Gwyneth Paltrow For Harper's Bazaar March 2012: Photoshop Fail? (PHOTOS, POLL)

We've spent basically all day drooling over the new Gwyneth Paltrow shoot in Harper's Bazaar's March 2012 issue.

But we paused briefly when looking at one of the stunning Terry Richardson pics, which shows Gwynnie having fun in her stretchy Anthony Vaccarello gown. The actress' gams are amazingly toned... yet also bent at amazingly odd angles. Check out the second shot from the right -- is that some sort of Photoshop Fail?

Either Gwynnie is pulling the back hem of her dress around the front of her leg or the entire lower half of her body has been digitally modified. It's a toss-up.

See for yourself. Is something wrong with this photo?

Quick Poll

Is Gwyneth Paltrow a Photoshop victim?

TOTALLY! Her legs look attached in the strangest ways.

NO WAY. Her dress is just making it look that way.

VOTE

Share your vote on Facebook so your friends can take this poll

Also on HuffPost:

Comments

[SapphireBlaze9]

12:04 AM on 02/05/2012

Hm, Terry Richardson sometimes posts pics of the adorable Matthew Gray Gubler- and the pics are always expressive and occasionally spontaneous. They never have the signs of post-work. So if the pic of her is photoshopped, I doubt Terry would have approved of it or done it himself.

[Asmarina]

07:46 PM on 02/04/2012

enough of the same actors and models representing beauty. try others, editors!!

[maliksmama]

07:34 PM on 02/04/2012

I'm 5'2". I've always wished for long legs. Life sucks!

[deathbychanel]

09:05 AM on 02/04/2012

Nope. Those moves are doable. I just stood up and tried it. Even with my disappointingly short legs these positions work :)

[eXpresso]

04:30 PM on 02/03/2012

legs: very nice
interview: yikes.

[hypyrwyf]

01:59 PM on 02/03/2012

She looks hot. I love those shoes with that dress.

[thehappymos]

05:52 PM on 02/02/2012

That outfit looks like something my preschool girls put together when I give them scarves or swatches of fabric to "design their own look". I'm not sure which group that says more about.

[goosie29]

02:41 PM on 02/02/2012

Eww?

[by-the-sea-]

01:20 PM on 02/02/2012

I'm quite sure that the third and fourth pics are positions that are impossible for a human body to achieve. There is no way to have one leg bent outward that way from the hip, while the other one is straight ahead! The 49% that say it looks fine need glasses, pronto!!

[Kellybelle22]

01:51 PM on 02/02/2012

I definitely think those third and fourth shots are tweaked, but remember that she's a longtime yogini. Their (our) bodies do things more flexibly than most!

[by-the-sea-]

02:10 PM on 02/02/2012

Maybe so, but it's definitely a photo shop flub.

[SkipEU]

07:44 PM on 02/15/2012

impossible? I can do it with ease.

[jmmoore27]

12:42 PM on 02/02/2012

cant stand this women...only famous cause her Dad and Mom were Hollywood freaks too

[DaMojo]

12:31 PM on 02/02/2012

Good. Stay in Europe. And please shut up.

[djrowan]

11:24 AM on 02/02/2012

Paltrow should keep her mouth shut. she and the interviewer are just another glaring example of the dumbing down of America.

[monigram38]

10:57 AM on 02/02/2012

I really like when actors say what they really think. I think that this dumb American will use her uncivilized American dollars to NEVER PAY to see a movie Ms. Gwyneth Paltrow is in. I also REFUSE to BUY any magazine she is on the cover of.

[CKieffer]

10:48 AM on 02/02/2012

“I like living here because I don't fit into the bad side of American psychology­­. The British are much more intelligen­­t and civilized than the Americans.­­”

Ok.. in that case...

"I like you living there because I don't like the bad side of American actors who think they are much more intelligent and civilized than they actually are."

[Jes from Kemah]

10:46 AM on 02/02/2012

Another name I wish to never hear again...Gwyeth Paltrow. OMG. Spoiled Rich Kid to the Max.