More

Obama Holds Small Donor Advantage Over Mitt Romney

Obama 2012

Posted: 02/ 5/2012 9:34 am

By Alina Selyukh and Alexander Cohen

WASHINGTON--It does not guarantee him re-election in November, but it is an advantage President Barack Obama is likely to carry into the fall: a broad base of supporters who have given him the symbolic vote of confidence with a donation of less than $200.

Known as small donors, these people are personally invested in a candidate's march to becoming president, many ready to become active at the ground level as foot soldiers of the campaign.

Financial disclosures last week showed Obama's campaign in 2011 raised 60 percent of funds, or $58.5 million, from donors who gave less than $200.

The average listed donation to the Obama campaign in the last three months of the year was between $100 and $200, according to a Reuters analysis of the Federal Election Commission filings.

Campaigns are not required to list donors who gave less than $200 in total, but they have to list those who exceeded that amount even if it came in multiple smaller sums.

In 2008, such small donors helped sweep Obama into the White House, but pundits remain skeptical whether the president would be able to energize them this time around, with his popularity undermined by a long slog to U.S. economic recovery.

Republican candidates, unlike uncontested Obama, are caught up in a heated primary season, splitting the small donors among them.

The campaign of the Republican front-runner Mitt Romney in 2011 raised only 9 percent of its total funds, or $5.2 million, from donors who gave less than $200, FEC filings show. The average listed donation was between $900 and $1,000 in the fourth quarter of 2011, according to the Reuters analysis.

In the last three months of the year, Obama received four times as many donations as did Romney. The numbers included repeat contributions from the same people.

"This has the potential to be a strategic advantage for Obama," said David Magleby, political scientist at Brigham Young University in Utah and campaign spending expert. "That kind of involvement conveys a more substantial psychological investment ... They have a sense of ownership of the campaign."

(For a Reuters Insider report on 2011 fundraising, please see link.reuters.com/wyd46s)

KEEPING THEM ACTIVE

On April 4, 2011, the first day of the official launch of the campaign, the Obama 2012 team sent its first email to supporters, asking for donations. Their grassroots effort four years ago went down in political history books as the most organized digital attempt at rounding up supporters, and they are preparing to repeat it.

The Internet spawns a large chunk of small donors thanks to easy and quick access. A growing amount of the campaigning has been done online, targeting voters on Facebook and Twitter, and through Google, Youtube and online Hulu television ads.

Of some 300 people in Obama's Chicago campaign headquarters, the digital team is the largest, said one campaign official working there. The team includes video and graphics producers, advertising strategists and members interacting directly with voters. They work quietly on the margins, but their work has never stopped since the victory in November 2008.

The Romney team's digital chief Zac Moffatt told the Atlantic magazine last month that his team had 10 people and started the 2012 campaign from scratch, focusing first and foremost on the primaries and preparing to switch gears for the November 6 general election.

"Keeping the small-donor base active is a very important part of the strategic plan for any campaign ... Governor Romney hasn't had that luxury yet," said Peter Pasi, a Republican digital fundraiser.

Small donors are "an important indication of strength and it's a hole that any Republican nominee is going to have to fill," he said.

Moffatt did not respond to a Reuters request for an interview.

'NEVER TOO EARLY'

In 2008, the Obama campaign received some 30 percent of donations in low-dollar amounts in the campaign to secure the Democratic Party nomination, according to the Campaign Finance Institute data.

Romney, who lost the Republican nomination that year to Senator John McCain, relied on small-donor contributions for about 8 percent of his fundraising, the data shows. For McCain, it was 21 percent.

Romney, a wealthy former private-equity executive, has faced criticism that he is detached from the voters struggling with the economic downturn and high unemployment.

Obama, who in 2008 garnered important backing from Wall Street, has sought to emphasize a populist message in his campaign.

Historically, the Democratic National Committee has lagged behind the Republican National Committee in appealing to the small-check donors as the RNC has mastered the direct mail and phone method. But in the past few years, the technology has transformed radically and Democratic candidates have outdone Republicans in adopting it in campaigning.

"Small dollar donors ... are our grassroots who back up their monetary support with phone calls and door knocks - they are our boots on the ground and we do everything we can to reach out to them," RNC spokeswoman Kirsten Kukowski said in an email.

RNC is set to raise funds from many Americans who are disheartened with Washington and want to defeat Obama regardless of who becomes the Republican pick.

Romney would be positioned to take advantage of those RNC efforts and that population, but not until and unless he gets the nomination. Obama, in the meantime, can count on the DNC and the joint fund he has with the party, which predominantly attracted donations of more than $200.

But waiting for the general election to step up the appeal to the small donor could be risky. Campaign Finance Institute's Michael Malbin said that while a deep-pocketed campaign such as Romney's could pay organizers to match Obama's grassroots efforts, the proposition is expensive and inefficient.

"It's never too early to worry about how many donors you've got," said Pasi. "By allowing people to participate in the process, you create an evangelist for your cause."

(Additional reporting by Eric Johnson; editing by Marilyn Thompson and Mohammad Zargham)

Copyright 2012 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions.

Earlier on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
By Alina Selyukh and Alexander Cohen WASHINGTON--It does not guarantee him re-election in November, but it is an advantage President Barack Obama is likely to carry into the fall: a broad base ...
By Alina Selyukh and Alexander Cohen WASHINGTON--It does not guarantee him re-election in November, but it is an advantage President Barack Obama is likely to carry into the fall: a broad base ...
Filed by Luke Johnson  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,887
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (22 total)
  1 of 3  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
jamaicalover 02:10 PM on 02/05/2012
I'm a monthly small donor. I support Democratic values and the Democratic platform. We stand for Civil Rights, Economy & Job Creation, Education, Energy Independence, Environment, Fair Elections, Health Care, Immigration Reform, National Security, Open Government, Science & Technology, Retirement Security and Voting Rights. The U.S. has seen 23 consecutive months of private-sector job growth. The  Read More...
07:10 PM on 02/06/2012
He holds a "small donor" advantage because his fundraising website facilitates fraud and abuse. There is no CVV check, no matching address validation and no matching name validation.

How do I know this? I made two small donations on the site using a phony name and, separately, a phony address. The CVV is not even requested.

Basically, it will take any credit card number, debit card number or Visa gift card number. Oh, and you have to request that these validations be removed from your processing service...why would his campaign do that? (same reason they did it in 2008 - to take illegal campaign donations)

BTW, Romney's fundraising site has all of those standard validations.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
soisay
Angry? Scared? Thank a Republican.
12:38 AM on 02/07/2012
I am glad you did your part to help the president seek reelection. Election reports have always relied upon voluntary compliance. It was Mitch McConnell that sued to overturn McCain Feingold. Romney's Website is irrelevant as he can and will write a personnel check for any amount he wishes, along with the LDS, wall street, Big Oil, all laundered through Restore Our Future and Crossroads GPS, including corporations and orgs like the CofC using run or funded by arabs, chinese, or europeans. Like any Fox talking point, your CVV code story is true, out of context, scary, inflammatory, and masks the ”real truth” of GOP abuse which is tens or hundreds times larger.
08:34 AM on 02/07/2012
Maybe this will help you - would you want the Koch brothers and Prince Alwaleed to be able to funnel $20 million in "small donations" through a fundraising website for George W. Bush were he eligible for election? Without the standard security checks in the credit card form (used by every single legitimate business on the web) it's easy to do. Seriously, ask yourself why - why would the campaign REQUEST that standard security checks be removed?
01:42 PM on 02/06/2012
All his food stamps and Handout fans will help him out
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bordway
Our grandchildren will pay for our failure to
08:40 AM on 02/06/2012
One of the best gauges is the physical number of donations. Luckily voters still outnumber corporatons (intentional misspelling).

Judging from the stunning lack of participation in the Republican primaries thusfar, it seems that the GOP will have to spend a lot of money not only on fighting each other, but fighting to get their voters to the polls to pull the lever for a candidate they don't support. Hopefully the DNC learned their lesson from the mid-terms.

Obama 2012.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
last man standing
and that's just the way it is!
08:37 AM on 02/06/2012
Looks like we are in for a rerun of 2008

In 2008 Mary T. Biskup, a retired insurance manager from Manchester, Mo., who turned up on Obama's FEC reports as having donated $174,800 to the campaign. Contributors are limited to giving $2,300 for the general election.

Biskup, who had scores of Obama contributions attributed to her, said in an interview that she never donated to the candidate. "That's an error," she said. Moreover, she added, her credit card was never billed for the donations, meaning someone appropriated her name and made the contributions with another card.

Just like 2008 Obama’ campaign fund donations will be called into question
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/28/AR2008102803413.html?sid=ST2008102803431
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sherry Powell
Nostalgia isn’t what it used to be
08:22 AM on 02/06/2012
I live in a Democratic City in the middle of a Republican State.. I vote and I contribute what I can... it's not much, but I try to send a few dollars. I always get a thank you, and for me it makes me feel like someone noticed. I know my vote doesn't count when the delegates go to vote because the state is Republican. But I hope that someday it might. More and More folks move here from CA, Ohio, Michigan and other blue states...so someday it just might turn the tide. But for now my small donation counts for something.
oneleg
Armed progressive and ready for a revolution
08:08 AM on 02/06/2012
Robme stated he doesn't care about the poor only the middle class . Well since the middle class has shrunk down to almost no one i guess he won't be getting any small donations at all.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WowJones
Trolls are like mosquitoes on acid.
08:02 AM on 02/06/2012
In May 1970, Penn Central Railroad, then on the verge of bankruptcy, appealed to the Federal Reserve for aid on the grounds that it provided crucial national defense transportation services. The Nixon administration and the Federal Reserve supported providing financial assistance to Penn Central. Nixon

Lockheed

In August 1971, Congress passed the Emergency Loan Guarantee Act, which could provide funds to any major business enterprise in crisis. Lockheed was the first recipient. Its failure would have meant significant job loss in California, a loss to the GNP and an impact on national defense. Nixon

Chrysler

In 1979 Chrysler suffered a loss of $1.1 billion. That year the corporation requested aid from the government. In 1980 the Chrysler Loan Guarantee Act was passed, which provided $1.5 billion in loans to rescue Chrysler from insolvency. Reagan

S&L

After the widespread failure of savings and loan institutions, President George H. W. Bush signed and Congress enacted the Financial Institutions Reform Recovery and Enforcement Act in 1989. George H.W Bush

Suddenly Obama completes Part 2 of auto bailouts started by Bush, and a great American car co. is again #1 in the world, and Cons have a fit. This is why no one takes you seriously, you allow ideology to trump everything else.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
last man standing
and that's just the way it is!
08:45 AM on 02/06/2012
"Suddenly Obama completes Part 2 of auto bailouts started by Bush, and a great American car co. is again #1 in the world, and Cons have a fit"
.
Everyone with an ounce of intelligence knows that Obama stole GM and Chrysler from their right full owners using taxpayer money and gave the companies to his union buddies.

Obama stole the investments of hard working Americans who had invested their money in companies which triple A rating before the unions (UAW) bleed them dry. People who bought common and preferred stock. People who bought bonds with triple A ratings for their retirement accounts where all thrown under the bus in order to save the bloated retirement accounts and healthcare benefits of the UAW members which would have been addressed in a Chapter 11 filing.

Obama saved the union dues collections of hundreds of millions of dollars that are funneled to the democrat’s campaign coffers.

Most of the people who worked for years for these companies in management positions where let go with only a severance pay package No retirement of health insurance!

Which companies where the first granted a wavers from Obamacare, and why?
07:31 AM on 02/06/2012
I just gave $15.00 to Obama and that felt great!!!
07:00 AM on 02/06/2012
"Fix" in huge quotation marks.
07:00 AM on 02/06/2012
Know what other advantage he holds? He's already the President! I am so disappointed in the GOP for planning to fix President Obama's policies when he isn't even done with his term.
photo
fredpa
I will try again tomorrow.
06:53 AM on 02/06/2012
The other advantage he has is ethics. Gingrich--I don't think so. Romney--serial liar. BO cares about the American people, not himself as their leader. He is the most decent president I've ever voted for or against; and I started in 1964.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
04:58 AM on 02/06/2012
What the article failed to mention was many donating less than $200 donated ove $2000 last time. :)