iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Private Equity Tax Loopholes Coming Under International Pressure

Mitt Romney

The Huffington Post   First Posted: 02/15/2012 2:24 pm Updated: 02/15/2012 2:49 pm

With each passing day comes new evidence that the world is starting to shine a bright light on how the private equity industry does its business. The latest is a growing chorus of European governments considering raising taxes on private equity profits, according to The Financial Times.

In Germany, the FT reports, regional governments are looking into a plan that would remove a tax exemption from private equity managers' income, potentially bumping their effective tax rate above 60 percent. In Sweden, where profits from private equity transactions are reportedly taxed at 30 percent right now, the FT says authorities are looking to raise the rate for large Swedish firms to 56 percent, and implement a 40 percent penalty on all back private equity investment profits.

In the U.S., the drumbeat for higher rates on investment income (including profits from private equity transactions) is audible, though slightly more muted. Since Mitt Romney's presidential campaign brought both the industry--and the effective tax rate its leaders pay--into wide view, there have been calls from some government officials, including President Obama and business leaders like Warren Buffett to raise rates, as the FT notes.

As it stands now, a private equity manager's income from private equity transactions is taxed at the capital gains rate of fifteen percent (Most of Mitt Romney's income over the past two years has reportedly come from his investments as opposed to earned income). President Obama has proposed a budget plan that would raise the tax on investment dividends for individuals earning more than $200 thousand from 15 percent it stands at now to nearly 40 percent. The budget proposal would also raise taxes on capital gains to 20 percent from its current 15 percent. A recent New York Times/ CBS News poll suggests that a little over half of Americans thinks capital gains should be taxed like earned income.

Even if these proposals don't end up making it through a divided Congress, they come at a time when federal regulators are beginning to take a close look at the private equity industry's business practices.

Recently, the Securities and Exchange Commission reportedly sent letters notifying top private equity firms that it had launched an informal inquiry into how these firms value the companies they invest in. That letter came on the heels of a new requirement -- part of the 2010 Dodd-Frank financial reform bill -- that private equity firms register with the SEC.

It all amounts to an unprecedented degree of public and regulatory attention on an industry that had, for decades, pretty much been left to its own devices. How these firms and their captains will react to this new scrutiny remains to be seen.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS

With each passing day comes new evidence that the world is starting to shine a bright light on how the private equity industry does its business. The latest is a growing chorus of European government...
With each passing day comes new evidence that the world is starting to shine a bright light on how the private equity industry does its business. The latest is a growing chorus of European government...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 19
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Secrist
those who forget are condemned to repeat
03:20 PM on 02/18/2012
Income is income. Tax it at the same rate regardless of where it comes from. We all pay tax on the pittance of savings bank interest, for example. And not at some cushy rate.
07:09 AM on 02/16/2012
why are they paying less than 15% in the us ?
11:37 PM on 02/15/2012
As if we needed any reminder, tax loopholes reminds us again that this is Government of the people, rich people. They make the laws that benefits them.
photo
rodjard
I Update my brain frequently
11:28 PM on 02/15/2012
People like Romney think that staying at a dump like Embassy Suites
instead of somewhere I have never heard of is way beneath their dignity.
They actually think that is where the poor people stay.
photo
Captain Hindsight
Seeking the truth is my only agenda.
07:23 PM on 02/15/2012
If a fair tax rate had been paid by the uber rich on their capital gains and corporate profits from 2001 and now there would have been no deficits and a national debt of less less than a trillion.
photo
ToddlerJ
Cloud-hidden, whereabouts unknown
06:21 PM on 02/15/2012
Mitt would still be astronomically rich. It is a myth being propagated by politicians that higher taxes on the rich stymie either their innovation or their efforts. Why? Because money is power. Some form of income re-distribution is essential to the sustainability of free economies, especially democracies. Otherwise, you turn into Mexico. (sorry, I really do love Mexico, especially the surf in baja)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GaelicWench
Be good - if not, be careful.
09:43 PM on 02/15/2012
Boy, you aren't kidding about the surf in Baja. I've camped down below Ensenada as a kid [with my family]. We went clam digging. No modern facilities, no restaurants, not even an outhouse! BEST time of my young life.

As for Mitt being astronomically rich, I have to add that a truly rich person in the oval office strikes a mighty sour note for me. The country and its people cannot benefit from this. Cannot! The fact that he back pedaled on his health care program for MA as a flop is indicative of what he's capable of doing if elected.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
syllable
06:19 PM on 02/15/2012
At some point, Romney may realize that his handlers and strategists didn't have his best interests at heart. Either that or they are his cc's. With Obama, we sense that he's ultimately in charge because he has the smarts and history to integrate his actions with his core beliefs.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
jimme
Being liberal is true freedom.
11:14 PM on 02/15/2012
Well put.

#226
05:05 PM on 02/15/2012
A far better, and actually proven tax method prior to the adoption of income taxation, is to tax retail purchases. All people would pay tax. Tax could be reported and collected easily at less cost. There would be no avoidance. People could keep 100% of their pay and spend it or save it as they choose. With more money saved for spending on larger ticket items, the less dependency on credit -- bad for big bank but good for people.
04:49 PM on 02/15/2012
LET ME GET THIS STRAIGHT...........................EUROPE IS QUESTIONING THIS ????????

WHAT DO THEY THINK OF THE RIOTS TOO????????????????
photo
Mark Cormier Arizona
2012 has put us on the path to Europe
04:16 PM on 02/15/2012
Support the Fair Tax ...... no loopholes, period !!
photo
Parkite
Still haven't found what I'm looking for
04:30 PM on 02/15/2012
The Fair Tax is regressive. I do support ending/closing all loopholes.
04:52 PM on 02/15/2012
Why you can't have a fair tax.........EVERYBODY WOULD HAVE TO PAY THEIR FAIR SHARE THEN...............Like ODRAMA SAYS !!!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
forty8r
Gerrman Freethinker
04:10 PM on 02/15/2012
Leave it to the Germans and Swedes to figure it out.
03:53 PM on 02/15/2012
"Since Mitt Romney's presidential campaign brought both the industry--and the effective tax rate its leaders pay--into wide view, there have been calls from some government officials, including President Obama and business leaders like Warren Buffett to raise rates, as the FT notes".

Maybe Mitt's candidacy will actually bring about some positive change!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Shouterguy
Citizens united against Citizens United
03:33 PM on 02/15/2012
Can't wait for the Cayman Islands Primary.

Mitt will win in a walk.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Summertown
A former traveler of the US now a country wife jus
03:14 PM on 02/15/2012
Maybe once all these protectionist politicians who only care about the rich they carry around in their back pockets then just maybe this one sided tax advantage can be addressed seriously.