iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Byron Generating Station, Illinois Nuclear Plant, Shutdown Investigated By Officials

Byron Nuclear Power

Posted: 01/31/2012 3:06 am

CHICAGO (AP) — Officials are investigating the events surrounding a power failure at a nuclear reactor in northern Illinois, but believe they may have traced the cause to a piece of equipment at a switchyard.

After the shutdown Monday morning at Exelon Nuclear's Byron Generating Station, operators began releasing steam to cool the reactor from the part of the plant where turbines produce electricity, not from within the nuclear reactor itself, officials said. The steam contains low levels of tritium, a radioactive form of hydrogen, but federal and plant officials insisted the levels were safe for workers and the public.

Exelon Nuclear officials believe a failed piece of equipment at a switchyard at the plant about 95 miles northwest of Chicago caused the shutdown, but they were still investigating an exact cause. The switchyard is similar to a large substation that delivers power to the plant from the electrical grid and from the plant to the electrical grid.

Diesel generators were supplying the reactor with electricity, though it hasn't been generating power during the investigation into what happened. One question is why smoke was seen from an onsite station transformer, though no evidence of a fire was found when the plant's fire brigade responded, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission spokeswoman Viktoria Mitlyng said.

The commission declared the incident an "unusual event," the lowest of four levels of emergency. Commission officials also said the release of tritium was expected.

Mitlyng said officials can't yet calculate how much tritium was released. They know the amounts were small because monitors around the plant didn't show increased levels of radiation, she said.

Tritium molecules are so microscopic that small amounts are able to pass from radioactive steam that originates in the reactor through tubing and into the water used to cool turbines and other equipment outside the reactor, Mitlyng said. The steam that was being released was coming from the turbine side.

Tritium is relatively short-lived and penetrates the body weakly through the air compared to other radioactive contaminants.

Releasing steam helps "take away some of that energy still being produced by nuclear reaction but that doesn't have anywhere to go now," Mitlyng said. Even though the turbine is not turning to produce electricity, she said, "you still need to cool the equipment."

Candace Humphrey, Ogle County's emergency management coordinator, said county officials were notified of the incident as soon as it happened and that public safety was never in danger.

"It was standard procedure that they would notify county officials," she said. "There is always concern. But, it never crossed my mind that there was any danger to the people of Ogle County."

Another reactor at the plant was operating normally.

In March 2008, federal officials said they were investigating a problem with electrical transformers at the plant after outside power to a unit was interrupted.

In an unrelated issue last April, the commission said it was conducting special inspections of backup water pumps at the Byron and Braidwood generating stations after the agency's inspectors raised concerns about whether the pumps would be able to cool the reactors if the normal system wasn't working. The plants' operator, Exelon Corp., initially said the pumps would work but later concluded they wouldn't.

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

CHICAGO (AP) — A failed electrical insulator blamed for a power loss to a nuclear reactor in northern Illinois was replaced Tuesday, and the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission began a special inspec...
CHICAGO (AP) — A failed electrical insulator blamed for a power loss to a nuclear reactor in northern Illinois was replaced Tuesday, and the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission began a special inspec...
Filed by James Gerken  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 96
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael Mann
Nuclear Educator
04:30 PM on 02/04/2012
-- Illinois Emergency Management Agency officials say lab tests show no measurable increase of radiation after steam was released to cool a northern Illinois nuclear reactor.
http://www.reformer.com/nation/ci_19891587
05:01 PM on 02/03/2012
I'm in Illinois, and this story needs to be moved to front page of Environmental, Green, or Energy section. It is NOT normal operating procedure to vent gas when there is a loss of offsite power. Exelon says back up generators were working fine, and emergency systems worked "as planned." So why were workers evacuated from the site, radiation released to the environment, and the NRC tasked with a "special investigation" to report on equipment failures and water pumps. None of this adds up, and the AP should not be sourcing news primarily from Exelon Press Releases. Could someone investigate this story with a basic level of professional integrity and public interest, and peak behind the curtain a bit to ask why the company is coming up with a Crock of Bull story to draw attention away from this low nuclear emergency in my back yard!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael Mann
Nuclear Educator
05:32 PM on 02/03/2012
@idyl The only "gas" which was vented was H2O commonly known as "steam" or "water vapor" it IS NORMAL operating procedure to vent steam to control temperature and pressure. I have over 30 years experience with nuclear power plant operation, you look silly when you make comments like this. The circulating water pumps are very big and take a lot of power to run, they are not necessary for the safe shutdown of the nuclear power plant so they were secured and the atmospheric relief valves were used instead of the steam dumps which require CW and condenser vacuum for use. Calm down...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael Mann
Nuclear Educator
05:40 PM on 02/03/2012
Excerpt from the NRC training manual on PWRs:
If the steam dump system is not available (for example, no circulating water for the main condenser), the steam can be dumped directly to the atmosphere through the atmospheric relief valves.
By using either method of steam removal, the heat is being removed from the reactor coolant system, and the temperature of the reactor coolant system can be reduced to the desired level.
http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/basic-ref/teachers/04.pdf
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:23 PM on 02/06/2012
Dear Michael Mann :

1. It seems rather doubtful that you have absolute knowledge of what was released.
Unless you do, your opinions should be stated to sound like opinions, not facts.

2. Radioactive Iodine (a gas) can be released in a main steam vent procedure.

3. Having refused to answer my question after several requests, I will answer for you.

4. The only time that releasing contamination to the environment is preferred to
keeping it contained inside the facility is if releasing it is required to prevent a
catastrophic plant failure. It's better to "dust the locals" than to lose the plant.

5. All things considered, you should refrain from telling anyone that they look silly.

6. An emergency cooling failure is the only valid reason to vent the main steam.

7. World wide, we have serious problems at a great many nuclear power plants.

8. Hiding the problems doesn't make them go away. If it did, they'd be gone.
We've been hiding them for decades and they are getting worse, not better.

9. The children deserve better than what they are getting.

10. Nice job of stealing my posts and changing my message.

Best Wishes for Your Future,

The Rad Rider
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nirek
Proud progressive Vietnam vet. against WAR
10:44 AM on 02/02/2012
I have a couple serious questions for anyone who knows.
1 Why is the NRC the sole entity that can question the safety of the nuclear industry?
2 What happens to metal pipes after years of radioactive extremely hot water passing through it?

Thanks in advance for your answers.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael Mann
Nuclear Educator
04:15 PM on 02/02/2012
The NRC is the only agency qualified to make safety determinations for several reasons:
1.a. The NRC has resident inspectors at every nuclear plant in the USA constantly monitoring status.
1, b.. Nuclear safety is a highly technical determination and the NRC is the only agency with the specific technical knowledge to make that determination, it was created to expressly perform that function.
1 reference http://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/organization.html
2. Materials science has shown that different materials handle flow, temperature and radiation differently. Nuclear quality materials are documented from manufacture through installation to ensure high quality parts. There are tests performed on piping and equipment at initial installation and at regular intervals while in service to ensure no wall thinning or accelerated corrosion is not taking place. Chemistry of the water in the pipes is very tightly controlled to minimize corrosion. Through careful monitoring, any suspect piping is identified and replaced.
http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/contract/cr6721/
http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/fact-sheets/steam-gen.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael Mann
Nuclear Educator
12:30 PM on 02/03/2012
Preliminary calculations indicate that the radiation dose from Monday’s release at the Byron Generating Station was less than 0.001 (one one-thousandth) percent of the commission’s annual dose limit of 100 millirems.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/industries/nuclear-regulator-estimates-low-level-of-tritium-released-at-stalled-northern-illinois-reactor/2012/02/02/gIQAFArbkQ_story.html
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
07:22 PM on 02/03/2012
Yet the NRC supports LNT.
skykam
Out of the office.
08:47 AM on 02/01/2012
Experience has shown us that whenever and wherever there is a nuclear incident that we will get quick, factual, accurate and up-to-date information about the incident from the authorities, so if they tell us not to fear there is nothing to worry about.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Seer Clearly
Only truth remains when fear is denied
11:10 AM on 02/01/2012
You are joking, right? We still don't have factual answers from the authorities in Japan on the Fukushima multiple meltdowns. In fact, the answers have been shown to be at best incorrect, but more likely intentionally wrong, and they have covered up how bad the situation really is. What makes you think that would be any different here? Even this article points out that the backup pumps would fail in the event of a power failure, threatening a Fukushima-like disaster.
08:02 AM on 02/01/2012
Nuclear power plants are extremely dangerous.  Too many things can go wrong and result in a meltdown, especially if the plants are run by unregulated corporations concerned only with maximizing their profits at the expense of everything and everyone else.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael Mann
Nuclear Educator
04:04 PM on 02/03/2012
Nuclear power plants are among the SAFEST places to work, according to OSHA it's safer to work at a nuclear power plant than at a financial institution. In over 40 years of commercial nuclear power plant operation in the USA no member of the public has been injured from radiation. Industrial, radiological, environmental and nuclear safety are the top priorities at US commercial nuclear power plants.
http://nuclearstreet.com/nuclear_power_industry_news/b/nuclear_power_news/archive/2009/04/07/constellation-energy-s-r-e-ginna-nuclear-power-plant-recognized-for-safety-by-osha.aspx
http://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/regulatory/enforcement/INPO_PrinciplesSafetyCulture.pdf
http://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=Mou&p_id=233
http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/powergeneration/index.html
01:58 PM on 03/29/2012
Exelon, the owner of the plant has one of the safest records out of any electric utility that owns and operates nuclear plants in the United States. The size of their staff in their nuclear energy divisions is almost comparable to the size of the NRC itself, because of the fact that their nuclear plant fleet is enormous. Not to mention that Byron has won many safety awards and is one of the most efficient plants in the country.
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
06:59 AM on 02/01/2012
"Tritium molecules are so microscopic that small amounts are able to pass from radioactive steam that originates in the reactor through tubing and into the water used to cool turbines and other equipment outside the reactor, Mitlyng said."

Steam, from a pressurized-water reactor?
So, how big are these cracks in the heat exchangers that are traversed by the itsy bitsy tritium atoms? Because it isn't diffusing through solid steel.
09:15 AM on 02/01/2012
Actually it does, hydrogen atom is 1 angstrom with or without the extra neutrons
Metal atoms have bigger spaces, or we'd have hydrogen economy instantly and all
this crap goes away when you split water with a solar cell and burn the H2 anywhere.

Point is, cannot store it very long in welding tanks even.
But helium is no problem.......
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
10:59 AM on 02/01/2012
Helium atoms are smaller than even hydrogen atoms, never mind molecules. The reason you try not to keep hydrogen in tanks is its modest energy density, the price of the tanks, reactivity and unpleasant behavior after leaking.

That said, I guess you're right that some hydrogen escapes normally - the thinnest walls anywhere in the system are in the steam generator, and the pressurized cooling water is kept with a reducing chemistry. Once the longest-exposed turbine feed water has been ejected into the atmosphere, then the amount of tritium coming out will presumably drop way down.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:00 PM on 02/06/2012
Hi ThinkCreeps :

Having noted that mdinoregon corrected you on the size of tritium and the
size of the pores in a piece of steel piping, I'll try and answer your question
on the cracks in the steam generator tubing :

Cracks in the tubing can vary in size. However, due to the pressure
in the reactor vessel and the temperature variance from cold start to
full operation, even a tiny crack can soon become very troublesome.

When they become too troublesome, the problem tube(s) are plugged.
However, plugging tubes lowers the efficiency ( PROFIT ) of the plant.

When the number of plugged tubes causes the plants efficiency to
drop to the point of the being economically prudent, the generator is
replaced. The cost of replacing and storing a discarded steam
generator is more of a concern than a few leaking tubes.

The old generators ??? See the recent articles on Bruce Power.

The life of the replacements ??? See the recent articles on San Onfre.

Study hard, party little,
Live long and prosper,

The Rad Rider
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
beardown
06:56 AM on 02/01/2012
I live 40 miles from the plant. Its safe and is one of the best sources of power that is available.
10:28 AM on 02/01/2012
Did you know that studies have shown a significant increase in childhood leukemia near nuclear plants?
11:30 AM on 02/01/2012
No, because there are no studies that show this link. There have been studies that found leukemia clusters around nuclear plants, but there were an equal number of clusters nowhere near nuclear plants. This shows that there does seem to be something causing these leukemia clusters (be it environmental, genetic, or otherwise) but there is no evidence that the source in the nuclear plants. I guess you stopped reading once you saw nuclear plant and leukemia.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Seer Clearly
Only truth remains when fear is denied
11:12 AM on 02/01/2012
Tell that to the people who lived 40 miles from Fukushima. They thought the same thing.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:17 AM on 02/01/2012
Where are our regulators? These damned "equity groups" buy our utilities, increase the cost of energy beyond the reach of ordinary citizens and pocket the pillage instead of maintaining plant and equipment. Our local electric utility got a big rate increase for a maintenance program instead of spending the collected revenue for regular maintenance. Our utilities are under the command of criminal wall street insiders and their political sponsors in the legislator. In conversation with utility and telecommunication employees they reveal confidentially the corrupt policies and decadent procedures that our turning our consumers into serfs. A legislator should talk to the guys trying to maintain the plant and equipment to really gain an understanding of the precarious decline of plant and equipment of our plundered and pillaged utilities as rates have tripled in rate increases and CEOs have become oligarchs.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:33 AM on 02/02/2012
For nuclear energy production those wires that close to the nuclear generator should have had a redundant system. I would bet that the part that went haywire was old and should have been replaced long ago with preventive maintenance program. The corrupt corporation is risking public safety and energy delivery for selfishness and greed. Where are the regulators?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jtt
-
11:21 PM on 01/31/2012
No big Fukushima health impact seen: U.N. body chairman

"As far as the doses we have seen from the screening of the population ... they are very low," Weiss told Reuters. This was partly "due to the rapid evacuation and this worked very well."

Asked whether he was optimistic that the overall health effects would be quite small, Weiss said: "If we find out that what we know now is representing the situation, then the answer would be yes ... the health impact would be low." ( http://www.newsdaily.com/stories/tre80u1as-us-japan-fukushima-health/ )
09:24 AM on 02/01/2012
Dude, it been less then a year
Toxic metals and fetal damage -you do know that one, I really think you have stuff there.
How soon for chronic (as opposed to a big dose) does it show up?
The Japanese know about mercury The hard way
How do you suppose uranium and all these split products are "good"?
I agree coal is bad too, worse....probably until a Three Mile- you know one sticky valve
Chernobyl.....you tell me if you know...............
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Seer Clearly
Only truth remains when fear is denied
11:16 AM on 02/01/2012
The biggest problem with nuclear radiation is that in non-lethal doses, it takes 30 years to do its work, which is create cancers, birth defects, and mutations. Now, over 30 years after the Chernobyl tragedy, the numbers are in: hundreds of thousands of excess cancer deaths, hundreds of thousands of horrific birth defects. Google "Chernobyl Children" Now we have discovered that the residents around Fukushima were exposed to more radiation (and still are, since they were not evacuated as quickly or widely as those around Chernobyl.)

Everyone who claims that nuclear power is safe because it has killed so few conveniently ignores these long-term effects.
05:01 PM on 02/01/2012
Actually there is no science backing up your claims. Junk science.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
11:11 PM on 01/31/2012
Tritium combine with hydrogen for form radioactive water, which is readily absorbed by the lungs and even through the skin. http://iicph.org/comments-on-cnsc-tritium-studies-project

Do the nuclear pr companies pay news group to soft pedal radiation dangers?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jtt
-
11:19 PM on 01/31/2012
There are none at ridiculously low doses. Until we know different here there is no reason to expect problems.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
11:30 PM on 01/31/2012
We do know better. http://informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09553008414551081
animal studies already prove it.

Always minimize the effects of radiation. Rule one of the nuke pr folks.
08:03 PM on 01/31/2012
Standard procedures releasing radiation is the point.

It used to be standard procedure for dog owners to leave piles in public parks.

Polluting what belongs to all should never be standard procedure.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jtt
-
11:57 PM on 01/31/2012
Do you know how much a col plat, a gas turbine or a car pollutes in one day? Do you know how much radiation was released here?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael Mann
Nuclear Educator
06:34 PM on 02/03/2012
I do know that any operating coal plants released more radioactivity than Byron did...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
undsoweiter
but I know where to look it up
05:43 PM on 01/31/2012
Poor little Tritium. All the other isotopes kick sand in its face.

http://www.ead.anl.gov/pub/doc/tritium.pdf
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
antipodal2u
Just say NO to hypocrisy
04:37 PM on 01/31/2012
Yeah sure. Check ur local ponds n lakes for 2 headed frogs n fish
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jtt
-
11:22 PM on 01/31/2012
It actually takes a rather high doses of radiation to cause deformations and usually they are not that cleanly defined.
03:49 PM on 01/31/2012
It is time to transition to safe, clean alternative energy.

The price of oil, coal and nuclear keep rising while the price of wind and solar are dropping.
04:48 PM on 01/31/2012
Nope Kenz.

The cost of nuclear is dropping as experience is gained in modular construction while solar and wind already two orders of magnitude more expensive with begin rising shortly as Chinese dumping works its way through the system.
08:04 AM on 02/01/2012
Why don't you ask the Japanese how much Fukushima is costing them.  Ask the Russians how much Chernobyl is costing them.
02:29 PM on 01/31/2012
Intentional release of radiation being reported as a shutdown is journalistic malpractice.

The idea that such releases are safe and normal is corporatist PR from the most toxic and dangerous energy industry.

When simple equiptment failure causes a release of radiation it is clear that basic reactor design is flawed.

Taxpayer subsidies to support these criminal polluters must end.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael Mann
Nuclear Educator
10:40 PM on 02/06/2012
So what you're saying is shutdown all coal plants?