More

Pakistani Jets Bomb Militant Hideouts Near Afghan Border, Killing 31 Insurgents

CHRIS BRUMMITT and MUNIR AHMED 02/ 1/12 11:40 AM ET AP

ISLAMABAD — A university professor allegedly sent a packet containing anthrax to the Pakistani prime minister's office in October, his spokesman said Wednesday, raising new security concerns in a country battling Islamist extremists.

No one was made ill by the deadly spores in the package, which was sent by a female professor who was not otherwise identified, said Akram Shaheedi, a spokesman for Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani. He added that the motive was not clear.

Shaheedi said tests at laboratories run by Pakistan's Council for Scientific and Industrial Research in Islamabad confirmed the substance in the package was anthrax.

Shaheedi said the package was received in October. He did not say why the case was publicized only now.

Islamabad police officer Hakim Khan said the prime minister's office informed the force of the incident a few days ago, and a criminal case was filed on Tuesday, a formal step in a police investigation. He said no arrests had been made yet.

Al-Qaida and other Islamic militants have carried out scores of gun and bomb attacks against the Pakistani state and Western targets in recent years. But militants have not been known to send letters or packages containing toxic material.

U.S. officials have long expressed concerns that al-Qaida and affiliated groups would like to use chemical or biological agents in attacks.

Exposure to anthrax spores can be deadly, but preparing the bacteria in a form that can be easily delivered needs specialist knowledge and access to a laboratory.

Soon after the devastating Sept. 11, 2001, attacks in the United States, anthrax-laced letters were sent to media and government offices, including a leading U.S. Senator. Five people were killed and 17 others were made ill. The FBI announced in 2008 that a scientist at a U.S. army research institute was responsible, and the suspect killed himself as investigators closed in.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

ISLAMABAD — A university professor allegedly sent a packet containing anthrax to the Pakistani prime minister's office in October, his spokesman said Wednesday, raising new security concerns in ...
ISLAMABAD — A university professor allegedly sent a packet containing anthrax to the Pakistani prime minister's office in October, his spokesman said Wednesday, raising new security concerns in ...
Filed by Jade Walker  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 27
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
LRN2WRK4IT
Everything in moderation… even excess!
06:44 PM on 02/01/2012
This is staged for the US news.
ttruckr23
Empty?.... Not anymore.
05:29 PM on 02/01/2012
There's 1, and only 1, thing that makes those goat inseminators relevant: Nuclear weapons. And wouldn't those "insurgents", Taliban, Al Queda or whatever they're called just love to get their mitts on a few of those little delighful items, to be used to terrorize anyone they want to terrorize. I don't think it would take too much intellectual capacity to figure out who'd be #1 on their hit parade either.

We'll be looking at the identical ramifications once Iran finishes perfecting their own nukes. Make no mistake, once we have several nations governed by fanatics of the same religious bent in control of nukes, nobody will sleep at night until we figure out some reasonable way to eliminate that particular threat. .... preferably before it reaches that point. Pakistan already has 'em, common sense would say to make sure Iran, or any other fanatically religiously-based state, NEVER gets their hands on nukes.... for any purpose.
05:27 PM on 02/01/2012
Barack Hussein Obama said that the goal for Afghanistan was reached. He got his wish: Long live Islam.
11:00 AM on 02/01/2012
education, poverty, and infrastructure should be our main focus, let them kill themselves and things will turn out the same as if we went and paid to kill them ourselves=====wasted time and $
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bordway
Our grandchildren will pay for our failure to
09:38 AM on 02/01/2012
Did we get our headlines mixed up?
02:43 PM on 02/01/2012
What a non news story. Same slop different headline..?
09:11 AM on 02/01/2012
Pakistan is a terrorist state that we support with billions of our tax monies - we are financing our enemy, they: attacked us on "911", hid bin laden, gave North Korea technology to build nuclear weapons, and are trying kill Americans everyday in Afghanistan
09:08 AM on 02/01/2012
Sure they did.
08:45 AM on 02/01/2012
Are those the militants they didn't warn beforehand?
07:43 AM on 02/01/2012
Yeaaaaaa !!!!!!
07:11 AM on 02/01/2012
Drones only strike and kill insurgents, according to Mr. President.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
R500
05:08 AM on 02/01/2012
Why can't we just leave, and let the chips fall where they may? Surely our interests are better served by spending our tax dollars on the Americans that are food insecure, the public school system, and our economy. When I read that women's rights are non-existent in Afghanistan, and that Pakistan may be harboring terrorists, and that the war in Iraq has cost tens of thousands of innocent civilians; I have a hard time believing that our defense budget should be cut in half in order to reduce spending and increase social programs. It is time for us to defend ourselves domestically and geographically. We need to focus on our domestic problems, as well as those of our closest neighbors.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rich Cash
Enlisted in 1971 - Retired in 1996
06:44 AM on 02/01/2012
Your sentiments are nothing new. The majority of Americans, for our entire history as a nation, have always endorsed a policy of isolationism. It's never worked before, nor will it work now. American isolationism resulted in WWI, and WWII. Had we taken an active stance prior to either of those wars, neither would have happened. The U.S. is the dominant military and economic power on Earth. The world economy is so interdependent that if we were to withdraw from the world stage, the entire world economy would collapse and we'd face another world war that would put the first two to shame.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
R500
07:56 AM on 02/01/2012
Why obfuscate the question I posed by citing entirely different challenges in entirely different eras. Seems to me that WWI and WWII were conflicts between similar societies. I ask you, friend: what is the end game of US involvement in the Middle East? I am of the belief that it is a perpetual state of war. I believe in protecting Israel, but not being that nation's police. I have always believed that the best action against the anti-western crowd in the Middle East is to be a reactionary force, not an aggressor. That way, when it is time to act against those forces, westerners gain international support, rather than international condemnation for military action. I believe that this change in policy will allow us to act justly and magnanimously.
08:04 AM on 02/01/2012
Peaceful co-existence is not isolationism. Compliance with international law is not isolationism. Non-intrusion is not isolationism. US isolationism had nothing to do with WWI or WWII (please purchase a history of the 20th century and read). Construing the US as peaceful, law-abiding and non-intrusive does not equal its withdrawal from the world stage (the world is not a stage by the way, and this is not an act). The world economy may be more likely to collapse because of US action rather than its inaction (could you please stop creating global debt?). We agree that “The U.S. is the dominant military and economic power”, however I don’t want to be dominated. A peaceful, law-abiding, non-intrusive USA suits me best. Watch this space.
photo
CaliTLC
Pres. Obama's GOT THIS
04:45 AM on 02/01/2012
Too bad the Pakistanis didn't see fit to take out OBL while he was hiding out in the open.
04:36 AM on 02/01/2012
"The attacks followed clashes between soldiers and militants over a strategic mountaintop in Kurram that killed over 60 people in the last week."

Well, our strategy is clear. We have to get rid of those mountaintops that are killing all those people.

Dang AP, just proofread it once before you send it out.

The attacks followed clashes between soldiers and militants that killed over 60 people in the last week over a strategic mountaintop in Kurram.

Or

The attacks followed clashes over a strategic mountaintop in Kurram between soldiers and militants that killed over 60 people in the last week.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jon Combs
What's crackin boo boo?
03:51 AM on 02/01/2012
I don't even know no freakin insurgents. I do not have not one insurgent friend.
04:38 AM on 02/01/2012
My friends are all insurgents. They sneak over, steal my food supplies, defile my sister, and what they do to my bathroom is an international crime.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cccoyote
Welcome to Citizens United, formerly the USA
03:49 AM on 02/01/2012
"In recent years the Pakistani military has launched a series of offensives against militants in the border regions, which are only under the nominal control of the central government."

Lol, it is zero control. Takes a mountain of paperwork from the Pakistani Gov to enter tribal areas. After that hurdle is conquered, the military gives a rather heavy escort to the end of their "jurisdiction" and readily waves you on saying you are on your own.
This is hardly nominal control.

Even more interesting though, it took over 10 years to find one particular militant with a $25 million price tag, even though he resided over 7 yrs. in one spot.
Now, miraculously, "terrorists", Taliban, militants, enemies of the State are popping out of every nook and rock of Pakistan like a game of whack-a-mole.
Seems peculiar, doesn't it.
photo
planetjeffy
On the other hand, you have different fingers.
04:52 AM on 02/01/2012
Bush depended on OBL to justify his presidency.
And we paid for it with blood and money.