iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Congo River Study Suggests Climate Change Began On A Local Level 3,500 Years Ago

Congo River

  Posted: 02/14/2012 2:57 pm

By David Biello
(Click here for original article.)

Humans may have been causing climate change for much longer than we've been burning fossil fuels. In fact, the agrarian revolution may have started human-induced climate changes long before the industrial revolution began to sully the skies. How? Through the clearing of forests, which still remains the second-largest source of greenhouse gas emissions from human activity.

Sediment cores from the mouth of the Congo River -- the deepest river in the world -- suggest that humans may have played a significant role in changing the landscapes of Central Africa. That river curves through the world's second-biggest lingering tropical forest, but it and its tributaries also flow through the savannas so prized by modern-day safaris.

Scientists had previously thought that a climate shift from warm and humid to seasonally cooler and drier had helped create those savannas, which covered even more of Central Africa in the past. But the 40,000-year-old record preserved in the sediment cores tells a different story. Roughly 3,500 years ago the Congo River suddenly began dumping a lot more muck without any appreciable increase in rainfall to explain such weathering. One plausible explanation is the simultaneous arrival of the so-called Bantu people, who brought farming into the region.

They cultivated oil palm, pearl millet and yams, crops that need plenty of sunlight, which, of course, necessitated clearing forests. They also cut down trees for charcoal and as fuel for the fires of iron-smelting, which enabled them to make tools and weapons. Coupled with climate change, the result was savannas -- and mutually reinforcing climate change.

At the same time, the presence of crops such as millet and yams suggests that climate had already changed given that they require alternating seasons of wet and dry. So it remains unclear whether changing climate conditions created the savannas that made Bantu-style farming possible or if Bantu-style farming created the conditions for savannas and changed the climate. What is clear is that "the environmental impact of human population in the central African rainforest was already significant about 2,500 years ago," as the researchers write in the paper presenting their findings published online in Science on February 9.

The same story is being repeated today in the same area. Forest is being cleared for agriculture to feed a swelling population, though locals are caught up in regional wars. At the same time, exploitative mining is ongoing for resources such as coltan, the mineral compound that offers up the element tantalum, critical in the manufacture of the tiny circuits that make smaller cell phones possible. Once again the Congo River is discharging a record in sediment of humanity's forest-destroying ways -- and one that has been retold, with local variations, on every continent.

Image courtesy of NASA.

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

 
 
  • Comments
  • 27
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:21 AM on 02/21/2012
I expected the usual moronic remarks by pin-headed denialists and they are here, however I am happy to see that some intelligent lifeforms added information. Thanks.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cayce58
09:13 PM on 02/17/2012
One of the changes that I read about--goat herders added to desertification in the Sahara. Where vegetation was scarce the protected animals simply killed it.
02:45 PM on 02/15/2012
Well that can't be - we all know that cars cause climate change.
03:10 PM on 03/03/2012
Why? Because"we all know" that since cars cause climate change nothing else can - just like "we all know" that since smoking causes cancer nothing else can either.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Exusian
Nature bats last
01:56 PM on 02/15/2012
The research of Dr. William Ruddiman (UVa) suggests humans began influencing climate a lot further back than 3500 years ago. His study of atmospheric CH4 (methane) and N2O (nitrous oxide) levels in ice cores shows that both greenhouse gases have been significantly higher over the past 6000-5000 years than during comparable previous interglacial periods, suggesting that the development of agriculture, which generates N2O, and particularly wet rice cultivation, which generates significant amounts of CH4, may be responsible for those elevated levels, and thus may have slowed the decline in global average temperature since the warmest part of the Holocene 8000-6000 years ago.

See:
Early rice farming and anomalous methane trends (Quaternary Science Reviews, 2008)
How Did Humans First Alter Global Climate? (Nature, 2005)
The Anthropogenic Greenhouse Era Began Thousands of Years Ago (Climatic Change, 2003)
09:50 AM on 02/15/2012
this article is ridiculous. the earths climate goes in cycles every 20 or so years.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Exusian
Nature bats last
01:34 PM on 02/15/2012
And the mechanism for the cycles is?

Source cites?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cayce58
09:08 PM on 02/17/2012
I'm 63. 60s to 80s--warmer. 80s to 2000-warmer 2000 to 2012-warmer. I went from snow on the ground from dec to march in the 60s to this year, when it rained more than it snowed. I haven't seen snow stay on the ground all winter since 1975.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:15 AM on 02/21/2012
Mayflies think that a single day is the lifetime of the universe

Scientifically illiterate people think their lifetime is.
08:43 AM on 02/15/2012
I cant believe the average persons are so slow that they learn only by making a mistake. Human started colony, because some people want to be in control of others, with that proses we are destroying our-self. Human can not destroy the Earth.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:15 AM on 02/21/2012
Does your gibberish have an actual point?
01:39 PM on 04/14/2012
You have to figure it out by your self, just think you can do it. Don't rely on handout information .
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hardycross
07:54 AM on 02/15/2012
I see huffpo latched on to this paper to support their preconceived notion and made it seem that the humans were the cause of climate change even though the paper provides no such evidence. We already know that africa was affected by warming after the glaciers receded. Pre-SUV.
photo
banana republican
Next in line for crumbs from the King's Table
08:51 PM on 02/14/2012
I have no doubt that the global warming enthusiasts will regard this as scientific gospel. I wonder how they will digest the sentence that starts, "Scientists had previously thought. . . . . . . " (?)
04:10 AM on 02/15/2012
Nah
The best part is to the illussion that 3500 iears ago they were in the iron age.
Its just another wham, bam ,scam article
People are evil
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:20 AM on 02/21/2012
Scientists don't have "gospels" or "dogmas". Science is an ever-changing search for facts.

Religions claim that some old guy in a robe gave some other guy in a robe the "truth" and that anyone who denies it is a heretic who should be burned at the stake.

Do you get the difference now?
photo
intolleft
ObamaTAX...getting you shovel ready
08:49 PM on 02/14/2012
Where can I get one of those 1500BC Suburbans?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Backtalkisahorse
05:54 AM on 02/15/2012
YABBA DABBA DOO...Beaaaaatch!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:17 AM on 02/21/2012
Micro brains are not up to the task of rational thought.
photo
intolleft
ObamaTAX...getting you shovel ready
08:10 AM on 02/21/2012
1600BC?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jim Milks
Ecologist
06:44 PM on 02/14/2012
This discovery fits right in with other recent studies showing that humans have had an effect on climate long before the current global warming trend.

Doughty et al. 2010: http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/2010/2010GL043985.shtml

Kaplan et al. 2011: http://hol.sagepub.com/content/21/5/775

Kaplan et al. 2009: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027737910900331X

Pongratz et al. 2011: http://hol.sagepub.com/content/21/5/843

Pongratz et al. 2008: http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/2008/2007GB003153.shtml

Ruddiman et al. 2011: http://hol.sagepub.com/content/21/5/865

Ruddiman and Ellis 2008: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277379109001905
04:11 AM on 02/15/2012
Please get alife.
Go peddle your religion somewhwre else.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:16 AM on 02/21/2012
Another half-witted denialist, what a waste of protein.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Backtalkisahorse
05:55 AM on 02/15/2012
We didn't do it!!!!! It was the Black guy!!!!!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAA
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:17 AM on 02/21/2012
Dweeb.