Watchmen The Prequels: DC Comics Eyes Will Launch 7 Miniseries To Preface 1986 Series

Watchmen

MATT MOORE   02/ 1/12 08:38 AM ET  AP

PHILADELPHA — More than a quarter of a century after "Watchmen" intrigued readers with tales of less-than-heroic and all-too-human – save for Dr. Manhattan – crime-fighting vigilantes, DC Entertainment is revisiting them in a series of original prequels this summer.

The publisher of DC Comics said Wednesday that it will launch seven interlocking and inter-connected miniseries – each focusing on a specific character – as it revisits the world first and last seen in the 1986-1987 12-issue series written by Alan Moore and illustrated by Dave Gibbons, which has remained a staple of critics and consumers and a near-constant best-selling graphic novel.

The seven titles will carry the "Before Watchmen" banner, DC said.

"It's our responsibility as publishers to find new ways to keep all of our characters relevant," DC Entertainment co-publishers Dan DiDio and Jim Lee said in a statement. "After 25 years, the Watchmen are classic characters whose time has come for new stories to be told. We sought out the best writers and artists in the industry to build on the complex mythology of the original."

Moore is not participating, but Gibbons noted that their original series was "the complete story that Alan Moore and I wanted to tell. However, I appreciate DC's reasons for this initiative and the wish of the artists and writers involved to pay tribute to our work."

In that vein, the publisher said that the writers and artists bringing the miniseries about Rorschach, Dr. Manhattan, Nite Owl, Ozymandias, Silk Spectre, Comedian and the Minutemen include writers Len Wein, who edited the original series; Darwyn Cooke; Brian Azzarello and J. Michael Straczynski. Artists include Amanda Conner, Andy and Joe Kubert, Adam Hughes, Jae Lee, J.G. Jones, Lee Bermejo and Cooke.

Wein, who is writing "Ozymandias," is also penning a two-page backup feature in each of the series dubbed "The Curse of the Crimson Corsair," which is illustrated by John Higgins, who did the colors on the original "Watchmen" series.

"'The Curse of the Crimson Corsair' was actually my idea when we first started talking about doing these new stories," Wein said. "Since, in the world of the Watchmen, DC stopped doing superhero comics early on and started a line of pirate comics instead, I thought it might be fun to see what one of the other books in the line looked like."

That's akin to the similar pirate comic that played out in the pages of "Watchmen" that Moore wrote called "Tales of the Black Freighter,'" Wein said. "'Crimson Corsair' introduces a new character to follow from the beginning of his adventure to its grisly end. I must say I'm having a lot of fun getting creeped out by what I'm writing here."

Higgins said he and Wein have kept the sense of foreboding and darkness that permeated the "Black Freighter" story.

"What we are trying to achieve with the Crimson Corsair pages within the regular new series is to create a graphic `buffer' and to use the darkness of the Crimson Corsair stories as a literary counterpoint to the regular book," he said.

Looking ahead, Higgins said that even though the Watchmen has become a touchstone for comics and graphic novels, the new series can expand on its mythology.

"The challenge is to make the stories modern and relevant to 2012 and to show what can be done with respect and consideration for the source material that has inspired so many people over the years. By adding to the mythos and not to detract from it," he said. "'The Watchmen' had such an influence on graphic storytelling since it first appeared and is a timeless classic. If we can create a new set of stories that can be enjoyed 25 years on, that would be an achievement and a reward in itself."

___

Follow Matt Moore at . http://www.twitter.com/mattmooreap

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CULTURE

Filed by Gazelle Emami  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 25
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
04:44 PM on 02/04/2012
The pretentious delusions of those who criticize this project crack me up. DC is a company that publishes comic books. They have to publish books that are good in order to stay afloat. I guarantee you that if they don't, Warner Bros. will shut them down without so much as an e-mail to Alan Moore. If it wasn’t for the film and product licenses, Warner Bros. would have shut the company down years ago.

Moore can afford to rise above the situation. He has made enough money to live the way he sees fit. If he valued the same things as most people he would take the cash. Not taking money doesn't make him holy. It just means that the cash he refuses goes back into DC, not fans.

If Moore was as smart as he thinks he is, he would hold DC up for all he could get and donate it to Amnesty International.

Cooke, Azzarello and Straczynski are involved, any argument that this project is not being true to the spirit and quality of the original ends right there. Or are they only great when they do what you want them to? These guys would not risk their hard-earned credibility on something that will bite.

The self-righteous/self-important/self-serving outcry over this proves that fanboys are just like the Tea-Party and the Republicans, a very vocal minority that spits and howls whenever their close-minded self-contained universe is threatened in anyway.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
proggirl
college teacher, artist, writer
03:39 AM on 02/03/2012
Some of these might be OK. I like Wein and I like JMS. But if you bought every issue of every series, it would be just under $140. In these days of shrinking floppy markets dependent on overly gimmicky "events", that seems a clearer motivator than the story.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cynth Bage
w'hever
08:46 PM on 02/02/2012
Yes, but how will this affect the DC Universe Online gamers? (irony intended)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cdub1991
Seek first to understand, then to be understood
01:39 PM on 02/02/2012
The howl of protest are predictable, but misdirected. Ultimately, what matters is the quality of the final product and whether it does justice to the original work. Quite frankly, enough time has passed that it's hard to argue that DC is just doing it for the money (not that they aren't doing that also). They could have done that years ago. The fact that this is even of interest is a testament to the richness of the original work. I mean, it was a one-off limited series 25 years ago. I don't see anyone hungering to hear the back story of the characters from Camelot 3000 (a reference for the true nerds out there). Let's see how it turns out. If it's lousy, then attack, but judge the works on their own merit. Are they just going the rehash the same material, or expand on it in some way worth seeing? The original Dracula movie is a classic, but that doesn't mean Coppola shouldn't have made his version. Both are rich in their own ways.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
proggirl
college teacher, artist, writer
03:36 AM on 02/03/2012
Yeah, but in fairness, who could rival Brian Bolland's run on that book?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SimianNation
Progressive NOT Regressive
10:23 AM on 02/02/2012
A great place if you are a comic book head living in the Northern Virginia area.

Hole in the Wall Books
905 West Broad Street
Falls Church, Virginia 22046
703-536-2511

Monday - Friday 10 am - 8 pm
Saturday & Sunday 10 am - 6 pm
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SimianNation
Progressive NOT Regressive
10:19 AM on 02/02/2012
Yea...yea..yea...that is all fine and dandy, but the real question that should be asked, is WHO WATCHES THE WATCHMEN?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tuskin Roberts
10:10 AM on 02/02/2012
Way to capitalize DC. Take the one super hero comic that actually has real literary value and turn it into "Ozymandias: Year One" Jesus. First you release that horrible movie and now this.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MountPanic
09:54 AM on 02/02/2012
Just walk away.
08:08 AM on 02/02/2012
I bought the Watchmen comic when it was originally published 25 years ago. It was a complete one-off tale. The only reason I see for reviving it is for DC to make pots of money, but it's certainly not for artistic reasons and the original creators are not involved. If something is good and complete in its own right, I'd sooner leave it that way. This is like the film industry - if a movie is good box office, they then try to make several sequels, generally each one worse than the one before it. I like Robert L Stephenson's 'Treasure Island', but I'd not be interested by a different writer penning a sequel. Lewis Carroll's 'Alice in Wonderland' and 'Looking Glass' are complete entities, I wouldn't like a contempory writer to create a third Alice book. I bet Alan Moore feels sick!
07:34 AM on 02/02/2012
No Alan Moore? No thanks.
03:15 AM on 02/02/2012
Len Wein shops at the same comic place I do. He's a good guy and a great writer. I think he'll do the Watchmen justice.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ladybost74
Why not laugh, crying hurts
12:04 AM on 02/02/2012
i love this stuff
07:48 PM on 02/01/2012
Nobody should write Superman comics except for Siegel and Shuster! No new stories about King Arthur or Sherlock Holmes either!
Either the books will be good or they won't; it will not detract from the original Watchmen. Nobody's childhood is being raped (a loathsome phrase).
Moore's (justified) problems with DC aside, I'll give these a fair shake.
photo
clownprince
I'm tired and it's a lot of baloney!
06:37 PM on 02/01/2012
The backstories of these characters were addressed in the original. Why is this necessary?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Anthony Dodd
Pssst THE GOP IS OVER
04:46 PM on 02/01/2012
Alan Moore was scammed out of zillions of dollars regarding WATCHMEN. DC tricked him into a contract where he couldn't start making $$$ off the project until WMEN went out of print. So when the movie happened, Alan didn't get a nickel. Why? DC intentionally kept WATCHMEN in print year in year out to 'keep' his take.

It's criminal.

An easy way to fix this would be to renegotiate with Moore. Paying him a bundle up front and a nice cut.
06:42 AM on 02/02/2012
DC tried to give Moore money from the movie but he refused it because he didn't like other people messing with his artwork. Dave Gibbons got paid from the movie.