More

HuffPost Social Reading

Technology In Schools: In Some Cash-Strapped Districts, Kids Bring Their Own Devices

School Technology

  Jennifer Roland First Posted: 02/13/2012 12:01 pm Updated: 02/13/2012 6:21 pm

This piece comes to us courtesy of Mind/Shift.

At Mankato Public School System in Minnesota, students bring their homework, their lunches, and books to school like most students across the country. But they also bring whatever tech devices they own -- and they don't have to hide it or turn it off when they walk into class.

Mankato has joined the growing Bring Your Own Technology movement that allows students to use their own Netbooks, laptops, and tablets -- anything that connects to the school's wireless network -- during class time.

"By allowing kids to bring in their own devices, you free up school resources for the kids who don't have access," says Doug Johnson, director of media and technology for the Mankato Public School System. (Johnson wrote the book -- literally -- on the subject; The Classroom Teacher's Technology Survival Guide is published this month.) For example, in classrooms that have a group of four computers, finding time for all 30 students to use them can be challenging. In Mankato, 90% of the students have some sort of wireless-capable device, which leaves only eight students in a typical class who will need to use the class computers.

This kind of unconventional approach to schooling, in a public school system that's tangled with strict rules and regulations, was one of the tactics being hailed this week when President Obama and Secretary of Education Arne Duncan spoke about the importance of bringing schools to the 21st century by finding smart ways to integrate technology into the learning process at the inaugural Digital Learning Day.

For schools that are lucky enough to have the money to carry out this mission -- whether it's providing a computer lab, laptops and tablets for students -- the rewards of the technology are abundant. But the fiscal reality makes this difficult for most public schools that struggle with dwindling budgets and can't afford to hire enough teachers, let alone computers.

That's why school districts like Mankato are experimenting with what could be a very obvious solution: Let kids bring their own tech devices to school. Truth is, at last count (in 2010) more than 75 percent of American kids age 12 to 17 owned cell phones, according to a Pew Research study. And 19 percent of Americans now own a tablet. So it's no surprise that the Bring Your Own Technology (BYOT) movement is taking shape across the country with school districts that allow students to use their tablets, smart phones, and other mobile computing devices in the classroom for learning.

Conceptually, that makes a lot of sense. Why not let kids use the tech tools they're already familiar with to enhance their learning? But as schools try to figure out the best way of transitioning to this new world, some thorny issues must first be sorted out. How do teachers and school systems prepare for all the different platforms, when some kids are bringing in tablets, others are bringing their parents' old laptops, and the remainder are on mobile phones? And what effect does this change have on the dynamics of a classroom?

For starters, schools and districts are beset by myriad rules and policies they must follow in order to qualify for state and federal funding. And if district policy does allow kids to bring their own devices, schools must also make sure they have enough bandwidth to deal with all the new devices that need Internet connections.

Schools have long looked at providing Internet-capable devices as the only way to ensure equal access to education for all students, but these endeavors are extremely expensive and, many districts believe, unsustainable without long-term grant funding. That's where kids using their own devices could work.

What's so great about having a mobile device in class? Instant access to information is the main reason for allowing kids to use their devices: to search for information online. Some teachers also use mobile devices to gives quizzes or take instant polls. How they use their devices depends on what teachers decide to do with them.

Though there continues to be a large gap in those who own laptops and can afford broadband at home and those who can't, mobile devices can potentially serve to bridge gaps in access, allowing kids to use them in and outside of school for learning.

HELP OR HINDRANCE?

But allowing kids to use their devices at school might not be as simple a solution as it sounds. Educator and technology consultant Gary Stager believes the BYOT movement "diminishes the otherwise enormous potential of educational computing to the weakest device in the room." He contends that "cell phones are not computers! They may both contain microprocessors and batteries, but as of today, their functionality is quite different...The computer is an intellectual laboratory and vehicle for self-expression that makes it possible for children to learn and do things in ways unthinkable just a few years ago. We impair such empowerment when we limit educational practice to the functionality of the least powerful device."

Mobile phones, and especially those that aren't smart phones, obviously don't have the same capabilities as computers. But when tablets and Netbooks enter the picture, it becomes less of an argument against insufficient technology and more an argument against managing multiple technologies. Stager adds that in a class full of students handling his or her own device, each one different from the other, will only "amplify [teachers'] anxiety and reduce use."

But as one who's taken to using all kinds of devices in school, Johnson believes in the power of the cloud to provide tools that any device can access. In Mankato, they rely heavily on Google Docs and other platform-agnostic tools that serve information to any Internet-accessible device.

And although Johnson admits that more traditional teachers resist or are overwhelmed by this type of learning, students will need little support because they're already familiar with their own devices. If the bandwidth and infrastructure are in place for students to access the school network, Johnson says they'll be able to do their work with little oversight.

Johnson has enlisted parents' help to make sure teachers aren't overtaxed with trying to help kids figure out how to use the devices that don't meet district guidelines. He sent a letter home to parents before the holidays with a checklist of things to look for if they were already planning to buy a mobile device for their child's holiday gift.

The common theme he hears from parents is, "If I spend $500 on an iPad for my kid, I hope the teachers uses it!"

This post originally appeared on Mind/Shift.

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST EDUCATION

This piece comes to us courtesy of Mind/Shift. At Mankato Public School System in Minnesota, students bring their homework, their lunches, and books to school like most students across the country.
This piece comes to us courtesy of Mind/Shift. At Mankato Public School System in Minnesota, students bring their homework, their lunches, and books to school like most students across the country.
 
 
  • Comments
  • 41
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
shlack123
Independent; Moderate; Atheist; Texan.
10:16 AM on 02/14/2012
We'll be talking more about computers in school when we finally get the education funding in this country that is reflective of a first-world country. Until the right stops trying to cut educational funding for public schools, however, the cost of textbooks and faculty salary will always trump these issues.
10:48 AM on 02/14/2012
Simple solution. Stop having so ma many tax dollars go into very lucrative pension and health plans and their will be more money to spend on the students.
09:14 AM on 02/14/2012
Forget about computers. Most schools don't have enough textbooks for their students. I had to buy some for my kids so they could study at home. The books they had remained in the classroom. Kids were told to take notes in class and look on-line if they needed help...not the same as being able to digest a text at your own speed.
psandysdad
The older you get, the more excuses you have.
08:47 AM on 02/14/2012
The rather upbeat tone of the article disguises the tragedy that any of our schools AT ALL is not properly funded. It is therefore demonstrated that our children, and the education to prepare them for the world of today, is secondary to the bottom line.

Q.E.D.
08:31 AM on 02/14/2012
Most "poor" kids have technology at home. They have smart phones for sexting, Facebook accounts for bullying, and computers for watching porn. The divide in technology is how it is used.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Marcin A Mazurek
08:16 AM on 02/14/2012
I don't see what is so unusual about letting student bring their own technology, though I do recognize that some students wont have it, and that the variety of technology that will be present will be enormous
a big underlying issue of this is not causing anxiety for the children themselves - even at a young age kids compare themselves to their peers - computer "days" may cause feelings of insecurity for the kids who either don't have the tech or aren't allowed by their parents to bring it with them to school - blame either the consistence that used to be "no electronic devices" or just the belief that it might be lost or broken.
The second issue is getting schools the proper level of technology - do we tech up the teacher or the students? What about teachers with little experience with computers? stuff like that.There is little capability of setting a standard for something like this.
07:07 AM on 02/14/2012
Teaching is not about controlling kids; it's about creating conditions for kids to learn. Since I use content not from textbooks in my school, and it's very cash-strapped, I load content from pdfs, and google books on my edmodo site and have the students go to it via the edmodo app and read or download the material. I also have all of my assignments, posts, discussions, etc on the site. Kid can use phones and tables (supplied by them) to access info.
Technology is creating a large divide between rich and poor - this is going to be a very big issue soon.
06:38 AM on 02/14/2012
Hello,
Nice to see your blog that showcase uniqueness of the most updated technology strategy in online era. It definitely triggers the burning desire of technologies savvy professionals like me.
Todays children are so called the technology children.Their brain are highly developed.To train them a highly digital environment is required.I agree to your blog posting.
Again thanks for your great contribution by sharing this blog and hope you will maintain the same process in upcoming days !
Cheers !
Orimark
03:28 AM on 02/14/2012
Why don't the teachers just teach......they do NOT need computers.
08:37 AM on 02/14/2012
Would love to...but administrators and parents think there is something "special" about technology that will make lazy, unmotivated kids want to learn. It is all about the Ohh and Aww factor. Making a kid read a book is hard for parents and makes them have to pay attention to their kids. Technoloy is suppose to make learning fast and quick and interesting...an easy out for parents.
shlack123
Independent; Moderate; Atheist; Texan.
10:19 AM on 02/14/2012
No - technology is making progress to make these types of issues easier. E-readers that can hold all textbooks the student needs instead of the child lugging around 7-8 books, that cost $200 per item.

Nothing will take away from the teacher/student interaction. Tech items, like e-readers, are cheaper in bulk than the myriad of books schools have to purchase.

There are many other advantages to such approaches. It's not about a quick fix. It's about what's easier and what matches up with today's values.
06:55 PM on 02/14/2012
LOL.....we just had this run-in at my house. I asked my 9th graders (two adopted kids from Ukraine) to solve two simultaneous equations graphically and numerically. They almost pooped themselves when I said "no calculators."

Calculators are only good after you can do a calculation manually....right now, they get an answer and have no clue if it is reasonable or not.
09:16 AM on 02/14/2012
Actually, kids probably don't need computers to learn until high school, when they hit things that they need to research or simulate. I homeschool my daughter, when given the choice, she elected to use actual textbooks and paper and pen. She finds the computer stuff too distracting.
01:36 AM on 02/14/2012
An amazing application of common sense . BO, make it happen & win Nov !
11:20 PM on 02/13/2012
What ever happened to the value of opening a book? It is good to teach kids how to use technology, but let's be honest, if a kid was sitting in class with a laptop or tablet in front of them, they won't be paying attention to science or history or whatever the teacher is going over.

I think the school would be more effective in introducing technology to students if it puts a portion of its budget aside for a computer lab. This way teachers can schedule instruction time within the computer lab, thus all students will equally have a chance to be exposed to technology. We don't need to give every kid a computer, that's strain on the taxpayers and strain on parents who wish to keep up with the Jone's with every new piece of technology. All a school really needs to do is use technology as a supplement to teaching and expose every student to it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:59 PM on 02/13/2012
Textbooks used to be fine. Now we have technology where a student can interact with a "page" rather than just read it. As new discoveries are made, they can be updated to an app much faster than they can be published in a book. By the time a book is published it's often already outdated.

If students have tablets then the teacher can control what is on it; they won't be playing games unless it has to do with the lesson. Buying a tablet is much less expensive than buying textbooks over and over and over again. Many textbooks sit, dusty and forgotten, in warehouses. They are expensive. They take up a lot of room. Tablets are light. They can be moved from room to room in carts very easily if a school needs to share them. All kinds of educational apps can be bought for entire classes at much lower prices than providing books to each child. And children like them much better than books; they are more familiar with the tablets and they are more engaging to the students than books.
06:21 AM on 02/14/2012
How's the teacher going to control what's on student tablets that the students brought from home?

Let's be honest: the teacher isn't even going to be able to control what's on tablets if the school owns them. Some student will get around the security, and in a day all of them will know how. When the security's updated, the process will repeat.

I'm sure this is a good thing if we're talking about a class that's 100% interested and motivated. It adds to their access to information. But with the average class, it probably just adds to their access to distraction.
10:43 PM on 02/13/2012
I discourage my students from bringing technology to school because of theft. I would feel horrible if a family's ipad or laptop was stolen. We have caught students and parents stealing in the classrooms. My digital camera was stolen a while back. I have had collegues lose cash, cell phones, designer sunglasses etc. Expensive items are not always safe at school. Be careful.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:03 AM on 02/14/2012
Good points. We discourage students from bringing toys to school for that reason. And the rule is that if a child brings something to school they know it could be broken or stolen and it's their responsibility to take care of it--and it's the parents' responsibility to know what their children are bringing to school. Same thing with technology; schools can't be responsible for what students bring from home.
08:41 PM on 02/13/2012
ROFLMAO

Do people think the difference between 2 gigabytes of RAM and 4 gigabytes matters? If it does it is probably because the software is inefficient crap and that includes the operating system.

In 1980 an IBM 3033 mainframe was $3,000,000. The maximum memory it could take was 32 megabytes. But now they can't write an operating system that will fit in 100 meg and leave 900 meg for applications? They are selling NBAN technology.

NBAN == Nothing But A Number

It's bigger it must be better. Computer buyers don't know the difference between a complier and an interpreter. Uh, it's just software.

If they do all of the work with TEXT files then all of the different makes and models should be able to read it.
02:58 PM on 02/13/2012
This is already done at the college/university level. I bring my computer to class most of the time, but not to enhance my learning experience. Lol. Let's get real. Kids will be on websites that have nothing to do with education and schools can't block them all because its impossible.

I'm all for technology and the digital age, but aren't we getting a little carried away? Technology is just a supplement; it takes dedicated teachers, parents, administrators and students to have the best education experience and to be successful in life.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ifquilt
02:37 PM on 02/13/2012
Great idea, except...the poor kids, where will their iPad come from? Oh wait I know the...the Taxpayers. Plus, many of them don't have internet at home either. Oh wait...we can pay for that too and dinner and clothing and medical care and, and, and. Sadly, I am a teacher for 26 years. Public schools, needy kids. Taxpayers are paying for everything, and the parents are pulling up in nicer cars than the teachers. I'm tellin ya something is seriously wrong. From the big cities to the rural farming communities, it is very wrong out there.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:50 PM on 02/13/2012
I see your point, but it's not the children's fault that their parents would rather buy themselves expensive things than school supplies. Even parents who would rather spend money on themselves should be able to shell out $10 a month for internet and $150 for a computer.

http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/comcasts-launches-999-internet-for-low-income-families.ars

Besides, you know if we don't offer technology then we'll be blamed for not preparing students for the "real world". I love using the iPad with students (teachers in our district took classes and got "paid" in technology points which were used to purchase our choice of devices) and can see how books will be obsolete very soon.
09:20 AM on 02/14/2012
The problem is that the devices you purchased will be obsolete in fewer years than the books. Good quality textbooks are never obsolete. You can still teach math from a 20 yr.-old text but, what can you do with a 20 year-old computer????
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ifquilt
11:59 AM on 02/14/2012
Oh I'm with you. But, when we require, we must buy in public education. Yet another law has been passed where schools will be audited to make sure that students aren't being charged for anything.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:21 PM on 02/13/2012
As with instituting any new initiative into the educational system, teachers and administrators have to proceed with caution and put into place policies and procedures that are easy for the students to understand and follow as well as clear consequences for not following the expectations.

My school district instituted this policy at the beginning of this school year, but my principal chose to form a committee of parents and teachers that met frequently to flesh out any concerns as well as form a new technology code of conduct that allow this policy to enhance the students learning both academically and socially.

The students are well aware of when use of technology is acceptable and HOW their use is acceptable and so far, (fingers crossed) all is running along smoothly.