iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Minnesota Vikings Stadium Plan: Saddle Taxpayers With $1 Billion Field

Stadium

The Huffington Post   First Posted: 02/ 7/2012 9:17 am Updated: 02/ 7/2012 9:52 pm

Here's one way a Republican presidential candidate might gain more votes in Tuesday's Minnesota caucuses: Promise citizens they won't have to pay for the Minnesota Vikings' new football stadium.

A fifth plan for a $1 billion stadium in downtown Minneapolis emerged Monday, with taxpayers shouldering a large chunk to aid a privately owned NFL team that hasn't had a winning season in two years and has never won a Super Bowl. The state would be responsible for at least $340 million and Minneapolis for more than $300 million, according to estimates in the Minneapolis Star-Tribune. The Vikings are expected to fund about a third of any plan they approve, but the team hasn't pledged a dime on the latest project. They promised $425 million for an earlier proposal in the suburb of Arden Hills. That was several plans ago.

Despite state budget cuts in the stagnant U.S. economy, the push for new sports venues continues. Many will be built by digging into the wallets of taxpayers. The San Francisco 49ers are forging ahead with their own billion-dollar field of dreams in Santa Clara to replace Candlestick Park. They recently received a $200 million loan from the NFL to add to $850 million in loans from Goldman Sachs, Bank of America and others. A hotel tax and a redevelopment agency are supposed to pay part of the bill, with seat licenses and luxury box sales expected to figure heavily, according to the San Jose Mercury News. Stadium debates are also heating up in Atlanta and San Diego.

In Florida last month, Michael Bennett, a Republican state senator, became so disgusted with his state's already-built publicly funded stadiums that he tried to get authorities to enforce a 1988 law ordering the stadiums' teams to house the homeless on off nights. The Miami Marlins baseball team will begin playing in its new stadium in April, months after the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission began investigating $500 in stadium bond sales.

From 2000 to 2008, taxpayers contributed $5 billion of the $9 billion used to build 28 major league stadiums, according to a 2008 University of Utah study. That includes the $720 million Super Bowl site, Lucas Oil Stadium in Indianapolis, a losing proposition for taxpayers, Bloomberg News reported.
In fact, most subsidized sports complexes are a bad deal for communities, the Utah study concluded. Harvard professor Judith Grant Long told Bloomberg that taxpayers shell out an average of 40 percent more than the original estimate of stadiums.

Minnesota state and city officials fear the Vikings will leave if they don't get their new stadium. Public opinion is tough to pin down because the city won't stage a referendum, even though the city charter requires one on stadium subsidies exceeding $10 million. Opponents are accusing municipal authorities of circumventing the law by placing sales tax revenue into a stadium authority that would spend the money.

The plan may also include so-called pull-tabs, a form of gambling in which bettors match images on slot-machine like cards.

The latest plan calls for a new stadium to be built next to the Vikings current stadium, the Metrodome. The plan wouldn't make the Vikings relocate to the University of Minnesota's 50,000-seat stadium for several years, losing an estimated $50 million a year.

Gov. Mark Dayton and other officials hope to solidify a plan to be voted upon by the state legislature this spring. But it's no guarantee. Key figures in the legislature and in the city council are said to be "lukewarm" on the project, the Star-Tribune said. The battle to break ground will likely be hard-fought.

Now that would be worth the price of admission.

A sentence was added to this article at 9:45 p.m. Feb. 7 to clarify that the Vikings would provide about a third of the financing for a stadium plan they approve.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
Here's one way a Republican presidential candidate might gain more votes in Tuesday's Minnesota caucuses: Promise citizens they won't have to pay for the Minnesota Vikings' new football stadium. A ...
Here's one way a Republican presidential candidate might gain more votes in Tuesday's Minnesota caucuses: Promise citizens they won't have to pay for the Minnesota Vikings' new football stadium. A ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,076
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (30 total)
02:25 PM on 04/09/2013
So who are the makers and who are the takers again? Billionaires spend your own money!
photo
gsimon818
Keep on rockin' in the free world
01:58 PM on 02/11/2012
Hey Vikings, if they won't give you a stadium we would love to have you in LA. Ditch that snowhole and move west my friends.

And yea, they sucked so why would the taxpayers want to pay for a stadium? There will be football in Los Angeles soon, this is too big a market to not have an NFL team, this is closer than a lot of people think, really.
12:54 PM on 02/11/2012
They didn't even make it to the Superbowl this year, why do they need a new stadium?
07:28 AM on 02/09/2012
cannot educate our children, but we have a billion dollar stadium. fantastic!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kamact
Market Observer
12:06 AM on 02/09/2012
Then the taxpayers own the team,....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chester Erickson
(R) moderate
12:02 AM on 02/09/2012
There is no reason in the world that ANY Republican should support a plan to fund a private enterprise with taxpayer money.

We p!ss and moan about wasteful government spending. Then we whine and cry about how "socialist" this country is becoming.

The capitalist thing to do is let the business take care of itself. If we're insistent on providing corporate welfare in the hopes of getting jobs, let's at least fund a company that produces products for export.
photo
xUSAT
When will we ever learn?
10:10 PM on 02/08/2012
There is no professional sports team of any type that is worth a billion taxpayer dollars.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:11 PM on 02/08/2012
Cut education, police, firemen but build humungus sports stadiums. Priorities people.
10:07 PM on 02/08/2012
Isn't it pathetic.
03:27 AM on 02/09/2012
Yea.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MilesToGo
08:59 PM on 02/08/2012
The NFL owners certainly possess the wealth and financial connections to finance their own stadiums. But why would they, when they can easily sucker taxpayers to fund a large portion, while pocketing increased profit as a result?
10:24 PM on 02/08/2012
If you had a state of the art park on your property, the state would want a piece of it and eventually force you off your property. It's a way to make sure that the state doesn't engage in theft of your personal property via eminent domain.
08:28 PM on 02/08/2012
Interesting that they brought up Lucas Oil Stadium in Indianapolis... Where the superbowl was held about a weekend ago.. $400M in local revenues anybody?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
olitenup
08:16 PM on 02/08/2012
Now that is corporate welfare! Billionaire owner doesn't even freaking pay 1/2 and is too cheap to give Minnesotans a winning team.

See ya Vi-queens!!!
oilfield
large employer per obamacare
05:02 PM on 02/08/2012
the owners should cut back from that union 50/50 split and pay for their own stadiums...its out of control.
photo
Thumbody
just for the halibut!
03:42 PM on 02/08/2012
How sad it is to destroy a state and its citizens with expanded gambling, alcohol, higher taxes and fees all over a football team. Hello? Call their bluff and let them pay the 250 million NFL relocation fee minimum to move the team from Minnesota if they are so determined.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:23 AM on 02/08/2012
If I was in Congress, I would introduce a bill that either the NFL builds all the stadiums they need themselves OR all games are on "free" TV and not on ESPN or NFL Network. If the taxpayers fund the stadium then it is on local TV.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:12 PM on 02/08/2012
Typically local teams are on local tv channels. I believe select games like Thursday Night Football, and when they transfer games to Saturday at the end of the season ESPN and NFL Network can hold rights too, but typically local subsidiaries of FOX and NBC air the games on Sundays and Monday Nights.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:58 PM on 02/08/2012
I truly believe if taxpayer money is involved then it must be available on free over the air TV. Most families cannot afford the games. To force them to purchase cable or PPV is just an insult.
10:37 AM on 02/08/2012
This is just strange. Cut social services for the resource poor of society but grant public funds for a private corporation that has a lot of crazy well paid employees. This is one time I feel like Mitt. I'd enjoy firing the Viking and see them go if they aren't happy. After they go I wonder just how bad they'd be missed. You don't hear folks around here wishing the North Stars were still around.