More

HuffPost Social Reading

San Francisco MusicTech Summit Attempts To Save Rock And Roll


First Posted: 02/13/2012 8:10 pm Updated: 02/13/2012 8:10 pm

SAN FRANCISCO -- For the past decade and a half, Silicon Valley has been gleefully sticking its digital stake further and further into the rapidly decaying heart of the music industry.

File sharing dropped CD sales into the toilet just as iTunes and an endless array of music blogs proved the death knell for the previous monopolizers of music sales and discovery--record stores.

Critics believe the Internet is killing the music industry. But if a single word uttered at the SF MusicTech Summit is to be believed, the Internet will also be its savior.

It used to be that when people talked about "saving rock and roll," they meant the volume of guitars or the quality of lyrics. Now, it's mainly about social media, killer apps and file sharing. It may not be quite as sexy, but it's almost undoubtedly the only thing that's going to work.

San Francisco's annual music technology conference draws companies that seek new ways to bring music from guitars to ears. Somehow, in the process, those organizations generate enough revenue to keep the people holding said guitars enjoying the rock star lifestyle. And while some participating companies travel from across the world to attend the summit, the majority are either based out of the Bay Area or very strongly thinking about moving here.

Take Gary DeWaard, for example.

DeWaard is the founder of Songdish, a small, Des Monies-based start-up that provides one-stop shopping for songwriters hoping to get their songs licensed, pitched to radios stations, sold to record labels, recorded by big-name performers and/or marketed to fans. Young and scrappy, Songdish has only four full-time employees and is seriously considering opening an office in San Francisco.

"I know we're going to be expanding west and we're looking to see if San Francisco is the best place to do that," DeWaard told The Huffington Post after a discussion group at the conference. DeWaard knows the Bay Area has both the critical mass of engineering talent to turn a tech company into the next Google and the bevvy of venture capital firms needed to keep those engineers in the geek 'n' code lifestyle.

However, DeWaard voiced concerns about suddenly becoming a very small fish in a very big pond should he relocate. "I'm a little worried that if we move out here, the big guys like Twitter and Apple will swallow up all the top engineers and we'll only get the best of the rest."

"You're going to have a tough time getting a lot of top people to go someplace like Des Moines," countered Ellyn Parker with a laugh.

Parker runs San Francisco's efforts to encourage businesses to move into the city's once-blighted mid-Market area. "You have Berkeley and Stanford here too. When you're talking about at technology, this is the place people all over the world look to."

Even so, the Bay Area doesn't boast the same monopoly on innovative tech companies it once did. "Ten years ago, this stuff was pretty much only happening in the Bay Area," said Stephen White, the president of musical information management firm Gracenote. "But now its happening all over the world--in New York, in Europe and in Asia."

That spread of tech firms isn't just going from the Bay Area to the rest of the world. It's also moving from Northern California's long-time centers of innovation to areas not usually thought of as technological hubs.

Since its inception during the heady days of the Dot Com boom, Gracenote has always housed the vast majority of its 350 employees in the East Bay: first in Berkeley, then in Emeryville.

White admitted headquartering across the Bay from the traditional Silicon Valley tech corridor was initially difficult, especially as the conventional wisdom of needing to be within San Francisco proper to attract the top talent becomes more and more held as gospel.

"It's always challenging for East Bay tech companies because we get a different type of engineer--more family-oriented, usually a little bit older," said White. "Although it's easier now that we're a little bigger and have a little more cred than when we were a small start-up."

Largely because of companies like Gracenote and Oakland-based internet radio pioneer Pandora, areas like Emeryville are starting to grow their own community of start-ups and venture capital firms attracted to the significantly cheaper rent and Oakland's steadily growing hipster quotient.

No matter where their engineers hang their laptops, virtually every company at the conference focused on essentially the same priority: making the music industry work again. (Even if what they mean by the term "music industry" is something bearing little resemblance to the way music has been created, sold and consumed for the past half-century.)

Of course, there are no guarantees. At a presentation by the Future of Music Coalition, a speaker told the assembled crowd the majority of artists didn't make a single penny from having their music played on streaming services like Spotify, which have often been held out as the music industry's next great hope.

Attendees remained optimistic. But everyone still a has a whole lot of coding left to do.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST SAN FRANCISCO

SAN FRANCISCO -- For the past decade and a half, Silicon Valley has been gleefully sticking its digital stake further and further into the rapidly decaying heart of the music industry. File sharin...
SAN FRANCISCO -- For the past decade and a half, Silicon Valley has been gleefully sticking its digital stake further and further into the rapidly decaying heart of the music industry. File sharin...
SAN FRANCISCO -- For the past decade and a half, Silicon Valley has been gleefully sticking its digital stake further and further into the rapidly decaying heart of the music industry. File sharin...
SAN FRANCISCO -- For the past decade and a half, Silicon Valley has been gleefully sticking its digital stake further and further into the rapidly decaying heart of the music industry. File sharin...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 11
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
02:17 PM on 02/14/2012
I am in agreement with clebernpp. In terms of today's American popular music - there is simply a lack of good music and a lack of talent that has truly mastered their instruments and or their voices.Also, the one dimensional electric guitar band mind set has been detrimental over the long term.
After studying the big bands and singers and song writers and arrangers of the 1930's, 1940's and 1950's, I have concluded that what is offered today (for sure there are exceptions) is simply nowhere near the same level of talent and expertise. Very sad situation.
photo
Vintage59
Reading is still the warp drive of IT
01:27 PM on 02/14/2012
Money can't save music. Music has to be constantly saved from money.

The past twelve decades have seen the first phonograph recordings, the first radio broadcasts, the first television broadcasts, the rise of cable TV, and the birth of the internet.

Each time fortunes were lost while much larger fortunes were made. Each time someone figured out how to make more money than the old regime had. Meanwhile, more bad music is recorded and distributed than good music. That never changes. The good music has always needed to fight in order to be heard. Money likes things that are "safe."
12:52 PM on 02/14/2012
everything said in public can be recorded and desseminated areound the world freely. why should music be any different? i understand their delema but how far can we be expected to go in order to secure sound in a high tech world? same thing with movies, they made fortunes before videotape came on the scene. maybe they need to innovate the theatre experience to a level not achievable on tv.
11:55 AM on 02/14/2012
What is killing the music industry is the lack of good music that existed before the 90's...
Thanks to MTV and VH1, music became a side show, where looks, sex appeal and dancing became the focus and not the music.
Prior to that, most of us listened to radio and purchased the music we heard and liked.
The music back then had more to offer than just a beat, the music had harmony, great melodies, and the lyrics spoke to us and many songs became immortal...
There was no need to dance or show your skin, we didn't care if the artist had good looks, we didn't care if they were blind, or had a missing arm or leg, good music was all we cared.
Today, who wants to listen to the garbage that is been played in the radio?
Who wants to buy an album where only one song may be worth listening?
If the Record companies executives want to flourish again, they need to focus in making good music again as they did in the past, because the product they have out there today its not music.
aristippe
no more war for oil
01:58 PM on 02/14/2012
Sorry to inform you but you're just old.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Winthorpe
Need a fourth for squash
07:50 AM on 02/17/2012
Wow, what a deep, intelligent rebuttal. Would you care to elaborate, this time with at least one point?
11:41 AM on 02/14/2012
The music industry is still mourning the demise of the Conistoga wagon. This is an industry stuck so far in the past that they still use duels to settle contract disputes.
09:42 AM on 02/14/2012
The internet is killing the bloated music label that never served artists. It is not killing music by any means. The juice media, symphony of science, Skrillex, OkGo, and others are prime examples of this. You either learn the new means of distribution and sales, or get out of the way.
photo
QtheHero
The meaning of life is that there is no meaning
09:19 AM on 02/14/2012
Interesting article. I believe however, that in the long run the music world will be just fine.
photo
Pectin
Lie to me...
09:15 AM on 02/14/2012
"Can San Francisco Save Music?"

Nope.
11:27 PM on 02/13/2012
Can Superman save Krypton?
Can Davy Crockett save the Alamo?
Can Hiroshima save the Japanese?