More

HuffPost Social Reading

Space Outpost: NASA Considers Plan For Deep Space Waypoint Near Moon (VIDEO)

First Posted: 02/12/2012 9:03 pm Updated: 02/12/2012 9:13 pm

By: Leonard David
Published: 02/11/2012 09:32 PM EST on SPACE.com

NASA is pressing forward on assessing the value of a "human-tended waypoint" near the far side of the moon -- one that would embrace international partnerships as well as commercial and academic participation, SPACE.com has learned.

According to a Feb. 3 memo from William Gerstenmaier, NASA's associate administrator for human exploration and operations, a team is being formed to develop a cohesive plan for exploring a spot in space known as the Earth-moon libration point 2 (EML-2).

Libration points, also known as Lagrangian points, are places in space where the combined gravitational pull of two large masses roughly balance each other out, allowing spacecraft to essentially "park" there.

A pre-memo NASA appraisal of EML-2, which is near the lunar far side, has spotlighted this destination as the "leading option" for a near-term exploration capability. [Gallery: Visions of Deep-Space Station Missions]

EML-2 could serve as a gateway for capability-driven exploration of multiple destinations, such as near-lunar space, asteroids, the moon, the moons of Mars and, ultimately, Mars itself, according to NASA officials.

A capabilities-driven NASA architecture is one that should use the agency's planned heavy-lift rocket, known as the Space Launch System, and the Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle "as the foundational elements."

Cadence of compelling missions

The memo spells out six strategic principles to help enable exploration beyond low-Earth orbit:

  • Incorporating significant international participation that leverages current International Space Station partnerships.
  • U.S. commercial business opportunities to further enhance the space station logistics market with a goal of reducing costs and allowing for private sector innovation.
  • Multiuse or reusable in-space infrastructure that allows a capability to be developed and reused over time for a variety of exploration destinations.
  • The application of technologies for near-term applications while focusing research and development of new technologies to reduce costs, improve safety, and increase mission capture over the longer term.
  • Demonstrated affordability across the project life cycle.
  • Near-term mission opportunities with a well-defined cadence of compelling missions providing for an incremental buildup of capabilities to perform more complex missions over time.

Quiet zone

According to strategic space planners, an EML-2 waypoint could enable significant telerobotic science on the far side of the moon and could serve as a platform for solar and Earth scientific observation, radio astronomy and other science in the quiet zone behind the moon.

Furthermore, the waypoint could enable assembly and servicing of satellites and large telescopes, among a host of other uses.

If NASA succeeds in establishing an astronaut-tended EML-2 waypoint, it would represent the farthest humans have traveled from Earth to date, the memo points out.

Extended stays at EML-2 would provide advancements in life sciences and radiation-shielding for long-duration missions outside of the Van Allen radiation belts that protect Earth, scientists say.

Next step

Gerstenmaier noted that moving forward on international, commercial and academic partnerships will "require significant detailed development and integration."

Moreover, Gerstenmaier added, EML-2 "is a complex region of cis-lunar space that has certain advantages as an initial staging point for exploration, but may also have some disadvantages that must be well understood."

A NASA study team is assigned the task of developing near-term missions to EML-2 "as we continue to refine our understanding and implications of using this waypoint as part of the broader exploration capability development," the memo explains.

The study is targeted for completion by March 30, 2012.

A working group of International Space Station members --a meeting bringing together space agencies from around the world -- is being held in Paris this week with NASA’s EML-2 strategy likely to be discussed with international partners.

Proving ground

Bullish on the promise of telerobotics exploration of the moon from EML-2 is Jack Burns, director of the Lunar University Network for Astrophysics Research (LUNAR) Center at the University of Colorado, Boulder. LUNAR is funded by the NASA Lunar Science Institute.

Burns and his team have been collaborating with Lockheed Martin (builder of the Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle) for more than a year to plan an early Orion mission that would go into a halo orbit of EML-2 above the lunar far side. 

"This is extremely exciting from both the exploration and science sides," Burns told SPACE.com. "This mission concept seems to be really taking off now because it is unique and offers the prospects of doing something significant outside of low-Earth orbit within this decade."

In collaboration with Lockheed-Martin, the LUNAR Center is investigating human missions to EML-2 that could be a proving ground for future missions to deep space while also overseeing scientifically important investigations.

Roadways on the moon?

In a LUNAR Center white paper provided to SPACE.com, researchers note that an EML-2 mission would have astronauts traveling 15 percent farther from Earth than did the Apollo astronauts, and spending almost three times longer in deep space. [Lunar Legacy: Apollo Moon Mission Photos]

Such missions would validate the Orion spacecraft's life-support systems for shorter durations, could demonstrate the high-speed re-entry capability needed for return to Earth from deep space, and could help scientists gauge astronauts’ radiation dose from cosmic rays and solar flares. Doing so would help verify that Orion provides sufficient radiation protection, as it is designed to do, researchers said.

On such missions, the white paper explains, Orion astronauts could teleoperate gear on the lunar far side. For instance, the moon-based robotic hardware could obtain samples from the geologically appealing far side -- perhaps from the South Pole-Aitken basin, which is one of the largest, deepest and oldest craters in the solar system.

Also on a proposed lunar robotic agenda is deployment of a low-frequency array of radio antennas to observe the first stars in the early universe.

Among a number of research jobs, the LUNAR team has been investigating how modest equipment could be used to fuse lunar regolith into a concrete-like material, which could then be used for construction of large structures, without the expense of having to carry most of the material to the lunar surface.

The ability to fabricate hardened structures from lunar regolith could also foster on-the-spot creation of solar arrays, habitats, and radiation shielding and maybe, even roadways on the surface of the moon.

Leonard David has been reporting on the space industry for more than five decades. He is a winner of last year's National Space Club Press Award and a past editor-in-chief of the National Space Society's Ad Astra and Space World magazines. He has written for SPACE.com since 1999.

Follow SPACE.com for the latest in space science and exploration news on Twitter @Spacedotcom and on Facebook.



Copyright 2012 SPACE.com, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Also on HuffPost:

LOOK: NASA Lunar Base Concepts
All images and captions courtesy of NASA.
FOLLOW HUFFPOST SCIENCE

By: Leonard David Published: 02/11/2012 09:32 PM EST on SPACE.com NASA is pressing forward on assessing the value of a "human-tended waypoint" near the far side of the moon -- one tha...
By: Leonard David Published: 02/11/2012 09:32 PM EST on SPACE.com NASA is pressing forward on assessing the value of a "human-tended waypoint" near the far side of the moon -- one tha...
Filed by Timothy Stenovec  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 238
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rich Cash
Enlisted in 1971 - Retired in 1996
08:12 PM on 02/27/2012
L4 or L5, while being farther from the moon, would be more stable than L2 and require fewer adjustments to keep the outpost in place.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Supernatoir
Heard GOP does not believe in science now math too
11:14 AM on 02/20/2012
Yes but yes more resources
ProCynic
Weak minds become partisan, demonizing others.
08:02 PM on 02/17/2012
A manned space program with a target of the moon and then Mars will put 10's of thousands to work and pump up the economy.
02:46 AM on 02/18/2012
So would fixing the potholes.
ProCynic
Weak minds become partisan, demonizing others.
11:23 AM on 02/18/2012
You can do both. They aren't mutually exclusive and employ different talent pools.

A massive NASA program will be growing for the next 20 years which means colleges will be able to ramp up technical programs. Companies would be hiring blue collar assembly, engineering, scientific, and management talent.

A pot hole (infrastructure) push will employee an incredible amount of blue collar, engineering, and management talent.

All classes get employment boosts.
02:47 AM on 02/17/2012
I want to personally thank new.t for making a mockery of colonization and for focusing said attention on the moon where said efforts would be wasted. We need to go to Mars and build there, in two hundred years they'll just complain about how we didn't get it done earlier, and we could have started inside of NASA's existing budget in the 90s. It's not speculation, it's fact and it's incredibly embarrassing that we can't have an adult conversation about space colonization because it's inevitable and it's profitable. There are many sources and if you can manage zubrin's 'case for mars' you've got a good start.
03:11 AM on 02/17/2012
What's better on Mars than on the Moon? Can you please explain in scientific terms?

And, yes, while you are at it... who is going to pay for this kind of nonsense? The taxpayer? Come on... the US taxpayer doesn't even want to pay for the potholes any more.
photo
Djay0252
American First, Second, and ALWAYS
04:36 PM on 02/17/2012
I believe it is better to explore Mars....someday rather than the moon because we need to expand on our knowledge of life on Mars. This is a key factory in space exploration that you could not find on the moon. As for payment of this I believe this will have to be a multi national effort. I believe more and more that space exploration for be a cooperative world wide effort. It's the only way to go.
01:46 AM on 02/17/2012
To sum this up... the Congressional pork called SLS is looking for a mission profile that will take it beyond Earth orbit... without really going anywhere, which would be too expensive, even for Congress.
02:48 AM on 02/17/2012
space colonization is nearly upon us, nasa could have started years ago and now it's obvious that the credit will fall to a private entity or another country.
03:08 AM on 02/17/2012
What are you going to colonise? And with what money? Every citizen of Alaska receives currently over $20,000 per year from the federal government in support. Without it, Alaska would be economically impossible to "colonise".

Now imagine a place without oil, water, air and life, filled with deadly radiation, which costs a billion dollars per inhabitant per year in federal spending. That's space.

:-)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Norwegiano
Gay Lefty - admitted and proud.
10:02 AM on 02/16/2012
Don't underestimate the need for NASA, folks. As the world continues to explode with conflict, overpopulation, dwindling food and water supplies, NASA's methodical (wisely slow) and scientific approach to understanding how humans can exist—long term—outside of our natural biosphere through the space station and shuttle-crafts cannot be underestimated.

You cannot just GO to Mars without knowing if a human being can withstand such a journey. You cannot just mine that comet for water or that moon for precious minerals without knowing if physics and our current technology can actually do it safely without tragic results.

You can't do any of it safely and efficiently without first knowing if it's even possible! Think about the fuel required to get to and from Mars. Think about the amount of food required to make it that far. Not to mention the psychological effects on the astronauts who embark on an 18 month space-flight like that.

So no, NASA hasn't been wasting tax dollars. They have been frugally getting answers to problems that such space exploration requires. I, for one, would like a manned mission to Mars...but only if it isn't a one way trip. That takes decades of planning.
02:31 PM on 02/16/2012
You are joking, right?

:-)
photo
rsargerod
On a Journey towards Wisdom!
07:45 PM on 02/16/2012
I find your reasoning an acceptable fact F&F
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
13champlain
Trolling for grouper at 40 knots
07:59 AM on 02/16/2012
If the cumulative resources of war making and religion were used instead for science...hard to say when it will happen, but it will be a good time to be around (maybe my great great great grand children).
02:52 AM on 02/17/2012
let's hope a little sooner, what a grand a frustrating time to be alive.
05:56 AM on 02/16/2012
We can put a man on the moon, so why can't we put Newt Gingrich there?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GhostOfFDR
You're on the slippery slope to socialism
09:51 PM on 02/14/2012
L2 is radially unstable. How are we fueling this thing to maintain its position?
10:16 PM on 02/14/2012
The same way we are getting it there to begin with... with humongous stacks of taxpayer dollars.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GhostOfFDR
You're on the slippery slope to socialism
11:53 AM on 02/15/2012
Maybe Gingrich is a thin man who is storing rocket fuel under his skin.
General Washington
In the future, I return as Geddy Lee
02:16 PM on 02/15/2012
Lockheed and NASA were only concerned about creating a rationale for the SLS.

Which is the nice way of saying they never mind such pesky details...
06:00 PM on 02/14/2012
dont know why we have not established a base on the moon. would be cheaper to drill into the side of a crater wall and establish a base in tunnels and caverns. at least there would be some gravity and it would be protected from radiation. the excavated debris could be mined for any useable material, the caverns and tunnels could be pressurized with air and we could build a space port that would allow us to build and launch space craft from the moon instead of earth, which because of its much lower gravity, would need less fuel to get off the ground and go where ever its going. people could live up there much longer than they could in the weightless environment of a space station.
07:27 PM on 02/14/2012
You can have all of that... for an additional $4000 per year per family of four in taxes.

Let us know how your political campaign to raise that kind of tax revenue goes.
10:26 AM on 02/15/2012
the space agency wasnt gutted until we started stamping our elephant feet in wars around the world we had no business being in. stop playing cop around the world and the space agency will then have plenty of money. we dont even have a basic space program anymore. but the chinese, europe and russia do.
General Washington
In the future, I return as Geddy Lee
02:36 PM on 02/15/2012
You do realize it was "The Government" who either provided all the initial investments for, charters (with taxpayer-funded financial incentives) for, or outright built:

Roads
Canals
Early Railroads
and the Interstate Highway System

Private interests have never created a new transportation infrastructure (or ancillary infrastructure needed to use new transportation) without some government involvement, and never will.

Private interests are only capable of using what is already available...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jarrod Putnam
And so long as men die, liberty will never perish
03:07 PM on 02/15/2012
We might not even need to use the "after caverns" of mining to use as an area for a port or colony, whatever it may be. From what I understand there is a chance that lava tubes are all over the moon.
03:50 PM on 02/15/2012
if they are there, then so much the better. less labor,money and developement. read an article a while back saying they also believe there is ALOT of ice under the surface. if so, ready water source available. the only thing we would have to transport up initially would be air to fill the caverns/tunnels to pressurized them.
photo
HymnsToSilence
so - you want to part as friends
05:07 PM on 02/14/2012
You do not have to be a scientist to be interested in astronomy or the scientific method. I think that a valuable and wise jobs program can be found in the exploration of space. The value is more than monetary, it is that and spiritually enriching as well. Not to mention the knowledge acquired through discovery. What are we waiting for?
07:28 PM on 02/14/2012
What are we waiting for?

The necessary taxes to pay for this pipe dream.
photo
HymnsToSilence
so - you want to part as friends
08:34 PM on 02/14/2012
Get the money from the military budget, tax loopholes for corporations, Congressional salaries and benefits, unending wars and military presence all over the globe, and other wasteful areas of the budget. Getting to the Moon was a pipe dream when Kennedy announced it, so was the internet.
photo
oneeasyrider
E=mc2: From light you exist
09:44 PM on 02/14/2012
Nice idea, but, there are serious detrimental long term physiological side effects living in space. The human cardiovascular system and muscles atrophy, immune system weakens, vestibular system (balance) is impaired, red blood cells (carry oxygen to cells) decrease , bones weaken and body fluids shift just to name the most obvious physical problems.

Long term exposure to space is no picnic for humans, because we didn't evolve or haven't been conditioned for zero-g environment. To legitimately endure in space, we need artificial gravity in addition to the rest of the cocoon...so going to space for work isn't likely any time soon...not in our lifetime anyway.
photo
HymnsToSilence
so - you want to part as friends
04:25 AM on 02/15/2012
Excellent points and great challenges. I have read about the possibility that humans would transform genetically over generations and therefore adapt to the space environment. However, it may only allow basic survival and not much more than that.
I agree that going into space is as you say, no picnic', but I am not as sure of your conclusion.
03:25 AM on 03/07/2012
We have artificial gravity, we just need to use it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nautilus-X

All we need is half an accounting error from our war machine put it into the joke of a budget that NASA actually has.
photo
Dave24
Without God, life is everything.
07:43 AM on 02/14/2012
"The National Retail Federation’s survey estimates Americans will spend $17.6 billion this year for Valentine's Day."

That's NASA's entire budget for the year, in one day.

Don't tell me we don't have any money to spend on our cosmic environment.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dennygboehm
10:56 PM on 02/14/2012
Great information, kind of sad we spend that much on dead flowers, chocolate and shiny baubles.
07:20 AM on 02/14/2012
We have already wasted decades and dollars with the useless space station and shuttles that go nowhere. Read Gerard K. O'Neill's "The High Frontier" he has already thought this one through years ago. It all about gravity the moon and Lagrangian points. Lets top fooling around and get busy building a rail gun or space elevator on the moon to transport heavy construction material into space. That's when humans will truly begin colonizing other worlds. Or we could stay here and spend our days fighting our little political battles until the inevitable killer asteroid comes and cleans our clock.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Claudia L
Time is the seed of the Universe
10:56 AM on 02/14/2012
Won't we be able to blow it up or deflect it? That happens a lot on the SIFI channel. We should organize a recycling company to re claim those 20,000 pieces of debris floating around the earth. If it gets any thicker we'll be grounded anyway. Maybe they will flatten out and we'll have rings like Saturn. Wouldn't it be funny if they found that the rings of Saturn were just space junk that we left there before we came here and we're just making our solar system a big junk yard?
photo
oneeasyrider
E=mc2: From light you exist
08:24 PM on 02/14/2012
So...basically, what you're suggesting...is all the leftover ice comprising Saturn's ring system is probably party favors WE left behind after one big, or many small parties earlier in our history?

Wouldn't that be just like us.
07:32 PM on 02/14/2012
Remind me again... when did the last killer asteroid hit? 65 million years ago?

And what did it do? Oh, yes... it allowed mammals to take over the Earth from the dinosaurs.

:-)
photo
dreux62
The GOP - Now 100% Fact Free!
01:23 PM on 02/17/2012
Unfortunate wasn't it.
04:30 AM on 02/14/2012
I believe that we have done ourselves a disservice by not expanding further into space and should be a primary goal. Moon colonies and Mars exploration could mean a wealth of scientific advances that could propagate into many other fields.

For example, alternate fuels. Yes, hydrocarbons are the preferred method of leaving the Earth but what to use for power when you get in orbit or beyond? A break through in alternate fuel from space exploration could have a significant effect on what we use on earth.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Claudia L
Time is the seed of the Universe
10:59 AM on 02/14/2012
Yes! some kind of electro magnetic travel. Or using the gravitational pull of planets or a reaction engine. Taking oxygen into space is soooooo passe. They ought to watch the SiFi channel more.
07:34 PM on 02/14/2012
Let Congress suspend the laws of nature. Then we can all float to space by the mere power of our thoughts!

:-)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
edwardandersons
The Lord is my Shepard
10:25 PM on 02/13/2012
We should make the moon into a luxurious place and send the 1 percenters of the world there....with no way of getting back...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Ruyur
I can't believe you like money too. We should h...
07:25 AM on 02/14/2012
Good way to improve both the Earth and the Moon.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
guntotinganglion
07:24 PM on 02/14/2012
How would that improve the Moon?