 trillion deficit in the fiscal year that ends in September, a slight dip from last year but still very high by any measure, according to a budget repo...
Filed by Luke Johnson  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,399
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (18 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Anthony James Brooks
03:28 PM on 02/01/2012
All of this political mud-slinging is so sad. You have Republicans admonishing Democrats and vice versa, when there is not difference between the two. The GOP wants to cut your taxes and reduce the size of the government, but they also want military action on Iran. Dems want to raise your taxes, expand the size of the government and also want military action on Iran.

Most of our deficit is due to the wars fought in Iraq & Afghanistan. If you really want to cut down on the deficit, quit engaging in this pointless bickering and take an anti-war stance. 20 straight years of war in the middle east is enough. What is the net benefit for having went to war in Iraq & Afghanistan? Does anyone actually feel safer? I don't.
12:48 PM on 02/01/2012
what'll happen if we have 4 more years of this??? Oh wait...anyone speak chinese...perhaps they know what will be next.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
piratesfan23
Thomas Paine Reincarnated/guarding the guardians
07:40 AM on 02/01/2012
It's amazing how partisan it gets.

Both mainstream washington dems and repubs are the same party. They love to spend your money and take away your freedoms.

Both parties added to the debt and are corrupted by money from wall street and k-street. Both parties have major responsibility issues. Both parties don't have a consistent long-term solution to fix the problems they created.

Obama or Romney could win, it won't change a thing. Maybe in your minds it will, but the fact is - solutions involve principle. Our politicians have none.
08:33 PM on 01/31/2012
Still headed for bankrupty.
08:18 PM on 01/31/2012
Wow! Great news! Only a TRILLION DOLLARS last year!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
thinklib
I will not mince words.
05:36 PM on 01/31/2012
On 12/31/2006, unemployment was 4.4% and the federal debt was $8.1T.

Three days later, Dems took TOTAL control of Congress.

That's when the misery started.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OneInEveryFamily
I wish conservatives would read more liberally.
09:06 PM on 01/31/2012
If you says so. However, the first budget passed by the Dems took effect 10/07. Housing had already stalled by then.
05:28 PM on 01/31/2012
Oh great in 10 years we will reach 27 Trillion in debt......such great news
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
SteveSFM
Team Edward (Snowden)
05:19 PM on 01/31/2012
Ah, yes.

The Bush deficit.
05:26 PM on 01/31/2012
Excuse me.....O has spent more in 3 years than GWB spent in 8.......nice try or should I say lie
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
SteveSFM
Team Edward (Snowden)
05:37 PM on 01/31/2012
Say whatever you want, Sparky.
08:48 PM on 01/31/2012
You do realize that the CURRENT deficits are a result of PAST spending and taxation policies, right? Obama has only enacted policies that added ~$700 billion to the deficit, vs the $8 trillion resulting for two rounds of Bush Tax Cuts, 2 wars and the largest recession in the last century thanks to lax oversight and deregulation under Republican rule.
04:55 PM on 01/31/2012
They also said from 2012 to 2014, our taxes will increase by 30%.
04:18 PM on 01/31/2012
The Bush 43 tax cuts were ushered in on the promise of renewed economic growth, as well as on the promise that they would pay for themselves through increased economic activity.

Neither of those promises came even remotely close to being true. It was a failed experiment, and it has failed badly. There is no further basis for persisting with them, in view of their original rationale.

Many people will feel some sense of relief when they read that the ratio of debt to GDP will "shrink" over time from 8.7% to 7%; however the real metric to consider is the one that tells us that 30% of all federal revenue will need to be borrowed. And the most depressing metric is the one that tells us that for fiscal 2011 the interest charges alone on the debt were over $454 billion dollars:

http://www.treasurydirect.gov/govt/reports/ir/ir_expense.htm

That yearly number will continue to rise, and it won't even begin to be addressed until after the annual deficit is eliminated....

Got it? We are borrowing money to pay for the interest on the money that we previously borrowed. Tomorrow we will borrow even more, to pay for what we borrowed today, to pay for what we borrowed yesterday....
10:08 PM on 01/31/2012
Hmmm, in 2003, at the time of Bush's significant tax cut, Federal revenue was 1.901 Trillion. After the cut in 2004 it was 1.949T, then in 2005 it was 2.153T, in 2006 it was 2.324T, in 2007 it was 2.414T.. Revenue did not drop until the '08 crash, and even then it was well above the '03 number, coming in at 2.228T for 2008...
So how is it that tax cuts were the cause of the deficit growth exactly?? Basic economics will teach you that increased revenue does not equal increased debt.. It was then (and is now) the outrageous spending that causes deficit problems. This is 3rd grade math, but somehow it escapes both Bush and Obama. The last two Presidents built up more debt than the first 42 combined, and you think the problem was tax cuts.. Really? Seriously?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tundra599
11:23 PM on 01/31/2012
Careful using facts VFNY. LIbs in here do not want to see the actual numbers of increasing revenue after those 2003 tax cuts. It would destroy their world of blame Bush blame Bush for everything.
12:30 AM on 02/01/2012
What you fail to take into account is that in normal times an economy will grow, and revenues will grow as a result. It is the rate of revenue growth that is key, because as a population grows, and as the population ages (both of which happen in this country) outlays are going to also go up. Revenue growth must match increases in outlays, or you are going to end up in deficit.

Population growth doesn't stop, and people don't stop aging just because revenues decline. The problem is that the Bush 43 tax cuts hobbled revenue growth in relation to the corresponding annual increases in outlays. The non-partisan CBO chart that I have included below shows that during the Bush 43 years outlays grew by approximately $200 billion per year, but revenues did not increase by anything close to that:

http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/108xx/doc10871/historicaltables.pdf

Revenues fell in 2003, barely grew at all between 2004/05 and 2006/07, and languished between 2007/08. They of course fell the year after that.

As you can see from the chart, net revenues doubled during the Clinton years, whereas they only grew net 25% during the Bush 43 years (and then fell back to almost 2000 levels the year after he left office).

There is your deficit.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
DANIELISTICALL
HISTORY IS BUT A FABLE AGREED UPON,,NAPOLEON
04:06 PM on 01/31/2012
think they hurt quite a lot. The original Bush tax cuts of 2001 and 2003, remember, were sold to America as a way to revive the economy and also create a lot of jobs and generate a lot of wage growth. Well, actually, if you look at the record between 2001 and 2007, the so-called Bush recovery, there were very few jobs. Even the widest and broadest and most generous estimate is about 10 or eight million jobs, relative to the 22 million jobs created under the Clinton administration.
And, beyond that, median wages, Jeff, actually dropped between 2001 and 2007. Adjusted for inflation, the median worker actually grew poorer. There was no trickle-down at all.

Where are all those jobs the disgusting bush TAX CUTS for the rich were suppose to create??? left office with a 8.2% unemployment rate bush had a job growth rate of ,,,,,,0.5%,,,,and ,THE LOWEST SINCE HOOVER a republican,,,The highest unemployment rate ever was....24.9% ...in 1933 under Hoover.,,,,,,PROOF POSITIVE ,,,,,,,,,,, that republican tax cuts DO NOT WORK............
photo
AMERICABLESSGOD
It's the least we can do
04:04 PM on 01/31/2012
No doubt this will be spun by the democrat controlled media as a "deficit reduction"! Only in American politics could adding $1,100,000,000 in new debt be viewed as good fiscal news.

Obama will come up with 10 new ways to "invest" all the money he's saving us.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mech126
Science, and government are "NOT" the enemy...
04:19 PM on 01/31/2012
And he should to, that's called investing in America, unless of course your un-American...
10:16 PM on 01/31/2012
Well, maybe it's called "Investing in America"... Unless of course Obama gives Fisker some more money for the plant they built in Finland on our dime.. Or maybe some additional dollars to GE so they can ship more jobs offshore?

How about "Investing in Yourself"?? And while you're at it, try to stop looking towards a federal mommy to ease all of your ills. You were blessed at birth with arms, legs, and a functioning brain (I hope).. Use them to support yourself, to feed yourself, to care for yourself and to “Invest in yourself.. If you're the burden of some moral person that has to support you because they succeeded and you did not, doesn't that make them the slave and you the slave-owner? The efforts of their work are seized by you against their will.. Yes, it does sound like a slave/slave-owner scenario.. But I guess you are only outraged about things that don't benefit you? There's a word for that.. HYPOCRITE
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Irmanator
CARRIED INTEREST should be taxed as income
04:33 PM on 01/31/2012
Just like the GOP spins the slowing of the increase of the military budget as "OMG Obama is SLASHING the military budget. Wahhh!!! Scarey!!! Monsters, possibly muslim monsters, under my bed!!!!"
MP1987
The more corrupt the state, the more it legislates
03:55 PM on 01/31/2012
Why does it take like 20 minutes for a comment to post here? Come on HP, enough already.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
David Engage America
03:55 PM on 01/31/2012
At the report briefing, CBO Director Doug Elmendorf said that the longer Congress waits to determine the best course of action, the worse off the economy gets. Elmendorf also said that huge increases in taxes or deep spending cuts would severely hamper economic growth in the near future.

The best policy Congress could choose to implement would be the Bowles-Simpson deficit reduction plan. Not only would the plan both raise revenue and cut spending, but it would also simplify the tax code, improve fairness, increase U.S. competitiveness abroad, and spur economic growth. http://bit.ly/noTDPF
photo
planetjeffy
On the other hand, you have different fingers.
03:43 PM on 01/31/2012
letting the Bush Tax Cuts expire will take care of about half the deficit
and the recovery will take care of the other half

problem solved
04:08 PM on 01/31/2012
Those are now the Obama tax cuts, and it would take ten years of them to reduce just over half of this years deficit. D@mn it must be blissful to be a blind partisan.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
DANIELISTICALL
HISTORY IS BUT A FABLE AGREED UPON,,NAPOLEON
04:16 PM on 01/31/2012
FALSE,,, the BUSH tax cuts were a trade to the REPUBLICANS that were holding Unemployment payments hostadge with a FILIBUSTER threat,,,,,TURN OFF FIX NEWS and take a history lesson
photo
planetjeffy
On the other hand, you have different fingers.
04:18 PM on 01/31/2012
"Extending the full range of the Bush tax cuts costs $5.4 trillion over the coming decade, CBO says."
Again...that is half the deficit - 10 years at 540 billion a year. Maybe you should not have been home-schooled.