More

HuffPost Social Reading

Marco Rubio Writes Bill To Override Birth Control Mandate

Marco Rubio

First Posted: 01/31/2012 6:11 pm Updated: 01/31/2012 6:32 pm

WASHINGTON -- Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) introduced a bill on Monday that would override the Obama administration's new rule on birth control coverage and allow religious hospitals, universities, and other organizations that morally oppose contraception to refuse to cover it for their employees.

Churches and other places of worship are already exempt from the Department of Health and Human Services' mandate, which requires that most health plans cover contraception without a co-pay beginning on Aug. 1, 2013. The Religious Freedom Restoration Act, S. 2043, would expand the refusal clause to include any employer who opposes contraception "on the basis of religious belief."

"This is a common-sense bill that simply says the government can't force religious organizations to abandon the fundamental tenets of their faith because the government says so," Rubio said in a statement.

The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops and other major religious lobbying groups pushed hard against the birth control mandate, which insures that the vast majority of insured women in the country can easily afford birth control, arguing that it tramples on the constitutional right to religious liberty. Reproductive rights advocates contend that allowing certain employers to deny birth control coverage to women based on their own beliefs about contraception is unfair and discriminatory, and would have negative consequences for women's health.

"This bill will ride roughshod over the rights of American citizens so that employers can discriminate against them and take personal matters of conscience into their own hands," said Jon O'Brien, president of the advocacy group Catholics for Choice. "This is real government interference in the lives of citizens -- not very Republican of [Rubio] in an election year to have government dictating what people should do in personal matters, especially since most Catholics use a method of contraception the bishops disagree with."

Rubio, the only senator to be endorsed by the Catholic Advocate PAC, represents a state with a quarter of a million unintended pregnancies each year -- almost the highest in the country. He staunchly opposes abortion rights and federal funding for Planned Parenthood, which provides contraception and family planning services to millions of low-income women across the country.

"It makes no sense, given Florida's unintended pregnancy rate, to write a bill to limit women's access to birth control," said Judith Selzer, a spokeswoman for the Florida Association of Planned Parenthood Affiliates. "He should be working to expand access to reproductive health care services-- that would be common sense."

Rubio's office did not respond to a request for comment. But the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, which is representing two religious schools -- Belmont Abbey College and Colorado Christian University -- in separate lawsuits against the contraception rule, applauded his initiative.

"Rubio's bill is a balanced approach that will prevent the government from penalizing those who are simply being true to their religious faith," Hannah Smith, senior counsel at the Becket Fund, said in a statement.

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) introduced a bill on Monday that would override the Obama administration's new rule on birth control coverage and allow religious hospitals, universities, and o...
WASHINGTON -- Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) introduced a bill on Monday that would override the Obama administration's new rule on birth control coverage and allow religious hospitals, universities, and o...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 678
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (19 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:41 PM on 03/02/2012
Reply to Liberalpolicysucks,

No doubt, since you object to birth control coverage, surely you will object to testing or treatment for STDs, or HIV. There is no reason to pay for birth, normal, (or not) nor premature babies, nor the hospital stay for the birth. All these things can be prevented by condom use.

We should not pay coverage for heart disease or diabetes in overweight people. Nor pay for people who don't exercise at least 3 times a week. Nor pay for coverage for people who drink any alcohol, or soda, or tea. Nor pay for any cancer that has been linked in any way to poor diet. Nor should we pay for any blood transfusions or transplants. Nor should we have to pay for erectile disfunction medication, or any visit to get same.

Nor should we pay for any artificial fertility treatments, nor mental health care. I am sure I am missing some other objectionable things. However, it is only a matter of degree.

We must remember that the Catholic Church's right to religious freedom is more important that the rights of the people to be free from the Catholic Church.
We must remember that the right of Corporations to choose, is more important than the right of the employees to choose.

Did your sarcaso-meter hit the red zone?
10:47 PM on 02/25/2012
why he want to do this, i can't find it appropriate..
http://bestmattressesforbackpain.org/
12:02 AM on 02/13/2012
Health insurance providers shouldn't do that. It is insurance.

You don't call state farm for an oil change...

NO you go do it at the quick lube...

Condoms are cheap. They have them at literally every drug store in every city, town, EVERYWHERE... AND most gas stations..
04:38 PM on 02/13/2012
You complain that insurance companies should not have to pay for birth control, but insurance companoes have not voiced concerns over the compromise. Covering birth control saves the companies money. The pill is about more than just birth control, while condoms are indeed cheap they will not treat fibroids.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
KarenT
The crazies on the right are driving me crazy!
04:23 PM on 02/11/2012
Why do Republicans want to take away healthcare for women?
10:45 AM on 02/10/2012
OBAMA IS A COMMUNIST AND HE IS TRYING TO SET HIS SOCIALIST IDEAS.IT REMINDS ME
OF WHAT HAPPEN IN OUR COUNTRY (CUBA) AT THE BEGINING OF THE CASTROS REGIME.
THEY EXPELLED ALL CATHOLIC PRIEST AND CLOSED ALL CHURCHES... CHRISTIANITY IS
THE BIGGEST ENEMY OF THE COMMUNISTS...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stephanie Eaton Agosta
are you talkin' to me?
06:15 PM on 02/10/2012
you need to breathe
photo
labman57
science educator
09:35 PM on 02/09/2012
Traditional family values according to sanctimonious, Bible-beating, chest-thumping conservative pundits and politicians: unplanned pregnancies by unwed teenaged girls.
08:51 PM on 02/09/2012
Do the insurance companies pay for Viagra?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
KarenT
The crazies on the right are driving me crazy!
04:20 PM on 02/11/2012
Yes they do...including the coverage by these Catholic institutions.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bobWal
06:30 PM on 02/08/2012
Rubio,please do not say "employees" it effects only women. The female employees are the only ones effected.
07:14 AM on 02/02/2012
Here's an idea...Get the superstitions out of health care.
02:18 PM on 02/10/2012
Here's a better one...get the government out of it.
jerseyjoe99982002
less government means more in my pocket
03:28 PM on 02/10/2012
here's an even better idea, repeal Obamacare
05:41 PM on 02/01/2012
So, if we followed Rubio's logic, then any business owned by Christian Scientists gets around having to provide insurance, since they don't believe in medical care of any type.

Somehow I see a slew of tight fisted corporations becoming Christian Scientists in name only just for the religious exception.
06:40 PM on 02/06/2012
There a many places for people to get health care and if someone does not care to work for a Catholic or any other health care provider that will not support Obama Care and be forced to go against all beliefs of their religion. I think the constitution gives us the right to practice any religion we choose as long as it does not interfere with the rights of others. We are not trying to interfere with the rights of others like the ACLU does just to practice our rights under the constitution.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Fromageball
05:37 PM on 02/01/2012
Here's your common sense: if you're morally opposed to birth control, then don't use it.

Seems easy enough.

Oh right, these guys aren't happy unless they can force their fundamental tenets down our throats.
08:26 PM on 02/01/2012
That is a crazy argument. Birth control is personal. If you want to use it great. Just don't ask someone else to pay for it. The feds are doing the jamming not any fundamentalists..read the news
photo
cromag
two parties is the problem
05:27 PM on 02/01/2012
And yet the True Christians(tm) in this country go full wh@rrg@rbl over the mention of Sharia law.

Jail their priests
Tax their assets
Take their land
04:38 PM on 02/01/2012
So sharia law is legal in the U.S. Great.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Honest Babe
04:21 PM on 02/01/2012
Not all women who work for hospitals with Catholic in their name are Catholic, and not all Catholic women support restriction of legal birth control. Their position is based on a religious belief and if they want to restrict birth control, they should receive no funds for their services, just like other businesses that claim religious exemptions. If they are willing to give up the funding, they can do what they want.
The Right is Wrong
Voting for the good guys since 1976!
04:14 PM on 02/01/2012
I NEVER spend a single dollar that will end up in a religious organizations coffers of any sort.