More

Chrissy And Joseph Rivera, NJ Parents See Hope After Transplant Denial Outcry

PATRICK WALTERS   01/31/12 03:25 PM ET  AP

Amelia Rivera

PHILADELPHIA — A 3-year-old girl whose parents claimed she was denied a kidney transplant at one of the nation's top children's hospitals because of her mental disability is now being considered for the procedure, her father said Tuesday.

Joseph Rivera said he and his wife, Chrissy, met with doctors at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia on Friday and were told they are now willing to consider a transplant for their daughter, Amelia. The Stratford, N.J., family said doctors initially told them their daughter wasn't eligible for a transplant because of her quality of life and her mental condition.

"At this point, we're moving forward," Rivera said in an interview with The Associated Press. "They are allowing us at least to go through the process."

Rivera said his daughter will now have to go through screenings to see if she's a good transplant candidate. He and his wife will now be going in for tissue testing in March.

"We knew going in that it was a long process," Rivera said, adding that his daughter is a "healthy kid." "She's doing great right now."

A hospital spokeswoman didn't immediately comment on the status of the case, which led to a public outcry after Chrissy Rivera wrote about it on her blog this month.

The hospital has said it "does not disqualify potential transplant candidates on the basis of intellectual abilities." It has also said it is "deeply committed" to providing the best possible medical care for all children, including those with disabilities.

Amelia Rivera, who goes by the nickname Mia, was born with Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome, a rare genetic defect that can cause physical and mental disabilities. She will need a transplant in six months to a year.

The issues over how doctors determine eligibility for kidney transplants are complex and there is no federally mandated policy on who can have a transplant and who can't, according to Dr. Robert S. Gaston, president of the American Society of Transplantation and medical director of the kidney transplant program at the University of Alabama at Birmingham.

Gaston said, however, that he had not heard of a cognitive deficit alone being considered as a factor in a transplant case. More often, the factors considered involve whether the patient has problems that would make surgery risky or whether they have a caregiver who will make sure that they take the needed medications.

"People who have a committed caregiver, a parent who is going to make sure they have the medications ... those produce the very best outcomes in kidney transplantations," he said.

Arthur Caplan, director of the University of Pennsylvania's Center for Bioethics, said transplant teams are often looking at candidates who have a broad array of problems – prone to seizures, distorted body, hearts or livers that are likely to fail. But sometimes, he said, parents only hear them say mental disability.

Caplan, who spoke generally and wasn't commenting specifically on the Rivera case, said he didn't think mental impairment should be a factor in determining whether a patient is a good transplant candidate unless it's an "enormously severe impairment" that results in a permanently unconscious or minimally conscious person.

"Outside of severe mental impairment, I don't think it should count," he said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST PARENTS

Filed by Jessica Samakow  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 257
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
11:41 AM on 02/04/2012
The sweet girls parents are checking if they are a match, if so they will donate one of their own. Relax people.
12:44 PM on 02/04/2012
if the parents organs are not a possibility due to size etc, then she will be placed on a list. This girl is a human being. Of course the parents want everything done for her, they love her. Time is time. She may live another 20 yrs with a new kidney, or maybe another 5. Not every situation needs to thrown into a cost effective bowl. Glad some of you are not on an ethics board. Its apathy that is destroying our country.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
09:08 AM on 02/01/2012
I am glad they are being allowed to go through the process. At this point, though, they have to be able to face rejection. That is a very real part of the process. My father received a kidney transplant in December 2011 after 6 years of dialysis and 4 years on the list. Getting on the list is extremely complex. There are many factors and it reaches far beyond," Do you need a kidney? What is your blood type?" If this little girl likely will not live many more years regardless of the transplant, she will likely be denied. They look at quality of life post transplant as well as life expectancy. It is a complicated situation and this is a very sad story. I hope it works out best for this family but also hope they can approach this openly with the understanding that not everyone who wants a transplant receives one.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lisa Shields
Poet & Advocate For Special Needs Children
11:07 PM on 01/31/2012
No offense intended...but a child that needs an organ transplant in six months to a year is NOT healthy. I hope they are prepared for the possible outcome of the screening process, exclusive or their daughter's intellectual capabilities. Organs go to the best match, with the best hope of a possible outcome. Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome is tenacious, and attacks kidneys in particular. A transplant organ can usually survive 30 years...but her might be exhausted in three or less.

No one wants a child to die...ANY child. But scarcity of donor organs make this case particularly daunting. The issue will not be her mental abilities---but the likelihood that the transplant can save her life long term...not as a temporary measure.
09:11 AM on 02/01/2012
This is an excellent post. Sad but true. They are hesitant to give a kidney to someone who likely will destroy that kidney, whether it be through illness or abuse (see: Diabetics who eat fast food while on dialysis machines - combobreaker). I am sure a living donor would raise her chances since they would be donating directly to her, but I am wary about that decision since it is much harder for living donors to recuperate and, based on her perceived life expectancy, that may be a difficult choice to make.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
peegan
Obama 2012
09:03 PM on 02/01/2012
Donating a kidney today is much easier than it used to be. It can now be done laproscopically and recovery time is minimal. And there is little elevated risk to the doner because when kidneys fail, they both tend to fail.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cozumelcuz
12:32 PM on 02/01/2012
my reply as well...I am with you on that Lisa!
09:40 PM on 01/31/2012
Are we kidding? The hospital should be willing to explain their justifiable decision. Who's paying for the tests? Who would pay for the surgery? What about the TIME and EFFORT involved in doing the tests and the surgery and the recovery? All of these highly trained medical personel are taking time and money and effort away from children who would benefit from a transplant in order to extend the life of a sadly severely disabled girl who might live another couple of years as a wide awake vegetable. Medicine is about hard choices. Hopefully, these doctors are trained to make them. They should be trained to explain them too.
11:06 PM on 01/31/2012
Medicine is not about hard choices. Medicine is about doing everything and anything possible to save and improve all lives. "First, do no harm".

You have an absolutely disgusting outlook!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ashok Hegde
12:31 AM on 02/01/2012
It is not disgusting...quality of life matters. And, we can't invest such time/money towards people who won't benefit society.
09:13 AM on 02/01/2012
There are over 70,000 people on the kidney transplant list. Roughly 10,000 kidney transplants happen per year. When it comes to transplants, hard decisions are absolutely a huge part of the circumstance. Not everyone who is in kidney failure gets a kidney or even gets on the list. If more people were organ donors, perhaps this could be one of those "Do no harm" situations in medicine where everyone who needed an organ could get one. Alas, though, most people are not donors.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:43 AM on 02/01/2012
when and by whom were you appointed to decide who lives and who doesn't? shame on you!
01:01 PM on 02/01/2012
Fanned and faved. People like this absolutely turn my stomach. Wonder what the opinion would be if the shoe were on the other foot?
07:38 PM on 01/31/2012
I think many people are ignoring the fact that the family is willing to find a donor, so she would not take someone from the donor list. I think most people agree that she is not a viable candidate for a sought-after kidney due to her very low life-expectancy. If her family wants to donate, why deny her? If this was about the donor list, then it would be a different story!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lisa Shields
Poet & Advocate For Special Needs Children
11:10 PM on 01/31/2012
I'm sure that has been considered. But this child can't take an adult organ. And I wonder how many relatives would honestly be willing to give an organ from a healthy three year old to supply the match. I have many people I love dearly...but I could not take that risk with my own child...could you?
09:23 AM on 02/01/2012
It is harder for a living donor to recuperate than it is for the kidney recipient. I can understand a doctor's concern about jeopardizing the life of someone who may have a longer life expectancy and better quality of life than this girl (with or without a kidney). Also, Lisa made a great point - the child needs a younger organ and I believe any parent that would donate their healthy child's kidney to another child is making a horrific decision.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
peegan
Obama 2012
09:07 PM on 02/01/2012
Old information. It used to be true that donating a kidney was physically harder than receiving one. They used to have to practically cut you in half to retrieve the organ while it could be implanted just under the hip bone in the recipient. But today it is done laproscopically  and recovery time is minimal.
07:32 PM on 01/31/2012
I see no problem with this girl getting an organ from a family member - I was under the impression this was the case? Can anyone clarify? Of course, she should not receive an organ on a donor list, for obvious reasons (i.e. life expectancy).
09:24 AM on 02/01/2012
The age has to be close and the markers have to match. It's not only blood type but 7 additional markers. Not all family members match each other.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
scodwyer
07:14 PM on 01/31/2012
Nothing like a little bit of negative publicity to get corporate health corporations to reconsider.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nanaofmysky
Cats just keep you around to serve them!
06:42 PM on 01/31/2012
I think this child should be put on the list. BUT she should not bump someone to get there. Every life is preciuos with or without a dissibility. Every child has a right to live. But something is bothering me. In another story it said the parents or family were donating. So why is she even on a list? would it not be needed then?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lisa Shields
Poet & Advocate For Special Needs Children
11:12 PM on 01/31/2012
Again...because she can't use an adult organ.
Kidneys must be intact---it's not like a liver donation, where only a part is needed. She's too small for an fully grown organ to be of use...so it MUST be from a child.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nanaofmysky
Cats just keep you around to serve them!
08:50 AM on 02/01/2012
Then why were they(parents) in previous article complaining that they were donoting ? That they wanted to be tested. Still, another child who is ALREADY on the list should be first. I feel for the parents and am sure I would fight tooth and nails to save my child. In fact I know I would! This poor little girl has gone threw so much already. Would it be fare to her. How much time would be spent in the hospital away from what she knows. Even though I said I would fight for it' I would still want my child to live every single day with me to make her happy. I had a son in the hospital when he was only a yr old. I was there as much as I could.(also have an older son) I would cry all the time. (I never found out just what was wrong. Only of what he did not have) He is very healthy now. I just want what IS GOING to be best for her.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
peegan
Obama 2012
09:15 PM on 02/01/2012
She is big enough to receive an adult kidney. Google pediatric kidney transplants for confirmation.
06:30 PM on 01/31/2012
The underlying issue in this case is most likely not based on mental disability; rather, the physical aliments of Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome. This typically includes facial breathing difficulties, seizures, heart defects and auto-immune deficiencies; all are serious surgery and transplant complications. Transplant will extend the shortened life expectancy; however, risk for chronic injury and/or death is also seriously increased.
06:29 PM on 01/31/2012
Years ago there was a lottery for organ transplants. You won the lottery, you lived, you lost and you died. This little girl and her parents are undergoing tests to see if she is a candidate for a transplant and if the parents can be donors. If she is a candidate but the parents can not donate, she will be put on the transplant list. Only God knows if a match will be found. Hopefully one of the parents will be a match and all the comments about other children dying because she got a kidney and another child didn't would be moot.
06:10 PM on 01/31/2012
What about the child who is next on the waiting list for a transplant? If they do it for this child, then someone else has to be denied. Sometimes, tough choices have to be made when there are not enough resources to go around to everybody. This story touches the heart, but in a perfect world, there would be enough of everything that everyone needs. On the other hand, in a perfect world the baby would not be born with any defect. At my age (over 70), if I develop prostate cancer, I would be denied surgery because they figure I would die of something else pretty soon anyway. This earthly life isn't perfect and it's not permanent either. Looking forward to Heaven.
06:22 PM on 01/31/2012
Who said that you would be denied cancer treatment due to your age or are you just making an assumption?
06:57 PM on 01/31/2012
No assumption. My father-in-law was denied prostate surgery on the basis of his age, and that was several years ago. Progress is being made in all fields of medicine, and it depends on the type of treatment needed as to whether it will be attempted. I am a retired hospital pharmacist and was in staff meetings of the Pharmacy and Therapeutic Committee which decided which drugs and treatments would or would not be provided. There is a mathematical calculation called a QALY (Quality Adjusted Life-Years). The resulting score, much like a credit FICO score, is used to make judgements as to whether a certain treatment would be "worth it", so rationing of care has already been in use, gradually becoming more prevalent. I was assisting in a "Code Blue" cardiac arrest case when the doctor in charge asked whether the 90-something-year-old patient's family was in the building. When he was told that she had no children and no siblings, he ordered the team to back off and let her "straight-line". She did. None of us are going to live to be 120. Wise old Colonel Potter on M*A*S*H* once told Hawkeye that rule #1 in life is that people die, and rule #2 is that doctors can't change rule #1. It is human nature to hope for miracles or magic. Hospitals and doctors can't function on moonbeams and fairy dust. Humans must make choices. Sad, but that's how it is.
06:38 PM on 01/31/2012
My great-uncle was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer in his '80s and he was not denied treatment. He was one of the rare survivors and he lived to 98.
05:51 PM on 01/31/2012
I am a mother of 2 daughters... if my child had a genetic disorder that she would eventually die from I would NOT take a kidney from another child that will live a full healthy life with this kidney.

I honestly think it is selfish of the parents, I understand they love their child but to get such a precious gift to simply just maybe extend her life just a little... what about the child who needs a kidney to live a full healthy life?!

I'm sorry but I do not blame the hospital at all.
06:26 PM on 01/31/2012
Wow, you would really do that to your own child? How very sad. What exactly is a full, healthy life in your eyes? To these parents, their child will live as full and healthy of a life as they can possibly give her. . .nothing less. We owe them our admiration, not our judgement.

My guess is that you don't have a child with special needs. Because if you did you would soon realize how much you would fight for them, in spite of the odds against them. You would be of the incredible powerful belief that it would be up to you to be a difference in your child's life. . .quality and everything else. It would change you in every way. That's what happened when my son was born. I became his champion, and today he is mine. I'm glad we didn't give up on him.
07:34 PM on 01/31/2012
She's just being a decent person...why would you deprive a healthy person of an organ, when your child will live a year or two at most?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ashok Hegde
12:33 AM on 02/01/2012
Your words may sound noble to you, but it's ridiculous. We waste too much money on special needs...it's bankrupting our schools, and isn't fair. We must gauge quality of life before spending public monies.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
jacmed
71, female - whatever happened to common sense?
06:59 PM on 01/31/2012
I am so happy I'm not one of your daughters, jcreviston! Furthermore, I'm extremely happy that I don't know you! Any mother who would decide that her own child does not deserve to live because she's deemed that the quality of the child's life isn't worth it does not deserve to be a mother and is not the type of woman I'd want to know!
07:35 PM on 01/31/2012
Jacmed, emotions aside, this girl won't live much longer. To take an organ from a list is ethically wrong. Donate to her? By all means. But don't take an organ away from an otherwise healthy child.
11:13 PM on 01/31/2012
Bravo! Would fan you again, but I did so long ago!
gerald1961
Your approval is not required
05:22 PM on 01/31/2012
I am an old nurse and the child's condition has many factors that limit her quality and the length of life. A transplant will not cure her condition but may, I said MAY extend her life spam a little. Whats a little, who knows. But this in NOT a cure. For some other child a transplant is a cure and will give them a normal full life span. I understand the parents grief and wishes to help their child, but I also understand the limited supply of kidneys and that the few kidneys there are should be given to the one who can benefit the most form them. The hospital was right, transplant denied. How flame away, but let me tell you I am a renal patient and do not qualify for a transplant because of my age and health status , so you see I do understand what is like.
05:45 PM on 01/31/2012
No one should flame you. What you say is the honest truth. This transplant MAY extend her life or it MAY make her remaining days on earth full of suffering. I understand the parent's grief also but I hope their grief isn't compounded by seeing their child suffer and know they are the cause of it because they choose to push the issue instead of heed the advice of knowledgable professionals. The hospital wouldn't refuse a transplant just because she has a mental issue. They are there to make money, not just save people, and transplants make money. The transplant was refused because she has a comprimised immune system already and other issues that result in a probable negative outcome. I pray there isn't a tragedy for both the child and the donor.
photo
tjdwill02
There is no free lunch
05:47 PM on 01/31/2012
because of my age and health status ******** Under Obamacare, we all will eventually be subjected to some form of rationing !
05:51 PM on 01/31/2012
Give us a break and get off your soapbox.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SithRose
Mommy, I need Cthulhu. He keeps bad dreams away.
05:54 PM on 01/31/2012
Maybe you'd better talk to the insurance companies. Or perhaps Governor Jan Brewer of Arizona. I mean, if you're going to discuss rationing of healthcare, why don't we discuss the people in Arizona who were denied transplants because the state made budget cuts? There are two people *dead* now because of that.

Or perhaps the thousands of people who were denied health insurance because of pre-existing conditions...before your hated "Obamacare" made that illegal. I suggest you research your talking points, because this "rationing" has been happening for over a decade already in the name of profit.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:20 PM on 01/31/2012
This disgusts me, and I'm taking myself off the donor list. What a waste of a perfectly good kidney that is going to be. This 'thing' is going to just sit around and soak up social security until it dies, and now we're going to be wasting a kidney that could go to someone who would definitely lead a more productive life? This is wrong, and it should never have been allowed after doctors told them no.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:21 PM on 01/31/2012
LOL.. sure you're taking yourself "off the donor list". Who do you think you're fooling?

Dont' reproduce.. do everyone a favor.
05:36 PM on 01/31/2012
Sammie- do you have anything productive to say or just snarky comment?. Your only opinion is that no one should reproduce.
09:57 PM on 01/31/2012
Hey Sammie - Do eveyone a favor - turn off yoru computer
gerald1961
Your approval is not required
05:26 PM on 01/31/2012
Rather very harsh, but accurate. There a very fes kidneys available and they should go to those who can benefit the most. Transplant denied.