iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Corporate Taxes As Percentage Of Profits Now Lowest In Decades

Corporate Taxes

The Huffington Post   First Posted: 02/ 3/2012 3:19 pm Updated: 02/ 3/2012 3:19 pm

As a percentage of ever-growing profits, corporations are paying less in taxes than they have in decades.

Thanks in part to federal tax breaks, corporations paid out just 12.1 percent of their 2011 profits in taxes, according to the Congressional Budget Office. That's well below the country's top marginal corporate tax rate of 35 percent -- and as The Wall Street Journal notes, it's the lowest percentage corporations have paid since 1972. During the two previous decades, a period that included the economic prosperity of the 1990s and the housing boom of the George W. Bush administration, corporations were paying an average percentage almost twice as high.

The CBO's numbers undercut a popular conservative claim -- that the United States places a higher tax burden on its corporations than almost any other first-world nation -- and arrive at a time when national politicians are engaged in a fierce rhetorical battle over how much wealthy institutions and individuals should pay to the government.

Corporations reported a combined $1.97 trillion in profits in the third quarter of 2011. As recently as June, they were also believed to be sitting on more than $2 trillion in cash hoardings. Most of that money has not been touched by taxation, even though the federal government has experienced budget shortfalls of more than $1 trillion for each of the past four years, and is scrambling to cut back on staff and services as a result. Meanwhile, the money isn't going to employees either, as real wages for most Americans declined in 2011 in spite of strong corporate balance sheets.

There are any number of methods available to a firm looking to avoid paying the full tax rate. Companies can take advantage of industry subsidies, restructure their operations so as to sidestep certain taxes, and offer workers payment in the form of stock options, which then allows the company to claim a greater deduction. Many companies also move assets overseas where they can't be taxed. In 2008, 2009 and 2010, thirty major U.S. corporations, including General Electric, Boeing, Verizon and Wells Fargo, used so many tax-avoidance techniques that they ended up paying no income taxes at all, according to a report last year from Citizens for Tax Justice.

President Obama has denounced low corporate taxes in specific instances while at the same time downplaying the importance of raising the corporate tax rate itself. The president is said to be planning a major revision of the corporate tax code sometime in February.

Meanwhile, much of the country continues to struggle financially, with nearly 13 million people looking for work, 49 million people officially in poverty, and almost half of households lacking the kind of savings they would need in an emergency.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS

As a percentage of ever-growing profits, corporations are paying less in taxes than they have in decades. Thanks in part to federal tax breaks, corporations paid out just 12.1 percent of their 2011...
As a percentage of ever-growing profits, corporations are paying less in taxes than they have in decades. Thanks in part to federal tax breaks, corporations paid out just 12.1 percent of their 2011...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 864
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (15 total)
  1 of 2  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
TXfemmom 12:57 AM on 02/05/2012
These corporations are paying the lowest federal taxes since 1972 and they are sitting on a trillion dollars in cash at the same time, while the country's unemployment is so high and they continue to outsource jobs which should remain here in the U. S. They also continue to increase their executive compensation so it is growing at four or five hundred times what the salaries of their regular employees are  Read More...
12:47 PM on 02/12/2012
Hey if corporate taxes were zero and rich people paid absolutely no taxes, the republicans would compalin 24/7 because we don't worship the ground they walk on. Fundamentally, this argumant is about only one thing: the republicans and their sponsors (the rich) actually believe deep down in their dark self abosorbed souls that they are better than the rest of us and are deeply upset that we disagree with that absurdity.
04:50 AM on 02/06/2012
"The CBO's numbers undercut a popular conservative claim -- that the United States places a higher tax burden on its corporations than almost any other first-world nation..."

I think that if people actually took the time to cross reference their "facts" from Repubs they would find that about 90% of what "conservatives" claim is either distorted propaganda, disinformation or outright lies!
What they don't tell their flock of sheep is that American CEO's are the HIGHEST paid in the world while our corporations pay some of the LEAST taxes in the industrialized world.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
l78lancer
Wisdom is the principal thing
04:00 PM on 02/08/2012
...and that only scratches the surface of the disinformation.

F/F.
09:34 AM on 02/09/2012
That's a fact Jack!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:43 AM on 02/06/2012
Still with these low tax rates they try to avoid//cheat tax. Hope a new and powerfull government of near future will make them pay all they swindled since Reagan.
03:07 AM on 02/06/2012
vat tax
photo
K August
Research Alec Exposed
01:50 AM on 02/06/2012
"The CBO's numbers undercut a popular conservative claim -- that the United States places a higher tax burden on its corporations than almost any other first-world nation"

We can repeat that for years and all we will hear from the GOP is that corporations need yet more tax cuts.
I hope conservative voters see that they're being lied to.........
Corporations could easily use some of their 2 trillion to pay decent wages instead of promoting
union busting and offering minimum wage jobs or part-time jobs with zero benefits!
Workers with more money to spend would buy more products and services and that would be a Win-Win for everyone.
maxfax
Taa - dah!
09:08 PM on 02/05/2012
That worked out well for everyone.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Omega2012
05:01 PM on 02/05/2012
Bunch of crooks, all of them.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:08 PM on 02/05/2012
I am struck by the fact that President Clinton succeeded in getting taxes raised, which resulted in prosperity and four years of balanced budgets, something we had not seen in many decades.
So what happened then? The Republicans happened, that's what happened. They passed their program of massive tax cuts, and the economy started stagnating, then went in to the crapper, and we have had massive deficits every single year since the Bush tax cuts.

Because of the peculiarities of the American Senate's rules, the now minority Republicans have been able to block repeal of their tax cuts, all the while claiming that what is really needed is even more tax cuts.

I am reminded of the famous quote from one of the foremost thinkers of the 20th century, Albert Einstein: insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, and expecting different results.

We may never get the Republicans to admit that their economic ideology of constantly making the rich even richer is not good for America, but we can at least try to vote them out of power.
06:45 PM on 02/05/2012
Both parties supported GATT and NAFTA and "the giant sucking sound of jobs leaving the US" as Ross Perot warned. Both parties started to deregulate starting with the utilities and Ken Lay, CEO of Enron admitted that it allowed the energy blackouts and then the company's demise. Next our wise politicians modernized the financial services sector and that allowed investment and commercial banks to join in on risky mortgage-backed securities, that led to the Great Recession. With this much greed or stupidity to go around we will be lucky to maintain status as the world reserve currency as other nations see us as a depleted debtor nation, and choose to dump the dollar. If that day should come we have both parties to blame. And that begs the question: why do they have so many policies in common, policies that always seem to be a threat to the middle class? Does it really matter who we vote for when they represent the same globalist view?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:54 PM on 02/05/2012
Indeed, both parties supported NAFTA, but both parties did not support deregulation, both parties did not support slashing taxes, and both parties did not clamor for a war based on lies and propaganda. So, yes, it certainly does matter who we vote for!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
l78lancer
Wisdom is the principal thing
03:46 PM on 02/08/2012
F/F.
01:41 PM on 02/05/2012
An yet we support these Corporations day in an day out in one form or another without self reflection .... Its a love /hate relationship that we will not give up anytime soon either .... We are all hooked an its just a matter of which side of the fence we are on ..... So go get into your Corporate car..... an go get your corporate gas .....an go get your corporate coffee..... while talking on your corporate phone/ internet an checking on your 401k to see how your stocks are doing .... an all the while complaining about they all cost too much.... We hate it but We love it just the same
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OneInEveryFamily
I wish conservatives would read more liberally.
12:42 PM on 02/05/2012
Middle class tax cuts increase corporate profits
Increased government spending increase corp profits.
Middle class tax cuts increase top 1% income.
Increased government spending increase top 1% income.
Result = more dollars in tax for corps, 1%.

All of these facts are used to justify lower tax rates for the top 1% and corporations, when really they are justification for higher tax rates.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OneInEveryFamily
I wish conservatives would read more liberally.
12:33 PM on 02/05/2012
Charlie sells widgets.
Charlie sells 10 Million widgets for $1 each and makes a profit of $2 million, paying 500k in tax.

If the government starts buying another 10 million in widgets, Charlie is better off.
Charlie then pays more taxes and has more income.

If the government raised tax rates by 20% at the same time. Charlie is still better off.

Charlie however is more apt to complain that his taxes went up from, 500k to 1 Million than he is to appreciate that his net after tax went from 1.5 Million to 3 Million, all thanks to government spending.

Charlie is now looking for a lobbyist to make sure that the new level of government spending does not go away but that his tax rates get lowered.
12:57 PM on 02/05/2012
Your last line nailed it. 
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
l78lancer
Wisdom is the principal thing
03:50 PM on 02/08/2012
Great illustration of how counter-intuitive and counter-productive GOP and greedy corporate midsets are.

F/F.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OneInEveryFamily
I wish conservatives would read more liberally.
12:17 PM on 02/05/2012
The economy is 55% bigger than a decade ago.

Corporate income tax revenue is the same as a decade ago.
Individual income tax revenue is the same as a decade ago.

The only significant increase in tax revenues is FICA. If people do not see the problem with income tax revenues, they need to find more sources for information.
12:32 PM on 02/05/2012
You are mistaken

Corporate tax revenue and individual income tax revenue for the top 1% is NOT the same it was 10 years ago, it much lower. 

And more relevant, both are considerable lower then they were 30 years ago...40 years ago. 

But yes, the percentage of income the middle-class pays into FICA has gone up
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OneInEveryFamily
I wish conservatives would read more liberally.
12:35 PM on 02/05/2012
I mean total tax collections as a dollar amount. My point is that the tax revenues have not increased which as you correctly state is because the effective tax rates have decreased.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OneInEveryFamily
I wish conservatives would read more liberally.
11:59 AM on 02/05/2012
Viking says "A massive increase in Government spending causes a lower revenues as a percentage of GDP"

Now I know that he is just trying to be funny. Nobody actually thinks that government spending does not essentially all end up in the private sector adding to GDP, do they? Is that another example of what they are putting in schoolbooks in Texas.

When the government buys an airplane, is that added GDP?
When the government gives out foodstamps, does the use of foodstamps add to GDP?
When the government pays a salary, does the spending of the paycheck add to GDP?

Enough time wasted on Vikingchild, Happy Super Bowl everyone.
12:04 PM on 02/05/2012
"Viking says "A massive increase in Government spending causes a lower revenues as a percentage of GDP"

Of course I say that.

GDP = private consumption + gross investment + government spending + (exports − imports)

Government spending is part of the equation so if you increase that, the GDP numbers will go higher and Government revenues are not.

Hence if you increase Government spending with the same revenues, the lower revenues as a percentage of GDP you'll have.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OneInEveryFamily
I wish conservatives would read more liberally.
12:08 PM on 02/05/2012
Answer one question for me. If the government spending is the same in year 1 as in year 2, except that in year 2, the government buys 10 more F35s for a total cost of 1.5 Billion, what happens to government revenues in year 2?

A)Higher
B)Lower
C)The same
12:21 PM on 02/05/2012
Your assumption would hold true if the growth in GDP was over its historic average, 

for the last 10 years we've trended BELOW that average. 

Forget that there are other measures that show a decline in corporate tax rates.
12:15 PM on 02/05/2012
Yes, this type of thinking based on Neo-Liberal economic views is being taught more and more in our schools.

I'm not sure if Viking was actually taught this, more likely he is mindlessly repeating what he heard on Right-wing talk radio or some other element of the Right-wing propaganda machine  

I spend 2 long years in a very Conservative-minded business school getting my masters. This is what we learned
12:18 PM on 02/05/2012
"I spend 2 long years"

spend or spent?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OneInEveryFamily
I wish conservatives would read more liberally.
12:23 PM on 02/05/2012
Yes they actually believe that an airplane purchased by a consumer results in GDP and tax revenue but an airplane purchased by the government does not.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
victorlove1
I Build I Create I Play I Am
11:41 AM on 02/05/2012
The wolf would clearly and gladly kill all the sheep for a short lived feast today.

Now they are faced with a task of hunting prey who can kill them as well.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
victorlove1
I Build I Create I Play I Am
11:32 AM on 02/05/2012
Here is the real issue affecting America. Solve it and all other problems can then be solved, but not until then.

The shepherd drives the wolf from the sheep's for which the sheep thanks the shepherd as his liberator, while the wolf denounces him for the same act as the destroyer of liberty. Plainly, the sheep and the wolf are not agreed upon a definition of liberty.
Abraham Lincoln