iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Child Malnutrition Affects 1 In 4 Children Globally, Report Says

AP/The Huffington Post   First Posted: 02/15/2012 6:23 am Updated: 04/16/2012 5:12 am

Nearly half a billion children are at risk of "devastating and irreversible" damage from malnutrition, including stunted growth and undeveloped brains, according to a new report released by Save the Children. This "hidden crisis" kills more than 300 children every hour of every day and affects one in four children worldwide, according to the report.

Chronic childhood malnutrition has been called a "silent killer," as it is often not listed as a cause of death and does not benefit from as much attention as high-profile campaigns targeting malaria or HIV/AIDS.

Soaring food prices have left children particularly vulnerable. According to the Press Association, one-third of parents reported that their children did not have enough to eat, and one-sixth said that their children skipped school in favor of work. Chief executive of Save the Children Justin Forsyth outlined the gravity of the situation:

"Every hour of every day, 300 children die because of malnutrition, often simply because they don't have access to the basic, nutritious foods that we take for granted in rich countries," he said.

The report from Save the Children lists a number of trends that have contributed to the problem, including "climate change, volatile food prices, economic uncertainty, the global health worker shortage and demographic shifts."

The report also suggests six steps to help tackle the crisis; increasing visibility of chronic malnutrition, investing in direct interventions, increasing the number of health workers, investing in social protections against poverty, supporting female and small-scale farmers, and building up international political leadership.

Read more from the Associated Press:

Global hunger has fallen markedly over the last two decades, but the 2011 Global Hunger Index found that six countries have higher rates of hunger today than two decades ago. Five of those countries are in Africa. The other is North Korea.

The 2011 Global Hunger Index said that Congo, Burundi, Comoros, Swaziland and Ivory Coast have higher degrees of hunger today than in 1990. Kuwait, Turkey, Malaysia and Mexico have made the biggest gains against hunger.

Karin Lapping, a senior director of nutrition for Save the Children, said many Asian countries have made strides against hunger because of an explicit focus on reducing chronic malnutrition, but that many African countries have not made that same commitment and have fallen victims to predictable cycles of drought and famine.

"When we look at successful examples in Asia like Bangladesh, they have a national nutrition program," Lapping said. "We haven't seen that to be the case in many nations in Africa."

Ethiopia is one exception, she said, because of successful nutrition programs. But, she said, in many other regions "progress has been undercut by cyclical emergencies like what we're seeing now in the Sahel," a belt across northern Africa that experiencing a food crisis. Lapping said many African countries need greater political commitments from their governments and more external aid.

Malnutrition numbers in Africa remain startling. The report said that nearly two in five children on the continent -- 60 million children -- are stunted. The average yield of staple cereals is a third less than in Asia.

The British government estimates that between 50,000 and 100,000 people died during a famine in Somalia last year. Most of those killed were children.

Chronic hunger leaves children vulnerable to starvation when food crises hit, but also leaves them vulnerable to death by diarrhea, pneumonia and malaria even in better times.

1  of  10
PLAY
FULLSCREEN
ZOOM
SHARE THIS SLIDE 
In this Thursday, Jan. 19, 2012 file photo, children line up to receive a meal at a food distribution center for those displaced by last year's famine or by conflict, in Mogadishu, Somalia. A new report by Save the Children released Wednesday, Feb. 15, 2011 says that despite advances against hunger around the world, chronic childhood malnutrition remains largely overlooked and almost a half billion children are at risk of permanent damage over the next 15 years. (AP Photo/Ben Curtis, File)

Related on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,238
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (27 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Devaron Namsaar
10:57 PM on 02/29/2012
HP Moderators: I posted the comment you refused to post, to my Facebook account, and the world will still read it, HP, you need to get your priorities in line with reality... its not about what YOU understand, because we know you don't understand much...so get past your ignorance and your fear to say the wrong thing... You're an online newspaper... learn what that means and live with it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Devaron Namsaar
10:46 PM on 02/29/2012
The real sin in all of this is that none of this needs to be. The ultra rich in this world could change the fabric and direction of humanity virtually overnight but they are so egotistic, so bound up in their greed and insane desire to control that they are useless and in fact have become a burden upon the world. The poor people who have nothing cannot help themselves but the people who have everything refuse to help... who is the greater evil, who is the greater determent to the earth.. It is those who claim to have everything, but in fact have little of anything valuable to live for. I feel sorrow for those who starve and suffer, but I feel pity for those who could change all this and choose to do nothing.
06:24 AM on 02/23/2012
II suggest sterilizing the parents in exchange for food. That wouldn't be a bad idea for the families over here on welfare long term and with more then 1 kid, as well. I'm serious. Why should kids be brought into the world only to suffer, just because their parents can't stop breeding? This affects us all and will continue to make the world a worse place to live as long as we continue to absolve Darwin's Law in every possible way. I consider that a fair trade and a way to benefit both current and future generations.
05:13 PM on 02/21/2012
The tactics displayed by America as it's forces, (not just armed forces), stride across the globe seem to me to be very similar/the same as someone with a massive inferiority complex, over which they struggle to control.

What is America afraid of?
02:50 AM on 02/21/2012
We have the science and the ability, it is a shame that we can't feed these people. By we I mean mankind. I wonder how many of these "let nature take it's course" people would be saying the same thing if these were little white kids starving. I agree they need to move to somewhere they can make a living and life is more sustainable, but these people obviously are not in a situation to do so. They have no money and I imagine no education. Some charities are working on this and trying to educate and help people live sustainably off of the land. Childfund is one that I support and would encourage others to. You don't have to "adopt" a child that is just a gimmick to get people emotionaly connected.
11:29 AM on 02/21/2012
There is an area filled with starving white kids, it's called "Appalachia", and it's right here in the U.S. This is an area where 4% of people still don't have plumbing in their homes (yes, people still use outhouses in the U.S.). Where is your expected outcry ? Explain this... No, I will:

These people were suppressed by the same corporate exploitation that is now being exported to the entire world, the same people who then, and still now, control the route that 99% of our information comes through. Don't want outcry? Don't mention it in the news - people will probably not hear about it... Want people to over-react? Tell the story in a way that frightens them. Why does the news sound so much like the campfire stories of my youth, told to elicit fright ?
01:58 PM on 02/21/2012
The means exists in the US for people to get food. We have govetnment programs and charities if people choose not to use the available means then there is not much we can do, and I feel sorry for these children. The people starving in Africa have no means available, many do not even have fresh water.
11:31 AM on 02/21/2012
There IS a place where white kids starve every day...
It's called "Appalachia", and it's right here in the U.S.
Where is your expected outcry ?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Leon Holston Sr
09:40 AM on 02/20/2012
since the politicians and the schools are allways telling people how to eat healthy maybe they will come to the aid of families who cant even afford dog food to eat with prices so high.lets see if they really are concerned about kids eating healthy or just simply having any food at all.lower food prices,and stop having excuses for high gas prices every holiday.why is there allways a crisis during holidays that people travel on?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Devaron Namsaar
10:57 PM on 02/17/2012
The Earth can feed everyone, it is poor thinking, poor planning and poor management added to the most corrupt corporations and politicians and governments in the history of the planet. I am amazed and saddened by the comments of the people, on this subject... it seems the only thing greater then the ignorance being displayed is the arrogance. Perhaps these people did not read the headline of this article, it says, 1 in 4 Children GLOBALLY will die of starvation... by my count that is 1/4 of the world population but it does not say in what countries or what populations will be effected. It is obvious by the comments that some of these people believe themselves to be above it all, out of reach of this situation... we'll see!
12:09 PM on 02/18/2012
I would say that there have been more corrupt governments in the past, but this one is really bad.
It is an Imperialist Aristocracy masquerading as a Capitalist Republic, which is far more insidious than past forms. At least back then, people knew when they were being raped and pillaged. It's all done in silence, and secrecy. Maybe I agree on that point after all.
Everything else: Q.E.D. from all the credible, factually supported posts here.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Duke of Abq
04:01 PM on 02/17/2012
If our parents had not sent money and food to the people in the areas that land can not or does not produce enough food to care for their own populations than we would not be expected to feed their children and grandchildren now. This is as bad as the situation we are leaving our posterity by letting our Federal Government spend them in to slavery. If our parents had let a few thousand starve than we would not be faced with hundreds of thousands of starving people now. lets save our children now by letting these unfortunate die if they continue to stay on land that can not support them. It is inhumane to not let the population adjust to the level that can be supported by the land. Please stop trying to play god let nature run her true course.
07:37 PM on 02/16/2012
The pope pretends that a finite planet can feed an unlimited population if food were only shared evenly. Many lefties do the same. Sharing with no limit on fertility dooms everyone to starve to death on the same day.

Starving societies and starving families who continue to procreate choose starvation. Why deny them their choice? They began a far larger cycle and now suffer its consequences.

U.S. population grew because the excess from starving societies could go there and birth the huge families that were impossible in their home countries. Since the U.S. population already exceeded its carrying capacity, the U.S. HAD to grab resources from elsewhere. It was not greed but survival.

Do not blame the U.S. for protecting its own. Blame the societies that forced it to do. Each new infant born in the U.S. can consume as much as ten third-world infants and could cause ten third-world infants to starve. The profligate who exported their problem have seen it return tenfold.
05:55 PM on 02/17/2012
I discount the Pope, and what he and God think daily. Sharing is nice, but not a part of human nature. Good luck convincing people that breeding is not a right, but a privilege - seriously, good luck, I hope you succeed.

These people aren't choosing to breed. We like sex. It's human nature. We shouldn't deny them their choices, but we should try to help them at least understand the choices to begin with, maybe they'll make the right choices thereafter.

The U.S. has no NEED for the rest of the world. Our corps just want to steal everyone else's stuff because it makes them more money, and they don't need to blow their profit on environmental remediation measures there like we do here at home.

'Finite resources' is a lie. Even when we do run out of oil, we can make more from almost anything organic. Sasol in South Africa manufactured oil for decades so that South Africa would not need to cave to political pressure (in the form of embargoes) to end Apartheid.
Metals are infinitely re-usable, just melt them down, and reform them.
Farm land is not necessary, it's just easier than building a greenhouse. There is a very commercially successful agribusiness in the Arizona desert (poor soil, little water) growing tomatoes on a massive scale. Research is complete on Lettuce, Spinach, and Bok-Choy, and progressing beautifully on everything else (thank you NASA/Cornell-U).
04:56 PM on 02/21/2012
The research on lettuce is just the tip of the Iceberg.
05:56 PM on 02/17/2012
China and the U.S. have similar 'usable' land area, and resources, but China has 10 times the population, with room to grow. The US is NOT crowded, and we're not running low on anything.
We have the 10% of the continental U.S. reserved as National Forest we can use as soon as print media and junk-mail die, or when we become willing to harvest Alaskan trees for paper pulp. National Forest, BTW is NOT preservation, it's making sure that lumber companies replant so trees can continue to be harvested infinitely, and save the cost of holding the land themselves (taxes).

The U.S. IS GREEDY. That argument in impossible to make effectively. We STOLE New England, and Florida -at least- from the natives, we forced isolationist Japan to open their ports to trade, and we convinced the People of Hawaii to overthrow their rightful monarch (in DIRECT contradiction of the Treaty of Westphalia. The U.S. Told it's citizens to Move to Texas, then supported it militarily when we reached 'quorum' levels, and to further piss in our neighbors' faces, we demanded NM, AZ, NV, CO, UT, and California to stop kicking them for reasons that were our fault to start with. The Guano Islands act is the perfect illustration of the domineering 'gimme' attitude the world despises the U.S. for, and rightfully so.
I don't hate the U.S., just it's government, and what they do in OUR NAME without our say-so.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blueagle8u
05:32 PM on 02/16/2012
All the MORE reason for BIRTH CONTROL! HELLO???!
06:08 PM on 02/16/2012
"Roger that. This is Birth Control here. What is your position? What? A mile high in bound? Sorry, no, out bound, no in bound no, out bound. Captain, make sure the flaps are down before coming over the tower; visual confirmation required. The Control Tower is the impressive erection next to the box of tissues coming off runway 69. Yikes the flaps are up!! Don't worry, the tender is full of foam and will come over where you are. Speak up!! Shagging makes you deaf.
12:18 PM on 02/16/2012
This is perhaps the saddest consequence of our populations' failure to understand that the earth's resources are finite, and that there aren't enough resources to properly support 7 Billion humans....let alone the millions being born as the human population continues to increase EXPONENTIALLY. It is also unfortunate that so many leaders are ignorant of biological science and EVEN oppose use of contraception and Family Planning. Madness!
08:32 PM on 02/18/2012
What is the personal interest you have in people believing that resources are limited ? It is a lie told so the high prices we pay for goods are never questioned. Perhaps there aren't enough resources (in your mind) because Americans use EIGHT TIMES their share ? The change you seek starts at home.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jneedhamp
01:48 AM on 02/16/2012
This is simply a method for the ultra rich advocates of the New World Order to cull the excess world population. The disparity between rich and poor has only been NEAR what it is now, just before the Great Depression. Of course the government 'spin doctors' want everyone to believe unemployment decreases because of attrition, as people drop from unemployment roles simply because they can no longer receive unemployment benefits. Give 'em ice-cream on their way to the cyanide showers.
02:25 AM on 02/16/2012
I'm not sure what you are meaning here. There's a bit of conspiracy theory on the World stage and a bit of local 'kidology'' and Nazi style problem solving.

Inequality drives the system and is necessary otherwise there would be no trade. The rich need the needy as do the half-as-rich and the needy themselves. Everyone needs a tiered structure to rise up or fall down. Those who drop down the ladder lose wealth but gain knowledge and experience, which those who inherit wealth do not have, perhaps making some of them easier economic targets.
04:45 AM on 02/16/2012
If enequality drives trade we have to get rid of it.

Inequality does not, however, drive trade. Trade is driven by need. - AND of course the ability to buy - money. The starvation is not part of a natural order but the result of american corporations "privatizing" (read: stealing) natural resources in rich nations and leave the people who's wealth they just took to rot and die.

I went to Iraq presuming I would fight against duch criminals and it turned out the criminals were the ones starting the wars. - American politicians and corporations. I am sure I will take up arms again. But this time to fight the criminals. And You better make sure you will not be on the wrong side of that war. Because history will tell You that the parasites invariably faila nd die. Usually not very nicely. Just ask the ones who fought for Gaddhafi.
04:48 AM on 02/16/2012
I do not think that the death is driven by some plan to control the world population. I think the criminal parasites are driven only by greed. If they make more money letting millions starve that is what will happen. And our politicians who's job it is to make the system protect lives and who do the opposite are traitors and should be treated as such. But beyond that I do not beoieve they want to kill. It is just their way to profit. - Which is bad enough.
01:27 AM on 02/16/2012
This is a boring debate about something that is impossible to solve. The cultural backdrop of these starving nations is, (in spite of their great need), to procreate beyond what their lands can support, (and they know that) and to either take part in; or be a victim of conflict anywhere between bashing the neighbouring tribe to international genocide! They know it. The aide sent by foreigners is never sent without strings attached, but always carries a condition which might be, for example, to establish a naval base in the receiving country. Sending this aide is delaying the maturation of these poor countries into stable areas to live. The aide is perpetuating the problem and as foreigners continue to help to feed those people, the less of a headache it is for the obligatory tin-pot dictator who is raping the country's wealth. A sadist is a person who is kind to a masochist. The giving of this aide is a sadistic indulgence. The host nation's backdrop of conflict and kids is only going to change, (if ever), from within the people themselves. This was the situation in developed countries 1000 years ago; conflict and death all around, every day. Giving aide is making things worse by preventing the social structures from metabolising. What does death matter for Christians and Muslims? Both believe in life after death and rewards in Heaven - so no problem there.
04:42 AM on 02/16/2012
That is complete and utter BS.

It is very easy to solve. Just stop stealing what is not ours. Corporations own all natural resources of so called poor nations. These nations are NOT poor. They are very rich. The problem is that our forgein policy takes all the riches away and gives them to the worst criminal parasites this sides of Nazi germany. - And I am not even sure they do not outdo them tenfold. Because where Nazis had concentration camps our new world order has a hundred times that many in nations we take the riches from every day.

They are poor because we steal from them. The thief then going and claiming that the starvation is natural, has no other reasn than theft not getting You in jail but being a victim getting You underground.

What's worse is that people like You who legitimize the massive crimes by claiming they are natural and normal let it happen. YOU have part of the responsibility. - That is what most overlook in a so called democracy. You inaction and your vote give seeming legitimacy to crimes. You might want to think about that before You again callously claim that millions starving after american corproations and billionaires took what they owned is natural. It is not, has never been and never will be.

What IS natural however si the world killing off the criminals responsible sooner or later.
06:08 AM on 02/16/2012
Sir, it is not easy to solve.

I agree with your fist paragraph in full.

In the second; I need to explain that by 'natural', I mean that it will endure on its own. The criminals need do no more than meet their objective and starvation will result. In cases of natural disaster, eg. drought, starvation will result for different 'home-grown' problems derived from over population due to inappriate cultural demands.

As for your last paragraph; you assume too much about me and you contradict yourself. Tidy-up your thoughts and have another go.
06:48 AM on 02/16/2012
Very easy to solve is it? So hurry up and solve it; everyone is waiting for you!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
KENAWULF
Liberal Social Dem
05:04 AM on 02/16/2012
It is interesting Huffposty that you say, "The cultural backdrop of these starving nations is, (in spite of their great need), to procreate beyond what their lands can support, (and they know that)" - Would that line of thinking not give us pause to consider why the Conservatives and the Church want to do away with birth control and abortion? Is it not a means of controlling populations? I'm just saying...
05:51 AM on 02/16/2012
I stand by my comment on procreation. I have not heard that the Church and Conservatives want to ban birth control. Historically, the Church(s) are the biggest crooks ever followed by monachy.
Thanks for your reply.
07:41 AM on 02/16/2012
The cultural backdrop is nations full of people so ill-educated, that a trained chimp can score higher on an IQ test. This is both laughable and deplorable at the same time. Whole countries whose population averages solidly in the so-called 'mildly retarded' category in the U.S. Nations where rape is more common than literacy, which has only turned HIV into a pandemic, where 1 in 6 adults has HIV. That's OK, though, because the life expectancy is under 50 years anyway, right ?

What Africa needs is education.

I wish the citizens of the developed nations of the world would require their governments to educate these people. No hand-outs, just hand-ups.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
iLdoRight
Encouraging The Rightest Rightness
11:20 PM on 02/15/2012
Caption suggestion; " Yesterday I Ate 2 Bugs, What Did You Eat ? "
12:24 AM on 02/16/2012
A Citroen 2CV and a lamborghini pizza with thick base.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BigWillyG
11:18 PM on 02/15/2012
Dealing with the corrupt governments in third world countries that make Chicago politics look honest, a continuation of the decline of warfare worldwide and the third world getting the agricultural technologies and advancements of the last 150 years would help. The places that have this problem, particularly in Africa look much like Medieval or Early Modern Europe with most people trying to survive on bare subsistence agriculture, one storm or band of marauding soldiers is all that separated living from famine. Moving beyond subsistence and having military and governments that aren't bands of 14 year old's led by warlords does wonders to farm output and life expectancy.