iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Indiana Right-To-Work Bill Becomes Law

Indiana Right To Work

TOM LoBIANCO   02/ 1/12 06:49 PM ET  AP

INDIANAPOLIS — Indiana became the Rust Belt's first right-to-work state Wednesday in a move that is sure to embolden advocates seeking to curtail union rights across the country. But whether other states can replicate the conservatives' success in Indiana is less certain.

The political factors that aligned in Indiana were so unique, and it is unlikely the same thing could happen in other states – at least for now.

Gov. Mitch Daniels' signature Wednesday on the bill that made Indiana the nation's 23rd right-to-work state was the end of a contentious two-year political battle that included partisan bickering, lawmaker walkouts, legislative stall tactics and union protests. In the end, Indiana marked the first win for national right-to-work supporters who tried in vain last year to push the measure despite a Republican sweep of statehouses nationwide in 2010.

It also could stand as their only victory for a while, based on a mix of obstacles that have spurned advocates in other states stretching from New Hampshire to Minnesota. The very factors that made Indiana's right-to-work campaign uniquely successful – large state House and Senate majorities and Daniels' ability to clear one last run for governor in 2008 before mounting a unified push for the measure – also could undermine similar efforts elsewhere.

National Right to Work Committee Vice President Greg Mourad says two major obstacles have blocked his group's progress: governors who oppose right-to-work and pro-union Republicans in state legislatures. But much of that could change in 2012 depending on how some key state elections pan out.

"The next election should tell us quite a bit," Mourad said Wednesday afternoon.

In New Hampshire, right-to-work supporters found themselves unable to overturn a veto from Democratic Gov. John Lynch last year. Lynch is not running for re-election in November and the New Hampshire governor's office has often been traded between Democrats and Republicans in the last few decades.

Likewise in Montana, Democratic Gov. Brian Schweitzer is term-limited against seeking re-election in November. His veto threat has stalled efforts there, Mourad said.

However in other Rust Belt states, right-to-work advocates have run up against squeamish Republicans who don't want to pick fights with private sector unions whose influence has waned with the decline of American manufacturing, but not to a point where they are no longer a clear political threat.

Michigan's Republican Gov. Rick Snyder, who is up for re-election in 2014, has called right-to-work "too divisive" and Michigan's Republican Senate Majority Leader Randy Richardville said last week he doubted right-to-work would bring the economic benefits promised by supporters.

Experts say many factors influence states' economies and that it's nearly impossible to isolate the impact of right to work. For major industries, access to supplies, infrastructure, key markets and a skilled workforce are key factors, according to business recruitment specialists. For a state's workers, the impact of right-to-work legislation is limited because only about 7 percent of private sector employees are unionized. Over the years, job growth has surged in states with, and without, right-to-work laws.

"They are often the problem, guys like Randy Richardville, who have been pretty comfortable with unions," Mourad said. Mourad noted that dealing with pro-labor Republicans can mean either building large pro-right-to-work majorities around them in a chamber or voting them out of office.

Michigan's larger union presence has also made Republican lawmakers pause more than their Indiana counterparts, who work in a state where union membership dropped by roughly 50 percent in the last decade.

Right-to-work supporters won a decisive victory in Indiana in 2006 after the right-to-work supporter Sen. Greg Walker, a Columbus Republican, unseated Indiana's long-time Republican Senate Pro Tem Bob Garton, an ardent right-to-work opponent.

But even with the right parts, a right-to-work victory is never guaranteed, said Garton's successor, Senate President Pro Tem David Long, Republican of Fort Wayne.

"It doesn't come without a fight," Long said. "It is a passionate issue and people don't want to take that fight on."

Meanwhile, the union backlash in other Rust Belt states in the last few months has emboldened opponents trying to bolster their defenses.

Wisconsin's GOP-dominated Assembly passed a law backed by Gov. Scott Walker in March that strips nearly all collective bargaining rights from public-sector unions. Walker is now preparing for a recall election after opponents turned in a million signatures aimed at forcing a vote and ousting him from office. In November, Ohio voters repealed a law limiting collective bargaining rights that was championed by Gov. John Kasich and fellow Republican lawmakers.

Indiana right-to-work opponents won a second key victory in December, when Daniels switched his position on right-to-work. As a candidate for office, Daniels had promised Indiana Teamsters in 2004 he would oppose any effort to make Indiana a right-to-work state.

He explained his change as an evolution on the issue based on new facts and the ongoing problems.

"Seven years of evidence and experience ultimately demonstrated that Indiana did need a right-to-work law to capture jobs for which, despite our highly rated business climate, we are not currently being considered," Daniels said in a statement Wednesday.

For states without all the needed pieces, supporters have resorted to work-arounds and duct tape, in their efforts to ban mandatory union fees.

Missouri right-to-work supporters are attempting to skirt Democratic Gov. Jay Nixon's almost certain veto by moving a version of the measure that would go straight to the voters for consideration.

Likewise, in Michigan, supporters are pushing a series of measures that opponents have dubbed "mini right-to-work." A House committee controlled by Republicans approved a bill Tuesday that would require employees to annually renew their written consent allowing certain forms of union dues to be deducted from their paychecks.

The lead sponsor of New Hampshire's right-to-work proposal, Rep. Will Smith, Republican of New Castle, has submitted a new version of the measure that would let public employees could opt out of joining a union but would then have them negotiate their own contracts.

Smith says he hopes the re-jiggered bill will win the few extra votes needed to overturn another likely veto from Lynch.

___

Associated Press writers Glenn Adams in Augusta, Maine, Garrett Brnger in Concord, N.H., Tom Davies in Indianapolis, David Lieb in Jefferson City and Tim Martin in Lansing contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
INDIANAPOLIS — Indiana became the Rust Belt's first right-to-work state Wednesday in a move that is sure to embolden advocates seeking to curtail union rights across the country. But whether oth...
INDIANAPOLIS — Indiana became the Rust Belt's first right-to-work state Wednesday in a move that is sure to embolden advocates seeking to curtail union rights across the country. But whether oth...
Filed by Luke Johnson  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 554
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (7 total)
11:12 PM on 02/04/2012
How come when car companies like GM made their largest profits ever in 2004 they did it with the same union employees who everyone is villifying. Oops but then in 2008 when GM started to go on a downfall because excutives did not decide to stop making Hummers and Escalades, they blamed the downfall on the unions, but kept giving themselves 10 million dolllars bonuses even though their caompany was going bankrupt. Come on people, lets be smarter than this. Quit blaming unions.
11:05 PM on 02/04/2012
Way to go Indiana. Your well on your way to become one of the poorest states in the US just like the majority of "Right to Work--for minumum wage" states. let the facts speak for themselves and keep on listening to Mitch "who cares about the middleclass because I am RICH and want to stay that way" Daniels.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/09/15/americas-poorest-states-_n_964058.html

the only "right to work' state that is not below the 50% level in poverty and incomes out of the 50 staes is Virginia and that is because it has an abumdant amount of government jobs associated with DC which are public sector UNION jobs.
06:01 PM on 02/03/2012
I wonder how some of you would feel if you were forced into something other than a union. What if all - say GM- employees HAD to be catholic, or HAD to join the Shriners as a condition of their employment? Would you be so adamant? This law has absolutely nothing to do with lower wages but that's the typical thug mentality union rhetoric at work. Nobody should have to be a part of any union or club they don't want to.
10:46 PM on 02/03/2012
Amen. Couldn't have said it better myself. F&F
01:51 PM on 02/08/2012
What an ignorant comment. This legislation enables NON UNION members to take advantage of UNION grievance mechanisms. Perhaps if you would stop listening to Fox, you might actually understand some current events

btw, you are grossly over fanned
01:20 PM on 02/02/2012
If the unions don't like it move to another state.
10:52 PM on 02/03/2012
Exactly. I say they all go to Illinois, where Obama-nites are sure to welcome them with open arms.
01:53 PM on 02/08/2012
Every so called right to work state has suffered a net decrease in income levels after enacting the legislation. Furthermore all but one of the so called right to work states rank below the 50% poverty line

wait....wait....I know....no fair using actual knowledge
11:10 PM on 02/01/2012
Its interesting to read the comments villifying organized labor as some sort of reason for off shoring
jobs or making U.S. manufacturers uncompetitive in the global market place.
Unfortunately the collected data and lengthy studies conducted by think tanks and socio-moral
intellectual organizations dont concede the high ground to the union bashers.
Actually the auto industry as a whole was its own undoing thru its denial and subsequent inability
to offer automobiles that were gas efficient and appealed to consumers.
Actually thru off shoring and globalization the wealthy have increased their wealth 125 percent in the last 25 years while all the time union membership was dropping.
I could go on forever but its pointless. This is just another facet of the perverted manifest destiny
mentality that almost eradicated the native american indian.
What I am actually writing mister and mrs. union basher is that apparently you have not done your homework.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chevy706
Fighting Liberals' Attack on Liberty.
11:06 AM on 02/03/2012
Your argument is inaccurate at best. GM has been #1 or #2 in worldwide sales for the last 74 years. It's pretty safe to say, that with 6800 units sold, the Chevy Volt is not exactly pushing those numbers much. Toyota, despite it's myriad of fuel efficient vehicles, has fallen to #3 on the list.

Sales is not the issue. Exorbinant legacy costs and higher labor costs are the primary reason for GM's woes.
05:17 PM on 02/04/2012
Number one cost in a car is health insurance. Highest medical costs in the world here in the U.S.A. is a problem that free market will not fix as GOP suggests. My wife has had surgery abroad from great Doctor's at a fraction of cost here in America.
photo
tjdwill02
There is no free lunch
04:27 PM on 02/03/2012
Did you sleep through freshman economics ? The modern economy no longer values certain skills they way it did 25 years ago. If you built cars in Detroit. 25 years ago, you were guaranteed a middle to upper middle class lifestyle with off the chart benefits and a full pension after 25 years. That's no longer a realistic expectation. Wages have never in the history of industry kept up with productivity, as the are a metric by which productivity is measured. Consequently continued higher wages drove productivity to all time lows, before the collapse of GM. Of course the unions made a hugh difference or they wouldn't have agree to give up the jobs bank, and cut starting wages in half to $14/hr from $28 per hour (higher than the average university educated engineer).
09:41 PM on 02/06/2012
Try telling that to the heating and cooling repairman after your AC unit has just broke down and its 100 degrees outside. Quite frankly, I now vary rates according to zip code.
Alls fair in love and war.
photo
George Hanshaw
There are none so blind as those who will not see.
08:44 PM on 02/01/2012
“Free at last; free at last; thank God Almighty we are free at last.”
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:35 PM on 02/01/2012
Want to save money Indiana?? Chew off your legs.
ColoradoPete
End of term coming.......
05:11 PM on 02/01/2012
If the voices of the union workers could be heard, over the cries of the union bosses that is, I think we'd hear a clear message that the "right to work" laws are a much needed reform in the way unions operate........................
photo
RubyMontana
When did money become a four-letter-word?
05:11 PM on 02/01/2012
So glad the law was passed.
Now we can all watch the Super Bowl in peace!
Time to go home, Unions. The "job" is done.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:51 PM on 02/01/2012
It's is 2012 and our private businesses are competing GLOBALLY! I would love to make as much as I can but I don't do it at the expense of other tax payers who work just as hard as I do. Unions began when businesses were only competing locally and we didn't have OSHA or Labor Laws. Unions seems to protect bad employees even more then good employees. This raises business costs and reduces the chances our businesses can compete in other countries.
Try creating your own job or have the unions start creating jobs rather than chasing them overseas with their demands.
Why do public unions exist? because they have a huge number of employees that can strong arm the policitians to cave to their demands at the expense of other tax payers.
photo
RubyMontana
When did money become a four-letter-word?
04:53 PM on 02/01/2012
Good post.
Unions have become redundant.
Their purpose is to collect dues to buy politicians.
And they know it.
They have, in essence, priced themselves right out of the market.
photo
logansteele1
You can't have it both ways.
07:14 PM on 02/01/2012
Sadly, a once proud part of American history, unions have become as bad as the monster they were fighting.
02:58 PM on 02/02/2012
That is an interesting comment Ruby.
Almost says something for Campaign Finance Reform but then what would all the
corporations and Uber-wealthy do with the money made through globalization?
Create jobs and manufacture goods in the U.S. ?
The financial collapse, ensuing recession and massive unemployment are not
a cause of collected dues.
ColoradoPete
End of term coming.......
05:12 PM on 02/01/2012
Of course you are right..........thanks.
04:28 PM on 02/01/2012
Why do we allow the words "right to work" to be used on bills like this? Why not call it the "rainbow unicorn support act." That would be just as close to describing what it is as the words "right to work."
photo
George Hanshaw
There are none so blind as those who will not see.
08:48 PM on 02/01/2012
"Why do we allow the words "right to work" to be used on bills like this?"

You are, of course, ABSOLUTELY CORRECT! We ought to call it the right to keep the wages you earn without paying protection to thugs.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
demsrsilly
Proud supporter of workplace freedom.
07:31 AM on 02/03/2012
Kind of like how the Patient Protection and Affordability Act is misnamed?
04:09 PM on 02/01/2012
Republicans are just like communist russia used to be. They want all the money and power for themselves and dont care about the middle class. How many people were there demonstrating for the right to work law to be passed, how many buisness leaders were there protesting for the right to work law to be passed. Within communist countries unions are suppressed also, the rights of workers are also thrown aside. Look at cuba, south korea, iran, and any other communist coountry in the world, no unions and no middle class. Do you remember tiennamen square? I equal mitch daniels to any communist.
ColoradoPete
End of term coming.......
05:16 PM on 02/01/2012
You have no idea what you are talking about when you make mention of communist countries........but it sounds good to you to equate Repubs to communists. Try doing some research on communism and then come back and post something accurate..................
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
John Perozzi
Galt's Gulch or Bust
05:55 PM on 02/01/2012
How is not forcing workers to join a union if they don't want to the same thing as communism? It would make more sense to argue the opposite.
alunsulen
Digging the liberal hatred!
04:09 PM on 02/01/2012
Yeah.. Indiana is finally sticking it to them thugs!
ColoradoPete
End of term coming.......
05:16 PM on 02/01/2012
We can only hope that more states will follow............
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
drhooper
Hurting people...hurt others
04:06 PM on 02/01/2012
The name of this legislation is so misleading. "Right to work" does not by any means increase workers rights. It deminishes workers ability to have competitive wages, benefits, and job security. Don't let them continue to fool us.
09:14 PM on 02/01/2012
It gives them a choice they did not have before. How is that decreasing rights?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
drhooper
Hurting people...hurt others
10:03 PM on 02/01/2012
With all the marching in the streets....looks like the majority didn't want that choice.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
demsrsilly
Proud supporter of workplace freedom.
05:58 AM on 02/02/2012
No, just say what you really mean. You are against this as less money will be stolen from workers and turned over to a union. The money from the union then goes to the dems. Just have to courage to say your true reasons why you are opposed to a worker having a choice to join a union or not.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
drhooper
Hurting people...hurt others
04:08 PM on 02/02/2012
Doesn't seem much like a choice when the majority of workers are protesting in the Superbowl Plaza :)
photo
RepublicansAreFail
The first 3 letters of Conservatism spell "CON"
04:01 PM on 02/01/2012
Notice how all the right to work states have the lowest quality of life compared to the others.

Right to work basically means low wages for workers. Enjoy Indiana you get what you deserve.
ColoradoPete
End of term coming.......
05:18 PM on 02/01/2012
What a ridiculous statement.........the corollary is that high quality of life states are unionized?? As if unions result in the high quality of life??? Are you joking or just completely naive????
photo
RepublicansAreFail
The first 3 letters of Conservatism spell "CON"
07:04 PM on 02/01/2012
Facts are facts pal. Fact is that right to work laws REDUCES wages.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
demsrsilly
Proud supporter of workplace freedom.
05:59 AM on 02/02/2012
Notice how you just repeat the talking points of the union bosses and provide no proof?