iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

iPad Trademark In China May Cost Apple Millions

Ipad China

The Huffington Post   First Posted: 02/ 7/2012 6:31 pm Updated: 02/ 7/2012 8:47 pm

Apple's hold has spread across the world, but its reach seems to have hit a roadblock in China, where a protracted conflict continues.

LCD manufacturer Proview Technology (Shenzen), which is based in the southern city of Shenzen, China, and is a subsidiary of Hong Kong's Proview International Holdings, Ltd., is suing Apple in a Beijing court over the rights to the "iPad" name within mainland China's borders. Proview's Shenzen arm seeks $38 million in compensation for damages, as well as an apology from Apple for the purported trademark infringement, according to Apple Insider.

Proview International originally registered the iPad trademark in 2001, but the rights to the name switched hands from Proview to Apple in 2006 for $55,000. However, Proview (Shenzhen) lawyer Xie Xianghui told China Daily that Proview International's Taiwan subsidiary Proview Electronics sold the "iPad" trademark to a UK-based company, IP Application Development, which, in turn, sold the rights to Apple. The Shenzen company does not recognize Apple's ownership of the iPad name within China and currently sells several products branded with the "iPad" name.

"We ask the court to stop selling and marketing for Apple's iPad in China," said Xie, as reported by Fox Business.

On Tuesday, the Wall Street Journal sat down with Proview (Shenzen) Chairman Yang Rongshan, who spoke highly of Apple's iPad, despite the ongoing litigation.

"We have to admit that Apple's iPad is a great product, and Apple creates great value out of that," Yang told the Journal. "But this is not the reason to support their irregular practice here."

This latest flare follows in the wake of Apple's recently rejected suit against Proview Technology (Shenzhen) for trademark infringement and Proview's stalled legal action against Apple for 10 billion yuan ($1.5 billion), which Apple is currently appealing.

Do you think Apple will win?

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

 
 
  • Comments
  • 165
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
EdwardMRoche
12:26 PM on 03/30/2013
Nothing but an extortion racket against foreign multinationals.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
EdwardMRoche
12:26 PM on 03/30/2013
I regularly get calls from Chinese ISPs saying that someone has registered my domain name with a .cn extension and wanting if I wish to pay to get it back.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:42 AM on 02/14/2012
The Chinese are ruthless VERMIN and really are a waste of space.
02:37 AM on 02/14/2012
According to the poll from this comment section, 90% of people fails at elementary level reading.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:03 PM on 02/13/2012
just change the name to MaxiPad, problem solved!
photo
helioszephyr
What do you mean by "micro"?!
05:41 AM on 02/09/2012
In case someone thinks only Apple has an issue with Asian product/brand rip-offs. Here's some in the auto industry. Among other brands... BMW is in courts with Chinese mfrs.

http://www.bizaims.com/content/copycat-cars-price-over-quality
02:14 AM on 02/09/2012
Given that Apple lifted its original UI technology from Xerox....hmmmmm
photo
helioszephyr
What do you mean by "micro"?!
05:32 AM on 02/09/2012
they didn't lift it, Xerox took Apple IPO stock for a fee and approved Apple using their portion of the research. Incidentally... Xerox/PARC didn't originally develop GUI, it was brought there by researchers who had been developing it since the early 60's.
photo
Mitchman57
I might be indecisive. But... maybe not.
11:50 PM on 02/08/2012
"Apple is currently appealing"

Apple is a-peeling, get it?

HAHAHAHAHAHA
02:56 PM on 02/08/2012
iPeed
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Reggie Smyre
12:18 PM on 02/08/2012
Meh.....its only $38 mil.....peanuts to Apple. Lots of my friends switched over to Android anyway.
02:13 PM on 02/08/2012
1.5 bill... finish the article
12:08 PM on 02/08/2012
SPR Coffee (Chinese Starbucks ripoff), The Geely GE (Chinese Rolls-Royce Phantom ripoff) are but two of a VERY long list of Chinese ripoffs and they are suing apple for trademark infringement?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
midas360
12:03 PM on 02/08/2012
Their claim doesn't even make sense.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stephen Davies
09:54 AM on 02/08/2012
You have learned well from the master grasshopper
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kevin Mercado
09:36 AM on 02/08/2012
Screw 38 million ,go for 60 billion they have accorrding to the WSJ.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
drunkarate
09:12 AM on 02/08/2012
A company in China is suing for copyright infringement? Don't make me laugh! Ahahahahahahahaha!
photo
tumbler snapper
Lawyer, engineer, author, adventurer
06:06 PM on 02/08/2012
trademark infringement.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
drunkarate
11:15 PM on 02/08/2012
Double AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
photo
helioszephyr
What do you mean by "micro"?!
photo
helioszephyr
What do you mean by "micro"?!
07:42 AM on 02/09/2012
It's a bit like Newt accusing other candidates of lack of family values and spousal infidelity.