iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Chuck Schumer: Unemployment Is 'Sticking Point' In Payroll Negotiations

Unemployment

First Posted: 02/14/2012 2:51 pm Updated: 02/14/2012 4:13 pm

WASHINGTON -- Congress hasn't reached a deal to prevent the take-home pay for every American from shrinking 2 percent come March because Republicans will not agree to renew unemployment insurance as part of the payroll tax cut deal, Senate Democrats said Tuesday.

"The emerging sticking point in the discussions on the large package is whether the Republicans were serious or not about extending help to those who are looking for work in this tough economy," Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) told reporters at the Capitol Tuesday. "If the benefits are not continued...3.1 million Americans will be cut off from the program in the next three months."

Federal unemployment insurance kicks in when workers use up state-funded jobless pay, which typically lasts 26 weeks. But federal unemployment programs, along with a 2 percent Social Security payroll tax cut and a pay boost for doctors who see Medicare patients, are set to expire at the end of the month.

Republicans want a number of reforms to the unemployment system. A Republican bill that passed the House in December would shorten the maximum duration of combined state and federal compensation from 99 to 59 weeks, allow states to drug test claimants, and deny benefits to claimants who do not have a high-school level education. A bill introduced by Senate Republicans last week would require the jobless to volunteer 20 hours a week in order to be eligible for federal benefits.

Senate Democrats have said they want the maximum duration of benefits reduced to 93 weeks -- even though legislation that Democrats supported in December has already set in motion a gradual reduction of benefits to 79 weeks over the course of this year.

Schumer suggested Democrats may be willing to compromise on some elements of the unemployment system, but he declined to be specific.

"Obviously there are negotiations going on about what form [unemployment insurance] should take, but I'm not going to get into those details now," Schumer said. "[Republicans] have all kinds of changes to UI and many of those changes are very unfavorably regarded by our caucus."

HuffPost readers: Worried about your unemployment insurance lapsing if Congress can't reach a deal? Tell us about it -- email arthur@huffingtonpost.com. Please include your phone number if you're willing to do an interview.

Republicans in the House of Representatives said Monday they would be willing to handle the payroll tax cut separately from the unemployment insurance and other items, a development Schumer hailed as a retreat. He emphasized that Democrats have the upper hand in unemployment.

"The issue of unemployment benefits has already put the Republicans on the defensive," he said. "I remember in 2010, my old friend Jim Bunning, who used to have the office next door to me, being chased in and out of elevators in the Hart building when he held up unemployment benefits. It was an ugly couple of weeks for the Republicans, and their retreat there was reminiscent of their retreat yesterday on the payroll tax."

In February 2010, Bunning blocked a reauthorization of federal jobless benefits very similar to the one on the table right now. Members of his own party pleaded with him to relent; he said "tough shit" on the Senate floor, complained the debate caused him to miss a college basketball game, and flipped off ABC News as he boarded a Senate elevator.

But within a couple of months, the entire Republican party had adopted Bunning's hard-line opposition to renewing jobless pay without offsetting its cost with budget cuts or new revenue. A reporter pointed out to Schumer that after the Bunning blockade, congressional standoffs caused benefits to lapse four times and that Republicans were unafraid of the backlash.

"It is our view that given the depths of the recession," Schumer said, "given that so many people are out of work for a long period of time -- that so many middle class people, people's friends, neighbors, relatives, have lost work and need to be able to sustain their mortgage payments, college payments, etc. -- [blocking unemployment] is going to weigh very heavily on the Republicans."

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Congress hasn't reached a deal to prevent the take-home pay for every American from shrinking 2 percent come March because Republicans will not agree to renew unemployment insurance as p...
WASHINGTON -- Congress hasn't reached a deal to prevent the take-home pay for every American from shrinking 2 percent come March because Republicans will not agree to renew unemployment insurance as p...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,088
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (23 total)
  1 of 2  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
msgirlintn 04:13 PM on 02/14/2012
Republicans are on the wrong side of history AGAIN!

Republicans don't seem to realize that their are college educated people that are looking for work following the Bush Depression.  They don't seem to realize that for the unemployed, looking for a job is a full time job and they don't have 20 hrs. to volunteer.  While they are out volunteering, the job they are looking for could come open  Read More...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cb523
09:43 PM on 02/15/2012
Since the US government and its failure to oversee the financial system and prevent this lenghty recession that continues, the nhas no business changing unemployment benefits of initiating a very expensive drug screening in order to qualify for unemployment. The federal money used to bail out the big banks failed, and we know where most of that money went - into the pockets of bankers and Wall St. honchos as bonuses for doing their best to collapse the US financial system. Now we are making the unemployed the scapegoats when they have lost the most.....their dignity, self-respect, income, health insurance, homes, cars etc, and their respect for the United States government.
09:30 PM on 02/15/2012
Separating the debates seems like a good thing, after what happened last Nov/Dec.
05:46 PM on 02/15/2012
Republicans are just plain evil! Why would you deny benefits to people who don't have a high school education? If they have been working and got laid off for no fault of their own, they should be able to receive benefits just like everyone else. It seems like they think up ways to be cruel to those who need help the most. If you are a Republican, please do not say you are a Christian because you are not. You are giving the real Christians a bad name.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nancy84
It's not who's right but What's right that counts
03:39 PM on 02/15/2012
I think drug testing is a waste of money but if it has to be done, then ALL government employees, including Congress and their staff need to be tested. It's about time these people are affected by the laws they pass on others.
05:15 PM on 02/15/2012
Details?

How often?

When?

Scheduled, random or mandatory for all employees?
photo
ljmck
Stand Up, Show Up, Speak Up
02:19 PM on 02/15/2012
So, instead of simply extending unemployment, we're going to add a hugely expensive drug-testing program?

Aren't Republicans just paying off one of their lobbies -- the medical industry -- instead of helping Americans?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
msgirlintn
Magnolia's mom!
03:11 PM on 02/15/2012
ljmck.

Absolutely!  But the uninformed Fox crowd will never catch that part.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nancy84
It's not who's right but What's right that counts
03:40 PM on 02/15/2012
I think maybe they figured it out in Florida.
02:16 PM on 02/15/2012
Hey Dems. you love twisting numbers, don't extend the benefits---then the unemployment will come down to 8.0% Still 15 million unemployed but you won't count the ones that do not have benefits left.
02:10 PM on 02/15/2012
Republicans - If you do not have a high school diploma, you are not entitled to eat.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
SageBeguile
Keep Moving Forward!
02:05 PM on 02/15/2012
The proposals by the Republicans only validate the desperate need for term limits…..We need to END Career politicians …PERIOD…..No more than 8 years max.

You work, lose your job then you must jump thru hoops to get unemployment which is insurance you paid into while working….

And if no longer able to support oneself isn’t enough, you now must be further humiliated by a Republican bill that would shorten the maximum duration of combined state and federal compensation from 99 to 59 weeks, allow states to drug test claimants, and deny benefits to claimants who do not have a high-school level education. In addition to being required to volunteer 20 hours a week in order to be eligible for federal benefit…………..

Vote these folks OUT…..then don’t care about working people ….just their jobs and position….

We the people really need to demand and work towards having term limits for Congress!!

Obama /Biden/Dems - 2012
01:36 PM on 02/15/2012
Teapublicans are directionally challenged. When the welfare goes to those that pay them to receive it it is good and when aid goes to those in need it is bad.I guess that is why the love Trickle Down economics because they keep the unwashed clean with their golden shower of money.Take a bath you filthy hippies and get a job.
01:40 PM on 02/15/2012
I could care less if you get a job...your free to hang at the off-ramp l/o/s/e/r.
photo
ljmck
Stand Up, Show Up, Speak Up
01:54 PM on 02/15/2012
Name calling -- that's how you make an argument?
02:14 PM on 02/15/2012
My parents told me not to play in the streets when I was young it's a shame yours did'nt do the same for you.But then again maybe they thought the best way to keep you from chasing car was to let you get run over a few times.The brain damge seems severe but I still hope you eventually recover.
01:24 PM on 02/15/2012
this will put to rest the tier 5 lies and dreams. 99 weeks is enough and that average of almost 30k of free money was more than generous. and before any of you l/o/s/e/r/s comeback with a weak agurment -- 99 weeks mulitiplied by an average of 300 per week.
02:55 PM on 02/15/2012
In a way you are right as the unemployment rate drops the number of added week should deminish.This is basically how UE has worked for as long as it has been in existance.We need to find ways to help retrain people to find new jobs and as sad as it may seem they must understand that they must accept less than they had before if necessary.If Teapublicans where not so closed minded about stimulus to jump start the economy we would be further along in our recovery and people probably would be working instead of collecting UE.Still have a pair of big shoes and a rubber nose for sale are you still in the market.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:03 PM on 02/15/2012
I have to agree with the Republicans on this one. Debating the payroll tax cut and the extension of unemployment insurance should be separated and voted on independently.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mistinguette Grandison
No. Corporations are NOT people
01:00 PM on 02/15/2012
Good call. They were going to hold that hostage.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
realpolitic
Proud member of the reality-based community!
12:58 PM on 02/15/2012
The poor without jobs are not the only ones under attack by Republicans, but so are those who lost their jobs through no fault of their own.  Republicans want to humiliate them with drug tests and completely deny benefits to claimants who are not high school graduates. Why, do they not pay into unemployment compensation when they are working?  Both are draconian measures that serve little social purpose other than to humiliate the unemployed and to further stigmatize  those without high school degrees. Don't Republicans ever spend time to find ways to create jobs instead of searching for ways to socially engineer society.  Regarding Republicans, Big Brother is always watching!
01:24 PM on 02/15/2012
losing you job may not have been your fault but not getting another one is.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
realpolitic
Proud member of the reality-based community!
01:33 PM on 02/15/2012
Yes, especially given 8% unemployment. Sure!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mater
mater
12:43 PM on 02/15/2012
Congress can't seem to agree on money for infrastructure or other "shovel-ready" jobs, and yet, they don't want to extend unemployment benefits either. Seems obscene when Congress continues to get THEIR checks, their insurance and their pensions.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rhettphive
GOP- unaccountable since Y2K
01:15 PM on 02/15/2012
I would like congress people drug tested for their benefits. They are the ones who can afford the drugs they claim the poor are taking.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mater
mater
01:21 PM on 02/15/2012
I'd wish for them on food stamps for a month and see how they feed their families! Yes, if i could afford drugs, I'd buy food!
01:25 PM on 02/15/2012
my checks keep rolling in....whats your problem?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mater
mater
01:28 PM on 02/15/2012
don't know what you mean, sorry.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:43 PM on 02/15/2012
Republicans. Jeez.