iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Michael McAuliff
GET UPDATES FROM Michael:

STOCK Act: House Republicans Introduce Version Of Insider Trading Bill But Strip Disclosure Rules

Posted: 02/08/12 06:51 AM ET  |  Updated: 02/09/12 04:20 PM ET

Eric Cantor Insider Trading
House Majority Leader Eric Cantor of Va., speaks during a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, Jan. 31, 2012, to discuss the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge Act, or STOCK Act. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)

WASHINGTON -- Key provisions of the STOCK Act, the bill to bar insider trading by lawmakers, were removed in the latest version unveiled Wednesday in the House by Majority Leader Rep. Eric Cantor (R-Va.).

The overall bill mandates that members of Congress, staffers and the administration be subject to insider trading laws just like anyone else who profits from inside information, and requires the monthly reporting of significant financial transactions.

But provisions that were added by bipartisan votes to the Senate version last week are missing. Perhaps the most significant was a provision authored by Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) that would require people who trade on so-called political intelligence -- a rapidly growing practice in Washington -- to register as political intelligence consultants, just like lobbyists.

Political intelligence is insider information gleaned from officials writing laws or rules that can affect businesses, and that is then used to play the market. It's estimated to be at least a $100 million-a-year industry.

Republican leadership sources argued that the Senate measure was overly broad and could ensnare too many people, as some observers also suggested. But proponents of exposing the growing trade in legislative secrets had argued minor tweaks were all that was needed, not the entire removal of such provisions for registering as political intelligence consultants, as is the case with the House bill.

Grassley slammed the decision. "It's astonishing and extremely disappointing that the House would fulfill Wall Street's wishes by killing this provision," he said in a statement. "The Senate clearly voted to try to shed light on an industry that's behind the scenes. If the Senate language is too broad, as opponents say, why not propose a solution instead of scrapping the provision altogether?"

Cantor's office did not address the idea of modifying the measure, arguing that it was unworkable.

"This provision was extremely broad and its impact would have raised more questions than it answered," said Cantor spokesman Brad Dayspring in an email. "Worse, the unintended consequences on the provision could have affected the First Amendment rights of everyone participating in local rotaries to national media conglomerates. For example, members of the media who report on federal and congressional issues to a paid subscriber list might have to register as a political intelligence consultants for their reporting under the provision."

However, the Senate bill included a specific exemption for the press, and its sponsors insisted rotaries and other people who had incidental contact with lawmakers would have nothing to fear from the bill.

Ethics watchdogs said Cantor's surgery on the House version revealed that he is not really interested in curbing such insider trading practices.

"This is not nearly as good as the Senate's," said Melanie Sloan, the head of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington. "It's just Cantor trying to trick people into thinking he fixing a problem that he's not fixing. He gets the headline for an insider trading bill, but he's talking out both sides of his mouth."

Cantor also excised an amendment by Sens. John Cornyn (R-Texas) and Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) designed to crack down on public officials who are caught "self-dealing" and using their offices to enrich themselves.

The Public Corruption Prosecution Amendments Act prohibits undisclosed "self-dealing" by state and federal public officials to ensure that officials cannot secretly act in their own financial self-interest at the expense of the public, and in violation of existing ethics rules and regulations.

A similar measure passed the House Judiciary Committee, led by GOP Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner (R-Wis.), in a unanimous 30 to 0 vote in December.

"These provisions are the culmination of years of work on these issues by Republicans and Democrats in the Senate and the House, and would strengthen and clarify key aspects of Federal criminal law to help investigators and prosecutors attack public corruption nationwide," Leahy said in a statement. "If we are serious about restoring faith in government and addressing the kinds of egregious misconduct that we have witnessed in recent years in high-profile public corruption cases, Congress must act now to enact serious anti-corruption legislation."

Cornyn's office said the senator hopes to restore the language of the amendment to the House bill.

Citizens for Responsibility's Sloan and House Democrats were also hoping to restore the missing provisions after -- and if -- the bill passes the House in a vote expected Thursday. Since it differs from the Senate bill, it would have to go to a conference committee with the Senate to work out the variations.

"We think that enough people in both Houses want a conference and we should be able to get one," said Rep. Louise Slaughter (D-N.Y.), who had her own political intelligence bill with 288 co-sponsors, including 99 Republicans.

Slaughter was unimpressed with a measure that Cantor added to the bill widely referred to as the "Pelosi provision," and aimed at House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi of California. The provision bars lawmakers from participating in IPOs, such as a Visa offering her husband Paul bought into.

"She understands that this is a purely political piece of work that I thought was extraneous and totally unnecessary," Slaughter said. "I think the fact they put this in was strictly to cause grief to the leader, and I resent it."

Pelosi herself tweeted, "I support #STOCKAct-also support 'Pelosi provision' & thank @GOPLeader for giving me an amendment but sorry he weakened bill."

Cantor's version of the bill will come up under a suspension of the regular rules, and requires a two-thirds vote to pass. Lawmakers expect it will, setting up the conference to work out the variations between the Senate and House versions.

Michael McAuliff covers Congress and politics for The Huffington Post. Talk to him on Facebook.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Key provisions of the STOCK Act, the bill to bar insider trading by lawmakers, were removed in the latest version unveiled Wednesday in the House by Majority Leader Rep. Eric Cantor (R-V...
WASHINGTON -- Key provisions of the STOCK Act, the bill to bar insider trading by lawmakers, were removed in the latest version unveiled Wednesday in the House by Majority Leader Rep. Eric Cantor (R-V...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,074
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (42 total)
photo
rsargerod
Truth leads to enlightenment and wisdom!
08:17 AM on 02/11/2012
Its All Criminal Activity and should not be allowed by by Government Politicians. Haven't anyone ever heard of the RICO Laws, its the law that got many non-politicians in Wall Street thrown in Jail. Politicians are not above the Law. The fact of the matter is that insider trading is illegal.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
l78lancer
Wisdom is the principal thing
01:41 AM on 02/10/2012
I though this was supposed to be easy?

I thought this was supposed to be quick?

I thought this was supposed to be bi-partisan?

Greed and kiddie politics has gotten the best of Cantor again.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
l78lancer
Wisdom is the principal thing
01:38 AM on 02/10/2012
Chuck Grassley's righteous indignation falls on deaf ears. He knows that the only interest of the GOP house is politics. Despite the fact that his measure was stronger, he should have known that the house would balk and reject the senate version if for no other reason that it received bi-partisan support in the. Additionally, Cantor is willing to sabotage the bill just to score political points with his Pelosi amendment.

It is truly breathtaking how the house can take a relatively simple matter and screw it up so completely. This is why the GOP will lose the house.
Harpo1129
You can't spell Progressive without Progress
11:48 AM on 02/09/2012
Congress has its lowest approval ratings so far according to Gallup. Less than 10% approval rating. And it's because of things like this. Eric Cantor protecting his wealthy cronies in Congress instead of doing what the PEOPLE want. Another thing. According to Gallup, in 2011 only 80 laws were completed by the House. That breaks the record low set back in 1995 when only 88 laws were completed by the House. Interestingly, 1995 was the last time the republicans controlled the House when we had a Democratic President in the WH. Does anyone else see a pattern here? Is it just coincidence that the LAST time the House did virtually nothing, in 1995, and this past year, 2011 when the House did virtually nothing, there was a Democrat in the WH BOTH TIMES? Come on tr00lies. Tell us all again how republicans are not obstructing the peoples business in a cynical attempt to make a Democratic President look bad. And how's that working out for you anyhow? The Presidents approval numbers are going UP and Congress's are going DOWN. I guess the practice of obstructionism is just another failed policy in a long line of failed policies by republicans. When will they learn?
photo
acalm
truthiness
11:04 AM on 02/09/2012
Drill and drill everywhere. Lobbyists and Oil companies keep hitting gushers every time they drill Congress. Anyone in Congress going to cap this well...m-m-m, no.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Suzanne525
FourMore, WooHoo!!
11:04 AM on 02/09/2012
Still waiting for any defense of Cantor's actions. We KNOW you cons are reading these comments.
10:50 AM on 02/09/2012
I am amazed at how short Huff Post's memory is. It was only about a year ago this site wrote about Cantor's involvement in insider trading at time when it was rumored that he was making large sums of money by short selling and betting against the American Economy. Isn't about time we had a full investigation of Cantor's dealing and let the American public see just what is going on in Washington.....
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FVMTX75
10:47 AM on 02/09/2012
But it was the unions fault!
The Occupy Wall Street's fault!
But it was ___________ fault!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GrandmaG
I Support President Obama
10:45 AM on 02/09/2012
Where's the TPer's outrage on this?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FVMTX75
10:42 AM on 02/09/2012
Anyone really surprised? A new Amendment is needed for the following:

A. Mandatory drug tests for all political positions, including the Supreme Court, NO exceptions!
B. Video and audio documentary of all political positions and what they do on a daily basis, 24 hours a day, to include release of all phone records released immediately after 30 days.
C. Term limits for all positions, 2- (4 year) terms only. The same as the POTUS. NO exceptions!
D. All political positions maximum compensation is the equivalent of the national average.
E. No Government Health Care for all political positions, the exception are military personnel, not to include the POTUS. *Exception- if politicians want Government Health Care, then the same must be provided for all U.S. Citizens.

I wonder how we, the public, would love this Amendment?
letsbepeaceful
oh no, my micro-bio is now full...
11:38 AM on 02/09/2012
Don't know about an amendment, but some rules about your post would sure help!!

One comment, though - Health care is partly paid for by the employees, political or not. However, it is much more heavily subsidized than most, especially the premium plans.

How about we just offer those basic plans, where you have to stay in-network, must have written referrals for specialists and most tests (and you get put on hold forEVER while waiting for a representative!), limits on prescriptions, etc. (so they see how the REAL world works!!)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stape45
It IS what it IS!
10:36 AM on 02/09/2012
---------To all who perpetrate this deception:
S ecurity
C oncerns
A re
M oot
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:36 AM on 02/09/2012
No surprise. Cantor, Boehner, McConnell. The unholy trinity. If it's bad for their constituents, but good for themselves and cash supporters, 2 out of 3 isn't bad for "them".

Let's see 2 out of 3 "retired" in November 2012. Recycle Congress!
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
TeraWatt60
Cogito Ergo Sum
10:35 AM on 02/09/2012
Teapublicans refuse to allow the disclosure of "contributions" from their billionaire owners and now want to hide the fact that they are writing rules favorable to these billionaires and corporations and then profiting from them in backdoor "stock trades". Is it any wonder that Republicans were behind every major bribery and corruption scandal since TeaPot Dome?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
eric steven
u bio
10:35 AM on 02/09/2012
"Grassley slammed the decision. "It's astonishing and extremely disappointing that the House would fulfill Wall Street's wishes by killing this provision,""

EXCUSE ME MR. GRASSLEY, IT'S THE CONGRESSMEN WHO ARE DOING THE INSIDER TRADING!!! F-U ALL CORRUPT SC*MB@G5 ! ! !
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Phil Van Voorhis
10:32 AM on 02/09/2012
For those who wonder why candidates are willing to spend so much of their personal wealth to get elected to Congress, all you need to know is in this proposed legislation. It would be interesting to study the change in net worth of members of Congress over time. With today's derivative investments, a fortune can be made very quickly when you have the type of "protected" information this bill is attempting to sweep under the carpet.