More

Illinois GOP Lawmakers Attempt, Again, To Carve Out Religious Exceptions To State Civil Union Law

First Posted: 01/31/2012 2:07 pm Updated: 01/31/2012 6:23 pm

Illinois Civil Unions
Downstate Republican State Rep. Dwight Kay last month filed legislation that could water down Illinois' civil union law, if it is approved by the general assembly and signed by the governor.

A downstate Republican lawmaker is pushing a new bill to the Illinois state general assembly which attempts to introduce exceptions to the state's civil unions law allowing faith-based institutions to continue to deny adoptions to same-sex couples.

State Rep. Dwight Kay (R-Edwardsville) filed the bill (HB3942) late last month.

The bill, as written, would amend the Illinois Religious Freedom Protection and Civil Union Act to provide that any faith-based child welfare agency "may decline an adoption or foster family home application, including any related licensure and placement, from a party to a civil union if acceptance of that application would constitute a violation of the organization's sincerely held religious beliefs."

Further, if an agency declines such a couple's application, the bill states that the agency must refer them to another agency that would license them as adoptive or foster parents.

Last year, the state canceled its more than $30.6 million worth of contracts with Catholic Charities because they argued that charities in Peoria, Joliet, Springfield and Bellville were not following Illinois non-discrimination laws in denying adoption and foster care placements for couples in civil unions.

The charities said that they shouldn't be forced to place children in families whose lives don't align with Catholic teaching, namely unmarried or same-sex couples, and sued the state.

Judges at both the circuit and appellate levels ultimately agreed with the state's position that the charities could not contract to provide a service for the state while not following that state's laws.

Kay told the St. Louis Post-Dispatch that his proposal is "just another common sense bill." The measure has, as of Tuesday, attracted just two co-sponsors: State Rep. David Reis (R-Ste. Marie) and state Rep. Paul Evans (R-O'Fallon).

"Religious based childcare done by Catholic and Lutheran organizations has been an integral part of the state of Illinois," Kay said. "It has done a better job of handling child care services and it's done much cheaper."

Kay filed similar legislation last spring that mirrored the language of a Senate bill which also failed, the Windy City Times reported. As Equality Illinois public policy director Randy Hannig told the Chicago Phoenix, Kay's latest bill marks the fifth such piece of legislation that has been filed in the state general assembly in an attempt to water down the state's civil union law over the past year.

"Catholic Charities have gone through the courts and the courts have said 'no,'" Hannig told the Phoenix. "The governor said that there's no way that any adoption services will discriminate against same-sex couples. You'd think that when all three branches of government disagree with you, you'd give up."

Last fall, state Sen. Kyle McCarter (R-Lebanon) also filed similar legislation. The measure (SB2495) was cosponsored by every active Republican State Senator, plus one Democratic lawmaker: William Haine (D-Alton).

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CHICAGO

Filed by Joseph Erbentraut  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 101
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RJofDC
10:32 AM on 02/01/2012
Pathetic old man. His generation of hate and ignorance is dying off...............patience.
08:43 AM on 02/01/2012
Bigots hiding behind the Bible.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rockysparks
there's no law against being annoying.
08:39 AM on 02/01/2012
"Catholic Charities have gone through the courts and the courts have said 'no,'" Hannig told the Phoenix. "The governor said that there's no way that any adoption services will discriminate against same-sex couples. You'd think that when all three branches of government disagree with you, you'd give up."

Catholic Charities is free to continue functioning and is free to stick to its homophobic policies. They just can't do it with state funding. They've lost this battle and just don't want to admit it.
07:06 AM on 02/01/2012
The issue here in IL (where I live) was that an adoption agency that accepted state funds could not refuse a same sex couple. There is a long history of the Repubs using and the courts accepting concept that limits can be placed on organizations that accept and use public funds to provide public services.

There is nothing in current state law that keeps an adoption agency that is using its own funds from limiting who they accept applications from. So there is no need for Rep Kay's legislation. To be accurate, his legislation would allow religious groups to use public funds to discriminate against the public. Shame on him.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
beardown
06:52 AM on 02/01/2012
We need to get rid of all these disgusting laws in America!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bude
My Brain Hurts!
05:01 AM on 02/01/2012
As you can see, Illinois is broken.
photo
Aldyth
Advocating for those who cannot defend themselves.
09:08 AM on 02/01/2012
Now, that is one of the Greath Truths.
04:03 AM on 02/01/2012
Catholic Charities doesn't want to allow gay couples to adopt and place the childen in homsexual surroundings. They'd rather keep the children themselves in homsexual surroundings. They'll give the kids to the priests to watch instead.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NovemberScorp
10:31 AM on 02/01/2012
Yes and have you heard one "conservative" who speaks about "values" say one peep about priests that have molested for years and years? Of course not.
dans5843
Chicago retired gay guy
11:17 AM on 02/01/2012
great point!

fanned
03:12 AM on 02/01/2012
How hateful can these moral hucksters be? Sinking to all new low levels of douchbaggery as they attempt to legislate hate.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Bmori
Onna Bushi
02:50 AM on 02/01/2012
You shouldn't be able to discriminate with government funding and the Courts in Illinois agreed.
So ultimately the only ones screwed for the time being are the kids placed in their care because the bigots are too stubborn to let it go and see actual facts not some superstition.
12:39 AM on 02/01/2012
Seriously, I do not believe in any gods, and I don't think anyone of any sexual persuasion should be discriminated against. Unfortunately my good friends can't have children, and the only way they were able is through Catholic Charities. They have two foster kids that they were in the process of adopting, a 4 year old boy and a 2 year old girl, but now they will not be able to. I think more harm is coming to children by denying this bigots the ability to keep operating.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Bmori
Onna Bushi
02:45 AM on 02/01/2012
In the short run unfortunately yes.
photo
David N Taiwan
67 YO American in Taiwan
05:24 AM on 02/01/2012
You said that "the only way they were able [to have children] is through Catholic Charities."

I found that statement hard to believe. I thought there must be numerous Jewish and Protestant adoption agencies in Illinois and I Googled it just to be sure. Sure enough, the Illinois State Department of Children and Family Services has a list of all licensed adoption agencies. You can find the list at: http://licensedadoptionagencies.dcfs.illinois.gov/
11:29 AM on 02/01/2012
Oh, if you googled it, then it must be incredibley easy to adopt children! Wow, I think we need to tell people about this "Google something and adopt a kid program" that you found!

You are a damn idiot, and you should be ashamed of yourself for not spending the 30 seconds needed to figure out that adopting children is hard to do. If Carl and Lauren want to adopt the SAME CHILDREN that they were in the process of adopting then they will have to go through an entirely different process, one with different rules and different people overseeing it.

Maybe are are too dumb to realize that caring for a child for years on end and then having that child taken away from you is difficult beyond belief. Maybe in a few years they can spend thousands of more dollars and adopt some different children from a different agency, or maybe not. Either way Katie and Isiah will be in foster care for months or years.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nopinky
12:30 AM on 02/01/2012
So I'm assuming then that they would still have to serve lesbian couples since only man-on-man is "abomination". And I'm assuming these places are already allowed to not adopt to a couple where the man shaves his sideburns or touches his wife during her period or eats the fruit from trees less than four years old. And polygamous or incestuous couples, since the bible is riddled with both. And no Jews. And no Muslims. And REALLY no Wiccans or Pagans. So if all that is true then sure ... go for it.
12:28 AM on 02/01/2012
Oh look, another hateful Christian trying to get the state to stay out of his fear mongering. That's a surprise. If you have any sense, and live downstate, do yourself a favor, and get the hell out!
photo
David N Taiwan
67 YO American in Taiwan
05:25 AM on 02/01/2012
I did as you suggested. Left Belleville in 1980.
photo
Aldyth
Advocating for those who cannot defend themselves.
09:10 AM on 02/01/2012
I sympathize with the thought, but we need to remain in downstate so we can fight the good fight. Otherwise, they'd be imposing the Christian equivalent of Sharia law down here.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
12Purple
my microbio isn't empty yet communicates nothing
02:28 PM on 02/01/2012
True. I asked a vocally 'Christian' woman one time if it would be OK if she wasn't allowed to drive because she was female (Sharia). She didn't like that and said it wasn't the same thing - that's Muslim. So I asked her if it would be OK if the Christian Scientists were in power and made any other medical care other than prayer illegal, if she was OK with those laws. She sputtered and then went silent.

Ah the silence. And I make sure I'm around her whenever she starts to go down that track to repreat the same reasoning in front of whomever she is directing her comments - when I can, that is.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
VBH1622
Die Gedanken Sind Frei
11:31 PM on 01/31/2012
Catholic and Lutheran adoption agencies are not being forced to allow adoption to families that do not align with their religious attitudes. They are simply not being rewarded with taxpayer money for practicing their grounded in the dark ages discrimination.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
ChiGuy
Just an earthbound misfit, I
11:12 PM on 01/31/2012
Nothing more than the ongoing attempts at indoctrination of religion. And we're having no part of it.
photo
ThePeoriaKid
We're All Bozos On This Bus..
11:06 PM on 01/31/2012
Republican State Rep. Dwight Kay does not understand the meaning of freedom.

Republican State Rep. Dwight Kay does not understand the separation of church and state.

Republican State Rep. Dwight Kay should have retired 100 years ago.
photo
Aldyth
Advocating for those who cannot defend themselves.
09:10 AM on 02/01/2012
Rep. Dwight Kay.

The right man for Illinois in 1912.