More

HuffPost Social Reading

Foreclosure Deal Would Give States Future Authority To Punish Firms

Foreclosure

First Posted: 02/ 1/2012 12:59 pm Updated: 02/ 2/2012 12:34 am


* States can seek future penalties up to $5 million-documents

* Settlement will last for 3-1/2 years

* States face end-of-week deadline to join settlement

By Rick Rothacker and Aruna Viswanatha

Feb 1 (Reuters) - A proposed settlement to resolve mortgage abuses by top U.S. banks will give states broad authority to punish firms that mistreat borrowers in the future, according to documents seen by Reuters on Wednesday.

Under the settlement, which states are currently reviewing to decide whether they will join, the states and a separate "monitoring committee" will have the authority to go to court to enforce the terms and seek penalties of up to $5 million per violation.

A strong enforcement mechanism could help the states and the Obama administration sell the deal to the public, after left-leaning activist groups have questioned whether the negotiations were too lenient on the banks.

States have just a few more days to make a decision, and an announcement of a settlement could come as early as next week, people familiar with the talks said.

The settlement, expected to be filed as a consent judgment in federal court in Washington, D.C., will last for 3-1/2 years , according to documents laying out the pending deal's enforcement terms.

Joseph Smith, the banking commissioner in North Carolina, is expected to serve as the monitor on the settlement, people familiar with the matter told Reuters on Monday.

Negotiations between state and federal officials to resolve allegations of misconduct in servicing home loans have stretched into their second year, as some dissident states said the proposed deal was too lenient on the banks.

In exchange for up to $25 billion, much in the form of cutting mortgage debt for distressed homeowners, the banks will resolve state and federal lawsuits about servicing misconduct and faulty foreclosures, and some lawsuits about how they made the loans.

Banks have been accused of robo-signing documents and other sloppy paperwork in unlawfully rushing to deal with a flood of foreclosures triggered by the 2007-2009 financial crisis.

The core group of banks involved in settlement talks are Bank of America Corp, Wells Fargo & Co, JPMorgan Chase & Co, Citigroup Inc. and Ally Financial Inc .

The final value of the settlement will depend on which states it includes, and could drop sharply if states like California, one of the hardest hit by the foreclosure crisis, do not join.

On Wednesday, Oregon Attorney General John Kroger said his state will join the settlement. He said Oregon can expect to receive around $30 million from the settlement, and its distressed homeowners can expect around $100 million to $200 million in relief.


GIVING THE STATES SOME MUSCLE

Some states have raised concerns that banks have not adequately followed through on prior settlements, a concern that has pushed government negotiators to establish more forceful enforcement mechanisms in this deal than have been used in the past.

The enforcement terms also mark progress in states' ability to directly monitor mortgage servicing at national banks. For decades, big banks fought state efforts to enforce consumer protection laws by arguing that national banking laws pre-empted their authority.

Under the settlement, the banks will set up internal quality control groups to assess their mortgage servicing units' compliance with the terms of the agreement, and turn over quarterly reports to the monitor about servicing complaints.

If the monitor concludes the group "did not correctly implement" the reviews, the monitor can have a third party review the work.

If the monitor finds information that a servicer "may be engaged in a pattern of noncompliance," he can undertake a more thorough review, and impose even tougher standards.

Servicer compliance will be measured through detailed information about unlawful foreclosure sales and incorrect denials of loan modifications, according to the documents.

If the servicer continues to violate any of the terms, any of the states or a monitoring committee can go to court and seek penalties of up to $1 million for the first "uncured" violation and up to $5 million for a second.

Servicers will pick up the tab for the monitor, the documents said.

The monitoring committee is comprised of representatives of state attorneys general, the U.S. Justice Department, and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, who will review the work of the monitor.

The document says that all the terms are subject to approval by federal banking regulators. (Reporting By Rick Rothacker in Charlotte and Aruna Viswanatha in Washington, D.C.; Editing by Tim Dobbyn)

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
* States can seek future penalties up to $5 million-documents * Settlement will last for 3-1/2 years * States face end-of-week deadline to join settlement ...
* States can seek future penalties up to $5 million-documents * Settlement will last for 3-1/2 years * States face end-of-week deadline to join settlement ...
Filed by Reuters  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 79
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
anonymous67
05:56 PM on 02/03/2012
This is a bad, bad deal for Americans. These criminals belong in prison -- not retirement in lives of lavish luxury with ill-gotten gains -- even as their victims continue to suffer. Millions have been harmed.

And these were not accidents or an oversight, these were felony crimes that were systematically and knowingly committed thousands upon thousands of times.

America DEMANDS justice -- not amnesty.
01:40 PM on 02/02/2012
The headline makes this seem like a good thing but really if these people are in prison where they should be they won't be committing the crimes again for about 20 years. They need to be in prison!
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
TeeLolly
11:47 AM on 02/02/2012
Giving states the "authority" to punish banks in the future with limited financial penalties if the banks mistreat borrowers again is like giving courts the right to place a mass ki//er on probation in the future if he ki//s anyone else ...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bobwitmer
The Truth shall set you free
10:42 AM on 02/02/2012
"Future Authority?" What about the past practices? Do they get away with it? Crooks don't do their deeds when the cops are watching

As usual, Big Business gets away with their scurvy practices, and the people get screwed.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stratego
05:55 AM on 02/02/2012
Where is the REAL justice for REAL citizens, not corporate ones.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stratego
05:54 AM on 02/02/2012
What about the current white collar criminals. Why aren't they in jail? Crooked banksters.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Law101
My micro-bio is now full.
02:15 AM on 02/02/2012
I started to think it was another also on the wrist deal until I saw this:

"If the servicer continues to violate any of the terms, any of the states or a monitoring committee can go to court and seek penalties of up to $1 million for the first "uncured" violation and up to $5 million for a second."

This actually sounds tough enough to force the banks to comply with the terms of the settlement, if that is indeed accurate.
01:34 AM on 02/02/2012
The whole deal sounds like a slap on the wrist for the banks.
09:27 PM on 02/01/2012
As of 7PM Eastern Time, Bloomberg is reporting the deadline is now February 6.

And AG Masto's 38 Questions appears to have something to do with it. Oregon and Connecticut are on board. Delaware is not.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
J T K
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
12:13 AM on 02/02/2012
Considering how many banks are incorporated in Delaware that's somewhat surprising, they're probably getting a lot of pressure to sign on. I'd be incredibly surprised if they don't sign on before the deadline, this may very well be a ploy so they don't look like they are caving to the banks too quickly.
08:46 PM on 02/01/2012
This is BS. How is it legal for the state to take away the right of a private citizen to sue for violating the law or a contract the citizen has with a lender. And notice that they get penalties for FUTURE violations. Any AG that agrees to give the banksters blanket immunity for their mortgage crimes without any guarantee of fixing the harm they've caused ought to be drummed out of office.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bayard Waterbury
social philosopher
08:18 PM on 02/01/2012
Wow, I am definitely hot under the collar about this. The settlement would be small at a $trillion, but the size they are talking about is miniscule. What the banks did has cost this country at least $10 tillion dollars, and resulted in damage to this economy that will continue for at least a decade, if not more. This year's projected Federal deficit (by CBO) is about $1 trillion. The banks own that, and yet, since the problem started, the FED has pumped at least $7 trillion into them, and they have yet to pay for anything at all, no jail time, no major penalties, no bonuses sacrificed, nothing!!!!! When are we going to wise up. There are now more than 35 of the more than 50 million under and unemployed Americans who are the responsibility of these gangster banks. And yet they sit in their ivory towers and spend their millions buying politicians from both major parties to protect them from any backlash. These people are PURE EVIL, PERIOD!!!!
schatsie
banks are more dangerous than standing armies
10:53 PM on 02/01/2012
Exactly and that is exactly why the Preferential Capital gains rate should be replace by the income tax rate and ALSO why we should restore the Eisenhower income tax rates.....and they should thank their lucky stars that A WEALTH TAX OF 5% is not invoked immediately.....
07:42 PM on 02/01/2012
Until we ban all out of courts settlements of 1$ for 10$ fraud , it doesn't matter how many new regulations or deals are introduced ...
schatsie
banks are more dangerous than standing armies
10:54 PM on 02/01/2012
Just a little more wealth redistribution to the .1%....
07:24 PM on 02/01/2012
This is just more pandering.

As long as housing prices continue to fall, who cares?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:07 PM on 02/01/2012
the banking commisioner of NC will be in charge of the settlement? NC home of bank of america. this settlement sunds as usless as the countrywide settlement in 2008 -countryewide and bank of america did not comply and they still have not been held accountable for upholding all the conditions of that settlement.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Blogging Patriot
Serf-ing the Economy
06:16 PM on 02/01/2012
When states tried to use consumer protection laws to crack down on predatory lending in 2003, the comptroller of the currency blocked the effort, asserting that states had no authority over national banks (making "liar loans" the new standard.) When the states sued, Bush took his case to the supreme court and LOST the case in 2009. But by then the damage had been done.

North Carolina’s attorney general, said, “They took 50 sheriffs off the beat at a time when lending was becoming the Wild West.”

http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article.aspx?id=513719
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/21/business/21admin.html

After the Responsible Lending Act failed in Congress (the "Loan Shark Protection Act" designed to preempt stronger state laws against anti-predatory lending) the Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee bypassed Congress and by Republican party line vote relaxed the underwriting criteria for mortgages so that income did not have to be verified ("liar loans"). To do this Bush had the Office of the Currency Comptroller invoke an 1863 law to give itself the power to override state laws governing mortgage lending.

Information and the Supreme Court syllabus on the OCC rules:

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/29/business/29bizcourt.html
http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/08pdf/08-453.pdf