More

HuffPost Social Reading

Scuba-diver Allegedly Drowns Wife On Honeymoon In Australia: Gabe Watson On Trial For Tina Thomas Watson's Death

By JAY REEVES   02/12/12 09:33 PM ET  AP

BIRMINGHAM, Ala. -- A dream honeymoon to scuba dive on Australia's Great Barrier Reef turned into a terrible nightmare, and the horror is about to play out years later in a courtroom in Alabama.

An Alabama man who already served prison time in Australia after pleading guilty to a reduced charged in the death of his bride goes to trial Monday, accused of murdering her for insurance money. Tina Thomas Watson drowned during a scuba dive on the reef just days after her wedding in October 2003.

Gabe Watson is charged with capital murder – which normally is punishable by death – but faces life in prison without parole if convicted because of a deal the state made years ago with Australian officials to guarantee his return to the U.S.

Tina Watson's father said the family has endured eight years of delays and disappointments getting to the trial date.

"It's been a traumatic, excruciating ordeal," said Tommy Thomas, of suburban Helena.

Watson, 34, and Tina met in college. They wed and went to Australia to dive – a trip prosecutors claim Watson meticulously planned so he could kill the 26-year-old woman and make it seem like an accident.

Watson is accused of killing Tina Watson by turning off her air supply and bear-hugging her as she drowned while diving on a shipwreck in 2003. Don Valeska, an assistant state attorney general handling the case, argues Watson killed the woman believing he could collect on a modest life insurance policy.

Originally charged with murder in Australia, Watson avoided a jury trial there by pleading to a charge of manslaughter and serving 18 months for not doing enough to save his wife. He was an experienced diver; she was a novice.

The defense will argue during the trial that Tina Watson's death was an unintended, horrible mishap. One of Watson's lawyers said the man – who is free on bond and has remarried – was anxious to get the trial started.

"He's nervous. He's ready to get this trial behind him so he can be a free person," defense lawyer Joseph Basgier said after a hearing last month.

The state has subpoenaed people from as far away as Australia and California to testify about what happened that day on a dive boat called the Spoilsport, but it's unclear how many will take the stand. The defense has subpoenaed potential witnesses including former Alabama Attorney General Troy King, who pushed for state charges against Watson.

The case has aroused deep passions both in Australia and the United States, with hundreds of people joining sites on Facebook to show support either for Watson or the Thomas family.

Tina Watson's sister, Alanda Thomas, counted down to the start of the trial by posting messages to a group called "Call for Gabe Watson to do what is right!"

"Please everyone continue to pray for (j)ustice for Tina," she wrote.

Tommy Thomas said he is glad his former son-in-law will finally face a jury.

"This is our last chance to get justice, and we know it," Thomas said in an interview. "But we're confident, and if the bulk of the evidence is presented it doesn't matter whether it's a jury in Alabama or a jury in Australia, we're going to get a just outcome."

Once Watson finished his sentence in Australia in November 2010, the country deported him to the United States with an agreement from Alabama and federal prosecutors that he wouldn't face the death penalty. Such a deal is required under Australian extradition law.

Watson's attorneys asked an Alabama judge to throw out the state charge, arguing he was being tried twice for the same offense, but the judge refused. The state argued successfully that Watson could be tried in Alabama for something that happened in Australia by claiming he plotted the killing in the state.

The trial was delayed for 10 months because of concerns that layoffs linked to budget shortages would prevent court officials from providing adequate security.

Related on HuffPost:

Tina Watson Scuba Diving
1  of  18
PLAY
FULLSCREEN
ZOOM
SHARE THIS SLIDE 
This photo was taken in Oct. 2003 and inadvertently shows Tina Thomas Watson (right) in distress on the ocean floor while scuba diving off the Great Barrier Reef. Her husband, Gabe Watson, was charged by the Alabama Attorney General's office with drowning her for insurance money, but was acquitted by a judge on Feb. 23, 2012.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CRIME

BIRMINGHAM, Ala. -- A dream honeymoon to scuba dive on Australia's Great Barrier Reef turned into a terrible nightmare, and the horror is about to play out years later in a courtroom in Alabama. An A...
BIRMINGHAM, Ala. -- A dream honeymoon to scuba dive on Australia's Great Barrier Reef turned into a terrible nightmare, and the horror is about to play out years later in a courtroom in Alabama. An A...
Filed by Michael McLaughlin  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 662
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (8 total)
08:12 AM on 02/22/2012
He definitely plotted her murder for personal financial gain. Unfortunately, she was so anxious to be married to someone that she chose that ugly creep.
08:46 AM on 02/15/2012
he is definately ugly....how else did she die if he did not kill her...Iam a scuba diver and it sounds like they were not in a dangerous situation....very suspicios circumstances...hey Iam going on 50 and never needed anyone til now and so yea some people are blind to the facts and just want to have a relationship with someone they think they love.
04:58 PM on 02/14/2012
the second wife seen laughing believes his lies. typical.
06:37 PM on 02/14/2012
That reminds me of Drew Peterson's last wife.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pscottparker1
12:49 AM on 02/15/2012
Drew and him probably have quite a bit in common.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
andvoodoo2
My micro-bio is teeming with biodiversity.
07:01 PM on 02/14/2012
There's ALWAYS someone who will ignore the signs and convince themselves he didn't do it and, IF he did it, he would never do it to THEM.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
yukidongo1
07:48 AM on 02/15/2012
Yeah...once again, am reminded of Drew Peterson and his numerous wives. One drown in an empty bathtub, one survived to tell how horrendous it was being married to the controlling assh*le, and the last one disappeared...carried off in a plastic bin, if I remember the wtory his helper told of loading the thing into the SUV. He had no clue what was in it, but suspected after she disappeared that was what he helped to do. I hope my girls would have sense enough to know not to go chasing after and marry the likes of this guy after a wife got missing. Both are so cocky looking.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
piceaglauca
The picture says it all....
03:29 PM on 02/14/2012
I'm sure time spent is not time wasted. He's had eight years to think about it. Soon he 'll have more time uninterrupted to think about it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
yukidongo1
07:49 AM on 02/15/2012
I don't think they have enough evidence to prove he did it. I believe he did it, but I don't think they will get it proven. I think this guy will walk.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
piceaglauca
The picture says it all....
11:24 AM on 02/15/2012
You are probably right. If he is married again she n ends a head shake .
09:30 AM on 02/14/2012
In Australia you have to be very creative to get a long prison sentence even for murder. The entire handling of this tragic death is a joke.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jaelin227
08:59 AM on 02/14/2012
When is law enforcement going to be allowed to stop crimes they have evidence of 'in the making' before being committed? The "we can't do anything until ..." syndrome is letting really bad people get away with such horrendous things these days. There are lots of Tom Watsons, Drew Petersons, Scott Petersons, Josh Powells and all those other bad seeds that haven't even been heard of yet. I'm sure almost everyone knows of someone who is off their rocker and is capable of doing bad things. It's seriously time to change the laws to where the criminal element should have to face serious deterants already in place to make him or her think only twice before choosing to commit a crime or not. Premeditation should be as punishable as the crime itself under certain circumstances, because if it were, there would be a lot of murdered people still alive.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Khaos Spence
03:01 PM on 02/14/2012
Premeditation is a crime...its one of the requirements for first degree murder...and "off their rocker" includes a lot of people most of whom are actually harmless or if anything a greater harm to themselves...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jaelin227
09:25 AM on 02/15/2012
Perhaps the term I used, 'off their rocker', wasn't the correct one. What I meant was that there are people out there whose actions speak of serious potential violence and other crimes (fraud, arson and the like). Just being a little weird isn't included in that.
12:33 PM on 02/15/2012
It would be an even better idea if people started taking responsibility for themselves and their loved ones and quit with the "New Age Mentality" of relying on and expecting Goverment Agencies to protect & take care of them !
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jaelin227
11:24 PM on 02/17/2012
Unfortunately there are too many people these days who do not even know what responsibility is; they've been raised by irresponsible person to begin with. The ones who do make it into adulthood will still be at a loss and won't feel they have to answer to anyone but themselves, thus more misfits out there in our society causing havoc.
08:58 AM on 02/14/2012
Well, I mean, do they have physical evidence of what they're implying? Was the oxygen valve to her tank cut off when they found her? Did she still have an adequate supply left in her tank? Did she have bruising on her body suggesting this guy "bear hugged" her under the water?

I'm in shock this occurred 8 yrs. ago, it seems like yesterday I first read about it..
09:32 AM on 02/14/2012
It is alleged that he "hugged" her to give him access to the valve to turn it off. It is further alleged he waited, hugging her all the while, until she passed out, turned it back on and then let her drop to the ocean floor. No brusing involved.
10:09 AM on 02/14/2012
thanks, I'd forgotten about all that..
08:50 AM on 02/14/2012
Shes good looking. What a waist of a nice body !
I hope this guy gets off the charges.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:11 PM on 02/14/2012
Harmer john

"~~ I hope this guy gets off the charges. ~~"

If he killed her, why?
12:45 AM on 02/15/2012
@dogtac&andvoodoo...john the hammer's probably a serial killer on the making,,so dont anger him
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
andvoodoo2
My micro-bio is teeming with biodiversity.
06:57 PM on 02/14/2012
You're a pig.
08:42 AM on 02/14/2012
Somebody actually married this guy?!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
yukidongo1
07:56 AM on 02/15/2012
AGAIN... And, I thought he was ugly the first time I laid eyes on him. And, yes, it does matter. He is homely and what was she doing with him in the first place. They look so mismatched.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nonpolit123
08:38 AM on 02/14/2012
I think the fact he pled guilty to a lesser charge in Australia may be his downfall in this trial.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Fay Butler
08:25 AM on 02/14/2012
She was so pretty and looked so happy. I hope he enjoyed the money her life bought him.What a rat.

Let this be a lesson, girls. No pre-marital life insurance policies. If you don't believe in pre-nups, immediately following your wedding, sign legal papers keeping your money separate. That way, you signal trust without tempting anyone to bump you off for your money.
06:45 PM on 02/14/2012
I so agree with you about having no premarital life insurance policies. It's a shame that no one can be trusted anymore and that people will premeditate a murder like this for money.
12:48 AM on 02/15/2012
wait...is there proof outder that the insurance company gave him the money still,,,was'nt he accused/convicted,,,wouldnt that annulled the life insurance!!!! m confused,,,someone knows law plz help me
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Fay Butler
02:42 AM on 02/15/2012
Sort of a moot question for her, isn't it?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
yukidongo1
07:59 AM on 02/15/2012
He got the money. They didn't prove he killed her in Australia. They only have 45 days--in my state--to tell you they are investigating, and then a specific amount of time to find something or pay you. Anyway, he was not convicted of murder or actually causing her death, so he has been paid. Now, whatever happens with this trial will determine whether he keeps it or not... Probably all gone anyway.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Neil Reilly
08:21 AM on 02/14/2012
What ever happened to a speedy trial? This will be a great point to appeal on, if he is found guilty. It could be tough to prove he plotted it in this country and carried it out outside the U.S.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pdubpablo
08:07 AM on 02/14/2012
Yeah, I can't wait to get married
07:53 AM on 02/14/2012
guilty.... common sense once again. it does not take a great amt of thinking to figure this out!
photo
fxcruiser
Harassing liberals every chance I get!
07:38 AM on 02/14/2012
"The trial was delayed for 10 months because of concerns that layoffs linked to budget shortages would prevent court officials from providing adequate security."

Anyone with legal experience: could this mean that he is being kept from receiving his quick and speedy trial due him ? Is is my understanding that in Alabama, a defendant's right to a speedy trial derives from both the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, Section 6 of the Alabama Constitution. Although the United States Supreme Court affirmed the right to a speedy trial as a fundamental right imposed at the state level by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment in Klopfer v. North Carolina, 386 U.S. 213 (1967).
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
yukidongo1
08:03 AM on 02/15/2012
Hey... There have been other impediments in his way of trial, and 10 months isn't a long time to wait in most states for a jury trial.