iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Virginia Gay Adoption Faces Major Hurdle

Virginia Gay Adoption

LARRY O'DELL   02/ 9/12 05:02 PM ET  AP

RICHMOND, Va. — The Virginia state Senate passed legislation Thursday allowing private adoption agencies to deny placements that conflict with their religious or moral beliefs, including opposition to homosexuality.

The mostly party-line 22-18 vote virtually ensures the Republican-backed bill will become law. The House of Delegates has an identical version of the bill and Republican Gov. Bob McDonnell says he will sign it. Virginia would become just the second state with such a law, which supporters said was modeled after North Dakota's.

State Sen. Jeffrey McWaters, a Republican from Virginia Beach, said his "conscience clause" bill protects the religious rights of private child placement agencies, including dozens that contract with the state to provide foster care and adoption services.

"This is completely consistent with state and federal law," McWaters said. "It does not change who can or cannot adopt a child."

Sen. Adam Ebbin, D-Alexandria and the only openly gay member of the General Assembly, suggested all the talk about religious freedom is a smokescreen for discrimination against lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered people.

"It has always been about denying LGBT Virginians the right to form families, no matter what we say," Ebbin said.

He said the bill will endanger gay and bisexual children, who make up a disproportionate share of youths awaiting a home, by allowing agencies to place them with parents opposed to homosexuality.

"This does not uphold anyone's moral principles," Ebbin said. "It's morally wrong."

Sen. John Edwards, D-Roanoke, said agencies that contract with the state should not be allowed to discriminate.

"You have a right to exercise religion as you see fit, but you don't have a right to impose it on someone else using state dollars," he said.

Sen. Mark Herring, D-Loudoun, said the bill conflicts with the principle that the best interest of the child is paramount.

"Neither the interests of the placement agency nor their beliefs should stand in the way," he said.

The Family Foundation of Virginia, which lobbied for the legislation, lauded the Senate's action.

"The passage of conscience protection for private child placement agencies by a bipartisan majority in the Senate is a tremendous victory for religious liberty and for the thousands of children and families around Virginia that are served by these agencies," Victoria Cobb, the foundation's president, said in a written statement.

The Child Welfare League of America had sent a letter to senators earlier in the week urging them to reject the bill, saying it would just make it more difficult to place the approximately 1,300 Virginia children waiting for a home.

"These children have been through so much already," Christine James-Brown, president of the organization, wrote. "It is cruel to deny them a secure home with a qualified family that happens to differ from the religious or moral beliefs held by a particular agency."

If either the House or the Senate approves the other chamber's bill unchanged, it will go to the governor. If either chamber amends the bill – which seems unlikely after the Senate rejected a string of amendments proposed by Democrats on Wednesday – it could be sent to conference committee to resolve the differences.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
RICHMOND, Va. — The Virginia state Senate passed legislation Thursday allowing private adoption agencies to deny placements that conflict with their religious or moral beliefs, including opposit...
RICHMOND, Va. — The Virginia state Senate passed legislation Thursday allowing private adoption agencies to deny placements that conflict with their religious or moral beliefs, including opposit...
Filed by Katy Hall  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 183
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jeffrey Marks
08:02 AM on 02/12/2012
If private organizations want to discriminate, fine; however, private means not funded by my tax dollars. If an organization wants to take tax dollars from the fairer minded people of this land, then they need to follow the rule of the land. We are setting up a paradigm where religious organizations are not free, but actually above the law.
04:44 PM on 02/21/2012
Hmm, the pendulum swings both ways. Therefore, if other organizations offering gay adoption services which are supported by public tax dollars and are paid by citizens who do not support gay adoption, do those taxpayers get to make the same choice?

It is actually the gay community that is seeking to be above the law when they insist that all must do as they demand, regardless of personal belief. This is not about there not being other options, but rather forcing all to offer the same options. That is morally wrong. If your goal is personal freedom for the gay community, why would you insist that someone else cannot have personal freedom of conscience?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
dimplasm
More chocolate, please.
02:33 AM on 02/12/2012
So, today the religious adoption agencies get to discriminate against gay people. Who's it going to be tomorrow that offends their delicate sensibilities?
03:46 PM on 02/21/2012
Since there are other agencies to adopt from, why should it be an issue? They are talking about a private entity. The gay communities' argument has always been about 'what we do is a private affair', so why do you get to protect your private actions but others cannot protect their private convictions or organizations?
01:01 PM on 02/11/2012
Who does this legislation serve?
12:32 PM on 02/11/2012
Virginia is not for lovers. Boycott.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bessielil
trying to organize hummingbirds
11:34 AM on 02/11/2012
Let us decode the great philosopher JIMINY CRICKET:
"Yep, temptations. They're the wrong things that seem right at the time, but, uh... even though the right things may seem wrong sometimes, or sometimes the wrong things, [chuckles] may be right at the wrong time, or visa versa. [clears throat] Understand?"

===GOP is tempted (every minute of every day) to figure out how to do things that limit rights instead of expand them--which FEELS right even though it's the wrong thing when you think you stand for what's right, or want to please the right even though it's wrong. Understand?
photo
LMPE
I connect the most dissimilar things
01:00 AM on 02/11/2012
As always, the south wants to stay backwards.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Atwill
Christian puppets scare me
05:43 AM on 02/11/2012
so true
09:16 PM on 02/11/2012
Could you please leave the fact that it's the south out of it I live there and do not want it to stay backwards nor do any of the people I know.
photo
LMPE
I connect the most dissimilar things
10:51 PM on 02/11/2012
I meant the politicians.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SameBoat
Retired cop, educator
10:56 PM on 02/11/2012
Hmm. Trying to remember what part of the country has legalized marriage equality...you have a lot of work to do, I'm thinking.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mchcallow
Don't trip on my bio- it's safe
10:51 PM on 02/10/2012
I'm glad that the assembly member finaly made the connection that "gay and bisexual children, who make up a disproportionate share of youths awaiting a home' may be placed him homes with "parents opposed to homosexuality"

Many of the children who are awaiting foster or adoptive families have just escaped homes where thier parents likely abused and or neglected them. I can't imagine a conservative home would be one where these children would feel loved or wanted.

Now it would appear that not only can agencies willfully discriminate, tax payer dollars can be used to do it. Let's hope that the first of many cases will be brought to the courts.

As if Lovong vs Virginia wasn't enough...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DovS
08:38 PM on 02/10/2012
These anti-gay adoption laws get challenged in court in overturned in other states and these legislators know that. This bill is just political grandstanding meant to curry favor with ultra-conservative voters. The Republicans know that they are just wasting their taxpayers' time and money but they're going to do it anyway just to stir up a few more votes to get them in office. When legislators throw away the taxpayers' money in the middle of a recession, for entirely selfish reasons, they show exactly how seriously they take their responsibility to their constituents.
07:53 PM on 02/10/2012
Virginia is a cautionary tale of having Republicans in charge. No limits on gun purchases. Yikes!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
playflute2
flootz
10:00 AM on 02/11/2012
Yes, and each time they have been in charge lately, the Commonwealth has taken giant steps back in time. Remember Jim Gilmore and George Allen?!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Fonfax
04:37 PM on 02/10/2012
Virginia already has a hate law on the books barring gays from having any rights that approximate hetero rights. Its rather amazing but not surprising in Ole Virginny.
photo
VA Jill
I'm not perfect and neither are you
03:17 PM on 02/10/2012
MickeyD and Cooch are doing their best to drag us back to antebellum days. And MickeyD thinks he has the stuff to be VP! How depressing.
07:54 PM on 02/10/2012
Next they will bring back slavery.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SameBoat
Retired cop, educator
10:58 PM on 02/11/2012
If given half a chance, I suspect they would. But not while I'm alive.
02:59 PM on 02/10/2012
Same old story, religious organizations what to take government money then play by their own rules. It’s despicable. If you want to take government money you should be forced to play by the same rules as everyone else.
photo
BeninOakland
Don't tell me you love me. Let me guess.
01:43 PM on 02/10/2012
There are four really big losers in this idiotic law.

1. The kids who will never be adopted. Way to go, family values hypocrites.

2. Te stae if Virginia. How many thousands of kids are there, waiting for adoption? How many thousands of dollars does it cost the state to maintain them?

3. Heterosexuals. Just remember, when the religious right wingers have their beady eyes focused on us, you are not really that far off the radar. Birth control? Sex education? No fault divorce? HPV vaccines? Abortion? Just for starters. Call it straight rights.

4. The whole country.vusing gay people as their wedge issue, the country elected and then reelected the disaster known as George bush in 2000 and 2004. Everything got deregulated, and we got into two treasury draining wars, followed by the worst financial disaster in 80 years. How did that all work out for us?
07:58 PM on 02/10/2012
No regulations, except for your sex life and reproductive rights.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SameBoat
Retired cop, educator
11:01 PM on 02/11/2012
Oh, haven't you heard? All Obama's fault! Just ask 'em!
01:19 PM on 02/10/2012
"VIRGINIA IS FOR LOVERS" of/if ______________ (fill in the blank)
07:59 PM on 02/10/2012
lovers of intolerance?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
playflute2
flootz
10:02 AM on 02/11/2012
This fails to take into account all the many Virginians who do not in any way agree with these policies.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SameBoat
Retired cop, educator
11:02 PM on 02/11/2012
Yes it does. God love you.
photo
PLAYS WELL WITH OTHERS
Your BELIEFS do not trump my RIGHTS...
08:39 AM on 02/10/2012
These vile bigots are descipable..................The vast majority of kids adopted by Gay parents are not lilly white bouncing babies. But rather older kids, many minorities who have laungished in institutions or bounced from home to home for years. Only to age out of the syste at age 18 and be forced to live on the streets...................

Sooooo much better than to have them placed in a stable, nurturing, home with two parents who love them unconditionally...............Those on the right are in for such a darn rude awakening when they finally burn out their (im)moral coils and meet God and he tells them just how vile the lives they have lived are.........