Babes At The New Museum Triennial (PHOTOS)

Last night the New Museum kicked off its 2012 Triennial, "The Ungovernables." The Triennial will feature thirty-four artists, artist groups, and temporary collectives born between the mid-1970s and mid-1980s. The title references simultaneously anarchy, savagery and the organized civil disobedience of a generation that resists governability. The exhibition shows artists who came after the revolutionary buzz of the 1960s and 70s, and addresses the idea and limitations of resistance in art and life.

If you think the art sounds enticing, wait until you see the ladies who attended. The opening was ripe with all kinds of babes: intellectual babes, political babes, culturally relevant babes... Luckily Xavier Aaronson of Babes At The Museum was on hand to capture the best of the best. With her sartorialist-meets-ArtForum street style blog, babes everywhere have realized they don't have to hit the clubs to see and be seen!

What do you think of these new museum babes... or is it babes at the New Museum?

Comments

[omegapoint]

11:05 PM on 02/21/2012

Art? Luckily for some its relative to who's in their rolodex.

[mgmgmg]

07:15 PM on 02/21/2012

...and women wonder why they are sexualized.....

[Babes At The Museum]

03:15 PM on 02/21/2012

I agree with most of these comments but all I got to say is...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ri8FxYJsEng

[Joe Harrell]

01:03 PM on 02/16/2012

LAME. love that we don't even get the babes' names.

[ennui the third]

06:39 AM on 02/16/2012

Great...another dumb fashion show..who cares about the art?...let's show the babes!....yet another dumb article, featuring another dumb new York scene, populated with the most pretentious people in the country.

[eds123]

11:19 AM on 02/17/2012

bitter much?

[ennui the third]

02:39 PM on 02/17/2012

Nope, zippy...just honest.

[ennui the third]

04:56 PM on 02/17/2012

Hey eds123..what I said, genius, is that I found this particular article and it's participants, puerile and pretentious...you can relate, eh, sparky?

[Max Load]

03:37 PM on 02/15/2012

Ooooookay.

To complete the lamesauce, where's the piece on the "studs" at the museum?

[kmangiar]

02:40 PM on 02/15/2012

This article is disgusting

[eric14]

06:32 PM on 02/15/2012

But the postmodern ironic contrast between the ungovernable and the stated voyeurism of the shoot. Of course there was no one ungovernable after the sixties melted into the seventies. As I recall they were all meek and mild.

[Deleuzian Nomad]

01:25 PM on 02/16/2012

you just confused the guy....lol...

[SimianNation]

02:21 PM on 02/15/2012

ANYTHING for a place to put ads!

ONE BIG FAIL!

OR, pretty ladies don't go to the New Museum.

[jbonghtr]

02:09 PM on 02/15/2012

Someone needs glasses dude. Only 2 hotties in the bunch, the smoking hot Asian with the pink lips and the blonde at the end. The rest not worth noting or photographing.

[MtnGeek]

02:06 PM on 02/15/2012

The content of this article marks a new low for HP. This doesn't even qualify as "fluff".