iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Shaun Donovan, HUD Chief, Hopes Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Will Write Down Mortgages

Shaun Donovan

First Posted: 02/16/2012 7:41 pm Updated: 02/16/2012 10:53 pm

After a year of arguing with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac over the benefits of loan write-downs, the Obama administration is taking another approach: show, rather than tell. Officials are betting that the eventual success of the government's $25 billion deal with five of the nation's largest banks will convince the mortgage giants to fall in line.

In an interview with The Huffington Post on Thursday, Shaun Donovan, secretary of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, said that last week’s national foreclosure settlement could "catalyze the national effort" for loan write-downs, also called principal reductions, and bring Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac on board to follow suit.

Currently the mortgage giants control about half of all outstanding mortgages nationwide; and many of the borrowers involved owe more than their homes are worth. These homeowners, however, are not eligible for relief under the new settlement. Only a small portion of U.S. homeowners, as few 1 in 10, potentially qualify for relief under the terms of the agreement.

Principal reductions are hailed by many economists and housing experts as the most effective way to help homeowners who are underwater on their mortgages and owe more than their homes are worth. About $300 billion of the Fannie and Freddie loan portfolio is at least 15 percent underwater.

Donovan said that if principal reduction works on the grand scale envisioned under the deal -- with underwater borrowers possibly receiving $32 billion in loan write-downs -- it would help overcome a "quasi-religious resistance to principal reduction" in the market. Officials have said that roughly 1 million borrowers could qualify.

As part of the deal, 49 states, 11 federal agencies and five big banks all agreed to go along with principal reductions.

But some investors who own underwater home mortgages have balked at reducing principal: And the biggest holdouts are Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The chief roadblock to their participation, say federal and state officials, is the Federal Housing Finance Authority, which has controlled the mortgage giants since they nearly went bankrupt in 2008. The agency and its chief, Edward DeMarco, have refused to write down loans. The agency has said it is avoiding principal reductions to save taxpayers money and is instead taking other remedies, including modifying home loans, to offer relief to troubled borrowers.

Federal officials who participated in the deal say all attempts to change DeMarco's mind on loan write-downs failed.

“Several states wanted to have that conversation to get Freddie and Fannie in, to get them to the table to talk, but the feds didn’t seem to be able to pull that string. And we knew that if the feds couldn’t do it, then it didn’t seem like the states could,” said Trish Conners, Florida's associate deputy attorney general.

Administration attempts to replace DeMarco have also failed. Last year, the Senate refused to bring to a vote the nomination of Joseph Smith, Obama's pick to head the agency. (Smith, the North Carolina banking commissioner, was named last week to head the effort to ensure that the banks comply with the terms of the settlement.)

"Our goal is to get a good nominee and get someone in there who shares our view," Donovan said.

Last week Kamala Harris, the California attorney general and a key supporter of the deal, renewed her call for DeMarco to resign because of his resistance to principal reductions. "I said before and say again, [Edward DeMarco] should step aside because the guy can clearly not figure out what his job requires. In particular, it requires … principal reductions on those Freddie and Fannie loans,” Harris said.

In a statement this month Fannie Mae said that it had conducted small-scale pilot programs and determined that principal reduction poses a number of challenges, "including significant technological and systems complexity and substantial cost without proven effectiveness."

Despite Fannie Mae's claim that principal reductions are not cost effective, Treasury Department data shows that modification efforts that include principal reduction are more likely to prevent default than other loan restructurings.

About a third of the modifications of bank-held loans in the third quarter of 2011 included a principal reduction. Forty percent of those loans defaulted after one year.

In contrast, almost none of Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac modifications from the same period included a principal reduction. Fifty-nine percent of those loans defaulted after one year, according to the Treasury Department.

The FHFA said it would not comment on DeMarco's positions. The agency did say last month that it would consider an Obama administration proposal to increase incentives under the Home Affordable Modification Program for investors to write down loans.

Donovan said while convincing Fannie and Freddie to do more loan write-downs is undoubtedly important, last week's settlement is meaningful because it will aid as many as 1 million homeowners. "It could really move the needle," he said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS

After a year of arguing with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac over the benefits of loan write-downs, the Obama administration is taking another approach: show, rather than tell. Officials are betting that t...
After a year of arguing with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac over the benefits of loan write-downs, the Obama administration is taking another approach: show, rather than tell. Officials are betting that t...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 106
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
12:48 PM on 04/17/2013
thanks a lot for this article .This article helps me to know about the reverse mortgage. The following site also take me to the depth of reverse mortgage, thanks

http://www.reversemortgagelendersdirect.com/reverse-mortgages-how-they-work/
http://www.reversemortgagelendersdirect.com/reverse-mortgage-information/
http://www.reversemortgagelendersdirect.com/reverse-mortgage-calculator/
10:09 PM on 03/20/2012
Open Letter to Shaun Donovan: http://www.palsimonsintelligentsia.org/Palsimon%27s%20World.htm In part it shows the following:
 
 
 
Settlement Helps Fund $4M in Reverse Mortgage Assistance (See link above for details)
 

The funds being provided for counseling services will not help us.  Only a grant would help us.  We think it is nice that counselors can get jobs, but their main duty will be to get us to pay a bill we cannot pay, and, in the end, we will get nothing for that grant except useless counseling. WE DON'T NEED COUNSELING. WE NEED HELP. WE AREN'T STUPID. The counselors will, in effect, be working for the banks, not for us.
Will there be any real help for homeowners of any kind?    Anonymous
 
 

 
10:14 PM on 02/28/2012
Instead of writing down mortgages maybe more effort needs to go into the practices of building false equity into homes from 2002 forward until 2008. How banks profited as did investors from rising values of homes. Falsely appraised to build false equity to increase investor profits. This was a money-making effort enjoyed by banks/ realtors/insurance companies/ state county tax offices. So many hands were put into creating false equity with giving people false sense of security in the manner homes were appraised to seemingly always come in what banks required to close the loan ...at least up until 2008 ...If banks come down in principal investors lose out ...banks foreclose and reap insured default from original falsely appraised note as banks falsify documents in numerous designs. In Charlotte , N.C. mortgage papers from banks were discovered in dumpsters. Some of these banks will never admit wrongdoing with such smug indifferences i.e., bank execs giving out bonuses with bailout money etc., etc., as the examples of such sociopathy gets released everyday.
11:10 AM on 02/25/2012
As a disabled person with a very rare genetic bone disorder, I have been fighting with Chase & Freddie Mac since I was laid off from my job in August of 2010.

Despite multiple handicaps, I have worked for 20+ years when I could have easily applied for and received social security disability. With unemployment (for now) and disability my only sources of income, I struggle to get by.

Despite multiple applications, escalting to the Executive Resolution Group @ Chase, requesting assistance from a State Senator, my Attorney General, multiple news stations, and emailing the CEO of Chase, I have been denied a modification\principal reduction that will allow me to remain in my home.

Now, I am months and thousands of dollars delinquent. Without a modification or principal reduction, my home will ultimately be taken from me.

My family has created an online petition @ Change.org to keep this from happening. Every signature will send an email to State officials, Federal officials, Freddie Mac, the CEO & Executive Resolution group @ Chase, as well as media outlets.

For anyone who feels this is unfair, your signature would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.

http://www.change.org/petitions/freddie-mac-and-jp-morgan-chase-bank-help-our-disabled-son-keep-his-home
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:18 PM on 02/22/2012
The wave of American gimme-grants continues.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
carolgregor
10:31 AM on 02/22/2012
Better write them down and get ready to focus on all the illegal foreclosures that will absolutely make this current problem seem small.
Homeowners who were foreclosed on over the past few years still own their homes. Now what?
10:24 AM on 02/19/2012
The number of seriously delinquent FHA-insured single-family mortgages has surged from around 584,822 at the end of last June to an estimated 732,775 at the end of last month (based on data from the FHA's early warning system). At the same time, the number of FHA loan modifications completed plunged in the last few months of last year, totaling just 20,283 in the last three months of 2011 -- down from 45,497 in the last three months of 2010. FHA's serious delinquency rate has been rising significantly, in contrast to the rest of the industry. While hard data are not available, folks estimate that at least 20% of home owners with FHA-insured loans are "underwater."

Given Secretary Donovan's comments -- where is the FHA's push to write-down the principal of the loans IT insures? Sure, a wide-scale program would more than exhaust its reserves and it would need a Treasury bailout, but ... ??????????

Tom Lawler
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
stargazer13
To Love One Is To Love All
07:44 AM on 02/19/2012
I don;t want to hear about Fairness

until banks be held accountable

for their economic hit to our nation and her people
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
stargazer13
To Love One Is To Love All
07:37 AM on 02/19/2012
after bailing out banks with tax payer monies

I pretty much believe !! we the tax payer own something big or a lot of little somethings

I mean who spends that much money and has nothing to show for it ?? who ??? does that ??
06:10 PM on 02/17/2012
Believers in the "self-regulating free market" are a religious cult anyway, believers in The Church of the Invisible Hand.
03:33 PM on 02/17/2012
Why not send every homeowner, whether in or out of the money on their house, $20,000. Then people who bought a smaller house perhaps with a larger down payment won't feel that they are getting screwed for being responsible. Plus it would boost the economy.
12:31 PM on 02/20/2012
So all taxpayers, including renters (who on average make less than homeowners), should "send" $20,000 just to homeowners? Why not send $20,000 to all taxpayers, renters and homeowners alike. Renters have been hit just as hard as homeowners, and on average have higher unemployment rates. And how many renters have been evicted because they couldn't afford their rent? No one knows, because the government doesn't track such statistics, and sadly no one seems to care.
11:10 AM on 02/21/2012
Sounds okay to me....at least as much sense as what they are pproposing.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
cats530
16 Trillion To Banksters Per GAO Audit
01:37 PM on 02/17/2012
"BofA, for instance, will be able to use future modifications made under Hamp towards the $7.6bn in borrower assistance it is committed to provide under the settlement. Under Hamp, the bank will receive payments for averting borrower default and reimbursement from taxpayers for principal written down.."

http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2012/02/quelle-surprise-taxpayers-will-be-paying-for-part-of-mortgage-settlement.html
01:31 PM on 02/17/2012
The lumps will be taken. Wouldn't sooner be better than later? Everything is in a holding pattern waiting for the dust to settle when it wont.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
stargazer13
To Love One Is To Love All
07:34 AM on 02/19/2012
true

the GOP,s bath tub Drain be clogged beyond repair so bad now
not even joe the plumber can fix it
01:21 PM on 02/17/2012
DREAM ON!!
photo
CivilDebate10
Low Info People = Statism's Best Friends
01:19 PM on 02/17/2012
Person A: Saves money for 10 years, drives used cars, rarely goes out to eat and saves enough for a 50% down payment on a house and buys one in 2006 for $400,000 with a $200,000 mortgage. The house is now worth $250,000 but not "under water".

Person B: Never saved a penny, bought a new car every 2 years, went out to eat 3 times a week, bought all the latest gadgets but is able to buy a house in 2006 with only a 3% down payment and paid $400,000 with a $388,000 mortgage. The house is now worth $250,000 and "under water" by $138,000.

Now, tell me WHY does Person B deserve more "help" than person A? Should person B have to sell all his gadgets and cars? I swear, the left has no sense, or morals, when it comes to this issue. They think that Person B is somehow a victim who needs help and that Person A is a terrible selfish person if Person A thinks it is not fair to "help" Person B. YOU ALL MAKE ME SICK.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cordyc
01:34 PM on 02/17/2012
Why are you Cons always making stuff up with straw man arguments that ignore the reality of the situation.

You just look silly with those kinds of nonsense arguments.
photo
CivilDebate10
Low Info People = Statism's Best Friends
01:37 PM on 02/17/2012
Straw man argument?? Laughable. I personally know FIVE people in exactly the "Person B" situation. FIVE and my circle is a pretty responsible circle of people. FACT is, people overspent and over borrowed and irresponsible banks should not have been bailed out and neither should irresponsible people.
photo
Acemkr6
Trying to keep the left honest!
01:40 PM on 02/17/2012
I noticed you couldn't answer the question, The fact is it's true! So be that typical lib and don't answer and hope it all goes away and that the rest of the country will vote for Obama, because he's helping those poor people who got scammed with the people who followed the rules tax dollars it's a matter of fairness!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Catherine Hogan
Dude.....wait......what?
03:16 PM on 02/17/2012
How about the folks that did everything right and still ended up upside down? I bought my place in '97, paid my mortgage. when the market tanked my place is now worth less than it was when I bought it 16 years ago!
macchugsid
Conservative Progressive: Hey, it could work.
11:15 PM on 02/17/2012
But....but....people like you don't exist. Everyone in trouble is a leech don't you know!