iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

John Boehner Demands Reversal Of New Birth Control Rule (UPDATE)

John Boehner Birth Control

First Posted: 02/ 8/2012 12:58 pm Updated: 02/ 8/2012 2:14 pm

WASHINGTON -- In a rare floor speech Wednesday, House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) demanded that the Obama administration reverse its new rule requiring most employers' insurance plans to cover birth control with no co-pay for employees. Boehner pledged to take legislative action if the administration refuses to reverse.

Echoing the argument of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, one of the most powerful lobbying groups on the issue of birth control, Boehner called the coverage mandate "an unambiguous attack on religious freedom in our country" because it includes religiously affiliated organizations, such as schools and hospitals.

“In imposing this requirement, the federal government is violating a First Amendment right that has stood for more than two centuries. And it is doing so in a manner that affects millions of Americans and harms some of our nation's most vital institutions," Boehner said. "If the president does not reverse the [Health and Human Services] Department’s attack on religious freedom, then the Congress, acting on behalf of the American people and the Constitution we are sworn to uphold and defend, must."

Boehner said the House Energy and Commerce Committee is taking the lead on the matter "through appropriate legislative channels."

The willingness of the House Republican leadership to jump into the contraception debate underscores how tempting a quick political victory can be, even in light of the leadership's pledge to remain focused on jobs.

As for the Senate Republican leadership, Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said they are in talks about a legislative response to President Barack Obama's decision. He noted that a handful of GOP senators have already put forward bills that would override the rule.

"We're discussing the appropriate response," McConnell told reporters Wednesday. "The three senators you've heard from are involved in those discussions. We'll let you know when we decide what approach we're going to take."

Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), who introduced a bill last week that would allow religiously affiliated hospitals, universities and other organizations that morally oppose contraception to refuse to cover it for their employees, said no decision has been made on the timing of bringing legislation to the floor. Asked if he sees any middle ground with the White House, he proposed letting individual churches choose whether to pay for contraception for their employees.

Under the administration's rule, churches and houses of worship are already exempt from the general requirement to provide birth control coverage.

Rubio noted that he and some other Republicans met with a White House official last week and they told the official the contraception decision was "a mistake." The official, whom Rubio didn't identify, responded by justifying the administration's decision.

"I think their mind-set then was different than it is today," Rubio said. "I continue to say that the best outcome here would be for the White House to do this" -- that is, reverse the decision.

A group of 23 Christian, Jewish and Muslim religious leaders countered Boehner's argument, saying in a joint statement Wednesday that they stand with President Obama and HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius in their decision to expand birth control coverage for women.

"We believe that women and men have the right to decide whether or not to apply the principles of their faith to family planning decisions, and to do so they must have access to services," the group said. "Hospitals and universities across the religious spectrum have an obligation to assure that individuals' conscience and decisions are respected and that their students and employees have access to this basic health care service. We invite other religious leaders to speak out with us for universal coverage of contraception."

White House press secretary Jay Carney told reporters on Wednesday that the administration hopes to "work with all these organizations to implement this policy in a way that is as sensitive to their concerns as possible," but added that the president is not backing down on this.

"Let's be clear," Carney said. "The president is committed to ensuring that women have access to contraception without paying any extra cost no matter where they work. Right now, we are focused on the implementation of this rule and doing what we said back on Jan. 20, when Secretary Sebelius announced it, which was work with those who have concerns to see if there is a way to implement this policy to ensure that woman everywhere have the same level of health care coverage and the same access to preventative services."

Jennifer Bendery contributed to this report.

The article has been updated to include Wednesday remarks from Sens. Mitch McConnell and Marco Rubio and White House press secretary Jay Carney.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- In a rare floor speech Wednesday, House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) demanded that the Obama administration reverse its new rule requiring most employers' insurance plans to cover birth...
WASHINGTON -- In a rare floor speech Wednesday, House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) demanded that the Obama administration reverse its new rule requiring most employers' insurance plans to cover birth...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 12,488
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (316 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
shutzy56
George meet Harry. You both drive me crazy.
03:01 PM on 02/12/2012
I thought the GOP was all about getting America back on it's feet with jobs, jobs and more jobs ... but their ideas suck. So now we are back to rallying the base with this cr@pola. Whatever GOP. One of these days you will all be irrelevant unless you get yourselves back to the mainstream and out of the past.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:25 PM on 02/11/2012
Let's ask the Speaker if he's in favor of Catholic institutions providing Viagra to single men.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wakawaka09
Capitalism is a cult.
12:06 PM on 02/11/2012
Once a "religion" chooses to operate as a business it's role as a business takes precedence over it's role as a religious entity. Want to force your ideology down peoples throats? Then remain a church.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
shutzy56
George meet Harry. You both drive me crazy.
02:50 PM on 02/12/2012
Amen!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
willowtree3
Adopt a shelter animal.
07:36 AM on 02/11/2012
Someone needs to drag or push boehner into the 21st century. Most surveys show
that 99% of actively sexual people use contraceptives at some point.
#gop are anti-abortion. Contraception stops unwanted pregnancies.
Just because he's not getting any doesn't mean we shouldn't-and still be
protected. (that also explains all his crying.)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
angelavictoria5
Life is short. Do all the good you can!
11:40 PM on 02/10/2012
President Obama, let go of this one. Don't mess up your voter base. Religious freedom comes first.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
angelavictoria5
Life is short. Do all the good you can!
11:30 PM on 02/10/2012
If it is stated within the Church doctrine that contraception is against the precepts of that denomination, it is a violation of religious freedom to require that they provide birth control. That is a lawsuit and an egregious violation of a fundamental right. That is the foundation of America: Religious Freedom. Tell them to go to Planned Parenthood.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
l78lancer
Wisdom is the principal thing
03:27 PM on 02/11/2012
Render unto Caesar what is Caesar's and unto God what is God's...

Either there is a separation of church and state or there isn't. This has nothing to do with free speech or freedom of religion, although the rightwing and the Council of Bishops have conflated this into a constitutional argument. It is a labor law issue. If it involved strictly the church sanctuary employees, the argument would be completely understandable. But no one makes the Catholic Church run hospitals and universities. And unlike the church itself, hospitals and universities service and employee noncatholics. And these institutions want to hire as employees or admit as students the best talent they can get - Catholic or not. If they want hospitals and universities to be dompletely exempted, why do they hire and/or admit noncatholics? If the the Catholic Church doesn't want its hospitals to be held to account for labor laws like any other employer then they should stop accepting Medicare and Medicaid - all federal payments and funding - and get out of the business. Likewise, colleges and universities should stop accepting federal grants and financial aid for students, federal grants for research, etc. If they want the hospitals and universities to be considered "church" then treat them like churches. Otherwise, follow the law.

This is NOT about the violation of the church's religious freedom. It is about the denial of employees' individual rights.
04:19 PM on 02/11/2012
Yes, It IS a Labor Law Issue; your points are valid and if a Church Entity wants to deign policy, they should NOT be on the public dole. You do not get to denigrate the policy while you accept public monies; federal and state monies.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
shutzy56
George meet Harry. You both drive me crazy.
02:53 PM on 02/12/2012
Exactly!!
pbrunda
Learning every step of the journey.
04:54 PM on 02/10/2012
BTW, I don't remember him defending the pedophile victims like this. In fact, I don't rember the religious right or family values groups uttering a word. And most of those responsilble for that are still walking around being protected by the Church.
pbrunda
Learning every step of the journey.
04:49 PM on 02/10/2012
I wonder if he, and the religious right, knew which of those masses of cells were gay they would be so quick to defend them? Oh, that's right... it's only after they've grown up that they pay for that.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
temmaleah
03:26 PM on 02/10/2012
MR.BOO HOO HOO, for a lover of the constitution i suggest you read it.SEPERATION OF CHURCH AND STATE, for the SAME reason YOU and YOUR religious ZEALOTS are trying to impose your will and BELIEFS on the majority of non-christians is the SAME thing you ACCUSE muslims of doing to THEIR people. AND unless all your christian owned BUSINESSES' only hire CHRISTIANS then THEY are ALLOWED to PARTICIPATE in the insurance that offers them a CHOICE, did you hear that? A CHOICE. if you CHOOSE not to use it OKAY! but it's there for those who want or NEED that choice..REMEMBER render unto ceasar that which is CEASER'S , don't IMPOSE YOUR RELIGIOUS views on a population and condemn other countries who do the same. or we might accuse you of serving ANOTHER master as they tried to condemn jfk...just my opinion which apparantly doesn't count for much in washington.sign me as the 99%-who gets a wopping $32 a month food stamps on just social security,,with under $900 a month and still have to pay rent and the part b, and then supplemental health insurance to cover what medicare covers.doesn't leave much....so where are your christian values when you threaten to cut services which will help me and others like me OR is it only in the womb i'm protected? this is not the puritan time,and if you REMEMBER this country was concenvied for reliigious freedom
photo
rvrrat69
Theory vs. Reality - Who ya bettin' on?
01:49 PM on 02/10/2012
Boehner reminds me of the Bugs Bunny cartoon character Foghorn Leghorn. A lot of crowing and strutting, but does nothing - other than the hens. Had Foghorn been a Rhode Island Red, the match would have been perfect.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Jeany
Woman w/ Pitchfork
04:44 PM on 02/10/2012
Perfect. LMAO.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Terri Skau
Se... sotto una splendida luna piena...
01:49 PM on 02/10/2012
Nov can't get here soon enough to get this batsh*tcrazy out.

Obama 2012.....;-)
12:58 PM on 02/10/2012
And in November we will demand that boehner leave congress .................vote him out
twarns
Just the facts
12:28 PM on 02/10/2012
I think the solution is simple. Require all health insurance to include birth control at no cost. Allow business to opt out of health insurance for religious reaons.

Here is what the result will be. Catholic Organizations like Hospitals, etc could not offer health insurance as part of employee compensation package. This will either cost the organization either higher salaries to cover the cost of health insurance in the open market, or it will be difficult to staff the best and the brightest as employees.

Their belief system wil cost them something, It is not free. The problem is the Catholic organizations want it both ways. Lower costs and no contraception. They need to choose.

IT IS ALL ABOUT THE MONEY and IT IS NOT ABOUT THE DOGMA.
11:14 AM on 02/10/2012
At this point the church is just another employer and stops being a church
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GoGrammie
Gay Advocate, Grandma, Space Geek
10:25 AM on 02/10/2012
Why on earth would we want women to go back to the dark ages when they were not much more than baby makers? How many children are hungry and starving in this world? Why in the world would we want more teen pregnancies? And maybe more dead babies that they give birth to and throw away? They sure as hell aren't going to finish school and get out of poverty with kids to care for. And Fathers? Do you really think that fathers are going to stick around and help? Ask the court system just how many men (including at least 1 big mouth congressman Joe Walsh) are in arrears of their child support payments. WE ARE NOT INCUBATORS TO HAVE YOUR BABIES. So stop it.