iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Mitt Romney Beating President Obama Raising Wall Street Cash

Romney

First Posted: 02/ 1/2012 5:42 pm Updated: 02/ 1/2012 9:51 pm

New campaign finance data released late Tuesday reveals in stark monetary terms just how little love there is left for Barack Obama on Wall Street.

Wall Street dollars now favor Republican candidates over the president by more than a 5 to 1 margin, with the majority going to Mitt Romney, whose ties to the financial sector date back to his time at private equity powerhouse Bain Capital.

The financial sector, including insurance and real estate industries, has spent at least $33 million to support Republican candidates so far in the 2012 election cycle. That includes campaign donations by individuals and by a new creature on the political influence scene, the Super PAC, which can collect and spend unlimited amounts of cash to try to sway voters. President Obama has raised about $6 million, according to campaign finance data compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics and The Huffington Post.

It was not always this way. In his campaign for the White House, Barack Obama raised more money from Wall Street -- $15.8 million -- than any politician in history. (This is campaign donations only. Super PACS are new to this presidential election cycle.) As late as October 2009, Democrats were hauling in 70 percent of all money donated by banks and their allies.

Two months later, the House passed sweeping financial reforms and Obama infamously referred to bankers as "fat cats," in an interview with "60 Minutes." Democrats share of bank money plummeted to 40 percent in December 2009.

"Money is very responsive to the political dynamics of the moment," said Richard Pildes, a New York University law professor who is also a senior legal advisor to the Obama campaign.

For now, the numbers show that Wall Street is mostly showing love to Romney, who has promised to dismember the Dodd-Frank financial regulation reform.

"I will repeal the Dodd-Frank legislation, which is harming local banks and hurting credit creation when we need it most," Romney told the Las Vegas Journal-Review in a Q&A published on Sunday. Romney has raised more than $12 million from Wall Street in campaign donations. The "Restore Our Future" Super Pac that supports him has raised more than $30 million, mostly from the finance sector.

Towing the anti-regulation line, though, doesn't seem to work for everyone. "I would repeal Dodd-Frank tomorrow morning," Newt Gingrich told the newspaper. Gingrich has raised less than $500,000 from the financial sector.

Obama has said he will fight any effort to repeal or weaken the law. He recently defied Republicans by using a recess appointment to install Richard Cordray as head of the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, a signature creation of Dodd-Frank.

Donation dynamics do not always hinge on a single issue. David Ader is self-described moderate Democrat and head of government bond strategy at CRT Capital Group. He gave to the Obama campaign before the 2008 election, but is now leaning toward Romney.

Ader said he thinks Dodd-Frank "probably went too far," but said his chief concerns are fiscal responsibility and economic growth. He said he is disappointed that Obama has not done more to address the looming Social Security and health care crises as the American population ages.

Ader said he was particularly distressed that Obama ignored the recommendations of the Simpson-Bowles deficit commission, which charted a path from under the debt burden.

"It did immense damage to stature of the U.S. and perhaps our credit rating," Ader said. "It made me say, 'Who else is out there?'"

Ader has not yet donated to the Romney campaign -- "I'm holding back my penny," he said -- because he isn't sure what Romney stands for yet. As a social liberal, he has been turned off by the tenor of the Republican debates, he said.

Dodd-Frank hasn't turned off all of Wall Street. Keith Cockrell, a consumer banking executive at Bank of America who with his wife donated $2,750 to the Obama campaign in the 2008 election, said he does not support certain aspects of Dodd-Frank, including a provision that forced banks to cut the fees they collect from merchants whenever a customer swipes a debit card.

But that isn't enough to persuade him to back a Republican.

"Given that we have an economy that is struggling to show signs of life and a degree of uncertainty about the future, it is understandable in my perspective if [Obama] loses some support," Cockrell said. "But my personal view is that pales in comparison to the alternatives we are facing."

It is still relatively early in the campaign, and it is likely that Obama will start to close the Wall Street fundraising gap once the Republicans choose a nominee. Even if the bankers stay away, Obama isn't exactly struggling to convince people to give him money.

Romney has pulled in $80 million, including Super PAC donations to groups supporting him, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. Obama's war chest is bulging with more than $120 million.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
New campaign finance data released late Tuesday reveals in stark monetary terms just how little love there is left for Barack Obama on Wall Street. Wall Street dollars now favor Republican candida...
New campaign finance data released late Tuesday reveals in stark monetary terms just how little love there is left for Barack Obama on Wall Street. Wall Street dollars now favor Republican candida...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 959
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (26 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chosenson
You can't handle the truth!
06:16 PM on 05/13/2012
The free market is running its course. Ask JP Morgan.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:58 AM on 02/06/2012
Umm.... isn't the stock market up 42% since Obama's nomination? That's what, like a 13% annual return with dividends included?

Seems like Wall Street has been doing pretty well under Obama.
01:29 PM on 02/13/2012
Wall Street money is different than other campaign contributions in that it largely is not idealogically based. Wall Street isn't donating because they want one candidate or the other to win. What they Do want is access to whoever does wins. What this means is that Wall Street believes Romney will win, and Wall Street (as in 2008) is usually right.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chosenson
You can't handle the truth!
06:17 PM on 05/13/2012
No. Wall Street wants deregulation. Romney will give it to them.
12:08 PM on 02/03/2012
Romney and wall street and trump's faith

Romney seems to be taking in much support from wall street. Has Obama been bad to wall street
the occupiers marching tells us not really,but are they doing as well as they should be,or what are the reasons for that,or would they do better under Romney? Of course things are not going well
for Obama and on the news last night,and there are large airline layoffs in the newspapers,
unemployment may go above 9%...that may not happen. Money interests,and middle class voters feeling they mady do better until Romney,and voting trends indicate that so far,so the world looks good for Romney.

Trump on tv last night corrected some views on himself...he is interested in politics and always has been from the average person's interests,including tea party and evangelical interests whom he does very well with. He has stated in the past he has worked hard for his family, went to business school,and is a presbyeterian. Those are his values...his business interests are different..but actually quite diversified but his values are his family life and the values of average americans...although why would anyone think differently.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kalikat
79 year old breast cancer survivor
11:39 PM on 02/02/2012
Why not they know full well if there was even the tiniest chance that Romney gets in they will never have to worry about paying taxes, having regulations and do any darn thing they want as far as finances go.
mistergg69
obama 2012
09:41 PM on 02/02/2012
BANKSTERS LOVE MITTENS
05:35 PM on 02/02/2012
It's ok Mr President. I don't have much money but I am going to donate $40 of my food money for the month and every month after until election and I challenge others to do the same. This is the peoples election and country, not Wall Streets or the banks. Show them our votes and country are not for sale.
angelinthevi
First, You must ask the right Question.
03:55 PM on 02/02/2012
I really do't see a down side here! I mean really, does anyone really want to be seen as being in the pockects of the 1%? Are the GOP really that tone deaf or does greed really drown out all other sounds of the human condition. Raise on GOP, raise on!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kalikat
79 year old breast cancer survivor
11:41 PM on 02/02/2012
One thing all that money is going into the economy and hopefully it will end up with some people who need it. But it will mostly go back to the MSM and the republicans who own all twenty five publishing and media companies.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
John Derrick
03:30 PM on 02/03/2012
Kalikat...you might need to do a little more research as to media ownership...FOX is the only "conservative" media outlet; but also just happens to be watched by as many as all the others combined. I rely on my own research, not that of the media propagandists.
03:21 PM on 02/02/2012
I cannot believe the American people are sitting around and idly accepting the fact that our government leaders are now being hand picked and bribed into office by criminal elements who happen to have money and benefit from campaign contribution laws (that they no doubt bought) that enable this travesty to the American electoral process. People had better wake up now, or we will wake up in a police state with little or no freedom and zero prosperity. It will have all gone to the top elite .001%
11:42 PM on 02/02/2012
Almost there now...
photo
donk970
Hard working member of the 99%
12:08 PM on 02/02/2012
I can't help but wonder if Obama has spent the last three years setting out and baiting a big bear trap for the Republicans to step in and he's going to spring it this fall. I sure hope so because otherwise his performance in his first term seems pretty bad.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stape45
No brag, just fact.
02:35 PM on 02/02/2012
And in contrast, in terms of interference and obstruction, the Republicans' performance has been very good.
photo
donk970
Hard working member of the 99%
07:39 PM on 02/03/2012
I think a smart person could use all that rope the Republicans have been giving him to hang them this fall.
marilyn 63
LEVEL ONE NETWORKER
03:30 PM on 02/02/2012
huh? why don't you go to white house.Gov and see the TRUE story even with all the GOP blocking him. he's still done a lot but i suppose the Republicans have done great huh?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kalikat
79 year old breast cancer survivor
11:43 PM on 02/02/2012
Yep yep ....you heard McConnell he said that the senate has given the President every single thing he has wanted. In other words, republicans, have not been, obstructive, denying and trying to make this president a one term president. Even tho McConnell said that his very self. But that was three years ago he thinks people don't remember it.
photo
donk970
Hard working member of the 99%
07:42 PM on 02/03/2012
I understand that. But in many ways it's all small stuff out on the fringes. On the big stuff Republicans have been very successful at obstructing. The thing about the Republicans is that they lack the moral and political courage to take credit for their attempts to undermine Obama's presidency and the American people seem fine with this.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
flipacoin
Heads they win, tails we lose.
11:46 AM on 02/02/2012
Who knows more about what it takes to have a successful economy? Wall Street and the independent business people? Or...Occupy Wall Streeters? Until money ceases to be taken for bills, free our economy of central micro-control and myopic management. Don't give us 19th century Lenin-like talking points of 'economic justice'.
photo
donk970
Hard working member of the 99%
12:05 PM on 02/02/2012
Seems to me that recent history shows pretty clearly that the Wall Street elite are not the sharpest tools in the shed just vastly more powerful and greedy than anyone else.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kalikat
79 year old breast cancer survivor
11:44 PM on 02/02/2012
Come t think of it maybe Angel or that other republican from Nevada was right. We should barter for what we want and the bankers might go broke and their money become useless.
11:51 PM on 02/02/2012
They successfully transferred close to 26 trillion dollars in home equity into bonuses. That took some pretty sharp maneuvers if you think about it. They won. America lost...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
flipacoin
Heads they win, tails we lose.
12:28 PM on 02/02/2012
What messed up economy? The Democrats that pushed banks into giving mortgages to everyone without income verification or I.D., under the threat of fine and legal entanglement. This was 'housing justice'. Banks had to repackage them and sell them. Proof that liberals did it? Who chides the Republicans that require an I.D. to vote? The liberals say that ID requirements disinfranchise voters. They do it with voting and they did it for home ownership...while requiring ID's, believe it or not...cuts down on fraud. Yea, I know. Hard to comprehend, isn't it?
marilyn 63
LEVEL ONE NETWORKER
03:33 PM on 02/02/2012
that was Bush pushing for EVERYONE to have a home to put money in his rich friends hands. did you ever watch THE MOVIE TO BIG TO FAIL and see who messed this economy up?
photo
seeksthetruth
FAUX News: Junk food for your brain
09:13 PM on 02/02/2012
That was Bush, but nice try on the revisionist history.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kNqQx7sjoS8
photo
Moxo
Our enemies are in the GOP.
10:54 AM on 02/02/2012
I wonder what sort of bail-out terms Mitt is offering?

Don't forget, Wall Street crashes when a Republican is President!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
John Derrick
03:37 PM on 02/03/2012
Yes, just like Bush is blamed for 9-1-1, right? And the housing crisis, right? Get your facts straight Moxo. Party politics leaves half of the blame out....
photo
Moxo
Our enemies are in the GOP.
04:43 PM on 02/03/2012
LOL - You guys have left Hoover, Reagan and GW Bush out of every Stock market Crash blame list!
Tom in FTL
I am always for the working person
10:32 AM on 02/02/2012
That's the reason the financial institutions want Romney, he wants to deregulate and then we will be back in the same situation we are starting to come out of now. I couldn't vote for a richie rich who puts his money in offshore accounts to prevent paying US taxes. Romney is Filthy rich and now all he needs is power. I guess this is not an issue for the Republican party. They are more interested in continuing pushing social issues as they have in the past.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
John Derrick
03:41 PM on 02/03/2012
Romney's past has far more donation and economic reversal than the current Administration. Look at the accomplishments of each candidate and judge by that. Words can be hollow; actions speak louder than words.
10:14 AM on 02/02/2012
Wait a second!

"The financial sector, including insurance and real estate industries, has spent at least $33 million to support Republican candidates so far in the 2012 election cycle ... President Obama has raised about $6 million"

You're comparing ALL REPUBLICANS against the President and then claiming it's "Romney" specifically raising Wall St. Cash by a 5-1 margin over the president.

Try apples to apples comparisons next time.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rush Libraughl 83
Liberals unfortunately want to work with everyone,
09:59 AM on 02/02/2012
Not sure how true this is but it would make sense.

This is capitalism at work. Obama did well by Wall Street but probably won't do as well come his next term because he needs to come back around and focus more on social programs and the people than he has as of late. If Wall Street can get Romney in next year he will probably do better by Wall Street for the next 4 years than Obama would.

Romney is more profitable for Wall Street and that's their bottom line. Who cares about the people when there's so much money to make.
10:17 AM on 02/02/2012
"This is capitalism at work"

Wrong. Under a system of capitalism, everyone plays by the same rules, is subject to the same laws and succeeds or fails based on their own merits.

Government gives bankers special privileges in the marketplace, gives them immunity from criminal prosecution and gives them taxpayer bailouts when they get in trouble.

Make up a new name. That's NOT "capitalism".
photo
donk970
Hard working member of the 99%
12:14 PM on 02/02/2012
NO - true free market capitalism has no rules. True free market capitalism never exists in nature for very long because it is very, very unstable. Countries either contain and control it with laws or it destroys the country. Capitalism is like fire; fire is the single most important discovery in all of human history and has endless benefits but if you let it out of the fireplace or the stove it burns your house down.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
John Derrick
03:44 PM on 02/03/2012
Amen, miltonc41; it's called Socialism...but we must understand that there is a growing population out there criticizing conservatism with their hands out at the steps of the Capital. A solution doesn't exist in the current Administration, because if there were, it would have been implemented by now instead of austerity measures.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rush Libraughl 83
Liberals unfortunately want to work with everyone,
11:27 AM on 02/02/2012
Well I'll give you that...kind of.

The corporations have lobbies that influence the government so they cough, sneeze, and nudge the government into giving them bailouts. The notion of doing such an act is a capitalistic one thought the actual practice of giving bailouts may not be. Point is, the capitalistic philosophy has proved to be a failure if you expect it to work without strict regulations and laws.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fiddler3
physicist, musician, parent
09:57 AM on 02/02/2012
Those who have done well in corporations have largely done so in spite of Obama rather than because of him. Obama is perceived seen as anti-corporation, and with good reasons.

Because of the way the politics works, Obama will get a share of the corporate donations. But most corporate leaders would prefer the low tax, reduced regulation policies of the Republicans.