More

Homeland Security Theater: 8 Measures That Feel Good But Don't Make You Safer

First Posted: 02/ 1/2012 1:00 pm   Updated: 02/ 1/2012 2:14 pm

WASHINGTON -- The good news first. Government homeland security agencies are moving toward a more rational, risk-based system of protection.

Now the bad news. Even if you eventually get to keep your shoes on at the airport, many other annoying, expensive and, terrorism experts say, unnecessary measures introduced since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks will remain as part of our "security theater."

"Security theater refers to security measures that make people feel more secure without doing anything to actually improve their security," explained terrorism analyst Bruce Schneier on his blog.

He continued, "Security is both a feeling and a reality. The propensity for security theater comes from the interplay between the public and its leaders. When people are scared, they need something done that will make them feel safe, even if it doesn't truly make them safer. Politicians naturally want to do something in response to crisis, even if that something doesn't make any sense."

"Unfortunately for politicians," Schneier wrote, "the security measures that work (such as better intelligence gathering) are largely invisible."

In the meantime, though, the show must go on:

+ Add a slide
Have you been an unwitting actor in "security theater"? Tell us about it.
Find a picture, click the participate button, add a title and upload your picture
Air Marshals
1  of  9
PLAY
FULLSCREEN
ZOOM
SHARE THIS SLIDE 
Air marshals fly incognito to "detect, deter, and defeat hostile acts targeting U.S. air carriers, airports, passengers, and crew." But David Schanzer, co-director of Duke University's Institute for Homeland Security Solutions, knows of no studies that show they actually thwart attacks on planes. "Is there any proof that the marshals would do a better job stopping an attack than the concerted and spontaneous efforts of the crew and passengers?" he asks.

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- The good news first. Government homeland security agencies are moving toward a more rational, risk-based system of protection. Now the bad news. Even if you eventually get to keep you...
WASHINGTON -- The good news first. Government homeland security agencies are moving toward a more rational, risk-based system of protection. Now the bad news. Even if you eventually get to keep you...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 101
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
Buckeye Dreams
Blue and stuck in the red!
11:50 AM on 02/05/2012
Security is a fantasy. What ever someone can think of some one else can figure a way around.
On the other hand, it would be insane not to respond to known threats.
Maybe we should all just fly naked, put everything in the cargo hold. You get your clothes at you destination.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dbrett480
10:17 PM on 02/03/2012
We complain about "security theater" but when something happens, we complain that the government didn't do enough. The fact is that every little bit helps. We have to be right 100% of the time to stop a terrorist attack, and that means early warning systems, dog patrols, full-body scanners, etc. The terrorists only need to be right once, so if their is less security in their way, the chance of them achieving a successful terrorist attack is greatly increased.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jerry Bourbon
11:49 AM on 02/08/2012
Spoken like a true sheeple.
12:04 PM on 02/03/2012
That first one seems kind of stupid: "Is there any proof that the marshals would do a better job stopping an attack than the concerted and spontaneous efforts of the crew and passengers?"

Jeez...I don't know, but I'm gonna go with the air marshall on that one.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Achilles1963
01:55 PM on 02/03/2012
Biggest difference? Air Marshals have guns.
01:59 AM on 02/03/2012
the most laughable thing are these soldiers in full khaki camouflage gear patrolling the nyc subways. this gear was designed to make them invisible in the bush, where they would blend into the foliage, but having them wear this in the subway makes them stand out like a sore fist...
11:36 AM on 02/03/2012
Ummm....they are not TRYING to hide when patrolling the subway, genius.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Achilles1963
01:42 PM on 02/03/2012
You missed the point kid. Try again when you get out of school.
01:52 AM on 02/03/2012
the real laughable thing is seeing soldiers in full camouflage khakis patrolling the subways here in nyc... these khakis were designed to make them look invisible in the bush--where the green patterns would blend into the foliage. But in the nyc subways, they stick out like a sore fist...
07:11 PM on 02/01/2012
Ok, Time for TSA to go. Yes we need safety measures, but I sure as hell dont need someone feeling up my boobs after one of the naked type xrays. Then when I get home (meaning going through TSA twice). I dumped my purse completely out. I found a lighter, pair of scissors, and paraphanila, maily a metal cigarrette. I feel really safe. No I did not intentionally take those items with me. I am an avid quilter, so I keep scissors in my purse. I smoke, we already know what, so I carry the lighter and cigg. with me. They didnt find those, but felt the need to feel my boobs? Some crazy system.
07:32 PM on 02/01/2012
According to the TSA website, lighters, cigarettes, and scissors (even metal ones with pointed tips, as long as the blades are less than 4 inches) are allowed for carry-on. Bum deal about your boobs though!

http://www.tsa.gov/travelers/airtravel/prohibited/permitted-prohibited-items.shtm#4
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Achilles1963
01:54 PM on 02/03/2012
We do not need the security. There have been exactly two terrorist attacks in the USA in the last 100 years and one of them was committed by white guys FROM the USA. Terrorism is less of a threat than street crime and crackheads.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jerry Bourbon
11:51 AM on 02/08/2012
I am in full agreement on the idiocy of security theater, but "two" terrorist attacks in 100 years? Muslims went after the world trade center twice. OK City. The weathermen in the 70's. The "Donkey Bomb" that killed dozens on Wall Street in the 20's. Ft. Hood. Etc etc.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
eejantz
05:07 PM on 02/01/2012
With the mindset change of what a potential hijackers end goals are post 911 there is no way that a couple of terrorists will be able to hijack another plane. I can promise you that if I am on the plane I will be put down before the plane goes down.

All of this effort wasted in airport "security" when there is barely an eyeball check on people flying privately.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
randallr01
randall reynolds refuses to tan
04:48 PM on 02/01/2012
Most of it really is just "feel good" safety.
myaa
Justice - the only way to peace!
04:40 PM on 02/01/2012
Bottomline -
"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety".
(BENJAMIN FRANKLIN, in November 11, 1755)

Looks like our founding fathers did know a thing or two about security.

On a separate note, all major news outlet are quoting the defence secretary Panetta saying that US will withdraw from combat roles in Afghanistan by end of 2013 and switch to a mainly trianing and advisory role.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cadawa
04:29 PM on 02/01/2012
It's all reactive. None of this stuff makes us feel safer: it makes us feel annoyed, invaded and exploited.
The window dressing is all about the bloated Homeland Security budget, lucrative .01% government contracts for goods and services (ie. revolving door Michael Chertoff and his unsafe xray machines) and getting you used to surrendering your civil rights before they winkle them away entirely.
There is one exception. The Air Marshall program as practiced pre 9-11 (before it was gutted) was effective. In its current anaemic version, it is not.
07:40 PM on 02/01/2012
The Air Marshal program, pre-9/11, consisted of about 33 air marshals. Now there are enough to cover at least 21 field offices...I wouldn't call that "gutted" or "anaemic".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cadawa
08:18 PM on 02/01/2012
You're right about there being more but not about whether they are more effective. There are 27,000 flights a day and 2000 air marshalls. Only half of their time is spent in the air. A poisonous work atmosphere is making things much harder for employees. 'Intimidation, retaliation, discrimination' etc. Laws suits are pending. They are fielding good candidates but can' retain them. http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=6162290n
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SickHippie
No, YOUR micro-bio is empty.
04:18 PM on 02/01/2012
The implication here is that these measures somehow made people feel safer.

I don't know anyone who felt safer after the liquid limit, no lighters rule, or full body scanning were implemented. Every single person I talked with (even in Missouri) knew it was a sham.

The liquid limit is actually there to boost revenue at airport businesses. Before 9/11, anyone could go into the airport all the way to the gate. They had a customer base of not only travelers, but their family and friends as well. Post 9/11, not only were those non-flying customers removed, but the number of passengers dropped drastically as well. This rule is there to force people to purchase their beverages and such in the airport.
03:59 PM on 02/01/2012
Profiling. I know, people hate it because it works.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cadawa
04:30 PM on 02/01/2012
If it worked, they wouldn't hate it, would they.
myaa
Justice - the only way to peace!
04:36 PM on 02/01/2012
Racial profiling never works, cause terrorist come in all colors shapes and sizes (yes even "islamists"). But behavioral profiling - there is no better way to catch a terrorist, but it need highly trained agents, not the regular "mc-pay" getting agents currently manning the security points.
08:08 PM on 02/01/2012
So you want to employ a bunch of clinical psychologists to man the checkpoints? I'm willing to bet that the TSA payroll will go up a wee bit.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Achilles1963
01:48 PM on 02/03/2012
The airports ALWAYS had agents trained in behavioral psychology. Even before the "World Trade Center" bombings.
03:56 PM on 02/01/2012
Give the TSA and Border Patrol jobs to Returning Vets if they want them. They are more in tune with the possible threat.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cadawa
04:32 PM on 02/01/2012
Who shall we give the Constitutional scofflaw Janet Napolitano's job to?
The people that allegedly caused 9-11 were living in the US legally.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bethab
04:52 PM on 02/01/2012
That's actually a really good idea!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DON McDONALD
Politics is NOT a spectator sport, get involved
03:50 PM on 02/01/2012
Here's another to add to the list:

If you want to mail an item that weights over 13 ounces, you have to stand in line at the Post Office, so that a clerk (who as far as I can see it both totally untrained and unconcerned) can look at it and toss it in a bin...BUT, I and millions of others don't have to bother!

Why?

The rules don't apply to metered or permit mailed items, (that would make things "burdensome" for business)...thus it seems that either the government has concluded that terrorists are too dumb to use a postage meter...OR it's a total waste of your time so that it can LOOK like they are doing something...which to you think it is?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cadawa
04:30 PM on 02/01/2012
To get you used to living in a society where 'everything that isn't required is prohibited'.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Achilles1963
01:45 PM on 02/03/2012
That is funny. I always enjoy it when a $7/hr, 20 year old 7-11 employee checks my $20 bill to see if it's counterfeit. I am surprised criminals can exist in the face of such tight security.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DON McDONALD
Politics is NOT a spectator sport, get involved
04:45 PM on 02/03/2012
Yes, but...
photo
Buckeye Dreams
Blue and stuck in the red!
11:21 AM on 02/05/2012
Achilles; your "heel" is showing.
As a small (under 100k) mostly cash business; I'm aware of the huge increase in counterfeit bills due to high quality copiers. Fortunately there are two low or no cost tests that can be quickly performed to eliminate all but the most sophisticated fakes. Checking bills is a good business practice and has nothing to do security.
In fact it is good personal practice to check all large bills that you get outside of a bank. Just hold the bill up to a light and if you can't see a vertical stripe and a watermark, it is a fake. Remember that if you are caught passing counterfeit bills you will have some serious explaining to do to the Cops.
myaa
Justice - the only way to peace!
02:55 PM on 02/01/2012
Working as a consultant till a few years back, I had to endure this "security theater" numerous time, including an extended period of time where I had to wear a leg brace due to an injured and badly healed hip. Each time I had to stop near the scanners, move out of line and remove my shoes and braces (while at the same time signalling to the people behind me to move ahead) then walk over through the scanners (albeit painfully) to the other side to wear it back again. Making things worse were they (the TSA agents) would not allow any chairs on all most all airports for people like me to sit down and remove my shoes.
A couple of times some "kindly" TSA agent would say that "you do not need to remove your shoes", only to be patted down, frisked and my luggage rummaged through if I followed that instruction.
All this got so frustrating that I eventually quit that job and settled for a more sedetary (although less paying) job.

Adding to the pain was the fact that I knew that this was not doing anything to make me more safe with the news on the Saudi prince and other "almost successful" attacks coming through.