iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Mitt Romney: Minimum Wage Should Automatically Increase

Romney Automatic Wage Hikes

KASIE HUNT and DAVID ESPO   02/ 1/12 08:53 PM ET  AP

EAGAN, Minn. — Republican presidential contender Mitt Romney renewed his support Wednesday for automatic increases in the federal minimum wage to keep pace with inflation, a position sharply at odds with traditional GOP business allies, conservatives and the party's senior lawmakers.

"I haven't changed my thoughts on that," the former Massachusetts governor told reporters aboard his chartered campaign plane, referring to a stand he has held for a decade.

He did not say if he would ask Congress to approve the change if he wins the White House this fall.

Congress first enacted federal minimum wage legislation in 1938 and has raised it sporadically in the years since. The last increase, approved in 2007, took effect in three installments and reached $7.25 an hour for covered workers effective July 24, 2009.

It has never been allowed to rise automatically, as Romney envisions.

Romney's chief rival for the nomination, Newt Gingrich, criticized Romney for the stance, pointing to previous periods of hyperinflation and saying it would end up costing way too much money. "That would be a very dangerous idea," Gingrich said.

Romney also drew criticism from the anti-tax Club for Growth. "Indexing the minimum wage would be an absolute job killer," the group's president, Chris Chocola, said in a statement. He called the proposal "anti-growth."

Organized labor generally supports increases in the minimum wage, and Romney's position could give him cross-over appeal among blue-collar Democrats in a general election campaign.

Republicans have generally opposed attempts to raise it, although in 1996, the GOP-controlled Congress passed an election-year increase that included a package of tax cuts for business and a subminimum wage to apply to new, younger employees.

At the time lawmakers were considering the 2007 legislation, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce registered its disapproval.

"Any minimum wage increase will significantly affect the bottom line of the nation's small business owners," said Bruce Josten, the executive vice president for government affairs at the organization, which says it represents more than 3 million businesses and organizations across the country.

A spokesman for the organization declined to comment on Romney's statement.

The National Federation of Independent Business says on its website that it opposes any increase in the current federal minimum wage.

"Mandatory wage increases not only hurt small businesses, but their employees as well," the group says. "It has not been proven to reduce poverty or narrow the income gap and puts a stranglehold on America's top job creators: small businesses."

A spokesman for House Speaker John Boehner, Michael Steel, said Congress' top Republican "is following the presidential campaign but has not been commenting on the individual candidates' specific proposals." Boehner opposed the most recent increase that passed Congress.

An aide to Senate GOP leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Romney's statement.

As a candidate for governor of Massachusetts in 2002, Romney said he supported minimum wage increases in line with inflation.

Five years ago, he said he liked the "idea of getting the political debate out and I like the idea of not having the huge jumps as we do now."

___

Espo reported from Washington.

Related on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
EAGAN, Minn. — Republican presidential contender Mitt Romney renewed his support Wednesday for automatic increases in the federal minimum wage to keep pace with inflation, a position sharply at ...
EAGAN, Minn. — Republican presidential contender Mitt Romney renewed his support Wednesday for automatic increases in the federal minimum wage to keep pace with inflation, a position sharply at ...
Filed by Leigh Owens  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 34
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ocrmom59
06:13 PM on 02/12/2012
Rest assured he will back track on this and say he didn't mean it at all and didn't really say it. Or people didn't hear him correctly, he meant to say something else. But he like flip flopping around thinking that no one will remember anything he have said. Between now and the time the republicans chose their candidate to run against the president will be an interesting time for all the world to see just how much these peoplereally care about the american people.

So far it has been planned parenthood, abortions, bc, mammographs. So the more they talk and want to take things away from people the more their true agenda will come out and they will be left out in the cold looking for a job.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Scurvydog74
10:28 AM on 02/02/2012
Is this one of his "repairs" of the safety net for the "extremely poor?"
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
truly moderate
Paleo-conservative and Anti-tea party
09:14 PM on 02/01/2012
Wow, you people are just so anti GOP, it doesn't matter WHAT plans the guy has, they are automatically bad.

The same can be said of the stupid tea bagger conservatives that demonize everything that doesn't pass their litmus test.

Quit being media mules and THINK for yourselves. Stop buying into this polarization BS. Both parties have serious issues, no doubt. However, to demonize someone because of what party they belong to (regardless of whether ideology, people, policy, ect come first) = low informationism. The media is making this country retarded.

Maybe if people spent more time using NON PARTSIAN sources like PBS/NPR or C-SPAN radio, we'd be better off.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
truly moderate
Paleo-conservative and Anti-tea party
09:08 PM on 02/01/2012
WITH the current economic taxation system, minimal wage increases ARE essential.

However, there is a an ideal that combines both progressive and conservative ideology that has been feared by litmus test conservatives and most liberals alike.

Negative Income Tax + Flat Tax.

This could replace the welfare system and save billions in admistrative costs alone and simplify things while giving a helping hand to the working class (as well as an incentive to work) while limiting taxation on small business and thus could help revitalize small business and perhaps even manufacturing jobs.

Its important to note this WOULD NOT replace SS or SSDI for seniors and the disabled and so those safety nets would remain as they are.

Under the ideal, IF you make under a certain income (say 10,000) or do not work, the government would pay you a tax credit instead of taking taxes. This would be a set amount that would = 10,000 received per year for EVERYONE. If you made between 10,000 and 25,000 you would receive no government assistance BUT you would also pay ZERO taxes (receive no taxes back ofcourse). You keep everything you make. If you make 25k or higher, you pay 15 percent but receive no income tax return.

The Flat Tax alone is not a good option but coupled with negative income tax, it

seems like a good compromise that equally takes care of the poor, encourages the working class, and doesnt unfairly burden the middle and upper class.
photo
ram6968
lewis & clark went camping,dont tell me you do
11:35 PM on 02/01/2012
that under 10,000? we call that "welfare"
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Scurvydog74
10:31 AM on 02/02/2012
Flat tax will further stratify our privileged vs poor economy. It taxes the middle class the same as now while significantly lowering taxes on the wealthy and raising taxes on the poor. Sounds simple but it's only simple-minded...
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Tom Joad
"While there is a lower class, I am in it "
08:48 PM on 02/01/2012
...sure, sure...but when is he going to vilify poor people?...
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Tom Joad
"While there is a lower class, I am in it "
08:44 PM on 02/01/2012
'Romney Stance Could Have Cross-Over Appeal'

...ummm...he was in Minnesota...just how wide was his stance...
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
missmaizeybelle
08:15 PM on 02/01/2012
Once again Romney panders and the msm thinks he's viable.The man is pathalogical,stop trying to make him seem like a nice guy,he's not.A meanstreak a mile long.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
truly moderate
Paleo-conservative and Anti-tea party
09:10 PM on 02/01/2012
Why do you think that? Because the liberal media has made him out to be a bad guy? Did you do any research OUTSIDE of bias sources. The man gave 3 million in charity, roughly what he paid in taxes. That doesn't sound cold hearted. Do you give 15 percent of your pay to charity? Just curious.
photo
drwtsn
Could I please get an upgrade to a macro-bio?
09:17 PM on 02/01/2012
The vast majority of his charity goes to his cuurch or Republican organizations. Very little of it goes to help the poor.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
missmaizeybelle
05:37 AM on 02/02/2012
He paid 13.9% in taxes, I paid more than double and earned MILLIONS LESS. Good grief, maybe you should do the research, I mean the easiest thing to know is how he treated his dog and we all know that a man can be judged by how he treats animals. And that charity that he gave to? His church - it's called tithing and it's required.One more thing - yes I did donate to charity.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Veganie
Live food, live bodies
07:50 PM on 02/01/2012
When Romney loses they will blame it on Acorn and NPR
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bynddrvn5
My Micro-bio is unwritten...
07:47 PM on 02/01/2012
HA! Now that is a laugh!! This from the same guy who went back on his promises to increase the minimum wage as governor of Massachusetts. http://www.massaflcio.org/node/445

Back when he was running for the Senate in MA, he denied being a fan of Ronald Reagan. Now he apparently is for all things Reagan. From The Economist: http://www.economist.com/node/21542744

Even McCain didn't flip flop this much, Mitt Romney is a compete joke.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
efffox
The truth is NOT halfway between right and wrong
07:45 PM on 02/01/2012
Yes, but WHICH MItt said it? Doesn't matter, wait a few days and he'll change his stance again.
11:50 PM on 03/07/2012
I wanted to hear for myself what Romney said in the Kudlow interview because it is being touted all over the internet that Romney was for minimum wage hikes and now, because of conservative outcry, he is against it. Here again is a perfect example of how people misrepresent and spin what others say and then everyone else falls in line and quotes their take as if it were absolute truth, especially if you are trying to substantiate a premise that a candidate is a "flip flopper" or some other label. Romney said before, and he said it again, that any raise in minimum wage should be indexed to other considerations such as inflation, job opportunities, competition with wages abroad, etc. With this in mind, it would not probably be wise to make a hike presently. If this type of index had been implemented since 1990, the minimum wage would be lower right now. However, liberals hike it from time to time and try to take the credit for being "good guys." If you don't believe there should be a minimum wage at all, then you evidently differ with Romney. If you feel it is here to stay, then indexing it as Romney described would keep it from being a political football and give it some relevance to what is going on in the economy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Veganie
Live food, live bodies
07:35 PM on 02/01/2012
If Mitt had been President during the Kennedy Era this country would have never made it to the moon
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kimhoulian
06:58 PM on 02/01/2012
So this mean it can get passed now..so why wait or is this something our congress will only do if the American people (their Hostage) vote a republican into the WH?? Well, I don't believe Romney or the GOP Congress will pass such a bill
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
The Mask
Saguaro worshipping desert Druid
06:48 PM on 02/01/2012
I looked at the main page headline of "Romney Stance May Have Crossover Appeal" and misread it as crossdresser appeal. My bad.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Tom Joad
"While there is a lower class, I am in it "
08:45 PM on 02/01/2012
...no worries...I was wondering how wide his stance was...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chris hatala
06:10 PM on 02/01/2012
Who was he talking to, it will change tomorrow.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jeff Bunting
05:49 PM on 02/01/2012
which Mitt Romney said this again?