iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Going Hog Wild: Weaning Antibiotic-Resistant Bugs Out Of Pork

Pig Farm Antibiotics

First Posted: 02/11/2012 8:08 pm Updated: 02/11/2012 8:08 pm

After nearly succumbing to an antibiotic-resistant infection contracted from one of his hogs, Russ Kremer went cold turkey. He exterminated his diseased pigs and swore off the antibiotics he'd long-used to boost his herd's growth and prevent the illnesses so common in concentrated animal feeding operations, or CAFOs.

Now, more than 20 years later, he says his farm is organic, sustainable, humane and still nearly as efficient as the typical industrial CAFO. Plus he's eliminated the $16,000 a year he used to spend on veterinary and drug bills. And he hasn't sacrificed his pigs' health in the process. If anything, the opposite is true for Fred, Barney, Wilma, Pebbles, Bamm-Bamm and the other 500-some pigs that roam his 150-acre farm.

"My mortality rate is less than 1 percent after they leave their mother. In the industry, many people are seeing a 5 to 10 percent loss," Kremer, now president of Ozark Mountain Pork Cooperative in Missouri, told The Huffington Post. "I don't even own a syringe anymore."

Better yet, he has remained healthy himself.

Kremer's story exemplifies the findings of a growing number of scientific studies on the effects of antibiotic use in livestock. As HuffPost previously reported, the 29 million pounds of antibiotics given to livestock every year -- about four times the amount consumed by people, and mostly used at sub-therapeutic doses -- appears to be contributing to a rise in drug-resistant infections in both animals and people. The most infamous of the microbes: methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus, better known as MRSA.

"We've worked our way into a pickle," said David Wallinga, a senior adviser at the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy. The more antibiotics we use, the more microbes become resistant to those drugs -- even to our "biggest guns." It's a microscopic survival of the fittest.

Wallinga and his colleagues recently found drug-resistant microbes in 65 percent of about 400 pork products sampled from a dozen grocery stores across Iowa, Minnesota and New Jersey. Nearly 7 percent of the products had measurable amounts of MRSA, according to their study, published in January in the journal PLoS ONE.

To the team's surprise, MRSA thrived in both conventional meat and meat labeled as antibiotic-free. (The "antibiotic-free" label is not regulated.)

At first glance, this finding might contradict other research, such as a study also published in January from the National Animal Disease Center (NADC) in Ames, Iowa. The intestines of piglets raised with antibiotics added to their feed accommodated both a greater number and wider variety of antibiotic resistance genes than the intestines of pigs not fed the drugs, according to that research. The treated pigs' innards were also colonized by more E. coli.

Still, both groups of pigs carried at least some resistant genes, the information that tells a microbe how to evade microbe-killing drugs. Only the presence or absence -- not quantity of MRSA -- was measured in the pork study.

"We find antibiotic resistance genes quite prevalent in all pigs, irrespective of antibiotic feeding. We think this may be partially due to the fact that at least in pig growing regions, the background flora that they pick up is already enriched with antibiotic resistance genes," said James Tiedje, a microbiologist at Michigan State University and researcher on the study.

This concept was illustrated in yet another study published last year. Wild pigs from an island off the coast of South Carolina were compared to organically raised pigs in the Midwest. In this case, the guts of the wild pigs had 1,000-fold fewer bacteria resistant to the tetracycline class of antibiotics compared to their organic counterparts. (An organic label does imply antibiotic-free certification.)

Kremer is well aware that antibiotic residue can persist in the environment and lead to resistance long after the last dose of antibiotics was used on that land. Fortunately, he set up his new operation on land that -- as far back as he's aware -- had only been used for organic farming. And he made every effort not to introduce any bad bugs or drugs, including bringing in only piglets that had been born via cesarean section.

A pristine farm may still not be enough to ensure safe pork. Wallinga of the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy notes that it remains unclear just how MRSA got into both the conventional and antibiotic-free retail meat he studied. MRSA may have encountered the pig on the farm, or the microbe may have hitched a ride in the slaughterhouse; at the processing plant; or en route to, or at, the store.

Research even suggests that effluent from sewage treatment plants is introducing antibiotic resistance into the environment that could be picked up by food animals. In other words, humans may well be the original source of the bugs, despite our predilection for blaming the 9 billion or so animals raised for food every year -- and their manure.

Regardless of its origin, debate abounds over just how much danger is posed by MRSA in meat. According to Liz Wagstrom, chief veterinarian for the National Pork Producers Council, that concern is minimal.

Gail Hansen, senior officer with the Pew Campaign on Human Health and Industrial Farming, added, "It's not clear what happens when MRSA is ingested." However, a lot is known about exposure through the blood stream, she said, which is the typical route of infection in the hospital and among livestock handlers such as Kremer.

Even if MRSA doesn't directly make you sick, it can share its lethal information with other bugs in your body, including those that are well-known to cause trouble when consumed, Hansen told HuffPost. Further, many of the resistance genes identified in the NADC study are not typically linked to the antibiotics used in the animals.

"Bacteria are promiscuous with their resistance genes," said Wallinga, highlighting a range of reservoirs of resistance, from manure lagoons to hog CAFOs to sewage treatment plants. "In general, it's not good to have these environments with a lot of bacteria and antibiotics."

Thad Stanton of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, who was involved in both the wild pig and NADC studies, added another wrinkle to the issue: The small physical size of the wild island pigs. "The world would starve if you had to raise feral pigs. We would have to bring in food imports from overseas where there is very little scrutiny," said Stanton. "We need to reach a balance between what is short-term expedient and long-term foolish."

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued a draft "Guidance on the Judicious Use of Medically Important Antimicrobial Drugs in Food Producing Animals" in 2010, which offers suggestions to the livestock industry on the prudent use of antibiotics in order to preserve the effectiveness of the drugs for the treatment of human disease. A final version has not yet been released.

Sponsored by Rep. Louise Slaughter (D-N.Y.), the only microbiologist in Congress, the Preservation of Antibiotics for Medical Treatment Act aims higher: the elimination of the non-therapeutic use of antibiotics in livestock. PAMTA was re-introduced in March 2011 after getting buried in Congress in 2007 and 2009.

"We know what to do, it's just a question of the leadership to get it done," Wallinga said.

Meanwhile, the market is spurring some change on its own. "The writing is on the wall," Wallinga told HuffPost. "The farmer that is the early adopter of antibiotic-free production is the farmer that is going to win the future market."

Kremer and the other farmers in his co-op provide pork to rising outlets including Chipotle, Applegate Farms and Whole Foods.

Of course, the consumer also has a major role to play in this line of defense. "'Antibiotic-free' doesn't necessarily mean that the meat is going to be free of antibiotic resistant pathogens," said Tara Smith, an epidemiologist at the University of Iowa College of Public Health and lead researcher on the MRSA study. "Safe handling practices are just as relevant for antibiotic-free raised meats and meats grown conventionally."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

After nearly succumbing to an antibiotic-resistant infection contracted from one of his hogs, Russ Kremer went cold turkey. He exterminated his diseased pigs and swore off the antibiotics he'd long-us...
After nearly succumbing to an antibiotic-resistant infection contracted from one of his hogs, Russ Kremer went cold turkey. He exterminated his diseased pigs and swore off the antibiotics he'd long-us...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 84
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
01:43 PM on 02/14/2012
You can support the American family farmer who raises meat to your high standards by buying directly from them. They want to raise meat you want to buy and eat. Encourage this by growing the demand. Find one on Home Grown Cow and say "Thank you."
photo
SteveC 1979
Just...don't.
01:13 PM on 02/14/2012
People need to open their eyes, get educated, and stop buying factory farm products.
05:56 AM on 02/14/2012
We must NOT forget to thank the pharma industry for all the drug-resistant illnesses we manage to contract every day! Everything is pumped full antibiotics - pharma benefits, we lose.
09:35 PM on 02/13/2012
sometimes i feel like, while the right-wing and the tea party bemoans the evils of "big government", and while the left-wing and Occupy Wall Street bemoan the evils of "big business", we are perhaps not considering enough how we could have power over much of our lives by not being dependent on either big corporations or the federal/state governments. if we get all of our food from local sources, keep our money in local credit unions, get our clothing from locally manufactured sources made out of local raw materials, and our electricity comes from local sources (ideally from solar panels or wind turbines), then y would we need either Big Business or Big Government anymore?

unless big Corporations, backed by corporatist State power, were to seize our Land, and commit terror and violence (whether from the state or private paramilitary armies) against us -- which, of course, has been happening to Indigenous peoples and peasants for decades (centuries, actually). which is y i sometimes feel that localist/organic food movements need to be more militant in protecting ourselves from both private capital and the state. maybe i have more in common with those 2nd amendment tea partiers than i thought i did; but rather than possessing arms to harass immigrants or defend white supremacy, christian fundamentalism, patriarchy, & homophobia, i would want to protect/defend a community committed to sustainable organic agriculture, fair labor practices, women's reproductive rights, racial justice /immigrants' rights, respect for indigenous communities, and LGBT equality.
08:30 PM on 02/13/2012
It is now against the law to take and publish pictures of meat processing. According to the Supreme Court, corporations and money are protected by the First Amendment but apparently photography, even for journalistic purposes, must be restricted. Why? Because it might show inconvenient truths about corporations.

It would seem that corporations have not just used their massive power to oppress the will of the American people in order to become just "people" but rather "superior people" with special rights and priviledges.

In our modern world, corporations are wielding power unmatched by any other institution in history. Corporations are buying up our democracy and destroying our liberties. Corporation power has stolen our liberty to to know what's in our food. Corporation power has stolen our libery to know where our food comes from. Corporation power has stolen our liberty to know how our food is produced.

Americans once rebelled against the likes of the East India Company corrupting our colonial governments and destroying our liberties. It is long past time for Americans to once again rebel against the rise of huge corporations with massive power to corrupt OUR democracy and destroy our liberties.

The American family farmer is all but gone in America -- exterminated by the power of massive corporations like ADM, Cargill, and Monsanto.
photo
FaunaAndFlora
Daughter of Pan
11:07 PM on 02/13/2012
According to USDA statistics, 98% of American farms are family-owned and operated.
photo
SteveC 1979
Just...don't.
01:15 PM on 02/14/2012
It is now against the law to take and publish pictures of meat processing­.

Are you serious...?? What arguments could proponents of that possibly have put forth??
08:06 PM on 02/13/2012
If you haven't watched "Food, Inc", watch it. It is actually pretty fair in its acknowledgement of what industrialized food production has accomplished, while also pointing out the long list of problems. People simply don't have the slightest clue what their "food" is, how it's produced, and where it actually comes from.

The got the very slightest hint about what their "food" is when, buried down deep in the lower levels of news, it was reported that McDonald's announced it was going to stop adding "pink ammonia foam" to its ground beef. Mmmmmm... Pink ammonia foam. YUMMY!!! A few days later my wife and I were watching Food, Inc (which pre-dates the McDonald's announcement), and one of the segments covered a brand new high tech ground beef processing plant that was washing the beef in ammonia to kill off all the bacteria that is introduced as part of the industrialized beef production. It's bacteria that is not present in naturally raised and processed beef.

Another segment shows how, thanks to W (the movie was filmed during the W regime), the government no longer actually has any food safety; and how that directly correlates with the sudden increase in the number of actual reported incidents of mass food poisoning and deaths. W appointed all industry insiders to "oversee" the industry. The number of inspections promptly dropped by a magnitude of 10.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
"RP Siegel"
07:55 PM on 02/13/2012
Ultimately nature wins out. Always.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sallybutt45
To thine own self be true.
07:30 PM on 02/13/2012
Republicans would like to eliminate the FDA and any other govt. org that oversees or regulates the food safety for this nation. That we are being poisoned, through the food we eat is obvious. When we consider that we are ingesting antibiotics every time we eat meat and meat products, we are building resistance to those antibiotics and when we really need them, they will no longer work to fight infections. MERSA is a scary infection, and it is not a rare things these days, found even in the gyms where so many of us work out everyday.

We need to rethink our entire food supply. I certainly worry about genetically modified foods that are foisted on us unlabeled. It is no wonder that France and other European countries have outlawed them, why haven't we?

If our mind set becomes one of "smaller" government, we may live to regret it, deregulation means relaxing the already failing system that is supposed to protect us from diseased meat and contaminated produce. We need a government that protects us, that is what their job is, self policing doesn't work.
09:11 PM on 02/13/2012
or maybe we all (or a very large portion of us) should become organic farmers ourselves, whether in rural, suburban, or urban areas. lots of urban organic farms are sprouting up in places like detroit and milwaukee and all around the USA. if we're growing our own food, we'll have control over whether or not hormones/pesticides get into the food we eat. the world's supply of petroleum and other fossil fuels is finite (not to mention polluting/damaging to biological life on Earth as we know it, including to ourselves), so we can't rely on oil-based industrialization/electrification/transportation anymore.

i totally agree with you about the need to regulate our food supply to ensure that consumers aren't being poisoned. but at the same time, i'm wondering to what extent we're surrendering our power to our "representatives" that we elect into office. i'm all for pressuring them to protect us (e.g. through citizen watchdog groups), but then again, maybe we should be doing it ourselves (e.g., through growing our own organic pesticide-free produce or raising hormone-free livestock; through building personal relationships with organic farmers [whether neighbors, or farmers' market people], allowing us to see their farms for ourselves; community associations committed to sustainable/organic/socially just farming practices; etc.).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sallybutt45
To thine own self be true.
09:29 PM on 02/13/2012
I still think it is Governments job to secure our safety, domestic and foreign. And food, water, and air should be included. So maybe we are miles apart on this, but on growing our own produce is right on.

For many, many years I grew my own tomatoes,( there is nothing quite as delicious as home grown tomatoes right off the vine!) shallots, cucumbers, okra, parsley, mint, and chiles. I was unable to do so this last year, because my disability has set limits on my mobility. I have enough space here for a community garden, even have some raised beds. Unable to care for my lawns back and front would also allow additional growing space, so I am open to it. I just don't know how to get started and would appreciate any suggestions.

I am not able to participate physically, but, I hate the thought of one more store bought tomatoe!
09:28 PM on 02/13/2012
people are already doing all of those examples i mentioned, but i guess i'm just wondering about the idea of our elected officials protecting "us", the "consumers". what if we were the "producers" (or at least consumers that are very close, both physically and personally, to the production process)?

[but i do not at all intend to imply that i support abandoning the electoral process and surrendering our state institutions and state decision-making powers to the right-wing. i do believe that the government should be ensuring food safety and a poison-free food supply, not to mention universal healthcare and universal free public education and efficient mass transit systems.]
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sallybutt45
To thine own self be true.
09:52 PM on 02/13/2012
Yay! We agree all the way around. Thank you for being level headed, we need as many people thinking like you do. I applaud you soundly, sir!!!
photo
plantbasedpunk
live from the PHX
11:11 AM on 02/13/2012
The mental somersaults one must have to go through in order to raise, name then completely destroy a living being is beyond me.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Karl Wilder
Chef Stirring The Pot Harlem
01:00 PM on 02/13/2012
It is not that hard. I named my chickens Gumbo, Stew, Frito, etc.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
directac
06:02 AM on 02/13/2012
Methinks you need to look up the definition of sentience!
photo
plantbasedpunk
live from the PHX
11:09 AM on 02/13/2012
Methinks this was supposed to be a reply to freefrom harm. And if so, methinks YOU need to look up the definition of "sentience". To say that pigs aren't sentient is as absurd as saying 1+1=3.
photo
FaunaAndFlora
Daughter of Pan
11:57 PM on 02/13/2012
Yes, pigs are sentient. There are scientists who now believe plants and bacteria are also sentient.

From the Merriam Webster's Collegiate Dictionary-
sen·tience noun
\ˈsen(t)-sh(ē-)ən(t)s, ˈsen-tē-ən(t)s\
Definition of SENTIENCE
1: a sentient quality or state
2: feeling or sensation as distinguished from perception and thought

Sentience refers to the ability to react to changes in the environment and nothing more. Sentience is not sapience.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
directac
06:01 AM on 02/13/2012
This is great. Glad to see that this is actually doable. But, is it possible for everyone?.­...No, given the huge market demand for pork products.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
directac
06:00 AM on 02/13/2012
They killed and ate all the ones they had and restructur­ed their society to live entirely on vegetable, chickens, and fish.
photo
stjoshy
"C is for COOKIEEEEE. thats good enough for me"
03:53 PM on 02/12/2012
just as marijuana reform is kicked in the shins by big PHARMA, so is this movement. i applaud this mans efforts, and again the correlation between natural and cost effective/ safety is apparent(just like marijuana is for the people). but this is an isolated case of non reliance on big pharma, and unless more farms get on this road to change, big PHARMA will stomp this out and refute it the best they can to no end.
Cash Rules Everything Around Me
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:09 PM on 02/12/2012
There was an island in the Pacific whose people, like most most Polynesians, raised pigs and enjoyed eating pork. As their population increased they came to realize that their economy was unbalanced. They were feeding too much of their produce to their pigs, they could not support a pig population and their own as well. So they sat down talked it out, and then decided to kill off all the pigs. They killed and ate all the ones they had and restructured their society to live entirely on vegetable, chickens, and fish.

We should also get rid of all our pigs. I love pork, I love eating bacon and ham an pork chops, but I realize that hog-raising is placing unacceptable strains on our society. Most pigs are factory farmed, with horrible living conditions for the animals, horrible ecological and social consequences, and terrible health risks for our country. Bacteria in pig feces turn into spores which can be carried by the wind from the open cesspools which surround factory farms. These bacteria can infect people for miles downwind of the farms.

Every factory farm, for chickens, pigs, or cattle, is a disease time-bomb waiting to go off, but pigs are the most dangerous because they are the closest to humans in their metabolism. We should do as the islanders did, kill off and eat all our pigs and bring an end to factory farming.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stephen Thorpe
Every breath you take - I'll take one too!
02:56 PM on 02/12/2012
Could it be that they just had too many? They stopped fishing and began to rely to heavily on pigs. Pigs seemed easy to cultivate. So just like in our daily lives make pork a 1 fiftht of your diet. Never the less, these concentrated animal feeding operations, or CAFOs, whether it be chickens beef or pigs are problematic.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:08 PM on 02/12/2012
The island had plenty of resources when the people arrived, but as time went of by the people increased and they ran out of arable land. When the squeeze came they did the rational thing, and matched their diet to their resources. It gives me hope for the human race. If we were to do the same it would save the world a great deal of suffering.
photo
FaunaAndFlora
Daughter of Pan
12:59 AM on 02/13/2012
For what it's worth, beef cattle spend most of their lives on pasture. They only spend 30 to 90 days in a feedlot. Not that I'm a fan of feedlots. I also think there is a place for some pork, but only as an occasional treat and not as a staple because hogs are omnivores. They can't survive on graze alone. Of course that is also true of chickens. Geese and ducks, on the other hand, are grazers and browsers. That's why I prefer geese and ducks over chickens for both eggs and meat.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:26 AM on 02/13/2012
I lived in Texas for 17 years, had cattle and horses for neighbors. I found a bull in my yard one day. He was a peaceful chap, once he had eaten his fill of my grass he jumped over the fence and made friends with the cows next door.

Things are different nowadays, too many animals live on factory farms. "Animal Factory" by David Kirby makes the facts dreadfully clear.

As far as chickens are concerned they eat bugs and anything else (except bell peppers) but they also harbor diseases, as do ducks and geese, especially influenza.