More

Ben Bernanke: Don't Impede The Recovery By Cutting Spending Too Much

Ben Bernanke

MARTIN CRUTSINGER   02/ 2/12 02:48 PM ET  AP

WASHINGTON — Ben Bernanke defended the Federal Reserve's decision to hold interest rates at record-low levels for the next three years, during a contentious hearing before federal lawmakers.

The Fed chairman told the House Budget Committee Thursday that the central bank's plan is an appropriate step to combat high unemployment while inflation is stable.

Bernanke was challenged immediately on the issue by the panel's chairman, Paul Ryan, a Wisconsin Republican, who said the Fed's move would risk higher inflation and hurt growth.

"I think this policy runs the great risk of fueling asset bubbles, destabilizing prices and eventually eroding the value of the dollar," Ryan told Bernanke. "The prospect of all three is adding to uncertainty and holding our economy back."

Bernanke disagreed. He said prices have stabilized since spiking in early 2011 and the dollar has shown no signs of weakening.

Bernanke testified one week after the Fed signaled that a full recovery could take at least three more years. As a result, the Fed said it doesn't plan to raise its benchmark interest rate from a record low before late 2014 at the earliest.

The questions from lawmakers covered a range of topics, from Europe's debt crisis to the surging federal deficit.

Bernanke didn't stray far from remarks he made last week after the Fed's policy meeting. He said the economy has shown improvement, but that the pace has been frustratingly slow. He noted that many threats remain, including Europe's debt crisis and the nation's rising debt.

"We still have a long way to go before the labor market can be said to be operating normally," Bernanke told the committee.

Bernanke generally received praise from Democrats, while Republicans were more critical.

One member even accused Bernanke and the Fed of overstepping their authority.

Rep. Scott Garrett, R-N.J., said the Fed ventured into Congress's territory when it issued a white paper last month exploring proposals to rescue the troubled housing market. He compared the action to lawmakers approving a resolution instructing the Fed on monetary policy – the Fed's use of interest rates to try to boost or slow the economy.

"I was taken aback when the Fed issued an unsolicited white paper on housing policy and it mirrored in many ways the administration's policies on housing," Garrett, scolded Bernanke.

Bernanke apologized if Garrett felt the Fed went too far. He said that the weak housing sector was holding back overall growth and that this was of great concern for the Fed. He said the central bank did not endorse any actions but instead just explored various policy options.

"We were trying to provide pros and cons," Bernanke said.

Still, much of the morning was spent debating the Fed's policies.

Ryan criticized the Fed's decision to establish an annual inflation target of 2 percent. He said Bernanke seemed willing to accept higher inflation in order to get lower unemployment.

Bernanke said the Fed would not waiver in its efforts to maintain low inflation, believing that provided the best framework for full employment.

Rep. Diane Black, R-Tenn., said the Fed wasn't showing enough concern about the impact low interest rates were having on people who keep their money in conservative investments, such as savings accounts and CDs.

The interest on those investments hasn't kept pace with inflation.

Bernanke said the Fed was trying to get the weak economy moving and that raising interest rates could trigger a recession, which would hurt all investors.

A few questions touched on transcripts released last month that showed the Fed was slow to recognize the severity of the housing crisis in 2006. Bernanke said the Fed had learned a lot of lessons since then.

"While I can never promise that we will not have another financial crisis, I think we have made a lot of progress in how we monitor financial situations," he told the lawmakers.

Bernanke urged lawmakers to balance their desire to cut deficits with policies that could help boost the weak U.S. economy in the short run.

Earlier this week, the Congressional Budget Office estimated that the deficit will top $1 trillion for a fourth straight year and could stay around that level for years.

A key reason the deficit has surged in the past four years is that the government collected less tax revenue. In part, that's because the economy has yet to regain the millions of jobs lost during the Great Recession.

And the government has had to spend more on emergency unemployment benefits and efforts to boost growth, such as the Social Security tax cut that will expire in February unless Congress extends it.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
WASHINGTON — Ben Bernanke defended the Federal Reserve's decision to hold interest rates at record-low levels for the next three years, during a contentious hearing before federal lawmakers. Th...
WASHINGTON — Ben Bernanke defended the Federal Reserve's decision to hold interest rates at record-low levels for the next three years, during a contentious hearing before federal lawmakers. Th...
Filed by Maxwell Strachan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 20
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
jimme
They're Right, but never correct.
01:24 PM on 02/02/2012
How much spending was cut by the Repubz during 2000 to 2008 ?

That's right, they increased the debt by trillions by not paying their bills and then dumping it all on the next guy who just so happened to be a Democrat. Then they try and place blame on him and cause all kinds of havoc by terrorizing from within, instead of trying to make things better. They talk about Obama's failed policies but forget it was their policies that got us into this mess.
photo
aceshigh11
Nowhere is the dreamer or the misfit so alone
12:48 PM on 02/02/2012
Wow, Bernanke is becoming a regular lib is in his old age.

If only he and Greenspan had gotten religion, oh, 30 years ago...we wouldn't be in this mess.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
steve siravo
12:41 PM on 02/02/2012
This guy has done such a great job that we should do the complete opposite of what he suggests.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Max Load
Bailouts subvert survival of the fittest.
12:39 PM on 02/02/2012
I notice the esteemed economist didn't recommend raising revenues to the panel. Too bad.
12:13 PM on 02/02/2012
Read these this ONE SENTENCE:

http://www­.federalre­serve.gov/­aboutthefe­d/section2­a.htm

2% inflation target is ***AGAINST THE LAW***

2% compounded over 30 years is more than a DOUBLE in prices!!!

Inflation is imply a means for Bernanke to finance gvmt deificit spending which keeps the whole ponzi going until it collapses.

It means your savings is being destroyed 1% per year vs a 2% inflation rate which means your money is worthless over time.

It is a SCAM and YOUR gvmt is ripping you off. You will see. You have already seen! Look at tuition, housing (still expensive), property taxes, food costs, EVERYTHING.

It is all a means of allowing politicians to spend us all into increasing debts - debts which are financed by forced inflation from the Fed which is once again - AGAINST THE LAW.

WAKE UP!!!
photo
BBackSoon
Hello, I must be going.
12:41 PM on 02/02/2012
OK anti-government guy, who gets the money?

The Super Rich that own our government.
12:50 PM on 02/02/2012
Actually - the reverse. The wealthy are in a position to receive the new money as it is created by you (bank loans are new money) OR by the Fed.

So they ALWAYS want as much inflation as is possible!!!

Which is what we get right?

If the dollars you earned preserved their value, that would give power to ALL WORKING PEOPLE as their savings would increase without the weight of inflation dragging it down. It would encourage hard work, savings and frugality not consumption, debt and PONZI!

Think about it. It is KEY.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Under Fed yet Fed Up
Business operator
11:22 AM on 02/02/2012
"An economist is an expert who will know tomorrow why the things he predicted yesterday didn't happen."

Laurence J. Peter
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Darwincrat
My God only exists if you believe too.
11:18 AM on 02/02/2012
Ben Bernanke doesn't have a partisan agenda and was appointed by President Bush. It must drive conservatives crazy that he doesn't call for draconian cuts to the federal budget. Because actual economists realize that you cannot cut your way to growth. While sensible spending cuts can be found within the current budget, by and large our current problems are revenue related and not spending related.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Norma Ward
11:01 AM on 02/02/2012
Not all Federal Reserve policymakers agree with Mr. Bernanke's plan for long-term near zero interest rates as shown here:

http://viableopposition.blogspot.com/2012/02/how-does-federal-reserve-define.html

The Fed's current policy could well result in higher inflation and low growth, resulting in further misery for Americans.
11:41 AM on 02/02/2012
Disagreement within the Fed over policy is nothing new. Raising rates could well result in deflation and negative growth. Pick your poison.
12:10 PM on 02/02/2012
2% inflation target is AGAINST THE LAW

http://www.federalreserve.gov/aboutthefed/section2a.htm

2% compounded over 30 years is more than a DOUBLE in prices!!!

Inflation is imply a means for Bernanke to finance gvmt deificit spending which keeps the whole ponzi going until it collapses.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
garymc8
We got OBL- not gop
10:58 AM on 02/02/2012
ECONOMY will take off like an SST if we simply START PUTTING ROBBER BARRONS IN JAIL. WALL ST, MORTGAGE BROKERS, ALLTHE WHITE COLLAR, WHITEMAN C(R)IMINAL$
photo
Mark Cormier Arizona
√2012=∑(Hope)4(Change)
10:52 AM on 02/02/2012
He is what a Fed is not supposed to be.......a tool for his political party. He does this nation NO good. He will be the first casualty when Mitt takes office.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
garymc8
We got OBL- not gop
10:59 AM on 02/02/2012
MITT WILL NEVER BE POTUS... any SLIGHTLY EDUCATED person, can see a man who is in it FOR HIMSELF, AND NO ONE ELSE.
11:42 AM on 02/02/2012
His political party is Republican
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bart DePalma
Bart DePalma
10:48 AM on 02/02/2012
"Bernanke told the House Budget Committee that he recognizes that huge budget deficits represent a serious threat to the economy. "Even as fiscal policymakers address the urgent issue of fiscal sustainability, they should take care not to unnecessarily impede the current economic recovery," Bernanke said. "Fortunately, the two goals ... are fully compatible.""

Huh? Overspending by a trillion plus dollars per year and balancing the budget are "fully compatible."

Bernanke is arguably the worst Fed chairman in the history of that institution.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
jimme
They're Right, but never correct.
01:30 PM on 02/02/2012
It takes money to make money. The Government starts the recovery by spending which in turn brings in revenue. If it's SO bad, then how come it's worked everytime they've done it ?
President Clinton inherited a deficit yet left with a surplus because he spent when it was needed.
Tax-cuts and unpaid wars are the problem. Where was the offsets then that they cry about now ?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bart DePalma
Bart DePalma
03:58 PM on 02/02/2012
What? There is no correlation between increased government spending and increased economic growth and revenues.

Keynesianism has failed every single time it was tried in both the Great Depression and Great Recession (not to mention Japan's lost decade).

In contrast, Eisenhower and Thatcher cut spending and were rewarded with booming economic recoveries.
Bladernr1001
Vote Libertarian
04:08 PM on 02/02/2012
Well wait Jimmie!!!!????

I thought you liberals believed that WWII ended the depression....why would this be any different?