iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Spencer Bachus Investigated By Ethics Committee Over Stock Trades

Bachus Investigation

LARRY MARGASAK   02/10/12 05:02 PM ET  AP

WASHINGTON — A new ethics investigation of the House Financial Services Committee chairman's investment activities during the events leading up to and surrounding Congress' $700 billion bailout of Wall Street sets back lawmakers' election-year efforts to rebound from their record low standing with the public.

Rep. Spencer Bachus, R-Ala., confirmed Friday that he is being investigated by the independent Office of Congressional Ethics. Just a day earlier, the House passed a bill explicitly prohibiting lawmakers from engaging in insider trading on nonpublic information they learned as officeholders.

Bachus has been the financial services panel's chairman since January 2011 when Republicans retook control of the House. Before that, as the committee's senior GOP member, he participated in closed-door briefings in September 2008 by Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke and then-Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson warning that Wall Street and the economy were in danger of a complete meltdown.

A 2008 Fidelity investment statement attached to Bachus' annual financial disclosure form for that year shows that he was an especially active trader in September and October 2008 with more than three dozen buy and sell orders. On some he made money but, totaled up, he suffered a net loss of $19,490 for the two months.

"I welcome the opportunity to set the record straight," Bachus said in a statement issued by his office. "I respect the congressional ethics process. I have fully abided by the rules governing members of Congress and look forward to the full exoneration this process will provide."

The investigation couldn't come at a worse time for lawmakers – eight months before they stand for re-election and with the latest Gallup poll figures putting Congress' approval rating at 10 percent, its lowest level since the company began tracking the measure in 1974.

It also is occurring in the middle of an effort to allay perceptions that lawmakers are flouting insider trading laws after a CBS "60 Minutes" report last November examined stock and other investment transactions by Bachus, House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.

Over the last eight days, both the House and Senate have rushed to pass bills that explicitly ban insider trading by lawmakers and thousands of other top government officials. The bills differ just enough to require what could be lengthy negotiations on a compromise.

Bachus' committee oversees banks and the regulation of other financial companies, and its members would be privy to the kind of financial information that would be useful in stock trades.

It won't be known for some time whether Bachus' trades violated the law. The independent Office of Congressional Ethics turns over its reports and recommendations to the member-run House Ethics Committee, which could then begin its own lengthy investigation.

The Washington Post first reported the investigation into possible violation of insider trading laws.

Even the appearance of a conflict of interest can lead to ethical problems. Bachus' penchant for playing the stock and futures markets with short-term trades while serving on the financial services committee has been criticized in the past.

Bachus had several dozen rapid-fire transactions, keeping some investments a matter of days, and had both gains and losses. The key question for investigators, however, is whether any of the transactions were the result of nonpublic information that Bachus received.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — A new ethics investigation of the House Financial Services Committee chairman's investment activities during the events leading up to and surrounding Congress' $700 billion bailout ...
WASHINGTON — A new ethics investigation of the House Financial Services Committee chairman's investment activities during the events leading up to and surrounding Congress' $700 billion bailout ...
Filed by Leigh Owens  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 101
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
02:59 PM on 02/11/2012
Here is another one that should be investigated.

Bingaman (D) voted NO, the bearer of much pork back home -- during 2008-2010, he sponsored 47 solo earmarks worth $36 million and supported 442 co-sponsored earmarks worth $973 million, and that doesn't count earmarks requested by President Obama.

He wields real power in committee assignments -- chairman of Energy and Natural Resources, member of the Finance Committee; the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee; and the Joint Committee on the Economy.

Bingaman financial disclosure reports show a man who entered the Senate in 1983 considerably less than a millionaire, inherited a Texaco oil and gas well in Gregg County, Texas, worth all of $15,000, and yet is retiring with investments worth possibly as much as $50 million.

Bingaman 40th richest of the 535 members of Congress his investment portfolio of the senator was unusually active, "racking up nearly 600 separate purchases and sales of stock in 2009, worth a combined total of more than $20 million" not counting their book of untraded stocks.

The range is so wide because federal disclosure law frustratingly requires reporting investments only in nearly meaningless categories, like $6 million to $25 million, hiding even the approximate value of any asset or debt.
02:15 PM on 02/11/2012
And yet he was considered 'super 'for the so called Super Committee as part of the bipartisan deal over raising the debt ceiling which is all still within living memory - even for Americans.
01:07 PM on 02/11/2012
Nothing will happen to him, just ask Bush/Cheney and the whole administration. Bush cant even travel outside of America without the fear of being arrested, but walks freely here. I am an avid Obama supporter but I wish some justice could have been served to these people. But I know how impossible that would have been to do, we cant even get women in the 21st century BIRTH CONTROL without the religious right and the republicans getting their panties in a twist. Now think what would happen if justice was served!
photo
christopherflynn
The wreligious wright is always rong...
05:56 PM on 02/11/2012
definitely put their panties in major jeopardy...
photo
ReMarker
Facts and reason For The Win!
11:06 AM on 02/11/2012
I think it's fair to say Bachus is NOT America's favorite Congressman and Alabama's best representatives are on the University of Alabama's football team.

Bama, you can do better in the Congressman department. Bachus is a loser.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TOPCAT711
What a Long Strange Trip It's Been
11:01 AM on 02/11/2012
He looks very 'aryan brotherhood'.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dax49
10:24 AM on 02/11/2012
Republicans and ethics- what a combination!
08:35 AM on 02/11/2012
Let's get Martha Stewart's opinion on the subject, who in my opinion was far less associated with this type activity. So he came in 2011 and got busy, not a minute to waste. This may explain why the congress can't get the mortgage situation straight. Can this be another "K" Street scandal?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OldGent
Alwayswatchin
01:29 AM on 02/11/2012
I only ask that the name Charley Rangle (D-NY) needs to be remembered and also how he was treated in Congress. It will be seen as to how the shoe fits the other foot here. Might as well throw in the indifferent treatment of David Vitter (Rep.) and Anthony Weiner (Dem). One lost his job in Congress and the other continues to practice for indecencies. They were either both wrong or both practicing their preferences outside of Congress, but both shouldn't be differently treated.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
l78lancer
Wisdom is the principal thing
10:51 PM on 02/10/2012
Even if he experienced a $19k loss, did having insider information help him to limit the losses to that amount, or would the losses have been significantly greater without the benefit of that knowledge?
photo
askandtell
Proud Minnesotan; Inspired by Paul Wellstone
02:01 AM on 02/11/2012
Great point.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
l78lancer
Wisdom is the principal thing
01:07 PM on 02/11/2012
It seems especially relevant for the past 4 years because while the average American has lost wealth due to the crash of the financial markets and housing bubble rupture, congress, on average, has gotten richer. Just the ability to cut your losses it a HUGE advantage.
09:25 PM on 02/10/2012
I will more than likely get a visit from our F.B.I. or another group from Homeland Security for making the following statment,although it is not intended to be hostility provoking or terroristic inciting : We need to start from SCRATCH and DUMP the CAPITOL HILL Elites.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
LiberalLee
Yes I am a witch. Deal with it.
11:37 AM on 02/11/2012
You don't rate a visit from anyone. Stop thinking you're something special, Ed.
09:03 PM on 02/10/2012
(The independent Office of Congressional Ethics turns over its reports and recommendations to the member-run House Ethics Committee) Another Prima Facie case of the FOX guarding the Henhouse. The RICH get Richer while the POOR get POORER. We the employers have let the Congress lead us down the proverbial "Garden Path' and all the while the only legislation approved and passed by said Congress (both Houses) is that WHICH EITHER BENEFITS THEIR party AND/OR THEMSELVES. Please people when you go to the polls this year,use your heads not your eyes and ears VOTE for someone that isn't beholding to LOBBYISTS and SPECIAL interest groups nor is a Suave Orator with his "teleprompter in FULL swing. With just a SMALL effort on your part,find out just WHO is and WHO is not taking $$$$$$$ from LOBBYISTS,PACs,and Special Interest Groups. These People come into office (MOST with a LAW DEGREE) and Larceny in their hearts and in a very short time go from Paupers to Princes. Vote for and Hold Accountable people that "fill this bill. (Please note that the Ethics COMMITTEE is "MEMBER RUN"
08:47 AM on 02/11/2012
The Republicans/Conservatives can talk, at the conventions, rallies and photo ops, about how trustworthy they are. Meantime, they bring distractions in big conversations why Obama needs to be a one term President while they profit from the nation's loss. Vulture capitalist and congress people playing to the downside/sizing of American's future. Who is it talking about concern for children, character and values, saying one thing and doing the opposite? Scam artists to the core.
photo
mcmutter
A Groover has to expect a few setbacks .....
08:51 PM on 02/10/2012
these southern hicks think they're above being questioned .... they're not .... cuff thte scum Dano .......
08:40 PM on 02/10/2012
The independent Office of Congressional Ethics turns over its reports and recommendations to the member-run House Ethics Committee Another prima facie case of The FOX guarding the Hen House. The RICh get RICHER while the POOR get POORER
08:14 PM on 02/10/2012
all elected officials should have any and all stocks, bonds,land holdings and businesses held in a blind trust until they leave office. and the holder of the trust would not know who the real owner of the blind trust fund belonged to either. also they could not tell anyone of any pending dealings where one might be able to make money from any stock,bonds,land holdings,businesses in which they could use before any offical rules or regulations,laws were in place so they could not benefit early compared to a common person.lets see how many elected officials would jump on this band wagon.
08:50 AM on 02/11/2012
This is an idea that is past due. Instead of watering down the bill it should be beefed up. "Say one thing and do another, when its not being the Party of "No".
07:12 PM on 02/10/2012
"They were the ones eating the pie!"