iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Senate Passes FAA Bill With Anti-Union Measure

Senate Faa Bill

Posted: 02/ 6/2012 6:20 pm

WASHINGTON -- The Senate passed a Federal Aviation Administration bill on Monday that includes an anti-union measure bitterly opposed by labor groups.

The bill, which modernizes America's air traffic control system and funds the FAA through 2014, was fought over for four years, leading to a partial shutdown of the FAA last summer because of anti-union measures added by the Republican-controlled House.

It passed 75 to 20, with a majority of Democrats backing it.

Among the controversial provisions were changes to labor law for rail and airline workers -- backed by the airline industry -- that would count anyone who did not vote in an election for a union as voting against it, making it much more difficult to certify attempts to organize new unions.

That measure was stripped in a conference committee to work out differences between the Senate and House versions of the bill, only to be replaced by another that raises the threshold for seeking a union from requiring 35 percent of workers' signatures to requiring half.

Unions mounted a last minute push against the measure Monday, including sending out a letter signed by 19 labor groups hammering Democrats for giving into the House.

"Rewarding the House Republican Leadership's desire to rewrite decades of long standing labor law in a flash by inserting an unrelated and controversial labor provision in a much needed aviation safety and security bill, without notice, hearing, or debate, sets an extremely dangerous precedent," says the letter, led by Communications Workers of America.

Senators who voted for the bill, including Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-W.Va.), the chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee, praised it as a good compromise and a vital step forward for the country's air traffic control system.

"I happen to think it's a very, very good bill," Rockefeller said.

A number of his Democratic colleagues, however, agreed with the unions, saying Congress was caving in to a few powerful airlines.

"The only entity that [the old union vote system] apparently doesn't work for is the management of a few powerful airlines," said Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa). "These powerful companies don't want workers to have representation. They don't want to engage in collective bargaining with their workers. They're deeply concerned, I guess, that at some point in the future they just might have to put a few additional dollars into middle class workers' pockets."

While Harkin called the changes to labor law "less detrimental" than the original language, he was still among the senators to vote against the bill.

"My vote is to stand up against the notion that a federal agency [the National Mediation Board] and the American workers it is charged to protect should be punished for doing what is right, what is fair, what is within their jurisdiction, and to stand up against a process that allows the few and the powerful to hijack this body, to change the rule of the game in their favor," Harkin said.

The bill now goes to President Obama.

Earlier on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- The Senate passed a Federal Aviation Administration bill on Monday that includes an anti-union measure bitterly opposed by labor groups. The bill, which modernizes America's air traff...
WASHINGTON -- The Senate passed a Federal Aviation Administration bill on Monday that includes an anti-union measure bitterly opposed by labor groups. The bill, which modernizes America's air traff...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 4,291
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (70 total)
  1 of 3  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
paganmist 11:00 PM on 02/06/2012
In every country that doesn't have unions, employees are treated like crap.

Every single country.

Any time in history where there weren't unions, companies treated their employees like crap.

And there was NOTHING the employees could do to change it because all anyone had to do was say, "Quit, then."

But you can't quit when there's a job shortage. You can, but you can't feed your  Read More...
11:26 AM on 06/01/2012
So any one who doesn't vote is considered to have voted no. In what world is that fair? The gall of the Republicans in unbelievable. They have no honor or self respect, only the will to win at any costs.
08:38 PM on 02/15/2012
FedEx was protecting a special interest rule that shorts workers. UPS pays its unionized drivers 53 percent to 104 percent more per hour than FedEx does
08:36 PM on 02/15/2012
Federal Express spent $25 million lobbying to protect a rule that makes it virtually impossible for its express delivery workers to unionize. That's 67 percent of what it paid in taxes.

FedEx says it was "educating lawmakers" about a proposal "that would cripple competition in the express delivery industry and hinder our nation's future economic success.
07:51 PM on 02/15/2012
AND FEDEX IS CONSIDERED A AIRLINE UNDER THE RAILROAD ACT FROM ANCIENT TIMES. FRED SMITH IF HE CARED ABOUT HIS EMPLOYEES WOULD GET RID OF THAT PROVISION AND PAY HIS EMPLOYEES ACCORDINGLY. FEDEX IS THE LOWEST PAID OF THE DELIVERY SERVICES.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
suddenfun
Subvert the dominant paradigm
11:27 AM on 02/08/2012
Democrats suck. Both sides are owned by the rich and powerful. Just keep it up...keep your foot on the necks of the working class and the poor...see what it gets you.
05:26 AM on 02/08/2012
gfyhgfh
05:23 AM on 02/08/2012
fghfghgfhgfhgfh
05:21 AM on 02/08/2012
test
10:07 PM on 02/07/2012
One small step..I despise unions.
07:57 PM on 02/07/2012
By the sick twisted haters swarming here, this may as well be called Breitbart-Huffington Post.
Gloat all you want, a great President is at work instead of the puffed out war criminal liar to a historic degree borrow and spend the reviled George Bush.
rob000000
Life is empirical...until God decides otherwise.
10:05 PM on 02/07/2012
Wow...a lotta "hate" in your post.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
brt929
02:19 PM on 02/08/2012
LOL! Whenever opinion doesn't go your way, you people on the right call it "hate," when in reality it is just a statement of fact.
photo
BurtonDesque
Fear a Blank Planet
03:47 PM on 02/07/2012
Don't let Democrats say they support unions anymore. They don't.
Bladernr1001
Vote Libertarian
04:16 PM on 02/07/2012
Hmmm..I might actually start voting fro some of them...if that is the case.
rob000000
Life is empirical...until God decides otherwise.
10:06 PM on 02/07/2012
It's an interesting thought experiment, but please resist the temptation if it moves beyond that point.
Bladernr1001
Vote Libertarian
03:34 PM on 02/07/2012
Contrary to the liberal blabber on this board......this is a GREAT day for the middle class who has been burdened by having to overpay insulated and unionized public employees that are now a significant reason why government at all levels is basically bankrupt.

The evidence is that public employee pay has gone from less or same as the private sector to as much as 23% more. I hope this helps swing the pedulum back.
07:52 PM on 02/07/2012
FIRST - these are PRIVATE employees in industries regulated by the FAA.
Overpaid - tell that to the thousands of merged (and screwed) airline employees who lose all seniority and are therefore first to be laid off after previous and future mergers. Many lose most of retirement pay.
Next up - all employers can stick it to their workers exactly as Bladernr1001 obvously is getting stuck.
Bladernr1001
Vote Libertarian
08:05 PM on 02/07/2012
My comment goes for private sector unions as well.

Like I said on another post.....there is only one main core function of a labor union....to get its members a higher wage than the market would otherwise pay. That is how you disrupt a market.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SofaKing22
If God is for us, who can be against us?
03:05 PM on 02/07/2012
They should've also require that this 50% has to vote at the same place. Being as they are transportation workers that'll probably never happen and then these unions would get busted for sure. I'm guessing that this attempt at union busting was used to hold funding for the FFA hostage and some dems caved in...again...
02:25 PM on 02/07/2012
The "signs" are pointing and the wind of change is blowing.

Democrats voting NON-union hoping to fluff their re-election hopes for November. This isn't going to work. They are toast ! The unions can't save them and they know it. The bail-outs have left a very sour taste in the taxpayer's mouths! And Obama - ONE..........and done!!!
07:21 AM on 02/08/2012
"Obama - ONE.......­...and done!!!"

Well if it rhymes it must be true.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thecornerangel
02:13 PM on 02/07/2012
And about the Senate. Why is it that Harry Reid never ever pushes back? Why does the filibuster still hang on? These are rules, not laws, not in the Constitution. Reid is too old and too whatever for the job. Pelosi should have been a Senator. Why haven't the Dems either helped Reid or forced him out (in 2010 that is)?
Obama is totally ineffectual as the leader of Democrats, progressives, liberals and whatever else you call us. All we want is for Congress to serve everyone, and be the counter-balance to the excesses of greed.

AND this is my attitude today...don't even bother to tell me I'm wrong.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
brt929
02:29 PM on 02/08/2012
Nah, I won't tell you that you are wrong. I actually have said same thing. I'm going to fan you for instead.