More

Richard Cordray Boycott By Senate Republicans Fizzles

Richard Cordray

First Posted: 01/31/2012 1:12 pm Updated: 01/31/2012 3:00 pm

WASHINGTON -- A Republican boycott of the first official Senate testimony of President Obama's consumer finance watchdog fizzled Tuesday, as only half the GOP members skipped Richard Cordray's appearance out of pique over his recess appointment.

Republican senators had vowed to block any nominee to head the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, but Obama went around them, putting Cordray in the job with a controversial recess appointment while senators were away for the Christmas vacation. They had been holding only "pro forma" sessions solely to prevent such appointments.

Some on the GOP side had hoped for a complete boycott, but four members of the Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs broke ranks.

Some Democrats seemed entertained that the boycott failed to materialize.

"I can't help but note the fact that we had a healthy attendance in committee this morning," Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) said. "That strikes me as a good thing, but also an admission that continuing to hold this nomination hostage until we agree to gut the bureau that we just passed ... means that my colleagues have dialed down some of their opposition."

"Plans of a mass protest appear not to have gone over with many members," Schumer added, suggesting the reason. "It's a losing fight, politically, for them," he said. "Many on the other side wisely don't want to continue the fight because they know it's on the wrong side of consumers ... It makes no sense for senators to go AWOL on these consumer issues."

Committee Chairman Tim Johnson (D-S.D.) had implored members who did attend to focus on the job of learning about the agency's first semi-annual report -- required under the law that created the bureau in order to ensure its accountability. "I would remind my colleagues that we are not here today to debate Mr. Cordray's appointment," Johnson said. "Our job is to roll up our sleeves and provide meaningful oversight."

While most senators did ask policy questions, the ones who attended insisted on focusing on the appointment as well, including the top Republican on the committee, Alabama Sen. Richard Shelby, who complained that the CFPB, created by the Dodd-Frank financial reform act, has far too much unchecked power.

"Unfortunately, the president has now circumvented one of the only remaining checks with his recess appointment of Mr. Cordray," Shelby said.

Other Republicans who attended were Sens. Mike Johanns of Nebraska, Jerry Moran of Kansas and Bob Corker of Tennessee.

Johanns, however, argued that Republicans had every right to be concerned with the manner of the appointment.

"If we accept the premise of your validity in this position," he told Cordray, "then we accept the premise that our ability to offer advice and consent basically disappears, because the president can determine when we're in recess and not in recess, and just appoint whoever."

Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) argued that before Obama took his nearly unprecedented step, Republicans had forced him into that position.

"This is the first time ... in American history, according to the Senate historian, where a political party has blocked a nominee simply because they don't like the agency," Brown said, arguing that at the root of the Republican opposition was their concern about protecting Wall Street.

"In the end, we know that the other side was simply doing the bidding of Wall Street. That's what they've always done, that's what they're doing today, that's what they'll continue to do."

CORRECTION: This article has been changed to reflect that the Democratic senator from Ohio is Sherrod Brown, not Sherry Brown.

Related on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- A Republican boycott of the first official Senate testimony of President Obama's consumer finance watchdog fizzled Tuesday, as only half the GOP members skipped Richard Cordray's appeara...
WASHINGTON -- A Republican boycott of the first official Senate testimony of President Obama's consumer finance watchdog fizzled Tuesday, as only half the GOP members skipped Richard Cordray's appeara...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,013
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (24 total)
  1 of 2  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS

photo
murphthesurf3 06:19 PM on 01/31/2012
AT THE CORE OF THE APPOINTMEN­T: THE LEGITAMACY OF PRO FORMA SESSIONS
Was Congress keeping the President from Performing His Duties?

Some background: Obama use of recess appointmen­ts has been much, much less often than either Clinton (139, 17 a year) or Bush (171, 20 a year). Obama is averaging 6. Presidents have made both intersessi­on (between sessions or Congresses­) and  Read More...
10:20 PM on 02/26/2012
the boycott will not mean anything if no further action is taken..

http://kyphosistreatment.net/
08:31 PM on 02/04/2012
Ninthraphael is the reason I joined. I want to follow isis excellent commentary! You ROCK!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thisboy
10:08 PM on 02/01/2012
I wonder how many of us would still have our jobs if we made it our sole mission to prevent anyone else from doing their jobs?
I am curious why middle class Repub voters insist on electing men who no longer believe their jobs can do anything to help Americans unless they are in the top income brackets.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CaptainRenault
Here to keep an eye on the rascals.
07:43 PM on 02/01/2012
The good Republican sentor may be concerned with the appointment, but he should be equally concerned about the fig leaf tactics of his own party that attempted to block it.

Prediction: The way that the GOP were attempting to dodge this appointment is not legal. Congress was not in session. (And the GOP surely knows it.) The GOP will lose this showdown if they try to push it.

^ ^
05:39 PM on 02/01/2012
Quite interesting that in Dec of 1913 when the Central Bank was created as legislation was prsented before an absent congress as Woodrow Wilson signed such nill three hours later. Now it has come full circle with e appointment of Mr. Courdroy to have the initiative to look deep into the exact causes and those really behind the economic meltdown with all the profits made and wrongdoings uncovered almost every week by those on Wall Street and financial institutions. The Republicans are fighting this as they are backing their campaignh contributors wanting no "regulation" with excuses it will stop entrepeneurship. That same hands off policy allowed outsourcing for profit as our jobs went overseas, no lending , and a myriad of trails left for this new consumer agency to sift throuh the ashes. The times of backing the guilty by hiding under deterrents to prosperity are over. There are many in the country who made their fortunes the right way without stealing and profiting from the American People then not wanting accountability to se how far the links to such atrocities really go. Why would the republicans not want the real truth to be investigated?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ennis438
07:07 AM on 02/01/2012
Republicants have ZERO room to attack Obama on dirty dealings. Their hands and pockets and bank accounts are full of slime money from anti-democracy gangsters who purchase their election. If they want to see dirt, then they need to look into their own mirrors.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Josh Crawford
Just the facts, man!
03:01 AM on 02/01/2012
Obama spent three years putting his hand out to these guys in an attempt at bipartisanship and they've taken every opportunity possible to not only slap his hand away but also to raise a fist in response. Well, they're about to get knockedtheFuqueOUT! And then they're going to come back and try to blame the media or the minorities or ANYONE but themselves. Maybe they'll FINALLY learn their lesson....but I doubt it....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ninthraphael
i have my god! He/she doesn't look like yours!
02:55 AM on 02/01/2012
it hurts!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Josh Crawford
Just the facts, man!
02:53 AM on 02/01/2012
That's a good sign. Maybe (just maybe) the GOP caucus in Congress is going to try and make a last ditch effort to come across as "reasonable" ahead of this Fall's election. Yesterday's 93-2 vote in favor or the STOCK Act (banning insider trading by Congress people) is a hint that such a thing is actually possible. And the best part of such a rational move would be this: it means the end of the TEAParty in America! That would be a HUGE step in the right direction....Better late than never, right?
05:30 PM on 02/01/2012
Who were the twits who voted against the STOCK act and the pea brained reasoning?
05:55 PM on 02/01/2012
Two repubies.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Josh Crawford
Just the facts, man!
01:51 AM on 02/02/2012
Similar bills have been introduced at least four times in the last several years (most by NY Sen. Gillenbrand) and none of those even got to the floor for a vote. So this is a HUGE change/move in the right direction. Maybe these clowns are FINALLY getting the message...
02:36 AM on 02/01/2012
Too bad that the republicanazis plan didn't work---after all, they are NOT worried about the business of the Government; they are worried about their 1% and how much they can get from them.........
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hangdogit
Progressive with some Libertarian (abolish DEA).
02:03 AM on 02/01/2012
Bullies like the GOP depend on people being afraid of them.

Stand up to a bully and they will flee the scene. Obama has stood up to them on the payroll tax cut and tax injustice as well as Cordray.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Josh Crawford
Just the facts, man!
02:57 AM on 02/01/2012
That's so right! I had experiences with bullies as a child and standing up to them is ALWAYS the best option. If you don't stand up to them they will grind you into the ground. They won't destroy you in one fell swoop; they don't have the brains or the balls to do such a thing. They will beat you down little by little and pretend that they are "tough" while they do it. It's amazing how their tune changes when you knock THEM down once or bloody their nose or kick 'em in the balls. I'm glad I learned that a long time ago...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hangdogit
Progressive with some Libertarian (abolish DEA).
10:07 PM on 02/01/2012
My personal encounter with a bully:

As I walked home alone from my fourth-grade class in school, a bigger and tougher kid than me announced that he was going to beat me up (a smaller child was present as an audience). Because I knew that he could clobber me -- and outrun me -- I had to think fast.

I said that my big sister was right behind me and would arrive any second (at that age, a big sister can be enough to scare a bully). The bully looked and said he didn't see her. Stalling some more, I repeated that she was almost upon us.

Then, he climbed up on a curb or small rock to get a better look. Knowing that my sister was not really coming (we usually walked home together), I saw the bully look to his left.

Having heard that the best way to combat bullies is to confront them, I did the unthinkable: while he was looking to his left (with a relaxed stomach), I took a step or two toward him and hit him as hard as I could in the stomach with my right fist, and took off running -- hoping that the punch would slow him down enough for me to get away.

Crying and nearly hysterical with terror, I looked back to see how close he was to catching me. (See next post.)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hangdogit
Progressive with some Libertarian (abolish DEA).
10:09 PM on 02/01/2012
I got the shock of my young life: Not only was he not close and not only was he not even chasing me -- but he was laying on the ground doubled over in pain, gasping, holding his stomach after getting every ounce of air knocked out of him!

And just as they say, that kid nor anyone else ever bothered me again. Eventually we moved away.

PS: Years later, some family friends from the old neighborhood visited my parents -- I was home from college. They mention the bullying incident -- and that the bully when on to play in the NFL! (I saw that potential back then in that tough kid.)

One time at a Happy Hour, I (at 5'5") casually announced that I had beaten up an NFL player and would maybe tell them the story some time. Of course, they wanted to know how immediately. (OK, it was a distortion to say that -- but it got their attention!)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Coyote50
"Taxes are the price we pay for civilization."
01:46 AM on 02/01/2012
I hope someone is noting which senators did not attend and will use that in their elections. And for the senators who went on record as continuing to oppose this agency. I don't think a lot of the 99% will like that...
08:12 PM on 02/01/2012
48.83% of the 99% pay ZERO federal income tax - that would be you?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Coyote50
"Taxes are the price we pay for civilization."
01:06 AM on 02/08/2012
I actually pay a fairly high rate - gladly. I believe that taxes are the price of civilization. Your statistics are wrong by the way. And, more importantly, people who don't pay taxes are making so very little money that they are barely getting by. I hardly expect them to pay taxes until the rich pay them better for the jobs they work. The rich steal and steal and steal.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Steve Rockett
12:54 AM on 02/01/2012
Republicans are the party of the undescended.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:56 AM on 02/01/2012
Like testicles?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ninthraphael
i have my god! He/she doesn't look like yours!
02:56 AM on 02/01/2012
i thought they have hernia..ugh! testicles would be bad!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Steve Rockett
12:52 AM on 02/01/2012
Republicans are going down very hard.
photo
kenEBport
I've been told, "My micro-bio is empty."
12:25 AM on 02/01/2012
This is going to prove a "swimmingly" bad year for the 'Pub's...gotta buy a new 'floatie'...